DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Randomized Comparison of the Platelet Inhibitory Efficacy between Low Dose Prasugrel and Standard Dose Clopidogrel in Patients Who Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

  • Jin, Han-Young (Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan Paik Hospital) ;
  • Yang, Tae-Hyun (Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan Paik Hospital) ;
  • Choi, Kyu-Nam (Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan Paik Hospital) ;
  • Seo, Jeong-Sook (Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan Paik Hospital) ;
  • Jang, Jae-Sik (Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan Paik Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Dae-Kyeong (Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan Paik Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Dong-Soo (Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan Paik Hospital)
  • Received : 2013.11.01
  • Accepted : 2014.01.16
  • Published : 2014.02.28

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Increased bleeding rates with standard dose prasugrel have led to increased questions about the effectiveness and safety of the lower maintenance dose. We compared platelet inhibitory efficacy between low dose prasugrel and standard dose clopidogrel in patients on maintenance dose dual antiplatelet therapy. Subjects and Methods: Forty-three patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention were randomized to receive 75 mg clopidogrel (n=23) or 5 mg prasugrel (n=20). Another 20 patients were allocated to 10 mg prasugrel as a reference comparison group. All patients (weight, ${\geq}60kg$; age, <75 years) had been receiving 100 mg aspirin and 75 mg clopidogrel daily. The platelet function test was performed at baseline and 30 days after randomization. The primary endpoint was $P2Y_{12}$ reaction unit (PRU) at 30 days between 5 mg prasugrel and 75 mg clopidogrel. Results: No differences in baseline PRU values were observed among the three groups. The prasugrel (5 mg) group had a significantly lower PRU value compared with that of 75 mg clopidogrel ($174.6{\pm}60.2$ vs. $223.4{\pm}72.9$, p=0.022) group at 30 days, whereas the 10 mg prasugrel group showed a lower PRU value ($71.9{\pm}34.4$) compared with that of the 5 mg prasugrel (p<0.001). The rate of high on-treatment platelet reactivity (PRU >235) was significant lower in the 5 mg prasugrel group than that in the 75 mg clopidogrel group (15.0% vs. 56.5%, p=0.010). Conclusion: Prasugrel (5 mg) is more potent antiplatelet therapy than 75 mg clopidogrel in non-low body weight and non-elderly patients on a maintenance dose dual antiplatelet therapy.

Keywords

References

  1. Hamm CW, Bassand JP, Agewall S, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2011;32:2999-3054. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehr236
  2. Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Circulation 2011;124:2574-609. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0b013e31823a5596
  3. Serebruany VL, Steinhubl SR, Berger PB, Malinin AI, Bhatt DL, Topol EJ. Variability in platelet responsiveness to clopidogrel among 544 individuals. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:246-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2004.09.067
  4. Mega JL, Close SL, Wiviott SD, et al. Cytochrome p-450 polymorphisms and response to clopidogrel. N Engl J Med 2009;360:354-62. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0809171
  5. Buonamici P, Marcucci R, Migliorini A, et al. Impact of platelet reactivity after clopidogrel administration on drug-eluting stent thrombosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:2312-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2007.01.094
  6. Cuisset T, Frere C, Quilici J, et al. Predictive values of post-treatment adenosine diphosphate-induced aggregation and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein index for stent thrombosis after acute coronary syndrome in clopidogrel-treated patients. Am J Cardiol 2009;104:1078-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.06.007
  7. Jin HY, Yang TH, Kim DI, et al. High post-clopidogrel platelet reactivity assessed by a point-of-care assay predicts long-term clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who underwent primary coronary stenting. Int J Cardiol 2013;167:1877-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.04.154
  8. Parodi G, Marcucci R, Valenti R, et al. High residual platelet reactivity after clopidogrel loading and long-term cardiovascular events among patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing PCI. JAMA 2011;306:1215-23. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.1332
  9. Brandt JT, Payne CD, Wiviott SD, et al. A comparison of prasugrel and clopidogrel loading doses on platelet function: magnitude of platelet inhibition is related to active metabolite formation. Am Heart J 2007;153:66.e9-16.
  10. Jernberg T, Payne CD, Winters KJ, et al. Prasugrel achieves greater inhibition of platelet aggregation and a lower rate of non-responders compared with clopidogrel in aspirin-treated patients with stable coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 2006;27:1166-73.
  11. Wiviott SD, Trenk D, Frelinger AL, et al. Prasugrel compared with high loading- and maintenance-dose clopidogrel in patients with planned percutaneous coronary intervention: the Prasugrel in Comparison to Clopidogrel for Inhibition of Platelet Activation and Aggregation-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 44 trial. Circulation 2007;116:2923-32. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.740324
  12. Michelson AD, Frelinger AL 3rd, Braunwald E, et al. Pharmacodynamic assessment of platelet inhibition by prasugrel vs. clopidogrel in the TRITON-TIMI 38 trial. Eur Heart J 2009;30:1753-63. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehp159
  13. Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2007;357:2001-15. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0706482
  14. Erlinge D, Ten Berg J, Foley D, et al. Reduction in platelet reactivity with prasugrel 5 mg in low-body-weight patients is noninferior to prasugrel 10 mg in higher-body-weight patients: results from the FEATHER trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:2032-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.08.964
  15. Erlinge D, Gurbel PA, James S, et al. Prasugrel 5 mg in the very elderly attenuates platelet inhibition but maintains noninferiority to prasugrel 10 mg in nonelderly patients: the GENERATIONS trial, a pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic study in stable coronary artery disease patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;62:577-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.023
  16. Varenhorst C, James S, Erlinge D, et al. Assessment of P2Y(12) inhibition with the point-of-care device VerifyNow P2Y12 in patients treated with prasugrel or clopidogrel coadministered with aspirin. Am Heart J 2009;157:562.e1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2008.11.021
  17. Price MJ, Endemann S, Gollapudi RR, et al. Prognostic significance of post-clopidogrel platelet reactivity assessed by a point-of-care assay on thrombotic events after drug-eluting stent implantation. Eur Heart J 2008;29:992-1000. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehn046
  18. Bonello L, Tantry US, Marcucci R, et al. Consensus and future directions on the definition of high on-treatment platelet reactivity to adenosine diphosphate. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56:919-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.04.047
  19. Roe MT, Armstrong PW, Fox KA, et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel for acute coronary syndromes without revascularization. N Engl J Med 2012;367:1297-309. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1205512
  20. Stone GW, Witzenbichler B, Weisz G, et al. Platelet reactivity and clinical outcomes after coronary artery implantation of drug-eluting stents (ADAPT-DES): a prospective multicentre registry study. Lancet 2013;382:614-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61170-8
  21. Unger EF. Weighing benefits and risks--the FDA's review of prasugrel. N Engl J Med 2009;361:942-5. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp0907122
  22. Wiviott SD, Antman EM, Braunwald E. Prasugrel. Circulation 2010;122:394-403. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.921502
  23. Fifth Organization to Assess Strategies in Acute Ischemic Syndromes Investigators, Yusuf S, Mehta SR, et al. Comparison of fondaparinux and enoxaparin in acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2006;354:1464-76. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa055443
  24. Eikelboom JW, Mehta SR, Anand SS, Xie C, Fox KA, Yusuf S. Adverse impact of bleeding on prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Circulation 2006;114:774-82. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.612812
  25. Mehran R, Pocock SJ, Stone GW, et al. Associations of major bleeding and myocardial infarction with the incidence and timing of mortality in patients presenting with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a risk model from the ACUITY trial. Eur Heart J 2009;30:1457-66. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehp110
  26. Wiviott SD, Desai N, Murphy SA, et al. Efficacy and safety of intensive antiplatelet therapy with prasugrel from TRITON-TIMI 38 in a core clinical cohort defined by worldwide regulatory agencies. Am J Cardiol 2011;108:905-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.05.020
  27. Gurbel PA, Erlinge D, Ohman EM, et al. Platelet function during extended prasugrel and clopidogrel therapy for patients with ACS treated without revascularization: the TRILOGY ACS platelet function substudy. JAMA 2012;308:1785-94. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.17312
  28. Small DS, Farid NA, Payne CD, et al. Effect of intrinsic and extrinsic factors on the clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of prasugrel. Clin Pharmacokinet 2010;49:777-98. https://doi.org/10.2165/11537820-000000000-00000
  29. Li YG, Ni L, Brandt JT, et al. Inhibition of platelet aggregation with prasugrel and clopidogrel: an integrated analysis in 846 subjects. Platelets 2009;20:316-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537100903046317
  30. Breet NJ, van Werkum JW, Bouman HJ, et al. Comparison of platelet function tests in predicting clinical outcome in patients undergoing coronary stent implantation. JAMA 2010;303:754-62. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.181

Cited by

  1. Switching from prasugrel to clopidogrel based on Cytochrome P450 2C19 genotyping in East Asian patients stabilized after acute myocardial infarction vol.27, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3109/09537104.2015.1095875
  2. Platelet reactivity in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with prasugrel or ticagrelor in comparison to clopidogrel: a retrospective pharmacodynamic analysis vol.30, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1080/09537104.2018.1445836
  3. Efficacy and Safety of Aspirin Combined with Low-Dose P2Y12 Receptor Antagonists in East Asian Patients Undergoing PCI : A Meta-Analysis vol.62, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1536/ihj.20-772