DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analyzing the Domestic Collaborative Research Network in Industrial Engineering

국내 산업공학 공동연구 네트워크 분석

  • Jeong, Bokwon (The Graduate School of Public Policy and Information Technology, Seoul National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Lee, Hakyeon (Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Seoul National University of Science and Technology)
  • 정보권 (서울과학기술대학교 IT정책전문대학원) ;
  • 이학연 (서울과학기술대학교 글로벌융합산업공학과)
  • Received : 2014.08.13
  • Accepted : 2014.10.24
  • Published : 2014.12.15

Abstract

This paper aims to construct and analyze the domestic collaborative research network in industrial engineering. Using co-authorship information contained in the papers published in the two journals of the Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers, the collaborate research network at the institutional level is constructed. The core institutions in the network are identified by means of the centrality indexes of social network analysis. In addition, the five types of roles of the institutions in industry-university-institute cooperation are examined through brokerage analysis: coordinator, consultant, gatekeeper, representative, and liaisons. The findings are expected to be fruitfully utilized in formulation of R&D strategy of relevant organizations and technology policy making for promoting collaborative research in industrial engineering.

Keywords

References

  1. Acedo, F. J., Barroso, C., Casanueva, C., and Gala'n, J. L. (2006), Co-authorship in management and organizational studies : an empirical and network analysis, Journal of Management Studies, 43(5), 957. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00625.x
  2. Baraba'si, A.-L., Jeong, H., Ne'da, Z., Ravasz, E., Schubert, A., and Vicsek, T. (2002), Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations, Physica A : Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 311(3/4), 590-614. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4371(02)00736-7
  3. Bonacich, P. (1972), Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification, Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2, 113-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.1972.9989806
  4. Borner, K., Chen, C., and Boyack, K. W. (2003), Visualizing knowledge domains, Annual review of information science and technology, 37, 179-255.
  5. Calvert, J. and Patel, P. (2003), University-Industry Research Collaborations in the UK : bibliometric trends, Science and Public Policy, 30(2), 85-96. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154303781780597
  6. Chen, C. (1999), Visualising semantic spaces and author co-citation networks in digital libraries, Information processing and management, 35(3), 401-420. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4573(98)00068-5
  7. Cho, G.-H., Lim, S.-Y., and Hur, S. (2014), An Analysis of the Research Methodologies and Techniques in the Industrial Engineering Using Text Mining, Journal of the Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers, 40(1), 52-59. https://doi.org/10.7232/JKIIE.2014.40.1.052
  8. Cho, H., Lee, J. S., Stefanone, M., and Gay, G. (2005), Development of computer-supported collaborative social networks in a distributed learning community, Behaviour and Information Technology, 24(2), 435-447. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290500044049
  9. Cho, S.-G. and Kim, S.-B. (2012), Finding Meaningful Pattern of Key Words in IIE Transactions Using Text Mining, Journal of the Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers, 38(1), 67-73. https://doi.org/10.7232/JKIIE.2012.38.1.067
  10. Choi, J.-H., Park, S.-H., and Kang J.-O. (2010), The Characteristics of a Research Network for Radiation Oncology in Korea, The Journal of the Korean society for therapeutic radiology and oncology, 28(3), 184-191. https://doi.org/10.3857/jkstro.2010.28.3.184
  11. Freeman, L. C. (1979), Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification, Social Networks, 1(3), 215-239.
  12. Gould, R. V. and Fernandez, R. M. (1989), Structures of mediation: A formal approach to brokerage in transaction networks, Sociological methodology, 89-126.
  13. Hahn, H., Kwon, O-J., Kang, H.-J., S, W., and Noh, K.-R. (2013), A Study on the Structure of Scientific Collaboration Networks in The Journal of The Korea Institute of Electronic Communication Sciences, The Journal of the Korean institute of electronic communication sciences, 8(5), 671-678. https://doi.org/10.13067/JKIECS.2013.8.5.671
  14. Hu, C. and Racherla, P. (2008), Visual representation of knowledge networks : A social network analysis of hospitality research domain, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 27(2), 302-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2007.01.002
  15. Jung, S.-H. (2012), Problems of and Alternatives to the Government-Led and Region-Based Industry-University-Research Institute Collaboration, Journal of The Association of Korean Photo-Geographers, 22(4), 65-74.
  16. Kang, H.-M., Kim, J.-S., Lee, Y.-S., and Noh, T.-C. (2010), A Study on the Social Network of the Technological Education in Korea-Focused on the journal of KTEA, Journal of Korean Institute of Industrial Educators, 35(1), 106-133.
  17. Katz J. S. and Martin B. R. (1997), What is research collaboration?, Research Policy, 26(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00917-1
  18. Kim, D.-S. and Kwahk, K.-Y. (2013), Investigating the Global Financial Markets from a Social Network Analysis Perspective, Journal of The Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society, 38(4), 11-34. https://doi.org/10.7737/JKORMS.2013.38.4.011
  19. Kim, G.-S. (2011), Structure of Collaborative Network and Research Productivity among Korean Sports Sociologist : Based on Korean Journal of Sociology of Sport, Journal of Korean Society for the Sociology of Sport, 24(3), 67-91. https://doi.org/10.22173/jksss.2011.24.3.67
  20. Kim, H.-N. and Cho, H.-G. (2005), Accomplishment and Success Story of Consortium Project for Small and Medium Business, Korea Electrotechnology Research Institute, 140-144.
  21. Lee, J.-M. and Choi, M.-S. (2010), Social Network Analysis on Interdisciplinary Collaboration of Convergence Technologies Specialists, Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 10(6), 415-428. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2010.10.6.415
  22. Lee, S.-S. (2010), A Preliminary Study on the Co-author Network Analysis of Korean Library and Information Science Research Community, Journal of Korean Library And Information Science Society, 41(2), 297-315. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.41.2.201006.297
  23. Lim, H.-S. and Chang, T.-W. (2012), A Study on Co-authorship Network in the Journals of a Branch of Logistics, IE interface, 25(4), 458-471. https://doi.org/10.7232/IEIF.2012.25.4.458
  24. Marsden, P. V. (1982), Brokerage Behavior in Restricted Exchange Networks, 201-18, edited by Peter V. Marsden and Nan Lin, Beverly Hills, Sage.
  25. Morlacchi, P., Wilkinson, I. F., and Young, L. (2004), Social networks of researchers in business to business marketing, A case study of the IMP Group, 1984-1999, Retrieved Dec 3 2005 from http://www.sussex.ac.uk/spru/documents/sewp116.pdf.
  26. Moody, J. (2004), The Structure of a Social Science Collaboration Network : Disciplinary Cohesion from 1963 to 1999, American Sociological Review, 69, 213-238. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240406900204
  27. Namn, S.-H. and Seol, S.-S. (2007), Coauthorship Analysis of Innovation Studies in Korea : A Social Network Perspective, Journal of Korea technology innovation society, 10(4), 605-628.
  28. Newman, M. E. J. (2001), Scientic collaboration networks II Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality, Physical Review, E64, 016132.
  29. Newman, M. E. J. (2001), The structure of scientific collaboration networks, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(2), 404-409.
  30. Otte, E. and Rousseau, R. (2002), Social network analysis: a powerful strategy, also for the information sciences, Journal of Information Science, 28, 441-453. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555150202800601
  31. Park, C.-S. (2012), A Study on the Network Structure of the Public Administration Academic Community Using the Coauthor Network from 1998 to 2009, Journal of Korean society and public administration, 22(4), 129-153.
  32. Racherla, P. and Hu, C. (2010), A Social Network Perspective of Tourism Research Collaborations, Annals of Tourism Research, 37(4), 1012-1034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2010.03.008
  33. van Raan, A. F. J. (2008), Scaling rules in the science system : Influence of field-specific citation characteristics on the impact of research groups, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59, 565-576. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20765
  34. White, H. D. and McCain, K. W. (1997), Visualization of Literatures, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 32, 99-168.
  35. Xiaoming, L., Johan, B., Michael, L. N., and Herbert, V. S. (2005), Coauthorship networks in the digital library research community, Information Processing and Management, 41(6), 1462-1480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2005.03.012
  36. Yan, E. and Ding, Y. (2009), Applying Centrality Measures to Impact Analysis : A Coauthorship Network Analysis, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(10), 2107-2118. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21128
  37. Yoo, K.-O., Kim, H.-M., and Kim, J.-W. (2013), Evolution and Development Process of Customer Value Research Using Network Analysis In Marketing : Focusing on SSCI Rank 20 Journals Using Author Co-Citation Analysis, Journal of The Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society, 38(2), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.7737/JKORMS.2013.38.2.001