The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Gene expression of MC3T3-E1 osteoblastic cells on titanium and zirconia surface

  • Gong, Soon-Hyun (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyung-Hee University) ;
  • Lee, Heesu (Department of Oral Anatomy, Dental School, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Pae, Ahran (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyung-Hee University) ;
  • Noh, Kwantae (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyung-Hee University) ;
  • Shin, Yong-Moon (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyung-Hee University) ;
  • Lee, Jung-Haeng (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyung-Hee University) ;
  • Woo, Yi-Hyung (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyung-Hee University)
  • Received : 2013.01.09
  • Accepted : 2013.07.15
  • Published : 2013.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. This study was performed to define attachment and growth behavior of osteoblast-like cells and evaluate the gene expression on zirconia compared to titanium. MATERIALS AND METHODS. MC3T3-E1 cells were cultured on (1) titanium and (2) zirconia discs. The tetrazolium-based colorimetric assay (MTT test) was used for examining the attachment of cells. Cellular morphology was examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity was measured to evaluate the cell differentiation rate. Mann-Whitney test was used to assess the significance level of the differences between the experimental groups. cDNA microarray was used for comparing the 20215 gene expressions on titanium and zirconia. RESULTS. From the MTT assay, there was no significant difference between titanium and zirconia (P>.05). From the SEM image, after 4 hours of culture, cells on both discs were triangular or elongated in shape with formation of filopodia. After 24 hours of culture, cells on both discs were more flattened and well spread compared to 4 hours of culture. From the ALP activity assay, the optical density of E1 cells on titanium was slightly higher than that of E1 cells on zirconia but there was no significant difference (P>.05). Most of the genes related to cell adhesion showed similar expression level between titanium and zirconia. CONCLUSION. Zirconia showed comparable biological responses of osteoblast-like cells to titanium for a short time during cell culture period. Most of the genes related to cell adhesion and signal showed similar expression level between titanium and zirconia.

Keywords

References

  1. Røynesdal AK, Ambjørnsen E, Støvne S, Haanaes HR. A comparative clinical study of three different endosseous implants in edentulous mandibles. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:500-5.
  2. Viornery C, Guenther HL, Aronsson BO, Péchy P, Descouts P, Gratzel M. Osteoblast culture on polished titanium disks modified with phosphonic acids. J Biomed Mater Res 2002; 62:149-55. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.10205
  3. Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, Brånemark PI, Jemt T. Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:347-59.
  4. van Steenberghe D. A retrospective multicenter evaluation of the survival rate of osseointegrated fixtures supporting fixed partial prostheses in the treatment of partial edentulism. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:217-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90378-8
  5. Schliephake H, Reiss G, Urban R, Neukam FW, Guckel S. Metal release from titanium fixtures during placement in the mandible: an experimental study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:502-11.
  6. Cortada M, Giner L, Costa S, Gil FJ, Rodríguez D, Planell JA. Galvanic corrosion behavior of titanium implants coupled to dental alloys. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2000;11:287-93. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008905229522
  7. Yamauchi R, Morita A, Tsuji T. Pacemaker dermatitis from titanium. Contact Dermatitis 2000;42:52-3.
  8. Henry PJ, Laney WR, Jemt T, Harris D, Krogh PH, Polizzi G, Zarb GA, Herrmann I. Osseointegrated implants for singletooth replacement: a prospective 5-year multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:450-5.
  9. Piconi C, Maccauro G. Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial. Biomaterials 1999;20:1-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00010-6
  10. Covacci V, Bruzzese N, Maccauro G, Andreassi C, Ricci GA, Piconi C, Marmo E, Burger W, Cittadini A. In vitro evaluation of the mutagenic and carcinogenic power of high purity zirconia ceramic. Biomaterials 1999;20:371-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00182-3
  11. Rimondini L, Cerroni L, Carrassi A, Torricelli P. Bacterial colonization of zirconia ceramic surfaces: an in vitro and in vivo study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:793-8.
  12. Scarano A, Piattelli M, Caputi S, Favero GA, Piattelli A. Bacterial adhesion on commercially pure titanium and zirconium oxide disks: an in vivo human study. J Periodontol 2004;75:292-6. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2004.75.2.292
  13. Puleo DA, Nanci A. Understanding and controlling the bone-implant interface. Biomaterials 1999;20:2311-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(99)00160-X
  14. Boyan BD, Hummert TW, Dean DD, Schwartz Z. Role of material surfaces in regulating bone and cartilage cell response. Biomaterials 1996;17:137-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(96)85758-9
  15. Chesmel KD, Clark CC, Brighton CT, Black J. Cellular responses to chemical and morphologic aspects of biomaterial surfaces. II. The biosynthetic and migratory response of bone cell populations. J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:1101-10. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820290910
  16. Puleo DA, Nanci A. Understanding and controlling the bone-implant interface. Biomaterials 1999;20:2311-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(99)00160-X
  17. Akagawa Y, Ichikawa Y, Nikai H, Tsuru H. Interface histology of unloaded and early loaded partially stabilized zirconia endosseous implant in initial bone healing. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:599-604. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90289-Z
  18. Albrektsson T, Hansson HA, Ivarsson B. Interface analysis of titanium and zirconium bone implants. Biomaterials 1985; 6:97-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(85)90070-5
  19. Ko HC, Han JS, Bächle M, Jang JH, Shin SW, Kim DJ. Initial osteoblast-like cell response to pure titanium and zirconia/ alumina ceramics. Dent Mater 2007;23:1349-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.11.023
  20. Grzesik WJ, Robey PG. Bone matrix RGD glycoproteins: immunolocalization and interaction with human primary osteoblastic bone cells in vitro. J Bone Miner Res 1994;9:487-96.
  21. Burridge K, Fath K. Focal contacts: transmembrane links between the extracellular matrix and the cytoskeleton. Bioessays 1989;10:104-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.950100403
  22. Burridge K, Turner CE, Romer LH. Tyrosine phosphorylation of paxillin and pp125FAK accompanies cell adhesion to extracellular matrix: a role in cytoskeletal assembly. J Cell Biol 1992;119:893-903. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.119.4.893
  23. Yamada KM, Geiger B. Molecular interactions in cell adhesion complexes. Curr Opin Cell Biol 1997;9:76-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-0674(97)80155-X
  24. Pistone M, Sanguineti C, Federici A, Sanguineti F, Defilippi P, Santolini F, Querzé G, Marchisio PC, Manduca P. Integrin synthesis and utilization in cultured human osteoblasts. Cell Biol Int 1996;20:471-9. https://doi.org/10.1006/cbir.1996.0062
  25. Colognato H, Yurchenco PD. Form and function: the laminin family of heterotrimers. Dev Dyn 2000;218:213-34. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0177(200006)218:2<213::AID-DVDY1>3.0.CO;2-R
  26. Jaakkola P, Jalkanen M. Transcriptional regulation of Syndecan-1 expression by growth factors. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol 1999;63:109-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6603(08)60721-7
  27. Wongdee K, Pandaranandaka J, Teerapornpuntakit J, Tudpor K, Thongbunchoo J, Thongon N, Jantarajit W, Krishnamra N, Charoenphandhu N. Osteoblasts express claudins and tight junction-associated proteins. Histochem Cell Biol 2008; 130:79-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00418-008-0419-6
  28. Willott E, Balda MS, Heintzelman M, Jameson B, Anderson JM. Localization and differential expression of two isoforms of the tight junction protein ZO-1. Am J Physiol 1992;262: C1119-24.
  29. Alonso A, Sasin J, Bottini N, Friedberg I, Friedberg I, Osterman A, Godzik A, Hunter T, Dixon J, Mustelin T. Protein tyrosine phosphatases in the human genome. Cell 2004;117:699-711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2004.05.018

Cited by

  1. Accelerated Osteogenic Differentiation and Bone Formation on Zirconia with Surface Grooves Created with Fiber Laser Irradiation vol.18, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12366
  2. Osteoblast integration of dental implant materials after challenge by sub-gingival pathogens: a co-culture study in vitro vol.7, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1038/ijos.2015.45
  3. Low-magnitude, high-frequency vibration promotes the adhesion and the osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells cultured on a hydroxyapatite-coated surface: The direct role of Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway activation vol.38, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2016.2757
  4. Behavior of MC3T3-E1 Osteoblastic Cells Cultured on Titanium and Zirconia Surfaces vol.26, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000543
  5. Cytotoxicity and biocompatibility of Zirconia (Y-TZP) posts with various dental cements vol.41, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2016.41.3.167
  6. Antibacterial Mesoporous Titania Films with Embedded Gentamicin and Surface Modified with Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 to Promote Osseointegration in Bone Implants pp.21967350, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.201801648
  7. Surface Modifications of Dental Ceramic Implants with Different Glass Solder Matrices: In Vitro Analyses with Human Primary Osteoblasts and Epithelial Cells vol.2014, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/742180
  8. Biological characterization of surface-treated dental implant materials in contact with mammalian host and bacterial cells: titanium versus zirconia vol.9, pp.55, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ra06010c
  9. Zirconia versus titanium in dentistry: A review vol.39, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2019-172
  10. Modification of Amorphous Mesoporous Zirconia Nanoparticles with Bisphosphonic Acids: A Straightforward Approach for Tailoring the Surface Properties of the Nanoparticles vol.27, pp.71, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.202103354