The Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육)

Korean Society of Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis on the peer assessment results and the attributes of mathematics pre-service teachers' virtual instruction

수학 예비교사의 가상 수업 시연의 특징 및 동료 예비교사의 평가

  • Kim, Sun Hee (Department of Mathematics Education, Silla University)
  • Received : 2013.06.13
  • Accepted : 2013.11.12
  • Published : 2013.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, 27 pre-service teachers presented virtual mathematics instruction to develop his/her own teaching practice ability. I found several attributes in their virtual mathematics instruction such as connecting contents, asking justification, encouraging students' communication, representing variously, and using ICT etc. These will be the characteristics of the future mathematics class. When peer pre-service teachers assess presenter's instruction quantitatively, there are differences in the results between expert and pre-service teachers. Pre-service teachers didn't find the elements of student self assessment or group assessment and communication activities at the virtual instruction. When they assess peers' virtual instruction qualitatively, the results are specific or new ones compared with the quantitative assessment elements. Thus I suggested some implications for the mathematics pre-service teachers' virtual instruction in the view of teacher education.

Keywords

References

  1. 권미선, 방정숙 (2009). 좋은 수학 수업에 대한 초등 교사의 인식 조사, 수학교육논문집 23(2), 231-253.(Kwon, M. & Pang, J. (2009). Good mathematics instruction: Hearing teachers' voices, Communications of Mathematics Education 23(2), 231-253.)
  2. 나귀수 (2008). 초등학교 예비교사들의 수학 수업 관점에 대한 연구 -예비교사들의 수업 논평 비교를 중심으로, 학교수학 10(2), 279-296.(Na, G. S. (2008). Examining the prospective elementary teachers' perspectives on mathematics class - Focused on the comparison of the comments on the mathematics class, School Mathematics 10(2), 279-296.)
  3. 방정숙 (2011). 예비 교사의 초등 수학 수업 분석과 인식, 한국초등수학교육학회지 15(2), 221-246.(Pang, J. (2011). Prospective teachers' analysis and conception of elementary mathematics instruction, Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea 15(2) 221-246.)
  4. 방정숙, 권미선, 김정원 (2012). 초등학교 우수 수업 동영상에 나타난 좋은 수학 수업의 특징 분석, 한국초등수학교육학회지 16(3) 403-426.(Pang, J., Kwon, M. & Kim, J. (2012). An Analysis of the Characteristics of Effective Mathematics Instruction in the Elementary School, Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea 16(3) 403-426.)
  5. 심상길, 윤혜순 (2012). 마이크로티칭에서 수학 예비교사들의 수업 행동과 변화에 대한 연구, 수학교육 51(2),131-144.(Shim, S. & Yun, H. S. (2012). A Study on Mathematics Pre-service Teachers' Teaching Behaviors and Changes in Microteaching, The Mathematics Education 51(2), 131-144.) https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2012.51.2.131
  6. 이금선, 강옥기 (2008). 수학교사의 전문성 신장을 위한 수업 반성에 대한 준거 제안, 학교수학 10(2),199-222.(Lee, K. S. & Kang, O. K. (2008). A Study on the Establishment of the Criteria for Teaching Reflection for the Professional Enhancement of Mathematics Teachers, School Mathematics 10(2), 199-222.)
  7. 이봉주 (2008). 중등수학 예비교사 수업장학 실태 및 요구 조사 연구, 한국학교수학회논문집 11(1), 1-18.(Lee, B. (2008). A preliminary study for the supervision of pre-service mathematics teachers, Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society 11(1), 1-18.)
  8. 임찬빈, 이화진, 최승현, 오은순, 이경언, 이수정, 노은희, 권순달 (2006). 수업 평가 기준 개발 연구(III): 일반기 준 및 교과(국어, 수학, 기술․;가정, 음악, 초등)기준 상세화, 서울: 한국교육과정평가원. 연구보고 RRI 2006-3.
  9. 황혜정 (2010a). 교과 내용 지식(SMK)에 초점을 둔 수학 수업 평가 기준 고찰, 한국학교수학회논문집, 13(1), 45-67.(Hwang, H. J. (2010a). The study on the investigation of the mathematics teaching evaluation standards focused on SMK, Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society 13(1), 45-67.)
  10. 황혜정 (2010b). 수업 상황에 관한 교사 지식의 평가 요소 탐색, 한국학교수학회논문집, 13(3), 397-413.(Hwang, H. J. (2010b). The study on the investigation of the mathematics teaching evaluation standards focused on teaching context, Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society 13(3), 397-413.)
  11. 황혜정 (2010c). 교사의 학습자 이해 지식에 초점을 둔 수학 수업 평가 요소 탐색, 한국학교수학회논문집 13(4), 569-594.(Hwang, H. J. (2010c). The Study on the Investigation of the Mathematics Teaching Evaluation Standards Focused on Understanding of Learners, Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society 13(4), 569-594.)
  12. 황혜정 (2011). 수학 교과에서의 교사 지식에 기초한 반 성적 수업 평가에 관한 연구. 한국학교수학회논문집 14(2), 123-142.(Hwang, H. J. (2011). A study on the reflective teaching evaluation based on teacher knowledge in school mathematics, Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society 14(2), 123-142.)
  13. 황혜정 (2012). 수학 수업에서 요구되는 교사 지식에 대한 평가 기준 재탐색, 수학교육논문집 26(1), 109-135.(Hwang, H. J. (2012). The Study on the Investigation of the Evaluation Standards for Mathematics Teaching Focused on Teacher's Knowledge, Communications of Mathematics Education 26(1), 109-135.)
  14. Alsawaie, O. N. & Alghazo, I. M. (2010). The effect of video-based approach on prospective teacher's ability to analyze mathematics teaching, Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 13, 223-241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-009-9138-8
  15. Fuller, F. F. & Manning, B. A. (1973). Selfconfrontation reviewed: A conceptualization for video playback in teacher education, Review of Educational Research, 43(4), 469-528. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543043004469
  16. Santagata, R., Zannoni, C. & Stigler, J. W. (2007). The role of lesson analysis in pre-service teacher education: an emperical investigation of teacher learning from virtual video-based field experience, Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10,123-140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-007-9029-9
  17. Seo, J. J. & Kim, T. (2011). 가상 수학수업에 관한 연구- 예비교사들의 수업 평가를 중심으로, Korean J . Math. 19(4), 495-521. https://doi.org/10.11568/kjm.2011.19.4.495
  18. Sherin, M. G. & van Es, E. A. (2005). Using video to support teachers' ability to interpret classroom interactions, Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(3), 475-491.
  19. Sherin, M. G. (2001). Developing a professional vision of classroom events. In T. Wood, B. S. Nelson & J. Warfild(eds.), Beyond classical pedagogy: Teaching elementary school mathematics(pp.75-93). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  20. Skyes, G., & Bird, T. (1992). Teacher education and the case idea. In G. Grant(Ed.), Review of research in education(vol.18, pp.457-521). Washington DC: American Educational Research Association.
  21. Star, J. R. & Strickland, S. K. (2008). Learning observe: using video to improve preservice mathematics teachers' ability to notice, Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11, 107-125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-007-9063-7

Cited by

  1. The utilization of cooperative microteaching for pre-service mathematics teachers vol.53, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2014.53.3.399
  2. 국내 수학 교사교육 연구의 동향 분석: 2000년 이후 게재된 한국수학교육학회의 학술지 논문을 중심으로 vol.58, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2019.58.1.121