DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Usefulness of Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Mild Head Injury and the Negative Findings of Brain Computed Tomography

  • Kim, Du Su (Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul Medical Center) ;
  • Kong, Min Ho (Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul Medical Center) ;
  • Jang, Se Youn (Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul Medical Center) ;
  • Kim, Jung Hee (Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul Medical Center) ;
  • Kang, Dong Soo (Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul Medical Center) ;
  • Song, Kwan Young (Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul Medical Center)
  • Received : 2012.10.15
  • Accepted : 2013.08.17
  • Published : 2013.08.28

Abstract

Objective : To investigate the cases of intracranial abnormal brain MRI findings even in the negative brain CT scan after mild head injury. Methods : During a 2-year period (January 2009-December 2010), we prospectively evaluated both brain CT and brain MRI of 180 patients with mild head injury. Patients were classified into two groups according to presence or absence of abnormal brain MRI finding even in the negative brain CT scan after mild head injury. Two neurosurgeons and one neuroradiologist validated the images from both brain CT scan and brain MRI double blindly. Results : Intracranial injury with negative brain CT scan after mild head injury occurred in 18 patients (10.0%). Headache (51.7%) without neurologic signs was the most common symptom. Locations of intracranial lesions showing abnormal brain MRI were as follows; temporal base (n=8), frontal pole (n=5), falx cerebri (n=2), basal ganglia (n=1), tentorium (n=1), and sylvian fissure (n=1). Intracranial injury was common in patients with a loss of consciousness, symptom duration >2 weeks, or in cases of patients with linear skull fracture (p=0.00013), and also more frequent in multiple associated injury than simple one (35.7%>8.6%) (p=0.105). Conclusion : Our investigation showed that patients with mild head injury even in the negative brain CT scan had a few cases of intracranial injury. These findings indicate that even though the brain CT does not show abnormal findings, they should be thoroughly watched in further study including brain MRI in cases of multiple injuries and when their complaints are sustained.

Keywords

References

  1. Alahmadi H, Vachhrajani S, Cusimano MD : The natural history of brain contusion : an analysis of radiological and clinical progression. J Neurosurg 112 : 1139-1145, 2010 https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.5.JNS081369
  2. Bordignon KC, Arruda WO : CT scan findings in mild head trauma : a series of 2,000 patients. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 60 : 204-210, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1590/S0004-282X2002000200004
  3. Borg J, Holm L, Cassidy JD, Peloso PM, Carroll LJ, von Holst H, et al. : Diagnostic procedures in mild traumatic brain injury : results of the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. J Rehabil Med (43 Suppl) : 61-75, 2004
  4. Clement CM, Stiell IG, Schull MJ, Rowe BH, Brison R, Lee JS, et al. : Clinical features of head injury patients presenting with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 15 and who require neurosurgical intervention. Ann Emerg Med 48 : 245-251, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.04.008
  5. Haydel MJ, Preston CA, Mills TJ, Luber S, Blaudeau E, DeBlieux PM : Indications for computed tomography in patients with minor head injury. N Engl J Med 343 : 100-105, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200007133430204
  6. Iverson GL, Lovell MR, Smith S, Franzen MD : Prevalence of abnormal CT-scans following mild head injury. Brain Inj 14 : 1057-1061, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1080/02699050050203559
  7. Kaups KL, Davis JW, Parks SN : Routinely repeated computed tomography after blunt head trauma : does it benefit patients? J Trauma 56 : 475-480; discussion 480-481, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.TA.0000114304.56006.D4
  8. Kim HJ : The prognostic factors related to traumatic brain stem injury. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 51 : 24-30, 2012 https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2012.51.1.24
  9. Langfitt TW, Obrist WD, Alavi A, Grossman RI, Zimmerman R, Jaggi J, et al. : Computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography in the study of brain trauma. Preliminary observations. J Neurosurg 64 : 760-767, 1986 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1986.64.5.0760
  10. Maas AI, Hukkelhoven CW, Marshall LF, Steyerberg EW : Prediction of outcome in traumatic brain injury with computed tomographic characteristics : a comparison between the computed tomographic classification and combinations of computed tomographic predictors. Neurosurgery 57 : 1173-1182; discussion 1173-1182, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000186013.63046.6B
  11. Mack LR, Chan SB, Silva JC, Hogan TM : The use of head computed tomography in elderly patients sustaining minor head trauma. J Emerg Med 24 : 157-162, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0736-4679(02)00714-X
  12. Miller EC, Derlet RW, Kinser D : Minor head trauma : is computed tomography always necessary? Ann Emerg Med 27 : 290-294, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-0644(96)70261-5
  13. Nagy KK, Joseph KT, Krosner SM, Roberts RR, Leslie CL, Dufty K, et al. : The utility of head computed tomography after minimal head injury. J Trauma 46 : 268-270, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-199902000-00012
  14. Niogi SN, Mukherjee P : Diffusion tensor imaging of mild traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 25 : 241-255, 2010 https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0b013e3181e52c2a
  15. Rosengren D, Rothwell S, Brown AF, Chu K : The application of North American CT scan criteria to an Australian population with minor head injury. Emerg Med Australas 16 : 195-200, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-6723.2004.00563.x
  16. Saadat S, Ghodsi SM, Naieni KH, Firouznia K, Hosseini M, Kadkhodaie HR, et al. : Prediction of intracranial computed tomography findings in patients with minor head injury by using logistic regression. J Neurosurg 111 : 688-694, 2009 https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.2.JNS08909
  17. Shackford SR, Wald SL, Ross SE, Cogbill TH, Hoyt DB, Morris JA, et al. : The clinical utility of computed tomographic scanning and neurologic examination in the management of patients with minor head injuries. J Trauma 33 : 385-394, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-199209000-00009
  18. Sifri ZC, Livingston DH, Lavery RF, Homnick AT, Mosenthal AC, Mohr AM, et al. : Value of repeat cranial computed axial tomography scanning in patients with minimal head injury. Am J Surg 187 : 338-342, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.12.015
  19. Smits M, Dippel DW, de Haan GG, Dekker HM, Vos PE, Kool DR, et al. : External validation of the Canadian CT Head Rule and the New Orleans Criteria for CT scanning in patients with minor head injury. JAMA 294 : 1519-1525, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.294.12.1519
  20. Smits M, Dippel DW, Steyerberg EW, de Haan GG, Dekker HM, Vos PE, et al. : Predicting intracranial traumatic findings on computed tomography in patients with minor head injury : the CHIP prediction rule. Ann Intern Med 146 : 397-405, 2007 https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-146-6-200703200-00004
  21. Thomas BW, Mejia VA, Maxwell RA, Dart BW, Smith PW, Gallagher MR, et al. : Scheduled repeat CT scanning for traumatic brain injury remains important in assessing head injury progression. J Am Coll Surg 210 : 824-830, 831-832, 2010 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.12.039
  22. Uduma FU, Motah M : An accounting of pathology found on head computer tomography of Road Traffic Accident (Rta) patients in Douala, Cameroon. GJHS 3 : 171-180, 2011
  23. Velmahos GC, Gervasini A, Petrovick L, Dorer DJ, Doran ME, Spaniolas K, et al. : Routine repeat head CT for minimal head injury is unnecessary. J Trauma 60 : 494-499; discussion 499-501, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ta.0000203546.14824.0d
  24. Wang MC, Linnau KF, Tirschwell DL, Hollingworth W : Utility of repeat head computed tomography after blunt head trauma : a systematic review. J Trauma 61 : 226-233, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ta.0000197385.18452.89
  25. Yuh EL, Mukherjee P, Lingsma HF, Yue JK, Ferguson AR, Gordon WA, et al. : Magnetic resonance imaging improves 3-month outcome prediction in mild traumatic brain injury. Ann Neurol 73 : 224-235, 2013 https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.23783