DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Transvenous Pacemaker Lead Removal in Pacemaker Lead Endocarditis with Large Vegetations: A Report of Two Cases

  • Cho, Hyunsoo (Division of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Mihyun (Division of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Uhm, Jae-Sun (Division of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Pak, Hui-Nam (Division of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Moon-Hyoung (Division of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Joung, Boyoung (Division of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2013.07.11
  • Accepted : 2013.10.05
  • Published : 2014.02.28

Abstract

Pacemaker lead endocarditis is treated with total removal of the infected device and proper antibiotics. The outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous lead extraction for large vegetations (>2 cm) have not yet been shown. In this case report, we present two patients with pacemaker lead endocarditis with large vegetations of maximum diameter 2.4 cm and 3.2 cm. The first patient had multiple vegetations attached to the tricuspid and mitral valves and developed septic emboli to the brain, lung, and liver. The second patient had a large, persistent vegetation on the tricuspid valve, even two weeks after complete removal of the leads. Both patients were successfully treated with transvenous pacemaker lead removal and antibiotics.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : National Research Foundation of Korea, Ministry of Health & Welfare

References

  1. Chua JD, Wilkoff BL, Lee I, Juratli N, Longworth DL, Gordon SM. Diagnosis and management of infections involving implantable electrophysiologic cardiac devices. Ann Intern Med 2000;133:604-8. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-133-8-200010170-00011
  2. Mond HG, Proclemer A. The 11th world survey of cardiac pacing and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: calendar year 2009--a World Society of Arrhythmia's project. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2011;34:1013-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03150.x
  3. Klug D, Balde M, Pavin D, et al. Risk factors related to infections of implanted pacemakers and cardioverter-defibrillators: results of a large prospective study. Circulation 2007;116:1349-55. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.678664
  4. Ruttmann E, Hangler HB, Kilo J, et al. Transvenous pacemaker lead removal is safe and effective even in large vegetations: an analysis of 53 cases of pacemaker lead endocarditis. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2006;29:231-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2006.00328.x
  5. Sohail MR, Uslan DZ, Khan AH, et al. Management and outcome of permanent pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator infections. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1851-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2007.01.072
  6. Camus C, Leport C, Raffi F, et al. Sustained bacteremia in 26 patients with a permanent endocardial pacemaker: assessment of wire removal. Clin Infect Dis 1993;17:46-55. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinids/17.1.46
  7. Meier-Ewert HK, Gray ME, John RM. Endocardial pacemaker or defibrillator leads with infected vegetations: a single-center experience and consequences of transvenous extraction. Am Heart J 2003;146:339-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8703(03)00188-1
  8. Klug D, Lacroix D, Savoye C, et al. Systemic infection related to endocarditis on pacemaker leads: clinical presentation and management. Circulation 1997;95:2098-107. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.95.8.2098

Cited by

  1. Transvenous Lead Extraction vol.18, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.18501/arrhythmia.2017.029
  2. A Rare Entity–Percutaneous Lead Extraction in a Very Late Onset Pacemaker Endocarditis: Case Report and Review of Literature vol.11, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11010096