DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Three-dimensional evaluation of the relationship between nasopharyngeal airway shape and adenoid size in children

  • Oh, Kyung-Min (Department of Orthodontics, Hallym University Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Min-Ah (Department of Orthodontics, Hallym University Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital) ;
  • Youn, Jong-Kuk (Departmet of Clinical Orthodontics, Graduate School of Hallym University) ;
  • Cho, Hyung-Jun (Departmet of Clinical Orthodontics, Graduate School of Hallym University) ;
  • Park, Yang-Ho (Department of Orthodontics, Hallym University Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital)
  • Received : 2012.10.07
  • Accepted : 2013.01.16
  • Published : 2013.08.25

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the shapes and sizes of nasopharyngeal airways by using cone-beam computed tomography and to assess the relationship between nasopharyngeal airway shape and adenoid hypertrophy in children. Methods: Linear and cross-sectional measurements on frontal and sagittal cross-sections containing the most enlarged adenoids and nasopharyngeal airway volumes were obtained from cone-beam computed tomography scans of 64 healthy children ($11.0{\pm}1.8$ years), and the interrelationships of these measurements were evaluated. Results: On the basis of frontal section images, the subjects' nasopharyngeal airways were divided into the following 2 types: the broad and long type and the narrow and flat type. The nasopharyngeal airway sizes and volumes were smaller in subjects with narrow and flat airways than in those with broad and long airways (p < 0.01). Children who showed high adenoid-nasopharyngeal ratios on sagittal imaging, indicating moderate to severe adenoid hypertrophy, had the narrow and flat type nasopharyngeal airway (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Cone-beam computed tomography is a clinically simple, reliable, and noninvasive tool that can simultaneously visualize the entire structure and a cross section of the nasopharyngeal airway and help in measurement of adenoid size as well as airway volume in children with adenoid hypertrophy.

Keywords

References

  1. Dunn GF, Green LJ, Cunat JJ. Relationships between variation of mandibular morphology and variation of nasopharyngeal airway size in monozygotic twins. Angle Orthod 1973;43:129-35.
  2. Linder-Aronson S. Adenoids. Their effect on mode of breathing and nasal airflow and their relationship to characteristics of the facial skeleton and the denition. A biometric, rhino-manometric and cephalometro- radiographic study on children with and without adenoids. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1970;265: 1-132.
  3. Subtelny JD, Baker HK. The significance of adenoid tissue in velopharyngeal function. Plast Reconstr Surg (1946) 1956;17:235-50. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-195603000-00008
  4. Caylakli F, Hizal E, Yilmaz I, Yilmazer C. Correlation between adenoid-nasopharynx ratio and endoscopic examination of adenoid hypertrophy: a blind, prospective clinical study. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2009;73:1532-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.07.018
  5. Selkin SG. Flexible fiberoptics and pediatric otolaryngology. A simple technique for examination and photodocumentation. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1983;5:325-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-5876(83)80046-9
  6. Li AM, Wong E, Kew J, Hui S, Fok TF. Use of tonsil size in the evaluation of obstructive sleep apnoea. Arch Dis Child 2002;87:156-9. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.87.2.156
  7. Paradise JL, Bernard BS, Colborn DK, Janosky JE. Assessment of adenoidal obstruction in children: clinical signs versus roentgenographic findings. Pediatrics 1998;101:979-86. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.101.6.979
  8. Lertsburapa K, Schroeder JW Jr, Sullivan C. Assessment of adenoid size: A comparison of lateral radiographic measurements, radiologist assessment, and nasal endoscopy. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2010;74:1281-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.08.005
  9. Aboudara C, Nielsen I, Huang JC, Maki K, Miller AJ, Hatcher D. Comparison of airway space with conventional lateral headfilms and 3-dimensional reconstruction from cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 135:468-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.04.043
  10. Scarfe WC, Farman AG. What is cone-beam CT and how does it work? Dent Clin North Am 2008;52: 707-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2008.05.005
  11. Kolo ES, Ahmed AO, Kazeem MJ, Nwaorgu OG. Plain radiographic evaluation of children with obstructive adenoids. Eur J Radiol 2011;79:e38-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.09.027
  12. Orji FT, Ezeanolue BC. Evaluation of adenoidal obstruction in children: clinical symptoms compared with roentgenographic assessment. J Laryngol Otol 2008;122:1201-5. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215108001916
  13. Ogawa T, Enciso R, Shintaku WH, Clark GT. Evaluation of cross-section airway configuration of obstructive sleep apnea. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;103:102-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.06.008
  14. Qu X, Li G, Zhang Z, Ma X. Thyroid shields for radiation dose reduction during cone beam computed tomography scanning for different oral and maxillofacial regions. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:e376-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.11.048
  15. Iwasaki T, Hayasaki H, Takemoto Y, Kanomi R, Yamasaki Y. Oropharyngeal airway in children with Class III malocclusion evaluated by cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.04.010
  16. Kim YJ, Hong JS, Hwang YI, Park YH. Threedimensional analysis of pharyngeal airway in preadolescent children with different anteroposterior skeletal patterns. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.10.026
  17. Solow B, Sandham A. Cranio-cervical posture: a factor in the development and function of the dentofacial structures. Eur J Orthod 2002;24:447-56. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/24.5.447
  18. Oh KM, Hong JS, Kim YJ, Cevidanes LS, Park YH. Three-dimensional analysis of pharyngeal airway form in children with anteroposterior facial patterns. Angle Orthod 2011;81:1075-82. https://doi.org/10.2319/010711-8.1
  19. Bartolome Benito M, Hernández-Sampelayo Matos MT. A radiological assessment of the nasopharynx in healthy children from the Madrid area. An Esp Pediatr 1998;49:571-6.
  20. Brodsky L, Moore L, Stanievich JF. A comparison of tonsillar size and oropharyngeal dimensions in children with obstructive adenotonsillar hypertrophy. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1987;13:149-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-5876(87)90091-7
  21. Hibbert J, Stell PM. A radiological study of the adenoid in normal children. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1979;4:321-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2273.1979.tb01760.x
  22. Tagaya M, Nakata S, Yasuma F, Miyazaki S, Sasaki F, Morinaga M, et al. Relationship between adenoid size and severity of obstructive sleep apnea in preschool children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2012;76:1827-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.09.010
  23. Marcus CL. Pathophysiology of childhood obstructive sleep apnea: current concepts. Respir Physiol 2000;119:143-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-5687(99)00109-7
  24. Schendel SA, Hatcher D. Automated 3-dimensional airway analysis from cone-beam computed tomography data. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;68:696-701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.07.040
  25. Bitar MA, Macari AT, Ghafari JG. Correspondence between subjective and linear measurements of the palatal airway on lateral cephalometric radiographs. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010;136:43-7. https://doi.org/10.1001/archoto.2009.198

Cited by

  1. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Analysis of the Nasopharyngeal Airway in Nonsyndromic Cleft Lip and Palate Subjects vol.54, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1597/15-134
  2. Novel Use of Ultrasound in Evaluation of Adenoid Hypertrophy in Children vol.87, pp.11, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-020-03487-6
  3. Three-dimensional analysis of upper airway and craniofacial morphology in orthodontic adolescents with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): A comparative retrospective study vol.19, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2021.08.005