Journal of Animal Science and Technology

  • 제55권5호
  • /
  • Pages.427-434
  • /
  • 2013
  • /
  • 2672-0191(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2055-0391(eISSN)
한국축산학회 (Korean Society of Animal Sciences and Technology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

한국재래닭 (오계) 원시생식세포에 있어 동결방법의 개선이 융해 후 생존율에 미치는 영향

The Effect of Modified Cryopreservation Method on Viability of Frozen-thawed Primordial Germ Cell on the Korean Native Chicken (Ogye)

  • 김현 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 가축유전자원시험장) ;
  • 김동훈 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 가축유전자원시험장) ;
  • 한재용 (서울대학교 동물자원과학과) ;
  • 최성복 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 가축유전자원시험장) ;
  • 고응규 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 가축유전자원시험장) ;
  • 도윤정 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 가축유전자원시험장) ;
  • 성환후 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 가축유전자원시험장) ;
  • 김성우 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 가축유전자원시험장)
  • Kim, Hyun (Animal Genetic Resources Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Kim, Dong Hun (Animal Genetic Resources Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Han, Jae Yong (WCU Biomodulation Major, Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University) ;
  • Choi, Sung Bok (Animal Genetic Resources Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Ko, Yeoung-Gyu (Animal Genetic Resources Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Do, Yoon Jung (Animal Genetic Resources Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Seong, Hwan-Hoo (Animal Genetic Resources Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Kim, Sung Woo (Animal Genetic Resources Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
  • 투고 : 2013.06.17
  • 심사 : 2013.09.13
  • 발행 : 2013.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

귀중한 한국재래닭 (오계)의 원시생식세포를 냉동보존하고, 키메라 닭을 통한 재래종의 복원을 도모하는 방법을 실용화하기 위해서, 오계의 원시생식세포에 있어 최적의 동결방법에 대해 검토했다. 원시생식세포의 동결은, 세포를 분리한 후, 동결배지의 기초가 되는 혈청으로서 소 태아혈청 (FBS) 그리고 닭 혈청(CS)를 이용하고, 동결보호제로서는 EG 및 DMSO의 첨가량을 2.5, 5, 10, 15%로 설정하고, 300 ${\mu}L$의 동결배지 용량으로 동결 튜브 안에서 $-70^{\circ}C$로 동결했다. 융해 후에는 오계 PGC의 생존율을 확인 및 검토를 했다. 그 결과, FBS 처리군이 CS 처리군 보다 생존 PGC 회수율이 높은 경향을 나타냈다. 또한 항동해제로서 최적의 조건은 10% EG + FBS의 조합을 기초로 한 동결배지에서 가장 높은 오계원시 생식세포의 생존율을 확인했다. 이러한 결과들로부터 한국재래종(오계)의 원시생식세포의 동결보존의 실용화가 보다 더 향상 될 수 있는 또 하나의 방법이 될 수 있음을 시사한다.

This study was conducted to establish methods for preserving chicken primordial germ cells (PGCs) for long-term storage in liquid nitrogen and for developmental engineering or preservation of species. The purpose of this study is to clarify the effects of fetal bovine serum (FBS) or chicken serum (CS) treatment on the viability of cryopreserved PGCs from Korean Native Chicken (Ogye). PGCs separated from a germinal gonad of an early embryo at day 5.5-6 (stage 28) were suspended in a freezing medium containing freezing and protective agents (dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), ethylene glycol (EG) and glycerol). The values from 0, 5, 10, and 15 % DMSO plus FBS treatment were 21.6, 30.36, 36.42, 50.39, and 48.36 %, respectively. The viability of PGCs after freeze-thawing was significantly higher for 10% EG plus FBS treatment than for 10% EG + FCS treatment (p<0.05) (64.36% vs. 50.66%). This study establishes a method for preserving chicken PGC that enables systematic storage and labeling of cryopreserved PGC in liquid nitrogen at a germplasm repository and an ease of entry into a database. In the future, the importance for this new technology is that poultry lines can be conserved while work is being conducted to improve the production of germline chimeras.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Allioli, N., Thomas, JL., Chebloune, Y., Nigon, VM., Verdier, G. and Legras, C. 1994. Use of retroviral vectors to introduce and express the $\beta$-galactosidase marker gene in cultured chicken primordial germ cells. Dev. Biol. 165:30-37. https://doi.org/10.1006/dbio.1994.1231
  2. Blackburn, HD. 2006. The National Animal Germplasm Program: Challenges and opportunities for poultry genetic resources. Poult Sci. 85:210-215. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/85.2.210
  3. Bakst, MR. and Sexton, TJ. 1979. Fertilizing capacity and ultrastructure of fowl and turkey spermatozoa before and after freezing. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility. 55:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0550001
  4. Bautista, JA. and Kanagawa, H. 1998. Current status of vitrification of embryos and oocytes in domestic animals: ethylene glycol as an emerging cryoprotectant of choice Jpn. J. Vet. Res. 45:183-191.
  5. Boutron, P. 1984. A more accurate determination of the quantity of ice crystallized at low cooling rates in the glycerol and 1,2-propandiol aqueous solutions: Comparison with equilibrium, Cryobiology. 21:183-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-2240(84)90210-4
  6. Chalah, TF., Seigneurin, E., Bleisbos and Brillard, JP. 1999. In vitro comparison of fowl sperm viability in ejaculates frozen by three different techniques and relationship with subsequent fertility in vivo. Cryobiology. 39:185-191. https://doi.org/10.1006/cryo.1999.2201
  7. Chi, HJ., Koo, JJ., Kim, MY., Joo, JY., Chang, SS. and Chung, K. S. 2002. Cryopreservation of human embryos using ethylene glycol in controlled slow freezing. Hum. Reprod. 17:2146-2151. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/17.8.2146
  8. D'Costa, SD., Pardue, SL. and Petitte, JN. 2001. Comparative development of avian primordial germ cells and production of germ line chimeras. Avian. Poult. Biol. Rev. 12:151-168. https://doi.org/10.3184/147020601783698477
  9. Desai, N., Blackmon, H., Szeptycki, J. and Goldfarb, J. 2007. Cryoloop vitrification of human day 3 cleavage-stage embryos: postvitrification development, pregnancy outcomes and live births. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 14:208-213 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60789-4
  10. Eyal-Giladi, H., Ginsburg, M. and Farbarov, A. 1981. Avian primordial germ cells are of epiblastic origin. Journal of Embryology and Experimental Morphology. 65:139-147.
  11. Eyal-Giladi, H. and Kochav, S. 1976. From cleavage to primitive streak formation :a complementary normal table and a new look at the first stages of the development of the chick I. General Morphology Development Biology. 49:321-337.
  12. Freshney, RI. 2005. Culture of animal cells: A manual of basic technique. 5th Edn Wiley-Liss Inc. Hoboken.
  13. Friedler, S., Giudice, LC., Lamb, EJ. 1988. Cryopreservation of embryos and ova. Fertil Steril 49:743-764.
  14. Fulton, JE. and Delany, ME. 2003. Poultry genetic resources-operation rescue needed. Science. 300:1667-1668. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1085407
  15. Gee, GF., Bakst, MR. and Sexton, TJ. 1985. Cryogenic preservation of semen from the greater sandhill crane. Journal of Wildlife Management. 49:480-484. https://doi.org/10.2307/3801557
  16. Hamburger, V. and Hamilton, HL. 1951. A series of normal stages in the development of the chicken embryo. Journal of Morphology 8:49-92.
  17. Hammerstedt, RH. and Graham, JK. 1992. Cryopreservation of poultry sperm: the enigma of glycerol. Cryobiology. 29:26-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-2240(92)90004-L
  18. Kim, JN., Kim, MA., Park, TS., Kim, DK., Park, HJ., Ono, T., Lim, JM. and Han, JY. 2004. Enriched gonadal migration of donorderived gonadal primordial germ cells by immunomagnetic cell sorting in birds. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 68:81-87. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.20051
  19. Kim, JT., Lee, SH., Lee, YJ. and Jo, DI. 2004. Utility of bolus suture and silicone protector in auricular reconstruction of microtia. J. Korean. Soc. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 31:9-16.
  20. Kim, H., Choi, JS., Yang, BS., Ko, YG., Kim, JH., Choi, SB. and Kim, SW. 2011. A comparison of reproductive ability on various korean native chicken. Reprod. Dev. Biol. 35:391-394.
  21. Kino, K., Pain, B., Leibo, SB., Cochran, M., Clark, ME. and Etches, RJ. 1997. Production of chicken chimeras from injection of frozen-thawed blastodermal cells. Poult. Sci. 76:753-760. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/76.5.753
  22. Kobayashi, T., Takeuchi, Y., Yoshizaki, G., Takeuchi, T. 2003. Cryopreservation of trout primordial germ cells. Fish. Physiol. Biochem. 28:479-480. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FISH.0000030634.37486.fa
  23. Lovelock, JE. and Bishop MWH. 1959. Prevention of freezing damage to living cells by dimethyl sulphoxide. Nature. 183:1394-1395. https://doi.org/10.1038/1831394a0
  24. Lucena, E., Bernal, DP., Lucena, C., Rojas, A., Moran, A. and Lucena, A. 2006. Successful ongoing pregnancies after vitrification of oocytes. Fertil. Steril. 85:108-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.09.013
  25. Maeda, T., Terada, T. and Tsutsumi, Y. 1984. Morphological observations on frozen and thawed muscovy spermatozoa. Br. Poult. Sci. 25:409-413. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668408454881
  26. Martino, A., Songsasen, N. and Leibo, SP. 1996. Development into blastocysts of bovine oocytes cryopreserved by ultra-rapid cooling. Biol. Reprod. 54:1059-1069. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod54.5.1059
  27. Mozdziak, PE., Angerman-Stewart, J., Rushton, B., Pardue, SL. and Petitte, JN. 2005. Isolation of chicken primordial germ cells using fluorescence-activated cell sorting. Poult. Sci. 84:594-600. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.4.594
  28. Natio, T., Tajima, A., Tagami, T., Yasuda, Y. and Kuwana, T. 1994. Preservation of chick primordial germ cells in liquid nitrogen and subsequent production of viable offspring. Journal of production and Fertility. 102:321-325. https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.1020321
  29. Nakamura, Y., Yamamoto, Y., Usui, F., Atsumi, Y., Ito, Y., Ono, T., Takeda, K., Nirasawa, K., Kagami, H., Park, TS., Hong, YH. and Kwon, SC. 2003. Birth of germline chimeras by transfer of chicken embryonic germ(EG) cells into recipient embryos. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 65:389-395. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.10304
  30. Park, JK., Go, YE., Jin, HE., Hyung, JW., Lee, WS., Yoon, TK. and Lee, DR. 2010. Effect on Survival and Developmental Competence of Vitrified Mouse Embryos Using Various Cryoprotectants and Cooling Speeds. Korean. J. Reprod. Med. 37(4):307-319.
  31. Park, TS., Hong, YH., Kwon, SC., Lim, JM. and Han, JY. 2003. Birth of germline chimeras by transfer of chicken embryonic germ(EG) cells into recipient embryos. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 65: 389-395. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.10304
  32. Park, TS., Jeong, DK., Kim, JN., Song, GH., Hong, YH., Lim, JM. and Han, JY. 2003. Improved germline transmission in chicken chimeras produced by transplantation of gonadal primordial germ cells into recipient embryos. Biol. Reprod. 68:1657-1662.
  33. Pugh, PA., Tervit, HR. and Niemann, H. 2000. Effects of vitrification medium composition on the survival of bovine in vitro produced embryos, following in straw-dilution, in vitro and in vivo following transfer. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 58:9-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(99)00087-1
  34. Pokorny, P. 2002. Obtaining chicken chimeras after injecting cryopreserved blastoderm cells into the subgerminal cavity of recipient embryos. Anim. Sci. Pap. Rep. 20:55-66.
  35. Polge, C. 1951. Functional survival of fowl spermatozoa after freezing at -79C. Nature. 167:949-950.
  36. Rezazadeh, V. M., Eftekhari-Yazdi, P., Karimian, L., Hassani, F. and Movaghar, B. 2009. Vitrification versus slow freezing gives excellent survival, post warming embryo morphology and pregnancy outcomes for human cleaved embryos. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 26:347-354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-009-9318-6
  37. Shaw, DL., Carsience, RS., Etches, RJ. and Verrinder, GAM. 1992. The fate of female donor blastodermal cells in male chimeric chickens. Biochem. Cell. Biol. 70:1218-1229. https://doi.org/10.1139/o92-168
  38. Sommerfeld, V. and Niemann, H. 1999. Cryopreservation of bovine in vitro produced embryos using ethylene glycol in controlled freezing or vitrification. Cryobiology. 38:95-105. https://doi.org/10.1006/cryo.1999.2159
  39. Swift, CH. 1914. Origin and early history of the primordial germ cells in the chick. American Journal of Anatomy. 135:51-70.
  40. Tajima, A., Naito, M., Yasuda, Y. and Kuwana, T. 1993. Production of germ line chimera by transfer of primordial germ cells in the domestic chicken (Gallus domesticus). Theriogenology. 40:509-519. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(93)90404-S
  41. Tajima, A., Naito, M., Yasuda, Y. and Kuwana, T. 1998. Production of germ-line chimeras by transfer of cryopreserved gonadal primordial germ cells (gPGC) in chicken. J. Exp. Zool. 280:265-267. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-010X(19980215)280:3<265::AID-JEZ8>3.0.CO;2-L
  42. Tajima, A., Barbato, G., Kuwana, T. and Hammerstedt, RH. 2003. Conservation of a genetically selected broiler line (42L) using cryopreserved circulating primordial germ cells (PCG) isolated by filtration method. J. Poult. Sci. 40:53-61. https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.40.53
  43. Tajima, A., Minematsu, T. and Ohara, M. 2004. Production of germ-line chimeras by the transfer of cryopreserved gonadal germ cells collected from 7- and 9-day old chick embryos. J. Anim. Sci. 75:85-88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-0929.2004.00160.x
  44. Watanabe, M., Kinutani, M., Naito, M., Ochi, O. and Takashima, Y. 1992. Distribution analysis of transferred donor cells in avaian blastodermal chimeras. Development. 114(2):331-338.
  45. Yasuda, Y., Tajima, A., Fujimoto, T. and Kuwana, T. 1992. A method to obtain germ-line chimaeras using isolated primordial germ cells. J. Reprod.Fertil. 96:521-528. https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0960521
  46. Yoon, SY., Sohn, C. and Bae, IH. 1997. Cryopreservation of Day 3 Mouse Embryos by Vitrification. Kor Fertil. 24:325-333.
  47. Zhao, DF. and Kuwana, T. 2003. Purification of avian circulating primordial germ cells by nycodenz density gradient centrifugation. Br. Poult. Sci. 44:30-35.