Computers and Concrete

  • 제12권5호
  • /
  • Pages.681-695
  • /
  • 2013
  • /
  • 1598-8198(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-818X(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Seismic assessment of R/C residential buildings with infill walls in Turkey

  • 투고 : 2012.05.19
  • 심사 : 2013.07.30
  • 발행 : 2013.11.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

In 1999 Marmara and 2011 Van earthquakes in Turkey, majority of the existing buildings either sustained severe damage or collapsed. These buildings include masonry infill walls in both the interior and exterior R/C frames. The material of the masonry infill is the main variant, ranging from natural stones to bricks and blocks. It is demanding to design these buildings for satisfactory structural behavior. In general, masonry infill walls are considered by its weights not by interaction between walls and frames. In this study, R/C buildings with infill walls are considered in terms of structural behavior. Therefore, 5 and 8-story R/C buildings are regarded as the representative models in the analyses. The R/C representative buildings, both with and without infill walls were analyzed to determine the effects of structural behavior change. The differences in earthquake behavior of these representative buildings were investigated to determine the effects of infill walls leading structural capacity. First, pushover curves of the representative buildings were sketched. Aftermath, time history analyses were carried out to define the displacement demands. Finally, fragility analyses were performed. Throughout the fragility analyses, probabilistic seismic assessment for R/C building structures both with and without infill walls were provided. In this study, besides the deterministic assessment methodology, a probabilistic approach was followed to define structural effect of infill walls under seismic loads.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Akkar, S., Sucuoglu, H. and Yakut, A. (2005), "Displacement-based fragility functions for low and mid-rise ordinary concrete buildings", Earthq. Spect., 21(4), 901-927. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2084232
  2. Arslan, M.H. and Korkmaz, H.H. (2007), "What is to be learned from damage and failure of reinforced concrete structures during recent earthquakes in Turkey", Eng. Fail. Anal., 14(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2006.01.003
  3. ATC-40 (1996), Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California.
  4. Ay, B.O, Erberik, M.A. and Akkar, S. (2006), Fragility based assesment of the structural deficiencies in Turkish RC frames structures, First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Geneva, Switzerland, N.593.
  5. Basoz, N. and Kiremidjian, A.S. (1997), Evaluation of Bridge Damage Data Form The Loma Prieta and Northridge, CA Earthquakes, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Report No. 127.
  6. Demir, F. and Sivri, M. (2002), "Earthquake response of masonry infilled frames", International Symposium on Structural and Earthquake Engineering, 151-158, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.
  7. Erberik, M.A. and Elnashai, A.S. (2004), "Ragility analysis of fat-sab structures" Eng. Struct., 26(7), 937-948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.02.012
  8. Erberik, M.A. (2008), "Fragility-based assessment of typical mid-rise and low-rise RC buildings in Turkey, Eng. Struct., 30(5), 1360-1374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.07.016
  9. Erberik, M.A. and Cullu, S. (2006), Assessment of Seismic Fragility Curves for Low- and Mid-Rise Reinforced Concrete Frame Buildings Using Duzce Field Database, (Eds. Wasti, S.T. and Ozcebe, G.), Advances in Earthquake Engineering for Urban Risk Reduction, Netherlands, 151-166.
  10. FEMA-356 (2000), Prestandart and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington.
  11. Hanoglu, K.B. (2002), "Fiber reinforced plastic overlay retrofit of hollow clay tile masonry infilled reinforced concrete frames", Ph.D. Dissertation, Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey.
  12. Kamanli, M. and Balik, F.S. (2010), "The behavior of roof gable walls under the effect of earthquake load", Natural Hazard d Earth Syst. Sci.10(2), 251-263. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-10-251-2010
  13. Karim, K.R. and Yamazaki, F. (2001), "Effect of earthquake ground motions on fragility curves of highway bridge piers based on numarical simulation", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 30(12), 1839-1856.
  14. Kircher, C.A., Nassar, A.A., Kustu, O. and Holmes, W.T. (1997), "Development of building damage functions for earthquake loss estimation", Earthq. Spect., 13(4), 663-681. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585974
  15. Kircil, M.S. and ve Polat, Z. (2006), "Fragility analysis of mid-rise RC frame buildings", Eng. Struct., 28(9), 1335-1345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.01.004
  16. Korkmaz, K.A. and Karahan, A.E. (2011), "Investigation of seismic behavior and infill wall effects of prefabricated iIndustrial buildings in Turkey", ASCE, J. Perform. Construct. Fac., 25(3), 158-171. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000148
  17. Lu, X., Huang, Z. and Zhou, Y. (2011), "Global seismic damage assessment of high-rise hybrid structures", Comput. Concr., 8(3), 311-325. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2011.8.3.311
  18. Irtem, E, Turker, K. and Hasgul, U. (2005), Effects of Infill Walls on Structural Behavior of R/C Buildings, ITU Eng. J., 4(4).
  19. Irtem, E., Turker, K. and Hasgul, U. (2007), "Causes of collapse and damage to low-rise RC buildings in recent Turkish earthquakes", ASCE, J. Perform. Construct. Fac., 21(5), 351-360. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2007)21:5(351)
  20. PEER (2012), earthquake data web page: http://peer.berkeley.edu
  21. Rossetto, T. and Elnashai, A. (2003), "Derivation of vulnerability functions for European-type RC structures based on observational data", Eng. Struct., 25(10), 1241-1263. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(03)00060-9
  22. shinozuka, M., Feng, M.Q., Lee, J. and Naganuma, T. (2000a), "Statistical analysis of fragility curves", J. Eng. Mech., 126(12), 1224-1231. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:12(1224)
  23. Shinozuka, M., Feng, M.Q., Kim, H.K. and Kim, S.H. (2000b), "Nonlinear static procedure for fragility curve development", J. Eng. Mech., 126(12), 1297-1295. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:12(1297)
  24. Singhal, A. and Kiremidjian, A.S. (1996), "Method for probabilistic evaluation of seismic structural damage", J. Struct. Eng., 122(12), 1459-1467. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:12(1459)
  25. Takeda, T., Sozen, M.A. and Nielsen, N.N. (1970), "Reinforced concrete response to simulated earthquakes", J. Struct. Div., 96(12), 2557-2573.
  26. TDC (1975), Turkish Design Code, Ministry of Public Works & Settlement Ankara Turkey.
  27. TDC (1998), Turkish Design Code, Ministry of Public Works & Settlement Ankara Turkey.
  28. TDC (2007), Turkish Design Code, Ministry of Public Works & Settlement Ankara Turkey.
  29. Wilson, E. and Habibullah, A. (1998), Sap 2000 Integrated Finite Element Analysis and Design of Structures Basic Analysis Refence Manual, Computers and Structures., Berkeley.
  30. Yakut, A. (2004), "Preliminary seismic performance assessment procedure for existing RC buildings", Eng. Struct., 26(10), 1447-1461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.05.011
  31. Yamazaki, F., Motomura, H. and Hamada, T. (2000), "Damage assesment of expressway networks in Japan based on seismic monitoring", Proceeding of the12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No:551.

피인용 문헌

  1. Effect of Hysteretic Models on Seismic Behavior of Existing RC Structures vol.29, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000653
  2. Seismic performance of RC buildings subjected to past earthquakes in Turkey vol.11, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.11.3.483
  3. Determination of lateral strength and ductility characteristics of existing mid-rise RC buildings in Turkey vol.16, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2015.16.3.467
  4. Evaluation of Structural Properties of Existing Turkish RC Building Stock vol.43, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-018-0207-z