DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of the Youth perceived importance of Entrepreneurship Education on the self-leadership strategy

청년층의 창업교육 인지도가 셀프리더십 전략수준에 미치는 영향

  • Kim, Yeon-Jeong (Dept. of Digital Management of Technology, Hoseo University)
  • 김연정 (호서대학교 경영학부 디지털기술경영 전공)
  • Received : 2014.10.19
  • Accepted : 2014.12.20
  • Published : 2014.12.28

Abstract

This study investigate the youth perceived importance of entrepreneurship education program on the self leadership strategy. The findings are as follows: First, the creativity category of entrepreneurship education were positively related with behavior focused self leadership, natural reward self leadership strategy and constructive thought self leadership. Second, the management category of entrepreneurship education were positively related with natural reward self leadership strategy. Third, the patent category of entrepreneurship education were positively related with behavior focused self leadership and constructive thought self leadership. Consequently, when the youth recognized the importance of management, creativity and patent category, the level of self control, self reward and self efficacy were increased.

본 연구는 대학 청년층의 창업교육 구성내용에 대한 인지된 중요도가 개인의 내재적 자기효능감과 내적 자기조절, 자기보상의 셀프리더십 전략 수준에 미치는 영향력을 분석하였다. 연구결과, 창업교육 개념에 대한 인지된 중요도는 셀프리더십 모두에 유의한 영향을 미치지 못한 반면, 창업교육의 창의성에 대한 인지된 중요도는 행동중심적 셀프리더십, 자연보상적 셀프리더십, 건설적 사유 셀프리더십 전략 모두 정(+)의 영향을 주었다. 창업교육 경영에 대한 인지된 중요도는 자연보상적 셀프리더십에 통계적으로 정(+)의 영향을 미쳤고, 행동주의적 셀프리더십, 건설적 사유 셀프리더십에는 영향을 미치지 않는 것으로 나타났다. 창업교육 특허에 대한 인지된 중요도는 행동중심적, 건설적 사유 셀프리더십에 통계적으로 유의한 정(+)의 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났다. 결과적으로 발명교육의 경영, 창의성, 특허와 같은 실제 창업내용을 중요하게 인지하는 청년층들이 자기통제와 긍정적 자기보상의 셀프리더십 수준이 높음을 알 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Y. J. Kim.K. H. Park, An Exploratory Study on Component of Invention Education Program to Building an Entrepreneur in Digital Age, Journal of Digital policy, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp.55-68, 2010.
  2. J. S. Nam.Y. J. Wang et al, Invnetor patent entrepreneurship," KIPI. 2008.
  3. B. S. Noh, A Study of Entrepreneurship Education Effect on the Self-Leadership and Entrepreneurship Hoseo Graduate University, Master, 2011.
  4. J. H. Park.J. H. Kim, An Empirical Study of Effect and Improvement of Entrepreneurship Education, Industry Economic study, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp.959-977, 2009.
  5. J. T. Bae, Entrepreneur Stimulus and entrepreneurship from University, Management consortium conference, Vol. 1-7, 2009.
  6. H. E. Seo. S. H. Cho. H. W. Kim. H. C. Jung. Y. A. Son, Contents Standard Development of Inventory education, Research Issue of Institute of Patent, 2002.
  7. Y.K.Shin, Revised Self-Leadership Questionnaire: focused university student, Hoseo Graduate University, Master. 2009.
  8. S. D. Lee.B. K. Park, The Effects of Transformational Leadership and Self-Leadership on Empowerment and Job Performance of Hotel Employees, Korea travel management, 6, pp.313-332, 2010.
  9. S. K. Lee.D. J. Lee.S. I. Lee, A Study on the influence of Self-Leadership to Technology Innovation Journal of digital policy study, Vol. 3, No.2, pp.117-129. 2011.
  10. S. K. Lee.S. Y. Jung, Kyungkido sciernce technology development for job creation, Gstep policy study 2014-01, 2014.
  11. H. Y. Cho, Study of effect factors which affect satisfaction in education and purpose of business foundation for small business founders, Hoseo Graduate University, Master, 2010.
  12. M.G. Choi.E. J. Park, Study on the effects of youth entrepreneurship education Entrepreneurial Intention focused on The Undergraduate Students in Culture.Tourism Entrepreneurship, Tourism, Leisure, Vol. 24, No. 5, pp.201-220, 2012.
  13. J. Gerstenfeld.J. W. Hong.S. J. Yong, The Relationship between the Type of New Product Idea Sources and the Rate of Success of NEW Product Development and Commercialization. J. of the Korean Society for Technology Management & Economics, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 219-241, 1994.
  14. Electronic Newspaper. 4th September. 2014.
  15. A. Bandura, Social learning Theory, Englewood Cliffs. 1991.
  16. J. F. Hair.W. C. Black.B. J. Babin.R. E. Anderson R.L. Tatham, Multivariate Data Analysis, 6th ed., Upper Saddle River, NJ:Pearson. 2006.
  17. J. D. Houghton.C. P. Neck. The revised self-leadership questionnaire: Testing a hierarchical factor structure for self-leadership. Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 17, No. 8, pp.672-691. 2002. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940210450484
  18. ITEA International Technology Education Association(2002), Standards for Technological Literacy : Contents for the Study of Technology. 2002.
  19. H. Laffel, Influencing Entrepreneurial Intent for New Technology Intrapreneurs and Entrepreneurs in a University Environment, PICMET Proceedings, Cape Town.2008.
  20. C. C. Manz, Self-Leadership toward an expanded theory of self-influence process in organization. Academy of Management Review, vol. 11, No. 3, pp.585-600.1996.
  21. C. C. Manz, Neck, C. P., Mastering Self-Leadership: Empowering yourself for personal excellence. 3rd ed. Pearson Prentice-hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. 2004.
  22. C. C. Manz.H. P. Jr. Sims, Super leadership: Leading others to lead themselves, New York: Mcgraw-Hill. 1989.
  23. W. E. McMullan. W. A. Long, Issues in entrepreneurship education, in Developing New Ventures, New York, N. Y.: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. 1990.
  24. R. Ronstadt, The educated entrepreneurs: a new era of entrepreneurial education is beginning, American Journal of Small Business, summer, pp.7-23. 1985.
  25. J. A. Timmons, New Venture Creation: Entrepreneurship for 21st century, Irwin MacGraw-Hill, Fourth (eds), 1994.