한국환경복원기술학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology)

  • 제17권6호
  • /
  • Pages.17-27
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 1229-3032(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-5011(eISSN)
한국환경복원기술학회 (The Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

경상남도 농경지에서 멧돼지에 의한 피해 경향 분석

An Analysis on Aspects of Farm Lands Damaged by the Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) in Gyeongnam Province, Korea

  • 김슬옹 (영남대학교 이과대학 생명과학과) ;
  • 권관익 (영남대학교 이과대학 생명과학과) ;
  • 김태수 (영남대학교 이과대학 생명과학과) ;
  • 고현서 (영남대학교 이과대학 생명과학과) ;
  • 장갑수 (영남대학교 이과대학 생명과학과)
  • Kim, Seul-Ong (Dept. of Life Sciences, College of Science, Yeungnam University) ;
  • Kwon, Kwan-Ik (Dept. of Life Sciences, College of Science, Yeungnam University) ;
  • Kim, Tae-Su (Dept. of Life Sciences, College of Science, Yeungnam University) ;
  • Ko, Hyun-Seo (Dept. of Life Sciences, College of Science, Yeungnam University) ;
  • Jang, Gab-Sue (Dept. of Life Sciences, College of Science, Yeungnam University)
  • 투고 : 2014.09.16
  • 심사 : 2014.11.17
  • 발행 : 2014.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Wild boars are one of the major wild life animals of which the number has increased a lot because there has been any predator and/or competitor in the Korean ecosystem. The increase of their number was a cause damaging crops in farm lands during the growing season in South Korea. This study was done to recognize the spatial pattern of farm lands damaged by wild boars. Totally 2,342 farms were known damaged by wild boars in 2012, and used to statistically analyze the perspectives of the farm land damages by wild boars in ArcMap v. 9.3. Damages by wild boars frequently happened in the western part of Gyeongnam Province including Jinju city, Tongyoung city and Namhae county. Most farm lands damaged were located nearby large mountains in this area. It might cause the number of wild boars increased in this area, which could finally stimulate the increase of farm land damaged by the species. Farm land damages by wild boars were also coincident with the preference of wild boars on their food. They preferred crops (e.g., sweet potato and corn) in uplands and rice paddies and orchards. The reason of their preference on rice, upland crops and fruits was related to the efficiency of their getting much more energy in a unit area. Another reason for the species to come into a rice paddy would be that they enjoy mud bath in there for scraping off parasites such as ticks and lice. Wild boars were seemed much overcrowded during the period from July to October when most of crops and fruits get ripen. About three-quarters of total farm land damages happened in this period. This analysis also said that 1,915 fields (81.8% of total targets) appeared within the 100-meter buffer from boundaries of mountain areas. This meant that wild boars were more sensitive to the anthropogenic land uses than we expected. They seemed to conservatively try their feeding activities in farm lands with paying attention to the human activity.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kyeongsangnam-do. 2014. kyeongnam statistics annual report. pp. 35-62.
  2. Park YG.Kwon JO.Kim EM.Kang CW. Kang HM.Ji NJ and Min DW. 2012. A study of inhabited pattern of mammals in warm-temperate forest conducted forest management prescription. Korean Forest Society. 643-645.
  3. Seo CW and Park JH. 2000. Wild Boar (Sus scrofa coreanus Heude) Habitat Modeling Using GIS and Logistic Regression. Korea spatial information society. 8(1): 85-99.
  4. Lee SM and Lee WS. 2014. Diet of The Wild boar (Sus scrofa) in Agricultural Land of Geochang, Gyeongnam Province, Korea. Korean Forest Society. 103(2): 307-312. https://doi.org/10.14578/jkfs.2014.103.2.307
  5. Cha SS.Lee SH.Chae HM and Shim JK. 2012. 멧돼지 Effects of Grubbing by Wild Boars on the Biological Activities of Forest Floor. Korea society of Environment and Ecology. 26(6): 902-910.
  6. Choi TY.Lee YS and Park JH. 2006. Home-range of Wild Boar, Sus scrofa Living in the Jirisan National Park, Korea. Korea society of Environment and Ecology. 29(3): 253-257
  7. Choi TY and Choi HM. 2007. Wildlife evidence guide pp. 234-242.
  8. Han SH.Oh JG.Cho IC.Ko IS.Kim TW. Jang MH.Kim BS.Park SG and Oh HS. 2011. A Molecular Genetic Analysis of the Introduced Wild Boar Species (Sus scrofa coreanus) on Mount Halla, Jeju Island, Korea. 25(5): 658-665.
  9. Cowx, I. G. 1994. Stocking strategies, Fishery management and ecology. 1(1): 15-30 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2400.1970.tb00003.x
  10. Schley, L. and Roper, T. J. 2003. Diet of wild boar Sus scrofa in Western Europe, with particular reference to consumption of agricultural crops, Mammal review. 3(1): 43-56.
  11. Deng, T. P..Zheng, H. X. and Zeng, G. S. 2009. Characteristics of wild boar (Sus scrofa) mud bath sites on the northern slope of Funiu Mountain. Acta Ecologica Sinica. 29(2): 1001-1008.
  12. Massei, G. and Genov, P. V. 2004. The environmental impact of wild boar. Galemys. 16: 135-145.
  13. Schley, L..Dufrene, M..Krier, A. and Frantz, A. C. 2008. Patterns of crop damage by wild boar in Luxembourg over a 10-year period. European Journal of Wildlife Research. 54(4): 589-599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-008-0183-x
  14. Thurfjell, H..Ball J. P..Ahlen, P. A.. Kornacher, P..Dettki, H. and Sjoberg, K. 2009. Habitat use and spatial patterns of wild boar Sus scrofa (L.): agricultural fields and edges. European Journal of Wildlife Research. 55(5): 517-523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-009-0268-1
  15. Wiggins, D. A. 1999. The peninsula effect on species diversity: a reassessment of the avifauna of Baja California. Ecography. 22: 542-547. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.1999.tb01284.x