대한치과보철학회지 (The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics)

  • 제51권4호
  • /
  • Pages.315-322
  • /
  • 2013
  • /
  • 0301-2875(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-3789(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

내측연결형 임플란트에 체결한 지대주의 수직침하에 대하여 반복하중이 미치는 영향

Effect of cyclic loading on axial displacement of abutment into implant with internal tapered connection: a pilot study

  • 설현우 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 허성주 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 곽재영 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 김성균 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 한종현 (연세대학교 강남세브란스병원 치과보철과)
  • Seol, Hyon-Woo (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Heo, Seong-Joo (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Koak, Jai-Young (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Seong-Kyun (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Han, Chong-Hyun (Department of Prosthodontics, Gangnam Severance Dental Hospital, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
  • 투고 : 2013.10.02
  • 심사 : 2013.10.14
  • 발행 : 2013.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

연구 목적: 내측연결형 임플란트와 지대주의 연결체에 반복하중을 부여하였을 때 수직 침하를 평가하고자 하였다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 외측연결형 임플란트와 내측연결형 임플란트에 세 종류의 시멘트유지형 지대주를 각각 장착하였다. 즉, 외측연결형 지대주(Ext 그룹), 내측연결형 1-piece 지대주(Int-1 그룹), 내측연결형 2-piece 지대주(Int-2 그룹)를 사용하였으며, 각 그룹마다 7개의 시편을 준비하였다. 임플란트-지대주 연결체에 수직하중을 적용하기 위하여 임플란트 받침대에 고정한 후, 4 Hz의 빈도로 $150{\pm}10N$의 반복하중을 가하였다. 수직침하량은 0, 5, 10, 50, 100, 1,000, 5,000, 10,000회의 반복하중 후에 각각 측정하였다. 반복측정분산분석(RM-ANOVA)를 이용하여 반복하중의 영향을 분석하였으며, 패턴변화를 관찰하기 위하여 선형혼합모형(linear mixed model)을 사용하였다. 유의수준은5% 로 설정하였다. 결과: 10,000회 반복하중 후 수직침하량은, Ext 그룹에서 $0.714{\pm}0.488{\mu}m$, Int-1그룹에서 $5.286{\pm}1.604{\mu}m$, Int-2 그룹에서 $11.429{\pm}1.902{\mu}m$를 나타내었다. 패턴분석에서는, Int-1 그룹 및 Int-2 그룹에서 지속적인 수직침하가 관찰되었으며, Ext그룹에서는 수직침하현상이 관찰되지 않았다. 결론:10,000회 반복하중 후의 선형혼합모형을 통한 분석에서, Ext그룹은 수직침하현상을 보이지 않았으나, Int-1 및 Int-2 그룹은 지속적인 수직침하현상을 나타내었다. 또한, Int-2그룹에서 Int-1그룹보다 더 많은 수직침하량이 관찰되었다.

Purpose: To evaluate the axial displacement of implant-abutment assembly after cyclic loading in internal tapered connection system. Materials and methods: External butt-joint connection implant and internal tapered connection implant were connected with three types of abutment for cement-retained prostheses, i.e. external type abutment (Ext group), internal tapered 1-piece abutment (Int-1 group), and internal tapered 2-piece abutment (Int-2 group). For each group, 7 implants and abutments were used. The implantabutments assemblies were clamped into the implant holder for vertical loads. A dynamic cyclic loading was applied for $150{\pm}10N$ at a frequency of 4 Hz. The amount of axial displacement of the abutment into the implant was calculated at each cycle of 0, 5, 10, 50, 100, 1,000, 5,000, and 10,000. A repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the overall effect of cyclic loading and the pattern analysis by linear mixed model were used for statistical analysis. Differences at P<.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: The mean axial displacement after 10,000 cycles were $0.714{\pm}0.488{\mu}m$ in Ext group, $5.286{\pm}1.604{\mu}m$ in Int-1 group, and $11.429{\pm}1.902{\mu}m$ in Int-2 group. In the pattern analysis, Int-1 and Int-2 group showed continuous axial displacement at 10,000 cycles. There was no declining pattern of axial displacement in the Ext group. Conclusion: The pattern of linear mixed model in Ext group showed no axial displacement. There were continuous axial displacements in abutment-implant assemblies in the Int-1 and Int-2 group at 10,000 cycles. More axial displacement was found in Int-2 group than in Int-1 group.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Jemt T. Fixed implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous maxilla. A five-year follow-up report. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994;5:142-7. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1994.050304.x
  2. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, Behneke A, Behneke N, Hirt HP, Belser UC, Lang NP. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:161-72. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080302.x
  3. Nelson K, Semper W, Hildebrand D, Ozyuvaci H. A retrospective analysis of sandblasted, acid-etched implants with reduced healing times with an observation period of up to 5 years. Int J Oral Max Impl 2008;23:726-32.
  4. Goodacre CJ, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JY. Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:121-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00212-9
  5. Jemt T, Pettersson P. A 3-year follow-up study on single implant treatment. J Dent 1993;21:203-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(93)90127-C
  6. Sutter F, Weber HP, Sorensen J, Belser U. The New Restorative Concept of the ITI Dental Implant System: Design and Engineering. Int J Periodont Rest 1993;13:408-31.
  7. Norton MR. Assessment of cold welding properties of the internal conical interface of two commercially available implant systems. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:159-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70243-X
  8. Khraisat A, Stegaroiu R, Nomura S, Miyakawa O. Fatigue resistance of two implant/abutment joint designs. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:604-10. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.129384
  9. Merz BR, Hunenbart S, Belser UC. Mechanics of the implantabutment connection: An 8-degree taper compared to a butt joint connection. Int J Oral Max Impl 2000;15:519-26.
  10. Kitagawa T, Tanimoto Y, Odaki M, Nemoto K, Aida M. Influence of implant/abutment joint designs on abutment screw loosening in a dental implant system. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2005;75B:457-63. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.30328
  11. Norton MR. An in vitro evaluation of the strength of an internal conical interface compared to a butt joint interface in implant design. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:290-8. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080407.x
  12. Schwarz MS. Mechanical complications of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:156-8. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011S1156.x
  13. Bozkaya D, Muftu S. Mechanics of the tapered interference fit in dental implants. J Biomech 2003;36:1649-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00177-5
  14. Dailey B, Jordan L, Blind O, Tavernier B. Axial Displacement of Abutments into Implants and Implant Replicas, with the Tapered Cone-Screw Internal Connection, as a Function of Tightening Torque. Int J Oral Max Impl 2009;24:251-6.
  15. Kim KS, Lim YJ, Kim MJ, Kwon HB, Yang JH, Lee JB, Yim SH. Variation in the total lengths of abutment/implant assemblies generated with a function of applied tightening torque in external and internal implant-abutment connection. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22:834-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02063.x
  16. Lee JH, Kim DG, Park CJ, Cho LR. Axial displacements in external and internal implant-abutment connection. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012:1-7.
  17. Kim SK, Koak JY, Heo SJ, Taylor TD, Ryoo S, Lee SY. Screw Loosening with Interchangeable Abutments in Internally Connected Implants After Cyclic Loading. Int J Oral Max Impl 2012;27:42-7.
  18. Richter E-J. In Vivo Vertical Forces on Implants. Int J Oral Max Impl 1995;10:120-40.
  19. Rosentritt M, Behr M, Gebhard R, Handel G. Influence of stress simulation parameters on the fracture strength of all-ceramic fixed-partial dentures. Dental materials: official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials 2006;22:176-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.04.024
  20. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999999-2. http://CRAN.Rproject.org/package=lme4. 2013.
  21. Siamos G, Winkler S, Boberick KG. Relationship between implant preload and screw loosening on implant-supported prostheses. J Oral Implantol 2002;28:67-73. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2002)028<0067:TRBIPA>2.3.CO;2
  22. Bakaeen LG, Winkler S, Neff PA. The effect of implant diameter, restoration design, and occlusal table variations on screw loosening of posterior single-tooth implant restorations. J Oral Implantol 2001;27:63-72. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2001)027<0063:TEOIDR>2.3.CO;2
  23. Wiskott HWA, Nicholls JI, Belser UC. Stress Fatigue: Basic Principles and Prosthodontic Implications. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:105-16.

피인용 문헌

  1. 임플란트 단일 치아 수복 시 수직 침하와 인접치와의 위치 변화: 증례 보고 vol.59, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2021.59.1.126