The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Shear bond strength of a new self-adhering flowable composite resin for lithium disilicate-reinforced CAD/CAM ceramic material

  • Erdemir, Ugur (Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University) ;
  • Sancakli, Hande Sar (Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University) ;
  • Sancakli, Erkan (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University) ;
  • Eren, Meltem Mert (Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University) ;
  • Ozel, Sevda (Faculty of Medicine Department of Biostatistics, Istanbul University) ;
  • Yucel, Taner (Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University) ;
  • Yildiz, Esra (Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University)
  • Received : 2014.04.08
  • Accepted : 2014.09.26
  • Published : 2014.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the effects of different surface pretreatment techniques on the surface roughness and shear bond strength of a new self-adhering flowable composite resin for use with lithium disilicate-reinforced CAD/CAM ceramic material. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A total of one hundred thirty lithium disilicate CAD/CAM ceramic plates with dimensions of $6mm{\times}4mm$ and 3 mm thick were prepared. Specimens were then assigned into five groups (n=26) as follows: untreated control, coating with $30{\mu}m$ silica oxide particles ($Cojet^{TM}$ Sand), 9.6% hydrofluoric acid etching, Er:YAG laser irradiation, and grinding with a high-speed fine diamond bur. A self-adhering flowable composite resin (Vertise Flow) was applied onto the pre-treated ceramic plates using the Ultradent shear bond Teflon mold system. Surface roughness was measured by atomic force microscopy. Shear bond strength test were performed using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Surface roughness data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and the Tukey HSD tests. Shear bond strength test values were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests at ${\alpha}=.05$. RESULTS. Hydrofluoric acid etching and grinding with high-speed fine diamond bur produced significantly higher surface roughness than the other pretreatment groups (P<.05). Hydrofluoric acid etching and silica coating yielded the highest shear bond strength values (P<.001). CONCLUSION. Self-adhering flowable composite resin used as repair composite resin exhibited very low bond strength irrespective of the surface pretreatments used.

Keywords

References

  1. Ozcan M, Valandro LF, Amaral R, Leite F, Bottino MA. Bond strength durability of a resin composite on a reinforced ceramic using various repair systems. Dent Mater 2009;25:1477-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.06.020
  2. Tinschert J, Natt G, Mautsch W, Augthun M, Spiekermann H. Fracture resistance of lithium disilicate-, alumina-, and zirconia-based three-unit fixed partial dentures: a laboratory study. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:231-8.
  3. Graiff L, Piovan C, Vigolo P, Mason PN. Shear bond strength between feldspathic CAD/CAM ceramic and human dentine for two adhesive cements. J Prosthodont 2008;17:294-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00294.x
  4. Peumans M, Hikita K, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Effects of ceramic surface treatments on the bond strength of an adhesive luting agent to CAD-CAM ceramic. J Dent 2007;35:282-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2006.09.006
  5. Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R. Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent 2004;29:481-508.
  6. Kara HB, Dilber E, Koc O, Ozturk AN, Bulbul M. Effect of different surface treatments on roughness of IPS Empress 2 ceramic. Lasers Med Sci 2012;27:267-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-010-0860-3
  7. Rathke A, Tymina Y, Haller B. Effect of different surface treatments on the composite-composite repair bond strength. Clin Oral Investig 2009;13:317-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-008-0228-2
  8. Robbins JW. Intraoral repair of the fractured porcelain restoration. Oper Dent 1998;23:203-7.
  9. Fabianelli A, Pollington S, Papacchini F, Goracci C, Cantoro A, Ferrari M, van Noort R. The effect of different surface treatments on bond strength between leucite reinforced feldspathic ceramic and composite resin. J Dent 2010;38:39-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2009.08.010
  10. Panah FG, Rezai SM, Ahmadian L. The influence of ceramic surface treatments on the micro-shear bond strength of composite resin to IPS Empress 2. J Prosthodont 2008;17:409-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00296.x
  11. Saracoglu A, Cura C, Cotert HS. Effect of various surface treatment methods on the bond strength of the heat-pressed ceramic samples. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:790-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01305.x
  12. Boscato N, Della Bona A, Del Bel Cury AA. Influence of ceramic pre-treatments on tensile bond strength and mode of failure of resin bonded to ceramics. Am J Dent 2007;20:103-8.
  13. Sarac D, Sarac YS, Kulunk S, Erkocak A. Effect of various surface treatments on the bond strength of porcelain repair. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2013;33:e120-6. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.1362
  14. Yavuz T, Dilber E, Kara HB, Tuncdemir AR, Ozturk AN. Effects of different surface treatments on shear bond strength in two different ceramic systems. Lasers Med Sci 2013;28:1233-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-012-1201-5
  15. Kiyan VH, Saraceni CH, da Silveira BL, Aranha AC, Eduardo Cda P. The influence of internal surface treatments on tensile bond strength for two ceramic systems. Oper Dent 2007;32:457-65. https://doi.org/10.2341/06-131
  16. Gokce B, Ozpinar B, Dundar M, Comlekoglu E, Sen BH, Gungor MA. Bond strengths of all-ceramics: acid vs laser etching. Oper Dent 2007;32:173-8. https://doi.org/10.2341/06-52
  17. Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M. Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:268-74. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2003.50
  18. Ozcan M, Vallittu PK. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics. Dent Mater 2003;19:725-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00019-8
  19. Ruttermann S, Fries L, Raab WH, Janda R. The effect of different bonding techniques on ceramic/ resin shear bond strength. J Adhes Dent 2008;10:197-203.
  20. Paranhos MP, Burnett LH Jr, Magne P. Effect Of Nd:YAG laser and $CO_2$ laser treatment on the resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic. Quintessence Int 2011;42:79-89.
  21. Meng X, Yoshida K, Atsuta M. Microshear bond strength of resin bonding systems to machinable ceramic with different surface treatments. J Adhes Dent 2008;10:189-96.
  22. Attar N, Tam LE, McComb D. Mechanical and physical properties of contemporary dental luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:127-34. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2003.20
  23. Goracci C, Margvelashvili M, Giovannetti A, Vichi A, Ferrari M. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with a new self-adhering flowable resin composite. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:609-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0729-x
  24. Ozcan M, Niedermeier W. Clinical study on the reasons for and location of failures of metal-ceramic restorations and survival of repairs. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:299-302.
  25. Ozcan M. Fracture reasons in ceramic-fused-to-metal restorations. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:265-9. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01038.x
  26. Kursoglu P, Motro PF, Yurdaguven H. Shear bond strength of resin cement to an acid etched and a laser irradiated ceramic surface. J Adv Prosthodont 2013;5:98-103. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2013.5.2.98
  27. Akova T, Aytutuldu N, Yoldas O. The evaluation of different surface treatment methods for porcelain-composite bonding. Int J Adhes Adhes 2007;27:20-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2005.09.008
  28. Garcia RN, Silva CS, Silva GG, Mocellin G, Ozelame J, Fracasso L, Ozelame MB, Nascimento RF, Gomes ACR. Bonding performance of a self-adhering flowable composite to indirect restorative materials. RSBO 2014;11:6-12.
  29. de Melo RM, Valandro LF, Bottino MA. Microtensile bond strength of a repair composite to leucite-reinforced feldspathic ceramic. Braz Dent J 2007;18:314-9. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402007000400008
  30. Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Sindel J. Repair strength of etched vs silica-coated metal-ceramic and all-ceramic restorations. Oper Dent 2000;25:209-15.
  31. Janda R, Roulet JF, Wulf M, Tiller HJ. A new adhesive technology for all-ceramics. Dent Mater 2003;19:567-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00106-9
  32. Shiu P, De Souza-Zaroni WC, Eduardo Cde P, Youssef MN. Effect of feldspathic ceramic surface treatments on bond strength to resin cement. Photomed Laser Surg 2007;25:291-6. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2007.2018
  33. Aboushelib MN, Ghoneim M, Mirmohammadi H, Salameh Z. General principles for achieving adequate bond to all ceramic restorations. J Dent Oral Hyg 2009;1:36-41.
  34. Shen C, Oh WS, Williams JR. Effect of post-silanization drying on the bond strength of composite to ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:453-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.03.007
  35. Della Bona A, Shen C, Anusavice KJ. Work of adhesion of resin on treated lithia disilicate-based ceramic. Dent Mater 2004;20:338-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00126-X
  36. Czasch P, Ilie N. In vitro comparison of mechanical properties and degree of cure of a self-adhesive and four novel flowable composites. J Adhes Dent 2013;15:229-36.
  37. Wei YJ, Silikas N, Zhang ZT, Watts DC. Hygroscopic dimensional changes of self-adhering and new resin-matrix composites during water sorption/desorption cycles. Dent Mater 2011;27:259-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.015
  38. Salerno M, Derchi G, Thorat S, Ceseracciu L, Ruffilli R, Barone AC. Surface morphology and mechanical properties of new-generation flowable resin composites for dental restoration. Dent Mater 2011;27:1221-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.08.596
  39. Poitevin A, De Munck J, Van Ende A, Suyama Y, Mine A, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B. Bonding effectiveness of self-adhesive composites to dentin and enamel. Dent Mater 2013;29:221-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.10.001
  40. De Munck J, Mine A, Poitevin A, Van Ende A, Cardoso MV, Van Landuyt KL, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B. Meta-analytical review of parameters involved in dentin bonding. J Dent Res 2012;91:351-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034511431251
  41. Ahmad I. Compobond: Evolution of a new restorative dental material. Cosmetic Dent Eng 2011;2:26-37.
  42. Thurmond JW, Barkmeier WW, Wilwerding TM. Effect of porcelain surface treatments on bond strengths of composite resin bonded to porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:355-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90553-3
  43. Piwowarczyk A, Lauer HC, Sorensen JA. The shear bond strength between luting cements and zirconia ceramics after two pre-treatments. Oper Dent 2005;30:382-8.
  44. Senyilmaz DP, Palin WM, Shortall AC, Burke FJ. The effect of surface preparation and luting agent on bond strength to a zirconium-based ceramic. Oper Dent 2007;32:623-30. https://doi.org/10.2341/07-14
  45. Aida M, Hayakawa T, Mizukawa K. Adhesion of composite to porcelain with various surface conditions. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:464-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80076-9
  46. Ersu B, Yuzugullu B, Ruya Yazici A, Canay S. Surface roughness and bond strengths of glass-infiltrated alumina-ceramics prepared using various surface treatments. J Dent 2009;37:848-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2009.06.017
  47. Swift EJ Jr, Perdigao J, Heymann HO. Bonding to enamel and dentin: a brief history and state of the art, 1995. Quintessence Int 1995;26:95-110.

Cited by

  1. Effect of etching with distinct hydrofluoric acid concentrations on the flexural strength of a lithium disilicate-based glass ceramic vol.105, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.33619
  2. Investigation of the Er: YAG laser and diamond bur cavity preparation on the marginal microleakage of Class V cavities restored with different flowable composites vol.80, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.22827
  3. Comparison of traditional and simplified methods for repairing CAD/CAM feldspathic ceramics vol.9, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.4.257
  4. Effect of Curing Mode on Shear Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Cement to Composite Blocks vol.9, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9030210
  5. The effect of different surface pretreatments on the bond strength of veneering resin to polyetheretherketone vol.32, pp.20, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2018.1468534
  6. The Effect of Energy Densities on the Shear Bond Strength of Self-Adhering Flowable Composite to Er:YAG Pretreated Dentin vol.2016, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6507924
  7. Microshear bond strength of self-adhesive composite to ceramic after mechanical, chemical and laser surface treatments vol.26, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5978/islsm.17-or-19
  8. Influence of Different Luting Cements on the Shear Bond Strength of Pretreated Lithium Disilicate Materials vol.20, pp.9, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2641
  9. Surface wettability and nano roughness at different grit blasting operational pressures and their effects on resin cement to zirconia adhesion vol.38, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2018-137
  10. Effect of Different Surface Treatments and Roughness on the Repair Bond Strength of Aged Nanohybrid Composite vol.37, pp.8, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1089/photob.2018.4585
  11. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of repair composite to indirect restorative materials vol.33, pp.21, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2019.1640173
  12. Microshear Bond Strength of a Self-adhesive Composite to Erbium Laser-Treated Primary Enamel vol.11, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.34172/jlms.2020.30
  13. Comparing the Repair of Veneered Zirconia Crowns with Ceramic or Composite Resin: An in Vitro Study vol.8, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3390/dj8020037
  14. Repair bond strength of resin composite to three aged CAD/CAM blocks using different repair systems vol.12, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2020.12.3.131
  15. Comparison between Shear Bond Strength of Er:YAG and Er,Cr:YSGG Lasers-Assisted Dentinal Adhesion of Self-Adhering Resin Composite: An Ex Vivo Study vol.8, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3390/dj8030066
  16. Shear bond strengths of aged and non-aged CAD/CAM materials after different surface treatments vol.12, pp.5, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2020.12.5.273
  17. Effect of etching with low concentration hydrofluoric acid on the bond strength of CAD/CAM resin block vol.39, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2018-398
  18. Shear bond strength of cemented zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramics (Celtra Duo) with two surface treatments (in vitro study) vol.35, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2020.1785082
  19. Effects of Veneering Ceramic and Methods on Failure Load of Veneered Zirconia vol.11, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3390/app11052129
  20. Repair bond strength and surface topography of resin‐ceramic and ceramic restorative blocks treated by laser and conventional surface treatments vol.84, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.23672