DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

지리정보체계를 이용한 눈 건강수준의 시각적 분포도

The Visual Distribution Map Based on the Geographic Information System for Ocular Health State

  • 김효진 (백석대학교 보건학부 안경광학과) ;
  • 김희진 (가톨릭대학교 의생명.건강과학과) ;
  • 박창원 (가톨릭대학교 의생명.건강과학과) ;
  • 이은희 (극동대학교 안경광학과) ;
  • 김희주 (한양대학교 도시공학과) ;
  • 류정묵 (건양대학교 안경광학과)
  • Kim, Hyojin (Dept. of Visual Optics, Division of Health Science, Baekseok University) ;
  • Kim, Hyi Jin (Dept. of Biomedicine and Health Sciences, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Park, Chang Won (Dept. of Biomedicine and Health Sciences, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Lee, Eun-Hee (Dept. of Visual Optics and Graduate School of Health Science, Far East University) ;
  • Kim, Hee Ju (Dept. of Urban Planning, Hanyang University) ;
  • Ryu, Jungmook (Dept. of Optometry, Konyang University)
  • 투고 : 2014.07.21
  • 심사 : 2014.12.13
  • 발행 : 2014.12.31

초록

목적: 한국 중고등학생을 대상으로 전국 16개 시도의 지역별 시력 분포를 나타내는데 대표적인 시각적 분포기법인 지리정보체계(geographic information system, GIS)를 활용하였다. 방법: 2009년부터 2011년도의 국민건강영양조사(NHANES)의 자료를 이용하여 인구 기반 단면 연구로 디자인하였다. 나안시력의 정보가 제공된 만 13~18세의 총 1,049명을 대상으로 하였고, 남자가 549명(52.3%), 여자가 500명(47.7%) 이었다. 지역은 전국을 16개 시도로 구분하였고, 각 지역별 평균 시력을 활용하였다. 공간분석 방법으로 GIS 기법을 활용하여 지역별 시력수준의 격차를 나타내었다. 결과: 연구 대상자의 평균 나안시력은 성별에 따라 유의한 차이를 보였다(p=0.001). 지역별 남학생과 여학생 그룹의 평균 시력은 16개 시도에서 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 없었다. 중고등학생의 지역별 시력 격차를 시각적 분포기법으로 나타내고자 GIS를 이용하여 지도화 하였다. 결론: 지역별 시력의 격차를 나타내는데 GIS 기법은 시각적으로 효과적인 분포도를 제공하였다.

Purpose: This study utilized the Geographic Information System (GIS) which is one of the representative methods for describing visual distribution, to show the distribution of visions of middle and high school students in 16 cities or provinces in Korea. Method: The data of National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) were analysed from 2009 to 2011 and designed a population-based cross-sectional study. The subjects were total 1,049 students at the age of 13 to 18 and uncorrected vision was provided. Male subjects were 549 (52.3%) and female subjects were 500 (47.7%). Subjects were divided into 16 cities or provinces and average vision of regions were analysed. the differentials of vision among the regions were analysed by as a spatial analysis method. Results: The average uncorrected vision were significant difference by sex (p=0.001). However male and female student groups' average vision indicated no statistically significant difference by region in those 16 cities and provinces. In order to show the differentials of middle and high school students' vision by region with a visual distribution method, the GIS was utilized for mapping. Conclusions: The differentials of vision among regions by GIS provide a visually effective distribution map.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Park EO. Analysis of community health status and related factors using community health and social indicators. J Korean Academy of Community Health Nursing. 2008; 19(1):13-26.
  2. Shin HS, Lee SH. Regional disparity of ambulatory health care utilization. J of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies. 2012;15(4):138-150. https://doi.org/10.11108/kagis.2012.15.4.138
  3. Booth GL, Greatore MI, Gozdyra P, Tynan AM and Glazier RH. 2007. Neighbourhood environments an resources for healthy living: A focus on diabetes in toronto. Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences. 299-307.
  4. Wilkinson R, Marmot M. Social determinates of health: the solid facts, 2th ed. Denmark: WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2003;1-32.
  5. Evans T, Whitehead M, Diderischsen F, Bhuiya A, Wirth M. Challenging inequalities in health from ethics to action. Oxford: Oxford University press, 2001.
  6. Yang JY. A GIS-based public health-geographical analysis of oral health programs for primary school students. J Dent Hyg Sci. 2013;13(2):174-181.
  7. Park KD. A study on the regional inequality of health care utilization. Korean Assoc Policy Stud. 2012;21:387-413.
  8. Cho DH, Shin JY, Kim KY. Lee GH. An analysis of spatial accessibility to public health service in rural areas. J Korean Assoc Reg Geogr. 2010;16:137-153.
  9. Kearns RG, Wilbert M. Putting health into place: landscape, identity and wellbeing. New York: Syracuse University Press, 1998;270-288.
  10. Park JH. Prevalence and odds ratio analysis of cataract related with age, sex, regions and social status. J Korean Vis Sci. 2013;15(1):84-92.
  11. Park JH, Kim JH, Lee YI. Refractive error relate with regional and educational differences in an adult Korea population. J Korean Vis Sci. 2011;13(2):91-98.
  12. Yun MO, Mah KC. Comparative analysis of refractive error in rural and urban elementary schoolchildren. J Korean Vis Sci. 2007;9(3):269-281.
  13. Yun MO, Eom JH, Mah KC. The survey of environmental factors by questionnaries with refractive state rural and urban elementary schoolchildren. J Korean Vis Sci. 2008; 10(2):87-97.
  14. Kim EJ, Kang M. Effects of built environment and individual characteristics on health condition. Journal of the KRSA. 2011;27(3):27-42.
  15. Stephoe A, Feldman PJ. Neighborhood problems as sources of chronic stress: development of a measure of neighborhood problems, and associations with socioecinomic status and health. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 2001;23(3):177-185. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324796ABM2303_5
  16. Swinburn B, Egger G, and Raza F. Dissecting obesogenic environments: the development and application of a framework for identifying and prioritizing environmental interventions for obesity. Preventive Medicine. 1999; 29(6): 563-570. https://doi.org/10.1006/pmed.1999.0585
  17. Kim Y, Ahn SJ, Park CH. Choi JD. A weight analysis of health determinants and healthy city. J of Korean Urban Management 2009;22(3):365-387.
  18. Lee KH, Ahn KH. The correlation between neighborhood characteristics and walking of residents: A case study of 40 areas in Seoul. J of Korea Planners Association. 2007;42(6):105-118.
  19. Guo Y, Liu LJ, Xu L, Lv YY, Tang P, Feng Y, Meng L, Jonas JB. Visual impairment and spectacle use in schoolchildren in rural and urban regions in Beijing. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2014;24(2):258-264. https://doi.org/10.5301/ejo.5000348
  20. He M, Huang W, Zheng Y, Huang L, Ellwein LB. Refractive error and visual impairment in school children in rural southern China. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:374-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.08.020
  21. Jung SK, Lee JH, Kakizaki H, Jee D. prevalence of myopia and its association with body stature and educational level in 19-year-old male conscripts in Seoul, South Korea. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;115:363-370.
  22. Xu L, Li J, Cui T, Hu A, Fan G, Zhang R, Yang H, Sun B, Jonas JB. Refractive error in urban and rural adult Chinese in Beijing. Ophthalmology. 2005;112(10):1676-1683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.05.015
  23. Sawada A, Tomidohoro A, Araie M, Iwase A, Yamamoto T. Refractive errors in an elderly Japanese population: the Tajimi study. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:363-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.03.075
  24. Lin LL, Shih YF, Hsiao CK, Chen CJ. Prevalence of myopia in taiwanese schoolchildren: 1983 to 2000. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2004;33:27-33.
  25. Lee JH, Jee D, Kwon JW, Lee WK. Prevalence and risk factors for myopia in a rural korean population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(8):5466-5470. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.13-12478
  26. Moon HJ, Lee WJ, Choi K. GIS analysis on change of cancer inpatients in a university hospital after the operation of korea express train. Korean Public Health Research. 2013;39(2):107-116.
  27. Ahn BC, Hong E, Joung H. Regional convergence in the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in Korea. Korean Public Health Research. 2013;39(1):1-11.
  28. Fujiwara T, Kawachi I. Social Capital and Health: A study of adult twins in the U.S. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35(2):139-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.04.015
  29. Hashemi H, Fotouhi A, Mohammad K. The age- and gender-specific prevalences of refractive errors in Tehran: the Tehran Eye Study. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2004;11(3):213-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/09286580490514513
  30. Choi YH, Choi YY. The difference comparison according to child refractive method and effect of life style on myopia. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2005;46(11):1841-1847.