Geomechanics and Engineering

  • 제5권5호
  • /
  • Pages.463-483
  • /
  • 2013
  • /
  • 2005-307X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2092-6219(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Perforation optimization of hydraulic fracturing of oil and gas well

  • Zhu, Hai Yan (State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resource and Prospecting (China University of Petroleum)) ;
  • Deng, Jin Gen (State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resource and Prospecting (China University of Petroleum)) ;
  • Chen, Zi Jian (State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resource and Prospecting (China University of Petroleum)) ;
  • An, Feng Chen (School of petroleum engineering, Southwest Petroleum University) ;
  • Liu, Shu Jie (School of Engineering and Electronics, Edinburgh University) ;
  • Peng, Cheng Yong (School of Engineering and Electronics, Edinburgh University) ;
  • Wen, Min (School of Engineering and Electronics, Edinburgh University) ;
  • Dong, Guang (CNOOC Research Institute)
  • 투고 : 2012.12.19
  • 심사 : 2013.05.23
  • 발행 : 2013.10.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Considering the influences of fluid penetration, casing, excavation processes of wellbore and perforation tunnels, the seepage-deformation finite element model of oil and gas well coupled with perforating technique is established using the tensile strength failure criterion, in which the user-defined subroutine is developed to investigate the dynamic evolvement of the reservoir porosity and permeability. The results show that the increases of perforation angle and decreases of perforation density lead to a higher fracture initiation pressure, while the changes of the perforation diameter and length have no evident influences on the fracture initiation pressure. As for initiation location for the fracture in wellbore, it is on the wellbore face while considering the presence of the casing. By contrast, the fractures firstly initiate on the root of the tunnels without considering casing. Besides, the initial fracture position is also related with the perforation angle. The fracture initiation position is located in the point far away from the wellbore face, when the perforation angle is around $30^{\circ}$; however, when the perforation angle is increased to $45^{\circ}$, a plane fracture is initiated from the wellbore face in the maximum horizontal stress direction; no fractures was found around perforation tunnels, when the angel is close to $90^{\circ}$. The results have been successfully applied in an oilfield, with the error of only 1.1% comparing the fracture initiation pressure simulated with the one from on-site experiment.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Abass, H.H., Meadows, D.L., Brumley, J.L., Hedayati, S. and Venditto, J.J. (1994), "Oriented perforations - A rock mechanics view", SPE Annual Techniesl Meeting, New Orleans, Louisiana, September.
  2. Akhaveissy, A.H., Desai, C.S., Mostofinejad, D. and Vafai, A. (2013), "FE analysis of RC structures using DSC model with yield surfaces for tension and compression", Comput. Concrete, Int. J., 11(2), 123-148. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2013.11.2.123
  3. Biao, F.J., Liu, H., Zhang, J., Zhang, S.C. and Wang, X.X. (2011), "A numerical study of fracture initiation pressure under helical perforation conditions", J. Univ. Sci. Tech. China, 41(3), 219-226. [In Chinese]
  4. Biot, M.A. (1941), "General theory of three-dimensional consolidation", J. Appl. Phys., 12(2), 155-164. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1712886
  5. Cao, Z.J. and Liu, Y.Y. (2012), "A new numerical modelling for evaluating the stress intensity factors in 3-D fracture analysis", Struct. Eng. Mech., Int. J., 43(3), 321-336. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2012.43.3.321
  6. Crosby, D.G., Rahman, M.M., Rahman, M.K. and Rahman, S.S. (2002), "Single and multiple transverse fracture initiation from horizontal wells", J. Pet. Sci. Eng., 35(3-4), 191-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-4105(02)00243-7
  7. Daneshy, A.A. (1972), "A study of inclined hydraulic fractures", SPE-AIME 47th Annual Fall Meeting, San Antonie, Texas, Oct.
  8. Daneshy, A.A. (1973), "Experimental investigation of hydraulic fracturing through perforations", J. Petrol. Tech., 25(10), 1201-1206. https://doi.org/10.2118/4333-PA
  9. de Pater, C.J., Cleary, M.P., Quinn, T.S., Barr, D.T., Johnson, D.E. and Weijers, L. (1994), "Experimental verification of dimensional analysis for hydraulic fracturing", SPE Prod. Facil., 9(4), 230-238. https://doi.org/10.2118/24994-PA
  10. El Rabaa, W. (1989), "Experimental study of hydraulic fracture geometry initiated from horizontal wells", SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, October.
  11. Fallahzadeh, S.H., Shadizadeh, S.R., Pourafshary, P. and Zare, M.R. (2010), "Modeling the perforation stress profile for analyzing hydraulic fracture initiation in a cased hole", Annual SPE International Conference and Exhibition, Tinapa - Calabar, Nigeria, July-August.
  12. Hallam, S.D. and Last, N.C. (1991), "Geometry of hydraulic fractures from modestly deviated wellbore", J. Petrol. Tech., 43(6), 742-748. https://doi.org/10.2118/20656-PA
  13. Hossain, M.M., Rahrnan, M.K. and Rahman, S.S. (2002), "Hydraulic fracture initiation and propagation: Roles of wellbore trajectory, perforation and stress regmes", J. Petrol. Sci. Eng., 27(3-4), 129-149.
  14. Lord, D.L. and McGowen, J.M. (1986), "Real-time treating pressure analysis aided by new correlation", SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana, October.
  15. Osorio, J.G. and Lopez, C.F. (2009), "Geomechanical factors affecting the hydraulic fracturing performance in a geomechanically complex, tectonically active area in Colombia", Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Cartagena de Indias, Colombia.
  16. Pearson, C.M., Bond, A.J., Eck, M.E. and Schmidt, J.H. (1992), "Results of stress oriented and aligned perforating in fracturing deviated wells", J. Pet. Tech., 44(1), 10-18. https://doi.org/10.2118/22836-PA
  17. Romero, J., Mack, M.G. and Elbel, J.L. (1995), "Theoretical model and numerical investigation of near-wellbore effects in hydraulic fracturing", SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, October.
  18. Soliman, M.Y. and Boonen, P. (2002), "Rock mechanics and stimulation aspects of horizontal wells", J. Pet. Sci. Eng., 25(3-4), 187-204.
  19. van de Ketterij, R.G. and de Pater, C.J. (1999), "Impact of perforations on hydraulic fracture tortuosity", SPE Prod. Facil., 14(2), 131-138. https://doi.org/10.2118/56204-PA
  20. Wang, L.J. and Lin, J.G. (1998), "Computational complex method for finite elastic plane problem with multiple elliptical holes", J. Basic Sci. Eng., 6(4), 327-334.
  21. Willingham, J.D., Tan, H.C. and Norman, L.R. (1993), "Perforation friction pressure of fracturing fluid slurries", Low Permeability Reservoirs Symposium, Denver, Colorado, April.
  22. Zhang, G.Q., Chen, M., Yin, Y.Q. and Sun, H.C. (2003), "Study on influence of perforation on formation", Chinese J. Rock Mech. Eng., 22(1), 40-44. [In Chinese]
  23. Zhu, X.H, Liu, S.H., Tong, H., Huang, X.B. and Li, J. (2012), "Experimental and numerical study of drill pipe erosion wear in gas drilling", Eng. Fail. Anal., 26, 370-380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2012.06.005

피인용 문헌

  1. Engineering geological characteristics and the hydraulic fracture propagation mechanism of the sand-shale interbedded formation in the Xu5 reservoir vol.12, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-2132/12/3/321
  2. Coupled flow-stress-damage simulation of deviated-wellbore fracturing in hard-rock vol.26, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2015.07.007
  3. Numerical investigation of hydraulic fracture propagation in a layered reservoir using the cohesive zone method vol.186, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.10.013
  4. Multilayer stress field interference in sandstone and mudstone thin interbed reservoir vol.13, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-2132/13/5/775
  5. Gas shale hydraulic fracturing: a numerical investigation of the fracturing network evolution in the Silurian Longmaxi formation in the southeast of Sichuan Basin, China, using a coupled FSD approach vol.75, pp.14, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5696-0
  6. Cementing failure of the casing-cement-rock interfaces during hydraulic fracturing vol.14, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2014.14.1.091
  7. Stress field interference of hydraulic fractures in layered formation vol.9, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2015.9.5.645
  8. Hydraulic fracture initiation pressure of anisotropic shale gas reservoirs vol.7, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2014.7.4.403
  9. Numerical simulation of hydraulic fracturing in circular holes vol.18, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2016.18.6.1135
  10. Analytical and Experimental Investigation of Perforation Layout Parameters on Hydraulic Fracture Propagation vol.143, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4047596
  11. Numerical Investigation on Hydraulic Fracturing of Extreme Limited Entry Perforating in Plug-and-Perforation Completion of Shale Oil Reservoir in Changqing Oilfield, China vol.54, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-021-02450-x