Effect of early robot-assisted training using virtual reality program in patient with stroke

가상현실을 이용한 조기 로봇보조 보행 훈련이 뇌졸중 환자에 미치는 영향

  • Lee, Dong-Soon (Department of Rehabilitation Center, Wonkwang University School of Medicine & Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Kyung-Hwa (Department of Rehabilitation Center, Wonkwang University School of Medicine & Hospital) ;
  • Kang, Tae-Woo (Department of Rehabilitation Center, Wonkwang University School of Medicine & Hospital) ;
  • Cho, Sung-Tae (Department of Rehabilitation Center, Wonkwang University School of Medicine & Hospital)
  • 이동순 (원광대학교병원 재활의학과 물리치료실) ;
  • 이경화 (원광대학교병원 재활의학과 물리치료실) ;
  • 강태우 (원광대학교병원 재활의학과 물리치료실) ;
  • 조성태 (원광대학교병원 재활의학과 물리치료실)
  • Received : 2013.07.12
  • Accepted : 2013.08.15
  • Published : 2013.08.25

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of early Robot-assisted training on gait ability, function and ADL in patients with stroke. Methods: 26 patients with stroke were recruited for this study. The subjects were randomly assigned to either the experimental group (EG) or the control group (CG), with 13 patients in each group. All subjects received a routine physical therapy. The robot-assisted training was for 30 min in the case of the EG subjects. The assessment tools of this study involved the gait ability, balance ability, function and ADL. The measurements were recorded before the intervention and after the intervention. Results: EG subjects and CG subjects, the variables measured after the intervention significantly differed from gait ability, balance ability, function and ADL without the FMA (p<0.05). The FMA was only effective experimental group after intervention. Also, there were significant differences in gait ability, balance ability, function and ADL without the FMA at post-test between the 2 groups (p<0.05). Conclusion: The findings indicate that early robot-assisted training exerts a positive effect on gait ability, balance ability, function and ADL in patients with stroke. This result indicates the possibility of application of the early Robot-assisted training to the management for stroke patients. Further studies are required to generalize the result for this study.

Keywords

References

  1. Hong KS, Bang OY, Kang DW et al. Stroke statistics in korea: part I. epidemiology and risk factors: a report from the korean stroke society and clinical research center for stroke. J Stroke 2013;15(1):2-20. https://doi.org/10.5853/jos.2013.15.1.2
  2. Kim JH. A Study on the correlation between static, dynamic standing balance symmetry and walking function in storke. J Korean Soc Phys Ther. 2012;24(2):73-81. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.24.73
  3. Lee MS, Lee JH, Park SG et al. The effect of ankle joint taping applied to patients with hemiplegia on their gait velocity and joint angles. J Korean Soc Phys Ther. 2012;24(2):157-62. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.24.157
  4. Suzuki T, Yoshida H, Hashimoto T. Case-control study of risk factors for hip fractures in the japanese elderly by a mediterranean osteoporosis study questionnaire. Bone 1997;21(5):461-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S8756-3282(97)00179-8
  5. Langhammer B, Stanghelle JK. Co-variation of tests commonly used in stroke rehabilitation. Physiother Res Int. 2006;11(4):228-34. https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.345
  6. Dobkin BH, Bruce H. An overview of treadmill locomotor training with partial body weight support: a neurophysiologically sound approach whose time has come for randomized clinical trials. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 1999;13(3):157-65. https://doi.org/10.1177/154596839901300301
  7. Hesse S, Bertelt C, Jahnke MT et al. Treadmill training with partial body weight support compared with physiotherapy in nonambulatory hemiparetic patients. Stroke. 1995;26(6):976-81. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.26.6.976
  8. Britta Husemann, Friedemann Müller, Carmen Krewer et al. Effects of locomotion training with assistance of a robot-driven gait orthosis in hemiparetic patients after stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. Stroke. 2007;38(2):349-54. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000254607.48765.cb
  9. Kosak MC, Reding MJ. Comparison of partial body weightsupported treadmill gait training versus aggressive bracing walking post stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2000;14(1):13-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/154596830001400102
  10. Colombo G, Wirz M, Dietz V. Driven gait orthosis for improvement of locomotor training in paraplegic patients. Spinal Cord. 2001;39(5):252-5. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3101154
  11. Mayr A, Kofler M, Quirbach E et al. Prospective, blinded, randomized crossover study of gait rehabilitation in stroke patients using the lokomat gait orthosis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007;21(4):307-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968307300697
  12. Lum PS, Burgar CG, Shor PC et al. Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(7):952-9. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2001.33101
  13. Weiss, PL, Rand, D, Katz N et al. Video capture virtual reality as a flexible and effective rehabilitation tool. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2004;1(1):1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-1-1
  14. Weiss PL, Bialik P, Kizony R. Virtual reality provides leisure time opportunities for young adults with physical and intellectual disabilities. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2003;6(3):335-42. https://doi.org/10.1089/109493103322011650
  15. Merians AS, Jack D, Boian R et al. Virtual reality- augmented rehabilitation for patients following stroke. Phys Ther. 2002;82(9):898-915.
  16. Yang YR, Tsai MP, Chuan TY et al. Virtual reality-based training improves community ambulation in individuals with stroke: A randomized controlled trial. gait & posture. 2008;28(2):201-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.11.007
  17. Song MS, Kang TW, No HJ et al. Effects of Robot-assist training using virtual reality program on Gait ability in patient with acute spinal cord injury. Journal of Special Education & Rehabilitation Science 2012:51(3);347-362.
  18. Marchal-Crespo L, Reinkensmeyer DJ. Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2009;16(6):6-20.
  19. Park JH, Kwon YC. Standardization of korean version of the mini-mental state examination(MMSE-K) for use in the elderly, part II, diagnostic validity. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc. 1989;28(3):508-13.
  20. Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed" up & go": a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39(2):142-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01616.x
  21. Liaw LJ. Hsieh CL, Lo SK et al. The relative and absolute reliability of two balance performance measures in chronic stroke patients. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(9):656-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280701400698
  22. Mao HF, Hsueh IP, Tang PF et al. Analysis and comparison of the psychometric properties of three balance measures for stroke patients. Stroke. 2002;33(4):1022-7. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000012516.63191.C5
  23. Berg KO, Wood-Dauphinee SL, Williams JI. The balance scale: reliability assessment with elderly residents and patients with an acute stroke. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1995;27(1):27-36.
  24. Carr JH, Shepherd RB. Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patient. Phys Ther. 1985;65(2):175-80. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/65.2.175
  25. Loewen SC, Anderson BA. Predictors of stroke outcome using objective measurement scales. Stroke. 1990;21(1):78-81. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.21.1.78
  26. Gladstone DJ, Danells CJ, Black SE. The fugl-meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2002;16(3):232-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/154596802401105171
  27. Granger CV, Albrecht GL, Hamilton BB. Outcome of comprehensive medical rehabilitation: Measurement by pulsesprofile and the barthel Index. Arch phys Med Rehabil. 1979;60(4):145-54.
  28. Arias M, Smith LN. Early mobilization of acute stroke patients. J Clin Nurs. 2007;16(2):282-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01488.x
  29. Sung DY, Kim JH, Park JW. The effect of changes in foot cutaneous sensation on plantar pressure distribution during gait. J Korean Soc Phys Ther. 2012;24(5):306-12.
  30. Miller EW, Quinn ME, Seddon PG. Body weight support treadmill and overground ambulation training for two patients with chronic disability secondary to stroke. Phys Ther. 2002;82(1):53-61. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/82.1.53
  31. Brutsch K, Schuler T, Koenig A et al. Influence of virtual reality soccer game on walking performance in robotic assisted gait training for children. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2010;22(4):7-15.
  32. Jung KH, Ha HG, Shin HJ et al. Effects of Robot-assisted Gait Therapy on Locomotor Recovery in Stroke Patients. J Korean Acad Rehab Med. 2008;32:(3)258-66.
  33. An SH, Kim JH, Song CH. The comparison of postural assessment scale for stroke(PASS : 5 items-3 level) and berg balance scale(BBS : 7 items-3 level) used for patients with stroke. The Korean society of Physical Medicine. 2010;5(1):89-99.
  34. Brutsch K, Koenig A, Mérillat-Koeneke S et al. Virtual reality for enhancement of robot-assisted gait training in children with neurological gait disorders. J Rehabil Med. 2011;43(6):493-9. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0802
  35. Crosbie JH, Lennon S, Basford JR et al. Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: still more virtual than real. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29(14):1139-1146. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280600960909
  36. Mehrholz J, Hadrich A, Platz T et al. Electro-mechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving generic activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;6:CD006876.
  37. Kim JJ, Gu S, Lee JJ et al. The effects of virtural reality-based continuous slow exercise on factors for falls in the elderly. J Korean Soc Phys Ther. 2012;24(2):90-7.
  38. Lee JH, Park SW, Kang JI et al. Effects of virtual reality exercise program on muscle activity and balance abilities in elderly women. J Korean Soc Phys Ther. 2011;23(4):37-44. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.23.37