Smart Structures and Systems

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of delay compensation in real-time dynamic hybrid testing with large integration time-step

  • Zhu, Fei (State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Tsinghua University) ;
  • Wang, Jin-Ting (State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Tsinghua University) ;
  • Jin, Feng (State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Tsinghua University) ;
  • Gui, Yao (State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Tsinghua University) ;
  • Zhou, Meng-Xia (State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Tsinghua University)
  • Received : 2014.04.10
  • Accepted : 2014.08.20
  • Published : 2014.12.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

With the sub-stepping technique, the numerical analysis in real-time dynamic hybrid testing is split into the response analysis and signal generation tasks. Two target computers that operate in real-time may be assigned to implement these two tasks, respectively, for fully extending the simulation scale of the numerical substructure. In this case, the integration time-step of solving the dynamic response of the numerical substructure can be dozens of times bigger than the sampling time-step of the controller. The time delay between the real and desired feedback forces becomes more striking, which challenges the well-developed delay compensation methods in real-time dynamic hybrid testing. This paper focuses on displacement prediction and force correction for delay compensation in the real-time dynamic hybrid testing with a large integration time-step. A new displacement prediction scheme is proposed based on recently-developed explicit integration algorithms and compared with several commonly-used prediction procedures. The evaluation of its prediction accuracy is carried out theoretically, numerically and experimentally. Results indicate that the accuracy and effectiveness of the proposed prediction method are of significance.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : National Natural Science Foundation of China

References

  1. Ahmadizadeh, M., Mosqueda, G. and Reinhorn, A.M. (2008), "Compensation of actuator delay and dynamics for real-time hybrid structural simulation", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 37(1), 21-42. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.743
  2. Bonnet, P.A. (2006), The development of multi-axis real-time substructure testing, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Oxford, Oxford.
  3. Bonnet, P.A., Lim, C.N., Williams, M.S., Blakeborough, A., Neild, S.A., Stoten, D.P. and Taylor, C.A. (2007), "Real-time hybrid experiments with Newmark integration, MCSmd outer-loop control and multi-tasking strategies", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 36 (1), 119-141. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.628
  4. Bonnet, P.A., Williams, M.S. and Blakeborough, A. (2008), "Evaluation of numerical time-integration schemes for real-time hybrid testing", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 37(13), 1467-1490. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.821
  5. Chen, C. and Ricles, J.M. (2008), "Development of direct integration algorithms for structural dynamics using discrete control theory", J. Eng. Mech.- ASCE., 134 (8), 676-683. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2008)134:8(676)
  6. Chen, C. and Ricles, J.M. (2012), "Large-scale real-time hybrid simulation involving multiple experimental substructures and adaptive actuator delay compensation", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 41 (3), 549-569. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1144
  7. Chen, C., Ricles, J.M., Marullo, T.M. and Mercan, O. (2009), "Real-time hybrid testing using the unconditionally stable explicit CR integration algorithm", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 38 (1), 23-44. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.838
  8. Gui, Y., Wang, J.T., Jin, F., Chen, C. and Zhou, M.X. (2014), "Development of a family of explicit algorithms for structural dynamics with unconditional stability", Nonlinear Dyn., 77(4), 1157-1170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-014-1368-3
  9. Horiuchi, T., Inoue, M., Konno, T. and Namita, Y. (1999), "Real-time hybrid experimental system with actuator delay compensation and its application to a piping system with energy absorber", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 28 (10), 1121-1141. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199910)28:10<1121::AID-EQE858>3.0.CO;2-O
  10. Horiuchi, T., and Konno, T. (2001), "A new method for compensating actuator delay in real-time hybrid experiments", Philos. T. R. Soc. London. A, 359(1786), 1893-1909. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2001.0878
  11. Jung, R.Y., Benson Shing, P., Stauffer, E. and Thoen, B. (2007), "Performance of a real-time pseudodynamic test system considering nonlinear structural response", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 36 (12), 1785-1809. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.722
  12. MATLAB. (2006), The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, Mass.
  13. Nakashima, M. and Masaoka, N. (1999), "Real-time on-line test for MDOF systems", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 28 (4), 393-420. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199904)28:4<393::AID-EQE823>3.0.CO;2-C
  14. Reinhorn, A.M., Sivaselvan, M.V., Liang, Z. and Shao, X.Y. (2004), "Real-time dynamic hybrid testing of structural systems", Proceedings of 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada, Paper No. 1644.
  15. Reinhorn, A.M., Shao X.Y., Sivaselvan, M.V., Pitman, M. and Weinreber, S. (2006), "Real time dynamic hybrid testing using shake tables and force-based substructuring", Proceedings of the ASCE 2006 Structures Congress, St. Louis, Missouri, USA, May.
  16. Schellenberg, A., Mahin, S.A. and Fenves, G.L. (2009), Advanced implemention of hybrid simulation, PEER Report 2009/104.
  17. Shao, X., Reinhorn, A.M. and Sivaselvan, M.V. (2011), "Real-time hybrid Simulation using shake tables and dynamic actuators", J. Struct. Eng. - ASCE, 137(7), 748-760. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000314
  18. Shing, P., Wei, Z., Jung, R.Y. and Stauffer, E. (2004), "NEES FAST HYBRID TEST SYSTEM AT THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO", Proceeding of 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada, August.
  19. Wallace, M.I., Wagg, D.J. and Neild, S.A. (2005), "An adaptive polynomial based forward prediction algorithm for multi-actuator real-time dynamic substructuring", Proc. R. Soc. A, 461 (2064), 3807-3826. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2005.1532
  20. Wu, B., Wang, Z. and Bursi O.S. (2013), "Actuator dynamics compensation based on upper bound delay for real-time hybrid simulation", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 42(12), 1749-1795. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2296
  21. Wang, Q., Wang, J.T., Jin, F., Chi, F.D. and Zhang, C.H. (2011), "Real-time dynamic hybrid testing for soil-structure interaction analysis", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 31(12), 1690-1702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.07.004
  22. Zhu, F., Wang, J.T., Jin, F., Zhou, M.X. and Gui, Y. (2014), "Simulation of large-scale numerical substructure in real-time dynamic hybrid testing", Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 13(4), 599-609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-014-0266-5

Cited by

  1. Stability analysis of MDOF real-time dynamic hybrid testing systems using the discrete-time root locus technique vol.44, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2467
  2. Real-time hybrid simulation of full-scale tuned liquid column dampers to control multi-order modal responses of structures vol.138, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.02.004
  3. Improvement of Real-Time Hybrid Simulation Using Parallel Finite-Element Program pp.1559-808X, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2018.1469442
  4. Advances in Real-Time Hybrid Testing Technology for Shaking Table Substructure Testing vol.6, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2020.00123
  5. Stability Prediction for Real-Time Hybrid Simulation with Different Physical and Numerical Substructure Discretization Using Asynchronous Multirate Simulation vol.147, pp.11, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)em.1943-7889.0001992