DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

통합수자원평가지수의 개발

Development of Integrated Water Resources Evaluation Index

  • 이동률 (한국건설기술연구원 수자원연구실) ;
  • 최시중 (한국건설기술연구원 수자원연구실) ;
  • 문장원 (한국건설기술연구원 수자원연구실)
  • Lee, Dong-Ryul (Korea Institute of Construction Technology, Water Resources Research Division) ;
  • Choi, Si Jung (Korea Institute of Construction Technology, Water Resources Research Division) ;
  • Moon, Jang Won (Korea Institute of Construction Technology, Water Resources Research Division)
  • 투고 : 2013.07.02
  • 심사 : 2013.09.02
  • 발행 : 2013.10.31

초록

본 연구의 목적은 물이용, 홍수 및 하천환경의 3개 수자원 정책 부문에서 수행한 사업성과를 지역별로 평가할 수 있는 통합수자원평가지수(Integrated Water Resources Evaluation Index, IWREI)를 개발하는 것이다. IWREI는 각 부문별 취약성을 나타내는 물이용취약지수(Water Use Vulnerability Index, WUVI), 홍수취약성지수(Flood Vulnerability Index, FVI), 하천환경취약지수(River Environment Vulnerability Index, REVI)를 통합하여 산정된다. 이들 지수들은 물이용, 홍수, 하천환경의 피해를 주는 압력지표(pressure indicators)와 이에 의한 피해 현상지표(state indicators) 및 피해의 대책지표(response indicators)에서 선정한 총 26개 지표로 구성된다, 산정된 지수는 Low, Medium Low, Medium, Medium High, 및 High의 5단계로 취약성 및 정책수행의 효과를 나타냈다. 우리나라 115개의 중권역에 대해 WUVI, FVI, REVI 및IWREI을 분석한 결과, 1990년대 초반에 비해 2000년대 초반의 지수가 개선되어 수자원 정책의 사업효과를 확인할 수 있다. 본 연구에서 개발된 지역간수자원의 취약지수와 평가지수는 수자원 정책목표의 설정과 사업이행의 우선지역을 선정하는데 이용할 수 있다.

The purpose of this research is to develop an Integrated Water Resources Evaluation Index (IWREI) which can used to assess the performance of water resources projects in a regional perspective focusing on three major sectors including water use, flood, and river environment in water resources policies. The IWREI is estimated by integrating the Water Use Vulnerability Index (WUVI), the Flood Vulnerability Index (FVI), and the River Environment Vulnerability Index (REVI) which represent the vulnerability in each sector. These indices consist of total 26 indicators selected from the pressure indicators representing the causes of damages in water use, flood, and river environment, the state indicators and the response indicators. The estimated index describes the vulnerability and effectiveness of policies with five levels: Low, Medium Low, Medium, Medium High, and High. The results of evaluating total 115 hydrological units in Korea using the WUVI, FVI, REVI, and IWREI indicate that the project effectiveness in water resources policies is clearly verified by the improved index results compared to the past (early 1990s). Regional vulnerability and evaluation indices developed in this research could be used to establish goals of water resources policy and to select priority regions for project implementation.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Chae, M.O., and Oh, Y.J. (2003). "A study on land suitability factors and their weights." Journal of Korean Geographical Society, KGS, Vol. 38, No. 5, pp. 725-740.
  2. Choi, S.J., and Lee, D.R. (2005). "Indicators for Evaluation of Sustainable Water Resources Development and Management." Journal of Korean Water Resources Association, KWRA, Vol. 38, No. 9, pp. 779-790. https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2005.38.9.779
  3. Connor, R.F., and Hiroki, K. (2005). "Development of a method for assessing flood vulnerability." Water Science & Technology, Vol. 51, No. 5, pp. 61-67.
  4. Han, P.H., and Kwon, O.H. (1995). A Study on the Development of Urban Indicators and Their Application. Korea Research Institute for Local Administration.
  5. Kim, H.S., Song, Y.I., Kim, L.J., and Lim, Y.S. (2007). Linking environmental assessment and sustainable development indicators. KEI-2007-RE-08, Korea Environment Institute.
  6. Lee, C.H., Lee, S,M., and Yeo, C.G. (2006). Development of the Resional Safety Assessment Model in Seoul-Focusing on Flood-. SDI 2006-R-37, Seoul Development Institute.
  7. Lee, D.K., and Yoon, S.W. (1998). "A study on Environmental Indicators for Sustainable City Development -The case of Coexistent Indicators between Men and Nature-." Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment, KSEIA, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 93-107.
  8. Lim, K.S., Choi, S.J., Lee, D.R., and Moon, J.W. (2010). "Development of Flood Risk Index using causal relationships of Flood Indicators." Journal of Korean Society of Civil Engineer, KSCE, Vol. 30, No. 1B, pp. 61-70.
  9. Matthew S.W., and Victoria, A.V. (2001). Urban indicators for managing cities: Cities Data Book, Asian Development Bank.
  10. MLTM(Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs) (2006). National water resources plan (2006-2020).
  11. MLTM(Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs) (2011). National water resources plan (2011-2020).
  12. MLTM(Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs) (2007). The Study of Water Use Characteristic Evaluation.
  13. MLTM(Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs). (2008). The Study of Flood Control Characteristic Evaluation.
  14. MLTM(Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs). (2009). The Study of River Environment Characteristic Evaluation.
  15. MLTM(Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs). (2010). The Study of Water Resources Evaluation Indicator Expansion.
  16. Ohlsson, L. (1999). Environment, Scarcity and Conflict : A study ofMalthusian Concerns. Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Peace and Development Research, University Goteborg.
  17. Sullivan, C.A. (2001). "The Potential for Calculating a Meaningful Water Poverty Index." Water International, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 471-480. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060108686948
  18. Sullivan, C.A. (2002). "Calculating a Water Poverty Index." World Development, Vol. 30, No. 7, pp. 1195-1210. http://epi.yale.edu/ https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00035-9
  19. UNDP. (2007). Human Development Report 2007/2008.
  20. Yun, H.Y. (1999). Development and application of environmental indicators of Incheon. Incheon Development Institute. pp. 1-51.

피인용 문헌

  1. Establishing Indicators and Stream Depletion Potential Index (SDPI) for Stream Health vol.15, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2015.15.2.285
  2. Development and assessment of water management resilience of mid-small scale tributaries vol.49, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2016.49.2.95
  3. Development and Implementation of an Assessment Framework for Coastal Flood Vulnerability vol.18, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2018.18.6.291
  4. Development of the Water Disaster Vulnerability Index and Evaluation of Water Disaster Vulnerability in the Asian Monsoon Region vol.18, pp.7, 2018, https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2018.18.7.457
  5. A Case Study on Flood Vulnerability Results of Different Assessment Methods in the Nakdong Watershed vol.18, pp.7, 2018, https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2018.18.7.525