DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Ultimate strength behavior of steel-concrete-steel sandwich beams with ultra-lightweight cement composite, Part 1: Experimental and analytical study

  • Yan, Jia-Bao (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, National University of Singapore) ;
  • Liew, J.Y. Richard (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, National University of Singapore) ;
  • Zhang, Min-Hong (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, National University of Singapore) ;
  • Wang, Junyan (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, National University of Singapore)
  • Received : 2013.12.13
  • Accepted : 2014.04.20
  • Published : 2014.12.25

Abstract

Ultra-lightweight cement composite (ULCC) with a compressive strength of 60 MPa and density of $1450kg/m^3$ has been developed and used in the steel-concrete-steel (SCS) sandwich structures. ULCC was adopted as the core material in the SCS sandwich composite beams to reduce the overall structural weight. Headed shear studs working in pairs with overlapped lengths were used to achieve composite action between the core material and steel face plates. Nine quasi-static tests on this type of SCS sandwich composite beams were carried out to evaluate their ultimate strength performances. Different parameters influencing the ultimate strength of the SCS sandwich composite beams were studied and discussed. Design equations were developed to predict the ultimate resistance of the cross section due to pure bending, pure shear and combined action between shear and moment. Effective stiffness of the sandwich composite beam section is also derived to predict the elastic deflection under service load. Finally, the design equations were validated by the test results.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Grant : Curved steel-concrete-steel sandwich composite for Arctic region

Supported by : National University of Singapore

References

  1. Aboobucker, M.A.M., Wang, T.Y. and Liew, J.Y.R. (2009), "An experimental investigation on shear bond strength between steel and fresh cast concrete using epoxy", The IES J. Part A: Civil Struct. Eng., 2(2), 107-115. https://doi.org/10.1080/19373260902726768
  2. American Concrete Institute 318 (ACI) (2008), Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-08) and Commentary (ACI 318R-08), Farmington Hills, MI, USA.
  3. ACI 349 (1990), Code Requirements for Nuclear Safety Related Concrete Structures (ACI 349-90) and Commentary (349R-90), American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, USA.
  4. ASTM A 370-05 (2005), Standard Test Methods and Definitions for Mechanical Testing of Steel Products, ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.
  5. Chung, K.F. and Lawson, R.M. (2001), "Simplified design of composite beams with large web openings to Eurocode 4", J. Constr. Steel Res., 57(2), 135-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(00)00011-0
  6. Dai, X.X. and Liew, J.Y.R. (2010), "Fatigue performance of lightweight steel-concrete-steel sandwich systems", J. Constr. Steel Res., 66(2), 256-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2009.07.009
  7. Eurocode 2 (2004), Design of Concrete Structures - Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings, BS EN 1992-1-1, Brussels, Belgium.
  8. Eurocode 3 (2005), Design of Steel Structures - Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings, BS EN 1993-1-1, Brussels, Belgium.
  9. Eurocode 4 (2004), Design of Composite Steel and Concrete Structures - Part 1.1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings, BS EN 1994-1-1, Brussels, Belgium.
  10. Kim, S.H., Choi, K.T., Park, S.J., Park, S.M. and Jung, C.Y. (2013), "Experimental shear resistance evaluation of Y-type perfobond rib shear connector", J. Constr. Steel Res., 82, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.12.001
  11. Kumar, G. (2000), "Double skin composite construction", Master Thesis, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
  12. Lam, D. (2007), "Capacities of headed stud shear connectors in composite steel beams with precast hollowcore slabs", J. Constr. Steel Res., 63(9), 1160-1174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2006.11.012
  13. Leekitwattana, M., Boyd, S.W. and Shenoi, R.A. (2011), "Evaluation of the transverse shear stiffness of a steel bi-directional corrugated-strip-core sandwich beam", J. Constr. Steel Res., 67(2), 248-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2010.07.010
  14. Liew, J.Y.R. and Sohel, K.M.A. (2009), "Lightweight steel-concrete-steel sandwich system with J-hook connectors", Eng. Struct., 31(5), 1166-1178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.01.013
  15. McKinley, B. and Boswell, L.F. (2002), "Behaviour of double skin composite construction", J. Constr. Steel Res., 58(10), 1347-1359. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(02)00015-9
  16. Mirza, O. and Uy, B. (2010), "Effects of the combination of axial and shear loading on the behaviour of headed stud steel anchors", Eng. Struct., 32(1), 93-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.08.019
  17. Narayanan, R., Roberts, T.M. and Naji, F.J. (1994), Design Guide for Steel-Concrete-Steel Sandwich Construction, Volume 1: General Principles and Rules for Basic Elements, SCI Publication P131, The Steel Construction Institute, Ascot, Berkshire, UK.
  18. Narayanan, R., Wright, H.D., Evans, H.R. and Francis, R.W. (1998), "Load tests on double skin composite girders", Proceedings of International Conference on Composite Construction, Henneker, NH, USA.
  19. Oduyemi, T.O.S. and Wright, H.D. (1989), "An experimental investigation into the behaviour of double skin sandwich beams", J. Constr. Steel Res., 19(2), 97-110.
  20. Oehlers, D.J. and Bradford, M.A. (1999), Elementary Behaviour of Composite Steel and Concrete Structural Members, Butterworth-Heinemann Publishing Inc., Oxford, Boston, MA, USA.
  21. Roberts, T.M., Edwards, D.N. and Narayanan, R. (1996), "Testing and analysis of steel-concrete-steel sandwich beams", J. Constr. Steel Res., 38(3), 257-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0143-974X(96)00022-3
  22. Shanmugam, N.E. and Lakshmi, B. (2001), "State of the art report on steel-concrete composite columns" J. Constr. Steel Res., 57(10), 1041-1080. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(01)00021-9
  23. Shanmugam, N.E., Kumar, G. and Thevendran, V. (2002), "Finite element modeling of double skin composite slabs", Finite Elem. Anal. Design, 38(7), 579-599. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-874X(01)00093-2
  24. Shim, C.S., Lee, P.G. and Yoon, T.Y. (2004), "Static behavior of large stud shear connectors", Eng. Struct., 26(12), 1853-1860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.07.011
  25. Sohel, K.M.A. (2008), "Impact behaviour of Steel-Composite sandwich beams", PhD. Thesis, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
  26. Sohel, K.M.A. and Liew, J.Y.R. (2011), "Steel-concrete-steel sandwich slabs with lightweight core-static performance", Eng. Struct., 33(3), 981-992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.12.019
  27. Sohel, K.M.A., Liew, J.Y.R., Yan, J.B., Zhang, M.H. and Chia, K.S. (2012), "Behavior of steel-concretesteel sandwich structures with lightweight cement composite and novel shear connectors", Compos. Struct., 94(12), 3500-3509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.05.023
  28. Wang, J.Y., Zhang, M.H., Li, W., Chia, K.S. and Liew, J.Y.R. (2012), "Stability of cenospheres in lightweight cement composites in terms of alkali-silica reaction", Cement Concrete Res., 42(5), 721-727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2012.02.010
  29. Wang, J.Y., Chia, K.S., Liew, J.Y.R. and Zhang, M.H. (2013), "Flexural performance of fiber-reinforced ultra lightweight cement composites with low fiber content", Cement Concrete Compos., 43(0), 39-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.06.006
  30. Wright, H.D., Oduyemi, T.O.S. and Evans, H.R. (1991), "The design of double skin composite elements", J. Constr. Steel Res., 19(2), 111-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/0143-974X(91)90037-2
  31. Xie, M., Foundoukos, N. and Chapman, J.C. (2007), "Static tests on steel-concrete-steel sandwich beams", J. Constr. Steel Res., 63(6), 735-750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2006.08.001
  32. Yan, J.B., Liew, J.Y.R., Sohel, K.M.A. and Zhang, M.H. (2014a), "Push-out tests on J-hook connectors in steel-concrete-steel sandwich structure", Mater. Struct., 47(10), 1693-1714. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-013-0145-y
  33. Yan, J.B., Liew, J.Y.R. and Zhang, M.H. (2014b), "Tensile resistance of J-hook connectors used in Steel-Concrete-Steel sandwich structure", J. Constr. Steel Res., 100, 146-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.04.023

Cited by

  1. Punching shear resistance of steel–concrete–steel sandwich composite shell structure vol.117, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.03.029
  2. Steel-concrete-steel sandwich composite structures-recent innovations vol.130, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.12.007
  3. Reinforced ultra-lightweight cement composite flat slabs: Experiments and analysis vol.95, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.097
  4. Punching shear behavior of steel–concrete–steel sandwich composite plate under patch loads vol.121, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.01.016
  5. Applications of ultra-lightweight cement composite in flat slabs and double skin composite structures vol.111, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.122
  6. Ultimate strength behavior of steel-concrete-steel sandwich beams with ultra-lightweight cement composite, Part 2: Finite element analysis vol.18, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2015.18.4.1001
  7. Numerical and parametric study of curved steel-concrete-steel sandwich composite beams under concentrated loading vol.49, pp.10, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-015-0768-2
  8. Ultimate strength behaviour of steel–concrete–steel sandwich plate under concentrated loads vol.118, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.03.062
  9. Design and behavior of steel–concrete–steel sandwich plates subject to concentrated loads vol.150, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.05.004
  10. Ultimate strength behavior of curved steel–concrete–steel sandwich composite beams vol.115, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.08.043
  11. Damage plasticity based numerical analysis on steel–concrete–steel sandwich shells used in the Arctic offshore structure vol.117, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.03.028
  12. Shear strength of steel–concrete–steel sandwich deep beams: A simplified approach pp.2048-4011, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433218777522
  13. Push-out test on the one end welded corrugated-strip connectors in steel-concrete-steel sandwich structure vol.24, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2017.24.1.023
  14. Free vibrations of precast modular steel-concrete composite railway track slabs vol.24, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2017.24.1.113
  15. Shear and tensile behaviors of headed stud connectors in double skin composite shear wall vol.26, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2018.26.6.759
  16. Finite element model for interlayer behavior of double skin steel-concrete-steel sandwich structure with corrugated-strip shear connectors vol.27, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2018.27.1.123
  17. Developments of double skin composite walls using novel enhanced C-channel connectors vol.33, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2019.33.6.877
  18. Investigation of the Behaviour of Steel-Concrete-Steel Sandwich Slabs with Bi-Directional Corrugated-Strip Connectors vol.10, pp.23, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/app10238647
  19. Ultimate strength behavior of steel plate-concrete composite slabs: An experimental and theoretical study vol.37, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2020.37.6.741
  20. Behaviors of novel sandwich composite beams with normal weight concrete vol.38, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2021.38.5.599
  21. Modification of Lightweight Aggregate Concretes with Silica Nanoparticles-A Review vol.14, pp.15, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14154242
  22. A bio-mimetic cellular structure for mitigating the effects of impulsive loadings - A numerical study vol.23, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1177/1099636220908581
  23. Flexural behaviours of one-way steel-concrete-steel sandwich panels with novel hybrid connectors: Tests and analysis vol.188, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2021.107013