Journal of Navigation and Port Research (한국항해항만학회지)

Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research (한국항해항만학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Strategic Identification of Unsafe Actions That Characterize Accidents on Ships

  • Received : 2012.12.31
  • Accepted : 2013.10.22
  • Published : 2013.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Seafarers are one of the main engines driving economic growth in the maritime sector. The International Maritime (IMO) Organization estimated that there were approximately 1.5 million seafarers around the world engaged in international trade in 2012. Data have shown that human casualties in maritime accidents around Japan have shown an increasing trend over the last ten years. One cause is human error, which is inseparable from the human element that influences mariner's decisions and actions. The Personal Identification (PIN) Safe method is one way to systematically identify substandard and unsafe actions by considering the error taxonomies associated with various scenarios for a maritime system. The results are based on analysis of the role of the human element in commonly reported unsafe actions when interacting with equipment and other systems. Furthermore, patterns of influencing shaping factors were observed on the basis of data processing; the aim of this study was to promote safety culture and provide an opportunity to improve safety at sea.

Keywords

References

  1. Marine Accident Inquiry Agency of Japan "Statistics of Accidents 1998-2008"
  2. Marine Accident Investigation Branch (MAIB), UK (1991) "Annual reports," London, p. 4.
  3. UK P&I Club (1999) "Ten-year trends in maritime risk analysis of major claims-a digest," London.
  4. Grime, R..P., Zhao, I., Wilson, P.A., Hu, Z., Wang, F (1996) "Human factors," Proceedings of the International Conference on Preventing Collision at Sea, Maritime Collision and Prevention 1 pp. 314-329. Epson, Surrey Chiavari Publishing.
  5. A. Rothblum, D. Wheal, S. Withington, S.A. Shappell, D.A. Wiegmann (2002) "Improving incident investigation through inclusion of human factors," United States Department of Transportation-Publications & Papers 32. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdot/32.
  6. E. Hollanagel (1998), Cognitive reliability and error analysis method (CREAM). Elsevier.
  7. M.R. Grech, T.J. Horberry, T. Koester (2008), Human Factors in Maritime Domain, CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 152.
  8. UK P&I Club (1999) "Ten-year trends in maritime risk analysis of major claims-a digest," London.
  9. L. Zhejiang (2001) "Identifying and reducing the involvement of human element in collision at sea," Thesis and Dissertation, World Maritime University, Malmo, Sweden, p. 1.
  10. International Maritime Organization (1997) "Human element vision, principles and goals for the organization (Resolutions A.850(20))," London.
  11. S.G. Kariuki, K. Lowe (2007) "Integrating human factors into process hazard analysis," Journal Science Direct: Reliability Engineering and System Safety 92 pp. 1764-1773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2007.01.002
  12. E. Charniak, R.P. Goldman (1993) "A Bayesian model of plan recognition," Artificial Intelligence 64 pp. 53-79 Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(93)90060-O
  13. M. Marseguerra, E. Zio, M. Librizzi (2007) "Human reliability analysis by fuzzy 'CREAM'," in Risk Analysis 27(1).
  14. A. J. Ross, B. Wallace, J. B. Davies CASP (2003) "Technical note: measurement issues in taxonomic reliability," Safety Science, Elsevier.
  15. Istiarto (2013),"Teori Statistik dan probabilitas", Civil Engineering Faculty, University Gadjahmada, Indonesia. Textbook of lecturer. Http://istiarto.staff.ugm.ac.id/docs/statpro/SDP04%20Probabilitas.pdf.
  16. Haryanti Rivai, Kohei Hirono and Masao Furusho (2012). Quantitative Model of Collision Causes in Japan. The Journal of Japan Institute of Navigation, 127, pp. 125-132. https://doi.org/10.9749/jin.127.125
  17. M.L. Lohberger (2010) "Suggested improvements for ship-installation collision risk models to reflect current collision avoidance systems," Master's Thesis, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Stavanger, pp. 24.
  18. Cockcroft, A.N. and Lameijer, J.N.F (1972) "A guide to the collision avoidance rules in international. regulations for preventing collisions at sea," 1972 in force 1977, Textbook, Stanford Maritime London.
  19. Japan Captain's Association (2009) "A guide to ship handling" in The Best Seaman Ship, International Mariners Management Association of Japan.
  20. Lloyd Register (June 2009),"Technical matters in a Lloyd's register publication containing case studies covering technical issues and their solutions."
  21. Japan Transport Safety Board (2008) "Marine accident investigations report for fire"