Earthquakes and Structures

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Optimum tuned mass damper approaches for adjacent structures

  • Received : 2014.04.11
  • Accepted : 2014.07.01
  • Published : 2014.12.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Pounding of adjacent structures are always a notable reason for damages after strong ground motions, but it is already unforeseen detail in newly constructed structures. Thus, several approaches have been proposed in order to prevent the pounding of structures. By using optimally tuned mass dampers, it is possible to decrease the displacement vibrations of structures. But in adjacent structures, the response of both structures must be considered in the objective function of optimization process. In this paper, two different designs of Tuned Mass Dampers (TMD) are investigated. The first design covers independent TMDs on both structures. In the second design, adjacent structures are coupled by a TMD on the top of the structures. Optimum TMD parameters are found by using the developed optimization methodology employing harmony search algorithm. The proposed method is presented with single degree of freedom and multiple degree of freedom structures. Results show that the coupled design is not effective on multiple degree of freedom adjacent structures. The coupled design is only effective for rigid structures with a single degree of freedom while the use of independent TMDs are effective on both rigid and flexural structures.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Istanbul University

References

  1. Akin, A. and Saka, M.P. (2010), "Optimum Detailed Design of Reinforced Concrete Continuous Beams using the Harmony Search Algorithm", in B.H.V. Topping, J.M. Adam, F.J. Pallares, R. Bru, M.L. Romero, (Editors), "Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Computational Structures Technology", Civil-Comp Press, Stirlingshire, UK, Paper 131.
  2. Anagnostopoulos, S.A. and Karamaneas, C.E. (2008), "Use of collision shear walls to minimize seismic separation and to protect adjacent buildings from collapse due to earthquake-induced pounding", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 37, 1371-1388. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.817
  3. Bekdas, G. and Nigdeli, S.M. (2011), "Estimating optimum parameters of tuned mass dampers using harmony Search", Eng. Struct., 33, 2716-2723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.05.024
  4. Bekdas, G. and Nigdeli, S.M. (2012), "Preventing the pounding of adjacent buildings with harmony search optimized tuned mass damper", In: 3rd European Conference of Civil Engineering, December 2-4 2012, Paris, France.
  5. Bekdas, G. and Nigdeli, S.M. (2013a), "Optimization of T-shaped RC flexural members for different compressive strengths of concrete", Int. J. Mech., 7, 109-119.
  6. Bekdas, G. and Nigdeli, S.M. (2013b), "Optimization of Tuned Mass Damper with Harmony Search", In Metaheuristic Applications in Structures and Infrastructures, Edited by Amir Hossein Gandomi, Xin-She Yang, Amir Hossein Alavi, Siamak Talatahari. Elsevier.
  7. Bekdas, G. and Nigdeli, S.M. (2013c), "Mass ratio factor for optimum tuned mass dmper strategies", Int. J. Mech. Sci., 71, 68-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2013.03.014
  8. Bharti, S.D., Dumne, S.M. and Shrimali, M.K. (2010), "Seismic response analysis of adjacent buildings connected with MR dampers", Eng. Struct., 32, 2122-2133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.03.015
  9. Bigdeli, K. and Hare, W. (2012), "Tesfamariam S. Configuration optimization of dampers for adjacent buildings under seismic excitations", Eng Optim, 44, 1491-1509. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215X.2012.654788
  10. Chang, C.C. (1999), "Mass dampers and their optimal designs for building vibration control", Engineering Structures, 21, 454-463. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00213-7
  11. Cimellaro, G.P. and Lopez-Garcia, D. (2011), "Algorithm for design of controlled motion of adjacent structures", Struct. Control Health Monit., 18, 140-148. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.357
  12. Cundumi, O. and Suarez, L.E. (2008), "Numerical Investigation of a Variable Damping Semiactive Device for the Mitigation of the Seismic Response of Adjacent Structures", Computer-aided civil and infrastructure engineering, 23, 291-308. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2007.00537.x
  13. Den Hartog, J.P. (1947), Mechanical Vibrations, McGraw-Hill, New York.
  14. Erdal, F., Dogan, E. and Saka, M.P. (2011), "Optimum Design of Cellular Beams Using Harmony Search and Particle Swarm Optimizers", Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 67(2), 237-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2010.07.014
  15. Frahm, H. (1911), Device for damping of bodies, U.S. Patent No: 989,958.
  16. Geem, Z.W. (2008), "Novel derivative of harmony search algorithm for discrete design variables", Applied Mathematics and Computation, 199, 223-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2007.09.049
  17. Geem, Z.W. (2009), "Harmony search optimisation to the pump-included water distribution network design", Civil Eng. Environ. Syst., 26(3), 211-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286600801919813
  18. Geem, Z.W. (2010), "Multiobjective optimization of time-cost trade-off uing harrmony search", J. Construct. Eng.Manag.-ASCE, 136(6), 711-716. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000167
  19. Geem, Z.W. (2011), "Parameter estimation of the nonlinear muskingum model using parameter-setting-free harmony search", J. Hydrologic Eng., 16(8), 684-688. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000352
  20. Geem, Z.W, Cho, Y.-H. (2011), "Optimal design of water distribution networks using parameter-settingfree harmony search for two major parameters", J. Water Resources Plan. Manag.-ASCE, 137(4), 377-380. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000130
  21. Geem, Z.W., Kim, J.H. and Loganathan, G.V. (2001), "A new heuristic optimization algorithm: harmony search", Simul., 76, 60-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/003754970107600201
  22. Hadi, M.N.S. and Arfiadi, Y. (1998), "Optimum design of absorber for MDOF structures", J. Struct. Eng.-ASCE, 124, 1272-1280. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:11(1272)
  23. Hasancebi, O., Carbas, S., Dogan, E., Erdal, F. and Saka, M.P. (2010), "Comparison of non-deterministic search techniques in the optimum design of real size seel fames", Comput. Struct., 88(17-18), 1033-1048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2010.06.006
  24. Jeng, V. and Tzeng, W.L. (2000), "Assessment of seismic pounding hazard for Taipei City", Eng. Struct., 22, 459-471. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(98)00123-0
  25. Kim, G.C. and Kang, J.W. (2011), "Seismic response control of adjacent building by using hybrid control algorithm of MR", Procedia Eng., 14, 1013-1020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.127
  26. Lee, K.S. and Geem, Z.W. (2004), "A new structural optimization method based on the harmony search algorithm", Comput. Struct., 82, 781-798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.01.002
  27. Lee, K.S. and Geem, Z.W. (2005), "A new meta-heuristic algorithm for continuous engineering optimization:Harmony search theory and practice", Comput.Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng., 194, 3902-3933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2004.09.007
  28. Lee, K.S., Geem, Z.W., Lee, S.H. and Bae, K.W. (2005), "The harmony search heuristic algorithm for discrete structural optimization", Eng. Optimization, 37, 663-684. https://doi.org/10.1080/03052150500211895
  29. Leung, A.Y.T. and Zhang, H. (2009), "Particle swarm optimization of tuned mass dampers", Eng. Struct., 31, 715-728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.11.017
  30. Leung, A.Y.T., Zhang, H., Cheng, C.C. and Lee, Y.Y. (2008), "Particle swarm optimization of TMD by non-stationary base excitation during earthquake", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 37, 1223-1246. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.811
  31. Mathworks (2010) MATLAB R2010a. The MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA,USA.
  32. Marano, G.C., Greco, R. and Chiaia, B. (2010), "A comparison between different optimization criteria for tuned mass dampers design", J. Sound Vib., 329, 4880-4890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2010.05.015
  33. Matsagar, V.A. and Jangid, R.S. (2005), "Viscoelastic damper connected to adjacent structures involving seismic isolation", J. Civil Eng. Manag., 11(4), 309-322. https://doi.org/10.1080/13923730.2005.9636362
  34. Ni, Y.Q., Ko, J.M. and Ying, Z.G. (2001), "Random Seismic Response Analysis of Adjacent Buildings Coupled with Non-Linear Hysteretic Dampers", J. Sound Vib., 246(3), 403-417. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.2001.3679
  35. Nigdeli, S.M. and Bekdaş, G. (2013), "Optimum tuned mass damper design for preventing brittle fracture of RC buildings", Smart Struct. Syst., 12, 137-155. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2013.12.2.137
  36. Ormondroyd, J. and Den Hartog, J.P. (1928), "The theory of dynamic vibration absorber", Transact. Am.. Soc.Mech.Eng., 50, 9-22.
  37. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER NGA DATABASE) http://peer.berkeley.edu/nga.
  38. Park, K.-S. and Ok S.-Y. (2012), "Optimal design of actively controlled adjacent structures for balancing the mutually conflicting objectives in design preference aspects", Eng. Struct., 45, 213-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.06.020
  39. Polycarpou, P.C. and Komodromos, P. (2010), "Earthquake-induced poundings of a seismically isolated building with adjacent structures", Eng. Struct., 32, 1937-1951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.03.011
  40. Polycarpou, P.C., Komodromos, P. and Polycarpou, A.C. (2013), "A nonlinear impact model for simulating the use of rubber shock absorbers for mitigating the effects of structural pounding during earthquakes", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 42, 81-100. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2194
  41. Sadek, F., Mohraz, B., Taylor, A.W. and Chung, R.M. (1997), "A method of estimating the parameters of tuned mass dampers for seismic applications", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 26, 617-635. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199706)26:6<617::AID-EQE664>3.0.CO;2-Z
  42. Sheikh, M.N., Xiong, J. and Li, W.H. (2012), "Reduction of seismic pounding effects of base-isolated RC highway bridges using MR damper", Struct. Eng.Mech., 41(6), 791-803. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2012.41.6.791
  43. Singh, M.P., Singh, S. and Moreschi, L.M. (2002), "Tuned mass dampers for response control of torsional buildings", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31, 749-769. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.119
  44. Steinbuch, R. (2011), "Bionic optimisation of the earthquake resistance of high buildings by tuned mass dampers", J. Bionic. Eng., 8, 335-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(11)60036-X
  45. Togan, V., Daloglu, A.T. and Karadeniz, H. (2011), "Optimization of Trusses under Uncertainties with Harmony Search", Struct. Eng.Mech., 37(5), 543-560. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2011.37.5.543
  46. Toklu, Y.C., Bekdas, G. and Temur, R. (2013), "Analysis of trusses by total potential optimization method coupled with harmony search", Struct. Eng. Mech., 45(2), 183-199. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2013.45.2.183
  47. Trombetti, T. and Silvestri, S. (2007), "Novel schemes for inserting seismic dampers in shear-type systems based upon the mass proportional component of the Rayleigh damping matrix", J. Sound Vib., 302, 486-526 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2006.11.030
  48. Tubaldi, E., Barbato, M. and Ghazizadeh, S. (2012), "A probabilistic performance-based risk assessment approach for seismic pounding with efficient application to linear systems", Struct. Safety, 36-37, 14-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2012.01.002
  49. Warburton, G.B. (1982), "Optimum absorber parameters for various combinations of response and excitation parameters", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 10, 381-401. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290100304
  50. Yang, X.S. (2010), Engineering Optimization: An Introduction with Metaheuristic Applications, Wiley New Jersey.
  51. Ying, Z.G., Ni, Y.Q. and Ko, J.M. (2003), "Stochastic optimal coupling-control of adjacent building structures", Comput. Struct., 81, 2775-2787. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(03)00332-8
  52. Xu, Y.L. and Zhang, W.S. (2002), "Closed-form solution for seismic response of adjacent buildings with linear quadratic Gaussian controllers", Earthq. Eng.Struct. Dyn., 31, 235-259. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.107

Cited by

  1. Tuned mass damper system of high-rise intake towers optimized by improved harmony search algorithm vol.138, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.02.011
  2. Design of double dynamic vibration absorbers for reduction of two DOF vibration system vol.57, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2016.57.1.161
  3. Application of artificial neural networks in optimal tuning of tuned mass dampers implemented in high-rise buildings subjected to wind load vol.17, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-018-0483-4
  4. Optimum design of multiple positioned tuned mass dampers for structures constrained with axial force capacity pp.15417794, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1593
  5. Expected extreme value of pounding force between two adjacent buildings vol.61, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2017.61.2.183
  6. Vertical isolation of a structure based on different states of seismic performance vol.13, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2017.13.2.103
  7. The seismic reliability of two connected SMRF structures vol.13, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2017.13.2.151
  8. Self-control of high rise building L-shape in plan considering soil structure interaction vol.6, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/csm.2017.6.3.229
  9. Effect of soil in controlling the seismic response of three-dimensional PBPD high-rise concrete structures vol.66, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2018.66.2.217
  10. Reliability-based design of tuned-mass dampers with soil−structure interaction vol.172, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1680/jencm.17.00018
  11. Optimum design of a non-conventional multiple tuned mass damper for a complex power plant structure vol.15, pp.7, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2019.1585461
  12. Optimum Parameters for Large Mass Ratio TMDs Using Frequency Response Function vol.25, pp.10, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2019.1624228
  13. Connection of coupled buildings: A state-of-the-art review vol.33, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.05.017
  14. A nonlinear optimization shooting method for bifurcation tracking of nonlinear systems vol.27, pp.19, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546320956743
  15. Optimization and buckling of rupture building beams reinforced by steel fibers on the basis of adaptive improved harmony search-harmonic differential quadrature methods vol.15, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00647
  16. Simultaneous optimization of structure together with attached tuned mass dampers considering dynamic performance vol.35, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2020.11.021