한국지열·수열에너지학회논문집 (Journal of the Korean Society for Geothermal and Hydrothermal Energy)

  • 제9권1호
  • /
  • Pages.15-19
  • /
  • 2013
  • /
  • 2799-4783(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2799-4805(eISSN)
한국지열·수열에너지학회 (Korean Society for Geothermal and Hydrothermal Energy)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

코어 위치와 종횡비 및 방위에 따른 건물 에너지 부하 분석

An Analysis on Building Energy Load along Core Position, Area Ratio and Orientation

  • 김진호 (삼성물산(주) 건설부문 기술연구센터 친환경에너지팀) ;
  • 박우평 (삼성물산(주) 건설부문 기술연구센터 친환경에너지팀) ;
  • 신승호 (삼성물산(주) 건설부문 기술연구센터 친환경에너지팀) ;
  • 민준기 ((주)삼우종합건축사사무소 친환경설계팀) ;
  • 김동훈 ((주)삼우종합건축사사무소 친환경설계팀)
  • Kim, Jin-Ho (Green Technology Team, Construction Technology Center, Samsung C&T Corporation) ;
  • Park, Woo-Pyoung (Green Technology Team, Construction Technology Center, Samsung C&T Corporation) ;
  • Shin, Seung-Ho (Green Technology Team, Construction Technology Center, Samsung C&T Corporation) ;
  • Min, Joon-Ki (Sustainable Team, Samoo Architect & Engineers) ;
  • Kim, Dong-Hoon (Sustainable Team, Samoo Architect & Engineers)
  • 투고 : 2013.01.10
  • 심사 : 2013.02.08
  • 발행 : 2013.03.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

In this Study, effect of core position, area ratio and orientation of building on energy load is examined using TRNSYS17. This parameters are major parameters of the conceptual design stage. Reference model is square floor plan($1,444m^2$), centered core and 29% core area ratio. As the results, without considering the building orientation, the annual heating load of central building with 1:1 area ratio is lowest ($10.33kWh/m^2yr$) and the annual cooling load of off-central building with 1:1 area ratio is lowest ($59.27kWh/m^2yr$). As area ratio is bigger, cooling load is lower and heating load is higher. But if we consider building orientation, orders of heating load and cooling load are changed for area ratio and orientation.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, 2013, Green Building Construction Support Law.
  2. Seoul city, 2011, 2030 Green Design Code for Buildings in Seoul.
  3. KICT, KIER, Hanil MEC, 2007, The Study of the Development of Energy Performance Assessment Method and Policy in Buildings.
  4. H.-W. Lee, 2008, Performance-Based Energy Standard of the Total Annual Energy Use in Office and Apartment Building, J. Korean Soc. Living Environ. Sys., Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 596-602.
  5. B.-S. Kim, J.-S. Kim, O-Y Uim, 2004, Optimal Windows Transmittance by Energy Performance Analysis and Subjective Evaluation in Office Building, J. of Korean Solar Energy Society, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 73-83.
  6. Hwang, Jang Seung, Kim, Kang-Soo, 2009, Energy Performance Evaluation of a Office Building using DOE-2 Simulation Program, KIAEBS Conference, pp. 238-242.
  7. Yoo, Ho-Chun, Kang, Hyun-Gu, 2011, Study on Energy Consumption according to Building Envelope Performance and Indoor Temperature, J. of Korean Solar Energy Society, Vol 31, No. 3, pp. 101-108. https://doi.org/10.7836/kses.2011.31.3.101
  8. H.-T. Seok, 1995, A Study on the Development of Load Prediction Equation and Design Guidelines for the Energy Conservation of Office Buildings, Ph. D. Thesis, Seoul National University.
  9. Korea Energy Management Corporation, 2011, Explanation of Energy Saving Design Standard in Buildings.
  10. Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, 2010, Energy Saving Design Guideline for Public Office in Innovation City.