DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Comparison of Aerodynamic Measures in Korean Stop Consonants based on Phonation Types

한국어 파열음의 발성 유형에 따른 공기역학 측정치 비교

  • 최성희 (대구가톨릭대학교 언어청각치료학과, 생체모방감각제어연구소, 가톨릭청각음성언어센터) ;
  • 최철희 (대구가톨릭대학교 언어청각치료학과, 생체모방감각제어연구소, 가톨릭청각음성언어센터)
  • Received : 2014.11.15
  • Accepted : 2014.12.19
  • Published : 2014.12.31

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of phonation types ([+/- aspirated], [+/- fortis]) on aerodynamic measures with Korean bilabial stops. Sixty-three healthy young adults (30 males, 33 females) participated to evaluate the VOEF (Voicing Efficiency) tasks with bilabial stop consonants /$p^h$/, /p/, /p'/ using Phonatory Aerodynamic System (PAS) Model 6600 (Kay PENTAX Corp, Lincoln Park, NJ). All VOEF measures were significantly influenced by phonation types except RANP(pitch range)(p <.01). For sound pressure, maximum SPL, mean SPL, and Mean SPL during Voicing have been shown to be significantly greatest in fortis stop /p'/ than aspirated /$p^h$/ and lenis stop /p/ (p<.001). On the other hand, mean pitch after lenis stop was significantly lower than after aspirated and fortis stops (p<.001). Peak expiratory airflow, Target airflow, and FVC (Expiratory volume) were significantly lowest in fortis stop /p'/ which might be associated with higher aerodynamic resistance while peak air pressure and mean peak air pressure during closure were significantly lower in lenis stop /p/. Additionally, AEFF (Aerodynamic efficiency) was significantly higher in fortis stop /p'/ than lenis stop /p/ as well as aspirated stop /$p^h$/ (p<.001). Thus, sound pressure, airflow parameters, and aerodynamic resistance made crucial roles in distinguishing fortis /p'/ from lenis stop /p/ and aspirated. Additionally, pitch and subglottal air pressure parameters were important aerodynamic characteristics in distinguishing lenis /p/ from fortis /p'/ and aspirated /$p^h$/. Therefore, accurate aspirated /p/ stop consonant should be elicited when collecting the airflow, intraoral pressure related data with patients with voice disorders in order to enhance the reliability and relevance or validity of aerodynamic measures using PAS.

Keywords

References

  1. Butcher, A.(2004). 'Fortis/lenis' revisited one more time: the aerodynamics of some oral stop contrasts in three continents. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics. 18(6-8), 547-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699200410001703565
  2. Cho, T. Jun, S.A., & Ladefoged, P. (2002). Acoustic and aerodynamic correlates of Korean stops. Journal of Phonetics, 30, 193-228. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.2001.0153
  3. Cho, T. & Keating, P. (2001). Articulatory and acoustic studies of domain-initial strengthening in Korean, Journal of Phonetics, 29(2), 155-190. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.2001.0131
  4. Dart, S. N. (1987). An aerodynamic study of Korean stop consonants : measurements and modeling, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 81(1), 138-147. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.395023
  5. Han, M.S. & Weitzman, R. S. (1970). Acoustic features of Korean /P, T, K/, /p, t, k/, /$p^h$, $t^h$, $k^h$/. Phonetica, 22, 112-128. https://doi.org/10.1159/000259311
  6. Hardcastle, W. J. (1973). Some observations of the tense-lax distinction in initial stops in Korean, Journal of Phonetics, 1, 263-271.
  7. Hirose, H., Lee, C. Y., & Ushijima, T. (1974). Laryngeal control in Korean stop production, Journal of Phonetics, 2, 145-152.
  8. Hong, K.H., Kim, H.K., & Niimi, S.(2002). Laryngeal gestures during stop production using high-speed digital images. Journal of Voice, 16(2), 207-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-1997(02)00090-5
  9. Hong, K.H., Jun, D. S., Kim, M. J., Jung K. Y., & Kim, Y. K. (1991). Laryngeal adjustments for the Korean stops and fricatives. Korean Journal of Otolaryngology, 34(5), 1008-1017. (홍기환, 전동석, 김미정, 정길양, 김영기(1991). 한국어 파열음 및 마찰음에 대한 후두근의 역할. 대한이비인후과학회지. 34(5), 1008-1017.)
  10. Kagaya, R. (1974). A fiberscopic and acoustic study of the Korean stops, affricates and fricatives, Journal of Phonetics, 2, 161-180.
  11. Kim, J. (2014). Korean Adult Normative Data for the KayPENTAX Phonatory Aerodynamic System Model 6600. Journal of the Korean Society of Speech Sciences, 6(1), 105-117. (김재옥(2014). 한국 성인의 공기역학적 변수들의 정상치. 말소리와 음성과학, 6(1), 105-117.) https://doi.org/10.13064/KSSS.2014.6.1.105
  12. Kohler, K. J. (1984). Phonetic explanation in phonology: the feature fortis/lenis. Phonetica, 41(3), 150-74. https://doi.org/10.1159/000261721
  13. Kohler, K. J. (1982). F0 in the production of lenis and fortis plosives. Phonetica, 39(4-5), 199-218. https://doi.org/10.1159/000261663
  14. Lee, C.Y., & Smith, T. S. (1972). Oral and direct subglottal pressure in Korean stops. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 51, S102.
  15. Lee, K. H., & Jung M. S. (2000). Acoustic characteristics and perceptual cues for Korean stops. Speech Sciences, 7(2), 139-155. (이경희 & 정명숙(2000). 한국어 파열음의 음향학적 특성과 지각단서. 음성과학. 7(2), 139-155.)
  16. Pae, J. Y., Shin, J., & Ko, D. H. (1999). Some acoustic aspects of Korean stops in various utterance positions: focusing on their temporal characteristics. Speech Sciences, 5(2), 139-159. (배재연, 신지영, 고도흥(1999). 음성 환경에 따른 한국어 폐쇄음의 음향적 특성: 시간적 특성을 중심으로. 음성과학, 5(2), 139-159.)
  17. Park, S. H., Jung, O. R., & Seok, D. I. (2001). The validity analysis between measurement method of subglottic air pressure, Speech Sciences, 8(3), 201-208. (박상희, 정옥란, 석동일(2001). 성문하압 측정 방법의 타당도 분석. 음성과학, 8, 201-208).
  18. Pyo, H. Y., & Choi, H. S. (1996). The Study on intraoral pressure, closure duration, and VOT during phonation of Korean bilabial stop consonants. The Journal of the Korean Society of Lgopedics and Phoniatrics, 7(1), 50-55. (표화영, 최홍식(1996). 한국어 양순파열음 발음 시 구강내압과 폐쇄기, VOT에 대한 연구, 대한후두음성언어의학회지, 7(1), 50-55).
  19. Umeda, H. & Umeda, N. (1985). Acoustical features of Korean "forced" consonants. Gengo Kenkyu. Journal of Linguistics Society of Japan, 48, 23-33.
  20. Zraick, R. I. & Smith-Olinde, L, & Shotts, L. L. (2011). Adult normative data for the KayPENTAX Phonatory Aerodynamic System Model 6600. Journal of Voice, 26(2), 164-176.

Cited by

  1. Aerodynamic features in patients with vocal polyps before & after laryngomicrosurgery vol.8, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.13064/KSSS.2016.8.3.039
  2. A Comparison among Repeated Measures of the Voicing Efficiency Protocol in the Aerodynamic Assessment vol.23, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.12963/csd.18516