DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

신장 질환이 있는 소아에서 $^{99m}$Technetium-mercaptoacetyltriglycine ($^{99m}Tc$-MAG3) 신장 스캔에 의한 사구체 여과율 측정

Glomerular Filtration Rate Measurements Using $^{99m}$Technetium-mercaptoacetyltriglycine Dynamic Renal Scintigraphy in Children with Renal Disease

  • 윤인애 (중앙대학교 의과대학 소아청소년과) ;
  • 윤기욱 (중앙대학교 의과대학 소아청소년과) ;
  • 임인석 (중앙대학교 의과대학 소아청소년과) ;
  • 최응상 (중앙대학교 의과대학 소아청소년과) ;
  • 유병훈 (중앙대학교 의과대학 소아청소년과)
  • Yoon, In Ae (Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Yun, Ki Wook (Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Lim, In Seok (Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Choi, Eung Sang (Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Yoo, Byung Hun (Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University)
  • 투고 : 2013.06.01
  • 심사 : 2013.07.02
  • 발행 : 2013.10.31

초록

목적: 소아에서 24시간 소변 수집의 단점을 대체하기 위해 $^{99m}Tc$-MAG3 신장 스캔을 통한 신기능을 측정하여, 크레아티닌 청소율과 혈청 cystatin C과 크레아티닌에 의한 사구체 여과율 추정식을 비교하여 연관성을 확인하였다. 방법: 2011년 7월부터 2012년 8월까지 101명의 18세 미만의 환자들을 대상으로 의무기록 후향적 조사로 실시하였고 $^{99m}Tc$-MAG3 신장 스캔을 시행하여 사구체 여과율을 측정하였다. 24시간 소변과 혈액을 체취하여 크레아티닌 청소율을 측정하였고 5개의 추정식을 통해 사구체 여과율을 측정하였다. 결과: 크레아티닌 청소율과 $^{99m}Tc$-MAG3 신장 스캔을 이용한 사구체 여과율의 Pearson 상관 계수는 0.389(P<0.001)이었다. $^{99m}Tc$-MAG3 신장 스캔과 Schwartz 식, Counahan-Barratt 식, MDRD 식, Cockcroft-Gault 식, Filler and Lepage 식, Bokencamp 식에 의한 사구체 여과율의 Pearson 상관 계수는 각각 0.265 (P=0.007), 0.128(P=0.044), 0.216 (P=0.030), 0.230 (P=0.021), 0.356 (P<0.001), 0.355 (P<0.001) 로 확인되었다. 사구체 및 비사구체 신질환의 비교에서 $^{99m}Tc$-MAG3 신장 스캔에 의한 사구체 여과율은 모두 유의한 상관성을 가졌고, 신기능의 저하 유무에 상관없이 $^{99m}Tc$-MAG3 신장 스캔에 의한 사구체 여과율은 크레아티닌 청소율과 유의한 연관성을 보였다. 결론: 크레아티닌 청소율과 $^{99m}Tc$-MAG3 신장 스캔에 의한 사구체 여과율 간에는 유의한 상관성이 있으며 $^{99m}Tc$-MAG3 신장 스캔에 의한 사구체 여과율은 신질환의 기원과 신기능의 정상 여부 모두에서 크레아티닌 청소율을 대체할 수 있는 방법임을 확인할 수 있었다. $^{99m}Tc$-MAG3 신장 스캔 이용 시 정확하고 빠른 결과를 얻을 수 있으리라 생각된다.

Purpose: In children, 24-hour urine collections are unreliable for evaluating glomerular filtration rate (GFR) because of the difficulty of regulating voiding and the daily variation of urinary creatinine up to 25%. Additionally, creatinine clearance (Ccr) based on urinary creatinine is considered inaccurate. The purpose of this study was to compare estimated GFR determined using Ccr, formulas with serum cystatin C and creatinine, and $^{99m}Tc$-mercaptoacetyltriglycine (MAG3) dynamic renal scintigraphy. Methods: This retrospective study included 101 patients (age, <18 years) who visited Chung-Ang University Hospital between July 2011 and August 2012. GFR was estimated using 24-hour urinary creatinine, five formulas with serum creatinine and cystatin C, and $^{99m}Tc$-MAG3 renal scan. Results: Of the 101 patients, glomerular renal diseases were present in 60 patients (59.4%) and non-glomerular diseases were present in 41 patients (40.6%). There was a significant correlation between estimated GFR determined using $^{99m}Tc$-MAG3 renal scan and Ccr (r=0.389, P <0.001). The correlation values between estimated GFR determined using $^{99m}Tc$-MAG3 renal scan and each formula of Schwartz, Counahan-Barratt, Cockcroft-Gault, Filler and Lepage, and Bokencamp were 0.265 (P=0.007), 0.128 (P=0.044), 0.230 (P=0.021), 0.356 (P<0.001), and 0.355 (P <0.001), respectively. $^{99m}Tc$-MAG3 renal scan was correlated with estimated-GFR by all formulas in decreased renal function. Conclusion: Estimated GFRs determined using serum creatinine and cystatin C, and $^{99m}Tc$-MAG3 renal scan correlated well with estimated GFR determined using Ccr. $^{99m}Tc$-MAG3 renal scan may be replaced for evaluation of renal function with convenience in patients with renal disease and decreased renal function in childhood.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Andersen TB, Jodal L, Erlandsen EJ, Morsing A, Frokiaer J, Brochner-Mortensen J. Detecting reduced renal function in children: comparison of GFR-models and serum markers. Pediatric nephrology 2013;28:83-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-012-2268-8
  2. Stevens LA, Stoycheff N. Standardization of serum creatinine and estimated GFR in the Kidney Early Evaluation Program (KEEP). American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation 2008;51(4 Suppl 2):S77-82. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.01.001
  3. Schwartz GJ, Brion LP, Spitzer A. The use of plasma creatinine concentration for estimating glomerular filtration rate in infants, children, and adolescents. Pediatric clinics of North America 1987;34:571-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-3955(16)36251-4
  4. Rule AD, Gussak HM, Pond GR, Bergstralh EJ, Stegall MD, Cosio FG, Larson TS. Measured and estimated GFR in healthy potential kidney donors. American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation 2004;43: 112-9. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2003.09.026
  5. Hoek FJ, Kemperman FA, Krediet RT. A comparison between cystatin C, plasma creatinine and the Cockcroft and Gault formula for the estimation of glomerular filtration rate. Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association 2003;18:2024-31. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfg349
  6. Grubb A, Nyman U, Bjork J, Lindstrom V, Rippe B, Sterner G, Christensson A. Simple cystatin C-based prediction equations for glomerular filtration rate compared with the modification of diet in renal disease prediction equation for adults and the Schwartz and the Counahan-Barratt prediction equations for children. Clinical chemistry 2005;51: 1420-31. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2005.051557
  7. Itoh K. 99mTc-MAG3: review of pharmacokinetics, clinical application to renal diseases and quantification of renal function. Annals of nuclear medicine 2001;15:179-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02987829
  8. Sharma AP, Yasin A, Garg AX, Filler G. Diagnostic accuracy of cystatin C-based eGFR equations at different GFR levels in children. Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN 2011;6:1599-608. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.10161110
  9. Ainsworth NL, Marshall A, Hatcher H, Whitehead L, Whitfield GA, Earl HM. Evaluation of glomerular filtration rate estimation by Cockcroft-Gault, Jelliffe, Wright and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formulae in oncology patients. Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology / ESMO 2012;23:1845-53. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdr539
  10. Michels WM, Grootendorst DC, Verduijn M, Elliott EG, Dekker FW, Krediet RT. Performance of the Cockcroft-Gault, MDRD, and new CKD-EPI formulas in relation to GFR, age, and body size. Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN 2010;5:1003-9. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.06870909
  11. Itoh K, Tsukamoto E, Mochizuki T, Kanegae K, Katoh C, Tamaki N. Comparison of single sample methods for determination of plasma clearance using 99mTc-MAG3. Kaku igaku The Japanese journal of nuclear medicine 1998;35:689-95.
  12. Bakoush O, Grubb A, Rippe B. Inaccuracy of GFR predictions by plasma cystatin C in patients without kidney dysfunction and in advanced kidney disease. Clinical nephrology 2008; 69:331-8. https://doi.org/10.5414/CNP69331
  13. Hojs R, Bevc S, Ekart R, Gorenjak M, Puklavec L. Serum cystatin C-based formulas for prediction of glomerular filtration rate in patients with chronic kidney disease. Nephron Clinical practice 2010;114:c118-26. https://doi.org/10.1159/000254384
  14. Domingues FC, Fujikawa GY, Decker H, Alonso G, Pereira JC, Duarte PS. Comparison of relative renal function measured with either 99mTc-DTPA or 99mTc-EC dynamic scintigraphies with that measured with 99mTc-DMSA static scintigraphy. International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology 2006;32:405-9. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-55382006000400004
  15. Takayama T, Aburano T, Shuke N, Yokoyama K, Michigishi T, Sun BF, et al. [Evaluation of renal function using 99mTc-MAG3: comparison with 123I-OIH and 99mTc-DTPA]. Kaku igaku The Japanese journal of nuclear medicine 1993;30:753-60.