DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Reliability Evaluation and Improvement Process of Aerospace Electronic Equipments using Operational Reliability-Cost Matrix

신뢰성-비용 매트릭스를 이용한 항공전자장비의 신뢰성 평가 및 개선 프로세스 연구

  • Jo, In-Tak (Korea Aerospace Industries, LTD.) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Cheon (Division of Industrial Systems Engineering,ERI, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Park, Jong-Hun (Department of Business Administration, Catholic University of Daegu) ;
  • Bae, Sung-Moon (Division of Industrial Systems Engineering,ERI, Gyeongsang National University)
  • 조인탁 (한국항공우주산업) ;
  • 이상천 (경상대학교 산업시스템공학부) ;
  • 박종훈 (대구가톨릭대학교 경영학과) ;
  • 배성문 (경상대학교 산업시스템공학부)
  • Received : 2014.10.16
  • Accepted : 2014.11.28
  • Published : 2014.12.31

Abstract

Purpose: The conventional predicted MFTBF by military standard has a wide discrepancy to that of real-world operation, which leads to overstock and increase operation cost. This paper introduces a analyzing frame using operational reliability and cost data to overcome the discrepancy, and provides reliability improvement process employing the analyzing frame. Methods: This paper suggests Reliability-Cost Matrix (R-C Matrix) and Operational Reliability & Cost Index (ORCI) as a tool for reliability evaluation. Results: KOREIP(KAI's Operational Reliability Evaluation and Improvement Process) is developed employing Reliability-Cost Matrix and Operational Reliability & Cost Index. Conclusion: KOREIP provides a process and its activities based on Reliability-Cost Matrix frame. The process and activities leads reliability improvement of aerospace electronic equipments by means of categorizing and follow-up action based on the concept of frame.

Keywords

References

  1. Cougan, W. P., and Kindig, W. G. 1979. "A Real Life MTBF Growth Program for a Deployed Radar." Proceedings at The Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 121-127.
  2. Gilmore, L., and Valaika, J. 1992. "Operating and Support Cost-Estimating Guide." Office of The Secretary of Defence Washington DC Director Program Analysis and Evaluation.
  3. Jeon, T. B. 2009. "An Overview on the Emergence of the Reliability Prediction Methodology 217 PLUSTM." Journal of Industrial Technology 29(A):28-36.
  4. Jeon, T. B. 2011. "Sensitivity Analysis of the 217PLUSTM Component Models for Reliability Prediction of Electronic Systems." Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 39(4):507-515.
  5. Jin, T., and Su, P. 2005. "Minimize system reliability variability based on six-sigma criteria considering component operational uncertainties." Proceedings at The Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 214-219.
  6. Jo, In-Tak, Lee, Sang-Cheon, and Kim, Yun-Hee. 2012. "A Study on Reliability Prediction Comparison of Aero Space Electronic Equipments." IE Interface 25(4):472-479. https://doi.org/10.7232/IEIF.2012.25.4.472
  7. Jo, In-Tak, Lee, Sang-Cheon, and Park, Jong Hun. 2013. "A Study on Reliability Growth through Failure Analysis by Operational Data of Avionic Equipments." Journal of Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering 36(4):100-108. https://doi.org/10.11627/jkise.2013.36.4.100
  8. Kern, G. A. 1978. "Operational Influences on Avionics Reliability." Proceedings at The Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 231-242.
  9. Kim, Y. I., Byun, K. S., and Kim, H. T. 2009. "Case Study on Improvement of Reliability Prediction Accuracy in Development Phase for Aircraft." Journal of the Korean Society for Aviation and Aeronautics 17(4):25-31.
  10. Ma, K. C. 1988. "Experts' opinions on the reliability gap and some practical guidelines on reliability growth." Air force institute of tech wright-patterson AFB OH school of systems and logistics.
  11. MIL-HDBK-217F Notice 2. 1991. Reliability Prediction of Electronic Equipment: USA Department of Defense.
  12. MIL-HDBK-338B. 1998. Military Handbook Electronic Design: US Department of Defense.
  13. Park, Jong-Man, Jung, Soo-il and Kim, Jae-Joo. 2011. "A Study on Application of Reliability Prediction & Demonstration Methods for Computer Monitor." Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 25(3):96-107.
  14. Miller, P. E. and Moore, R. I. 1991. "Field reliability versus predicted reliability: An analysis of root causes for the difference." Proceedings at the Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 405-410.
  15. Raghuram, R.. 2008. Challenges in Reliability Prediction of Aircraft Subsystems. HCL Technologies, 6-9.
  16. Yoon, Keun-Sig, and Lee, Jong-Chan. 2012. "A Case Study on the Reliability Assessment of Stockpile Ammunition." Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 40(3):259-269. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2012.40.3.259