Journal of Applied Biological Chemistry

The Korean Society for Applied Biological Chemistry (한국응용생명화학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Histone Modifications and It's Relation with Functional Aspects

히스톤의 변이와 이와 관련된 기능적 측면

  • Kang, Han-Chul (Department of metabolic engineering, National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Kim, Jong-Bum (Department of metabolic engineering, National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Roh, Kyung Hee (Department of metabolic engineering, National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Kim, Hyun-UK (Department of metabolic engineering, National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Lee, Kyung-Ryeol (Department of metabolic engineering, National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Kim, Sun Hee (Department of metabolic engineering, National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration)
  • Received : 2014.09.17
  • Accepted : 2014.10.14
  • Published : 2014.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Chromatin is an instructive DNA structure that can widely respond to external signals. An important change of chromatin is the modifications of histone for this regulation. There are accumulating lists of these modifications and the complexity of their action is gradually understood. It is evident that histone modifications play important roles in most biological processes that are involved in the expression or repression of DNA. The surface of nucleosomes is susceptible to multiplicity of modifications. Chromatin modifications can play either by eliminating chromatin contacts or by recruiting non-histone proteins to chromatin. Many of these regulations seem to be epigenetically inherited. Thus, histone modifications are closely correlated with many fundamental biological processes in animal, plant and microbial kingdoms. Failures of histone modification lead, in general, to defective chromosome condensation or decondensation, impeding many biological functions including development, maturation, and protection against various diseases.

크로마틴은 DNA 구조를 다시 결정해주는 것과 같은 존재로 각종 신호에 폭넓게 반응한다. 크로마틴의 중요한 변화는 이러한 조절을 위한 히스톤의 변이이다. 이러한 변화들에 대한 지식이 점점 축적되고 있으며 이러한 반응의 복잡성이 점점 더 명확히 이해되고 있다. 히스톤의 변화가 대부분의 생명체의 반응에 있어서 DNA 의 발현 또는 억제를 통하여 중요한 역할을 한다는 사실이 명확해지고 있다. Nucleosome 의 표면은 각종 변화를 수용할 수 있다. 크로마틴 변화는 크로마틴 수축을 제거하거나 또는 비히스톤 단백질들을 불러 모으는 과정을 통하여 작용될 수 있다. 히스톤 변이를 매개로 하는 이러한 많은 조절들이 유전적으로 보존되어 전달되는 것으로 추측된다. 따라서 히스톤 변이는 동물, 식물 또는 미생물 세계의 기본적인 생물학적 반응과 상당히 밀접한 관계가 있다. 히스톤 변이가 제대로 이루어지지 않을 경우 크로모좀의 응축 또는 이완이 제대로 않되며 결국은 발생, 성숙, 생물체 방어 등 다방면에 대해 기능을 제대로 수행하지 못한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Akasaka T, van Lohuizen M, van der Lugt N, and Mizutani-Koseki Y (2001) Mice doubly deficient for the Polycomb Group genes Mel18 and Bmi1 reveal synergy and requirement for maintenance but not initiation of Hox gene expression. Development 12, 1587-97.
  2. Ang YS, Tsai SY, Lee DF, Monk J, Su J, and Ratnakumar K (2011) Wdr5 mediates self-renewal and reprogramming via the embryonic stem cell core transcriptional network. Cell 14, 183-97.
  3. Bannister AJ and Kouzarides T (2011) Regulation of chromatin by histone modifications. Cell Research 21, 381-95. https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2011.22
  4. Bedford MT and Clarke SG (2009) Protein arginine methylation in mammals; who, what and why. Mol Cell 3, 11-3.
  5. Bilodeau S, Kagey MH, Frampton GM, Rahl PB, and Young RA (2009) SetDB1 contributes to repression of genes encoding developmental regulators and maintenance of ES cell state. Genes Dev 23, 2484-9. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1837309
  6. Carninci P, Kasukawa T, Katayama S, and Gough J (2005) The transcriptional landscape of the mammalian genome. Science 30, 1559-63.
  7. Castel SE and Martienssen RA (2013) RNA interference in the nucleus:roles for small RNAs in transcription, epigenetics and beyond. Nature Rev Genet 14,100-12. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3355
  8. Champagne KS and Kutateladze TG (2009) Structural insight into histone recognition by the ING PHD fingers. Curr Drug Targets 10, 432-41. https://doi.org/10.2174/138945009788185040
  9. Chen Z, Zang J, and Whetstine J (2006) Structural insights into histone demethylation by JMJD2 members. Cell 125, 691-702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.04.024
  10. Cohen-Armon M, Visochek L, and Rozensal D (2007) DNA independent PARP-1 activation by phosphorylated ERK2 increases Elk1 activity; a link to histone acetylation. Mol Cell 25, 297-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2006.12.012
  11. Cuthbert GL, Daujat S, Snowden AW, and Erdjument-Bromage H (2004) Histone deamination antagonizes arginine methylation. Cell 118, 545-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2004.08.020
  12. Dai J, Sultan S, Taylor SS, and Higgins JM (2005) The kinase haspin is required for mitotic histone H3 Thr 3 phosphorylation and normal metaphase chromosome alignment. Genes Dev 19, 472-88. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1267105
  13. Dawson MA, Bannister AJ, and Gottgens DA (2009) JAK2 phosphorylates histone H3Y41 and excludes HP1alpha from chromatin. Nature 461, 819-22. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08448
  14. Endoh M, Endo TA, Endoh T, Fujimura Y, and Ohara O (2008) Polycomb group proteins Ring1A/B are functionally linked to the core transcriptional regulatory circuitry to maintain ES cell identity. Development 135, 1513-24. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.014340
  15. Fischle W, Tseng BS, Dormann HL, and Ueberheide BM (2005) Regulation of HP1-chromatin binding by histone H3 methylation and phosphorylation. Nature 438, 1116-22. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04219
  16. Gao Z, Zhang J, and Bonassio R (2012) PCGF homologs, CBX proteins, and RYBP define functionally distinct PRC1 family complexes. Mol Cell 45, 344-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2012.01.002
  17. Gehring M, Huh JH, Hsieh TF, Penterman J, and Choi Y (2006) DEMETER DNA glycosylase establishes MEDEA polycomb gene self-imprinting by allele-specific demethylation. Cell 124, 495-506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2005.12.034
  18. Glaser S, Lubitz S, Loveland KL, Ohbo K, and Robb L (2009) The histone 3 lysine 4 methyltransferase, Mll2, is only required briefly in development and spermatogenesis. Epigenetics Chromatin 2, 5-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-8935-2-5
  19. Golebiewska A, Atkinson SP, Lako M, and Armstrong L (2009) Epigenetic landscaping during hESC differentiation to neural cells. Stem Cells 27, 1298-308. https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.59
  20. Hammoud SS, Nix DA, Zhang H, and Purwar J (2009) Distinctive chromatin in human sperm packages genes for embryo development. Nature 460, 473-8.
  21. He J, Shen L, and Wan M (2013) Kdm2b maintains murine embryonic stem cell status by recruiting PRC1 complex to CpG islands of developmental genes. Nature Cell Biol 15, 373-84. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2702
  22. Hodawadekar SC and Marmorstein R (2007) Chemistry of acetyl transfer by histone modifying enzymes;structure, mechanism and implications for effector design. Oncogene 26, 5528-40. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1210619
  23. Hong SH, Rampalli S, Lee JB, and McNicol J (2011) Cell fate potential of human pluripotent stem cells is encoded by histone modifications. Cell Stem Cell 9, 34-6.
  24. Hsieh TF, Ibarra CA, Silva P, and Zemach A (2009) Genome-wide demethylation of Arabidopsis endosperm. Science 32, 1451-4.
  25. Hu S, Xie Z, and Onishi A (2009) Profiling the human protein DNA interactome reveals ERK2 as a transcriptional repressor of interferon signaling. Cell 139, 610-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.08.037
  26. Huang Y, Fang J, Bedford MT, Zhang Y, and Xu RM (2006) Recognition of histone H3 lysine-4 methylation by the double tudor domain of JMJD2A. Science 312, 748-51. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1125162
  27. Jiang H, Shukla A, Wang X, Chen WY, Bernstein BE, and Roeder RG (2011) Role for Dpy-30 in ES cell-fate specification by regulation of H3K4 methylation within bivalent domains. Cell 144, 513-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.01.020
  28. Kim J, Daniel J, and Espejo A (2006) Tudor, MBT and chromodomains gauge the degree of lysine methylation. EMBO Rep 7, 397-403.
  29. Krishnamoorthy T, Chen X, Govin J, and Cheung WL (2006). Phosphorylation of histone H4 Ser1 regulates sporulation in yeast and is conserved in fly and mouse spermatogenesis. Genes Dev 20, 2580-92. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1457006
  30. Kumar R and Rao DN (2013) Role of DNA methyltransferases in epigenetic regulation in bacteria. Subcell Biochem 61, 81-102. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4525-4_4
  31. Mercer TR, Dinger ME, Mariani J, and Kosik KS (2008) Noncoding RNAs in long-term memory formation. Neuroscientist 14, 434-45.
  32. Metzger E, Wissmann M, Yin N, Muller JM, Schneider R, and Peters AH (2005) LSD1 demethylates repressive histone marks to promote androgen-receptor-dependent transcription. Nature 437, 436-9.
  33. Morey L, Pascual G, and Cozutto L (2012) Nonoverlapping functions of the Polycomb group Cbx family of proteins in embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 10, 47-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2011.12.006
  34. Morgan HD, Dean W, Coker HA, Reik W, and Petersen-Mahrt SK (2004) Activation-induced cytidine deaminase deaminates 5-methylcytosine in DNA and is expressed in pluripotent tissues: implications for epigenetic reprogramming. J Biol Chem 279, 52353-60. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M407695200
  35. Nathan D, Ingvarsdottir K, Sterner DE, and Bylebyl GR (2006) Histone sumoylation is a negative regulator in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and shows dynamic interplay with positive acting histone modifications. Genes Dev 20, 966-76. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1404206
  36. Nelson CJ, Santos-Rosa H, and Kouzarides T (2006) Proline isomerization of histone H3 regulates lysine methylation and gene expression. Cell 126, 906-16.
  37. Pasini D, Bracken A, Hansen J, Capillo M, and Helin K (2007) The polycomb group protein Suz12 is required for embryonic stem cell differentiation. Mol Cell Biol 27, 3769-79. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01432-06
  38. Pastor WA, Aravind L, and Rao A (2013) TETonic shift; biological roles of TET proteins in DNA demethylation and transcription. Nature Rev Mol Cell Biol 14, 341-56. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm3589
  39. Peters AH, O'Carroll D, Scherthan H, and Mechtler K (2001) Loss of the Suv39h histone methyltransferases impairs mammalian heterochromatin and genome stability. Cell 107, 323-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00542-6
  40. Popp C, Dean W, Feng S, and Cokus SJ (2010) Genome-wide erasure of DNA methylation in mouse primordial germ cells is affected by AID deficiency. Nature 463,1101-5. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08829
  41. Puschendorf M, Terranova R, Boutsma E, and Mao X (2008) PRC1 and Suv39h specify parental asymmetry at constitutive heterochromatin in early mouse embryos. Nat Genet 40, 411-20. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.99
  42. Rinn JL, Kertesz M, Wang JK, Squazzo SL, and Xu X (2007) Functional demarcation of active and silent chromatin domains in human HOX loci by noncoding RNAs. Cell 129, 1311-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.022
  43. Shen X, Liu Y, Hsu YJ, Fujiwara Y, and Kim J (2008) EZH1 mediates methylation on histone H3 lysine 27 and complements EZH2 in maintaining stem cell identity and executing pluripotency. Mol Cell 32, 491-502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2008.10.016
  44. Shilatifard A (2006) Chromatin modifications by methylation and ubiquitination; impli-cations in the regulation of gene expression. Annu Rev Biochem 75, 243-69. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.75.103004.142422
  45. Shimahara H, Hirano T, and Ohya K (2013) Nucleosome structural changes induced by binding of non-histone chromosomal proteins HMGN1 and HMGN2. FEBS 3,184-91
  46. Shogren-Knaak M, Ishii H, Sun JM, and Pazin MJ (2006) Histone H4K16 acetylation controls chromatin structure and protein interactions. Science 311, 844-7. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1124000
  47. Sims RJ, Chen CF, Santos-Rosa H, Kouzarides T, Patel SS, and Reinberg D (2005) Human but not yeast CHD1 binds directly and selectively to histone H3 methylated at lysine 4 via its tandem chromodomains. J Biol Chem 280, 41789-92. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.C500395200
  48. Skene PJ and Henikoff S (2013) Histone variants in pluripotency and disease. Development 140, 2513-24. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.091439
  49. Sone M, Hayashi T, and Tarui H (2007) The mRNA-like noncoding RNA Gomafu constitutes a novel nuclear domain in a subset of neurons. J Cell Sci 120, 2498-506. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.009357
  50. Steward MM, Lee JS, Donovan A, Wyatt M, Bernstein BE, and Shilatifard A (2006) Molecular regulation of H3K4 trimethylation by ASH2L, a shared subunit of MLL complexes. Nat Struct Mol Biol 13, 852-54. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb1131
  51. Tachibana M, Sugimoto K, Nozaki M, and Ueda J (2002) G9a histone methyltransferase plays a dominant role in euchromatic histone H3 lysine 9 methylation and is essential for early embryogenesis. Genes Dev 16, 1779-91. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.989402
  52. Tachibana M, Ueda J, Fukuda M, and Takeda N (2005) Histone methyltransferases G9a and GLP form heteromeric complexes and are both crucial for methylation of euchromatin at H3-K9. Genes Dev 19, 815-26. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1284005
  53. Takihara Y, Tomotsune D, Shirai M, and Katoh-Fukui Y (1997) Targeted disruption of the mouse homologue of the Drosophila polyhomeotic gene leads to altered anteroposterior patterning and neural crest defects. Development 124, 3673-82.
  54. Tavares L, Dimitrova E, and Webster J (2012) RYBP-PRC1 complexes mediate H2A ubiquity-lation at polycomb target sites independently of PRC2 and H3K27me3. Cell 148, 664-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.12.029
  55. Vaquero A, Scher, MB, Lee DH, and Sutton A (2006) SirT2 is a histone deacetylase with preference for histone H4 Lys 16 during mitosis. Genes Dev 20, 1256-61. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1412706
  56. Vermeulen M, Eberl HC, and Matarese F (2010) Quantitative interaction proteomics and genome-wide profiling of epigenetic histone marks and their readers. Cell 142, 967-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.08.020
  57. Walker E, Chang WY, Hunkapiller J, Cagney G, and Garcha K (2010) Polycomb-like 2 associates with PRC2 and regulates transcriptional networks during mouse embryonic stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. Cell Stem Cell 6, 153-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2009.12.014
  58. Wang Z, Zang C, and Rosenfeld JA (2008) Combinatorial patterns of histone acetylations and methylations in the human genome. Nat Genet 40, 897-903. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.154
  59. Wei Y, Mizzen CA, Cook RG, Gorovsky MA, and Allis CD (1998) Phosphorylation of histone H3 at serine 10 is correlated with chromosome condensation during mitosis and meiosis in Tetrahymena. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95, 7480-4. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.13.7480
  60. Wu X, Johansen JV, and Helin K (2013) Fbxl10/Kdm2b recruits polycomb repressive complex 1 to CpG islands and regulates H2A ubiquitylation. Mol Cell 49, 1134-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2013.01.016
  61. Zachary DS and Alexander M (2013) DNA methylation; roles in mammalian development. Nat Rev Genet 14, 204-20. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3354
  62. Zhang Y and Reinberg D (2006) Transcription regulation by histone methylation: interplay between different covalent modifications of the core histone tails. Genes Dev 15, 2343-60.

Cited by

  1. Phenylpropanoids from Lilium Asiatic hybrid flowers and their anti-inflammatory activities vol.60, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13765-017-0307-7