DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development for Wetland Network Model in Nakdong Basin using a Graph Theory

그래프이론을 이용한 낙동강 유역의 습지네트워크 구축모델 개발

  • Rho, Paikho (Department of Environmental Planning, Keimyung university)
  • 노백호 (계명대학교 환경계획학과)
  • Received : 2013.05.06
  • Accepted : 2013.06.20
  • Published : 2013.08.31

Abstract

Wetland conservation plan has been established to protect ecologically important wetlands based on vegetation integrity, spatial distribution of endangered species, but recently more demands are concentrated on the landscape ecological approaches such as topological relationship, neighboring area, spatial arrangements between wetlands at the broad scale. Landscape ecological analysis and graph theory are conducted to identify spatial characteristics related to core nodes and weak links of wetland networks in Nakdong basin. Regular planar model, which is selected for wetland networks, is applied in the Nakdong basin. The analysis indicates that 5 regional groups and 4 core wetlands are extracted with 15km threshold distance. The IIC and PC values based on the binary and probability models suggest that the wetland group C composed of main stream of Nakdong river and Geumho river is the most important area for wetland network. Wetland conservation plan, restoration projected of damaged and weak links between wetlands should be proposed through evaluating the node, links, and networks from wetlands at the local to the regional scale in Nakdong basin.

습지보전계획을 수립하는데 있어 식생의 온전성, 멸종위기종 출현여부 등 대상지역 위주의 습지평가방법에서 점차 주변지역이나 광역적인 위상관계, 연결성을 고려한 경관생태학적 접근방법에 의한 습지평가 필요성이 제기되고 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 낙동강 유역에 분포하는 407개 습지를 대상으로 경관생태학적 접근방법과 그래프이론에 의해 습지생태네트워크 구축모형을 제시하였다. 습지의 물질순환, 철새이동루트 등 현지조사 자료가 부족한 낙동강 유역의 네트워크 분석에는 평면네트워크 그래프 모델을 적용하였으며, 연결성 분석은 임계거리를 15km로 설정하여 습지군집 5개와 핵심습지 4개를 도출하였다. 이진모형과 확률모형에 의한 통합연결성지수와 연결가능성지수를 계산한 결과, 5개 습지군집 및 핵심습지와 취약습지를 검증할 수 있었으며, 낙동강본류와 금호강지류에 위치한 습지군집이 습지생태네트워크에 있어 중요한 역할을 담당하고 있다. 본 연구를 통해 얻은 낙동강 유역의 습지군집과 네트워크, 취약습지 분포특성은 유역 단위의 습지보전 관리계획 수립, 습지복원사업을 실시하는데 기초자료로 활용할 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bunn, A, Urban, D and Keitt, T (2000). Landscape connectivity: a conservation application of graph theory, J. Environmental Management, 59(4), pp. 265-278. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.2000.0373
  2. De Almeida, JP, Morley, JG and Dowman, IJ (2007). Graph theory in higher order topographical analysis of urban scenes, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 31(4), pp. 426-440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2006.03.005
  3. Eros, T, Olden, JD, Schlick, RS, Schmera, D and Fortin, MJ (2012). Characterizing connectivity relationships in freshwaters using patch-based graphs, Landscape Ecology, 27(2), pp. 303-317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-011-9659-2
  4. Gu, BH (2009). Wetland Ecology, ELA Publishing Co., Ltd.
  5. Haggett, P (1965). Location Analysis in Human Geography, Edward Arnold Press.
  6. Kang, WM and Park, CR (2011). Quantitative analysis of Seoul green space network with the application of graph theory, Korean J. of Environment and Ecology, 27(3), pp. 412-420. [Korean Literature]
  7. Ministry of Environment (MOE) (2006). The First National Comprehensive Plan for Wetland Conservation. [Korean Literature]
  8. Ministry of Environment (MOE) (2013). The Second National Comprehensive Plan for Wetland Conservation. [Korean Literature]
  9. Minor, ES and Urban, DL (2008). A graph-theory framework for evaluating landscape connectivity and conservation planning, Conservation Biology, 22(2), pp. 297-307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00871.x
  10. National Institute of Environmental Studies (NIER) (2008). Assessment for Storage Capacity of Riverine Wetlands in the Nakdong River during Flood Event, Nakdong River Environment Research Center. [Korean Literature]
  11. O'Brien, D, Manseau, M, Fall, A and Fortin, MJ (2006). Testing the importance of spatial configuration of winter habitat for woodland caribou: An application of graph theory, Biological Conservation, 130(1), pp. 70-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.12.014
  12. Oh, KS, Lee, DW, Jung, SH and Park, CS (2009). A spatial decision support system for establishing urban ecological network: based on the landscape ecology theory, J. of GIS Association of Korea, 17(3), pp. 251-259. [Korean Literature]
  13. Pascual-Hortal, L and Saura, S (2006). Comparison and development of new graph-based landscape connectivity indices: towards the priorization of habitat patches and corridors for conservation, Landscape Ecology, 21(7), pp. 959-967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-006-0013-z
  14. Saura, S and Torne, J (2009). Conefor Sensinode 2.2: a software package for quantifying the importance of habitat patches for landscape connectivity, Environmental Modelling and Software, 24(1), pp. 135-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.05.005
  15. Song, WK (2011). Habitat network modeling of leopard cat (Prionailurus bengalensis) based on the spatial graph theory, Ph.D. Dissertation, Seoul National University. [Korean Literature]
  16. Song, WK, Kim, EY and Lee, DK (2012). Measuring connectivity in heterogeneous landscapes: a review and application, J. of Environmental Impact Assessment, 21(3), pp. 391-407. [Korean Literature]
  17. Yi, GC (2012). Development, value and use of wetland inventory, J. of Wetlands Research, 14(2), pp. 303-315. [Korean Literature]

Cited by

  1. Prediction model for groundwater flooding vulnerability using discriminant analysis at riverside region vol.51, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14770/jgsk.2015.51.3.313