DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Spectral Characteristics and Formant Bandwidths of English Vowels by American Males with Different Speaking Styles

발화방식에 따른 미국인 남성 영어모음의 스펙트럼 특성과 포먼트 대역

  • Received : 2014.11.07
  • Accepted : 2014.12.14
  • Published : 2014.12.31

Abstract

Speaking styles tend to have an influence on spectral characteristics of produced speech. There are not many studies on the spectral characteristics of speech because of complicated processing of too much spectral data. The purpose of this study was to examine spectral characteristics and formant bandwidths of English vowels produced by nine American males with different speaking styles: clear or conversational styles; high- or low-pitched voices. Praat was used to collect pitch-corrected long-term averaged spectra and bandwidths of the first two formants of eleven vowels in the speaking styles. Results showed that the spectral characteristics of the vowels varied systematically according to the speaking styles. The clear speech showed higher spectral energy of the vowels than that of the conversational speech while the high-pitched voice did the same over the low-pitched voice. In addition, front and back vowel groups showed different spectral characteristics. Secondly, there was no statistically significant difference between B1 and B2 in the speaking styles. B1 was generally lower than B2 when reflecting the source spectrum and radiation effect. However, there was a statistically significant difference in B2 between the front and back vowel groups. The author concluded that spectral characteristics reflect speaking styles systematically while bandwidths measured at a few formant frequency points do not reveal style differences properly. Further studies would be desirable to examine how people would evaluate different sets of synthetic vowels with spectral characteristics or with bandwidths modified.

Keywords

References

  1. Assman, P.F. & Katz, W.F. (2000). Time-varying spectral change in the vowels of children and adults. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 71, 975-989.
  2. Borden, G.J., Harris, K.S., & Raphael, L.J. (2003). (3rd ed.). Speech science primer: Physiology, acoustics, and perception of speech. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.
  3. Boersma, P. & Kovacic, G. Spectral characteristics of three styles of Croatian folk singing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119(3), 1805-1816.
  4. Fant, G. (1970). Acoustic theory of speech production. The Hague: Mouton.
  5. Ferguson, S. H. & Kewley-Port, D. (2002). Vowel intelligibility in clear and conversational speech for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112, 259-271. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1482078
  6. Ferguson, S. H. (2004). Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: Vowel intelligibility for normal-hearing listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116, 2365-2373. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1788730
  7. Hillenbrand, J. M., Getty, L. A., Clark, M. J., & Wheeler, K. (1995). Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 3099-3111. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.411872
  8. Kang, S. (2007). Acoustic analysis of speech. (Korean translation) Seoul: Thomson Learning Korea, Pakhaksa. (강석한 역 (2007). 음향음성분석론. 서울: Thomson Learning Korea, 박학사.)
  9. Kent, R., & Read, C. (2002). (2nd ed.) Acoustic analysis of speech. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group.
  10. Klatt, D. H., & Klatt, L. C. (1990). Analysis, synthesis, and perception of voice quality variations among female and male talkers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 87, 820-857. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.398894
  11. Krause, J. C. & Braida, L. D. (2002). Investigating alternative forms of clear speech: The effects of speaking rate and speaking mode on intelligibility. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112, 2165-2172. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1509432
  12. Ladefoged, P. (2001). (4th ed.) A course in phonetics. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
  13. Peterson, G. & Barney, H. (1952). Control methods used in a study of vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 24, 175-184. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1906875
  14. Pickett, J. M. (1987). The sounds of speech communication: A primer of acoustic phonetics and speech perception. Austin, Texas: proed.
  15. Mannell, R. (2014). Speech acoustics. Retrieved on October 30 from http://clas.mq.edu.au/speech/acoustics/frequency/vocal_tract_resonance.html.
  16. Smiljanic, R. & Bradlow, A. R. (2005). Production and perception of clear speech in Croatian and English, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118 (3 Pt 1), 1677-88. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2000788
  17. Stevens, K. N. (1998). Acoustic phonetics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  18. Yang, Byunggon. (1990). Development of vowel normalization procedures: English and Korean. Ph. D. Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin.
  19. Yang, Byunggon. (1996). A comparative study of English and Korean monophthongs produced by male and female speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 24, 245-261. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1996.0013
  20. Yang, Byunggon. (2012). Pitch and formant trajectories of English vowels by American males with different speaking styles. Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 4(1), 21-28. (양병곤 (2012). 발화방식에 따른 미국인 남성 영어모음의 피치와 포먼트 궤적. 말소리와 음성과학, 4(1), 21-28.) https://doi.org/10.13064/KSSS.2012.4.1.021
  21. Yang, Byunggon & Kang, SunMee. (2002). A study on speaker identification by spectral difference sum and correlation coefficients. Speech Sciences, 9(3), 3-16. (양병곤과 강선미. (2002). 좁은대역 스펙트럼의 차이값과 상관 계수에 의한 화자확인 연구. 음성과학, 9(3), 3-16.)

Cited by

  1. Influence of Real Ear Resonance on Male Voice Formant Frequency vol.22, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12963/csd.17384