Structural Engineering and Mechanics

  • 제48권2호
  • /
  • Pages.257-274
  • /
  • 2013
  • /
  • 1225-4568(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-6217(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Rapid seismic performance assessment method for one story hinged precast buildings

  • Palanci, Mehmet (Institute of Natural Sciences, Pamukkale University, Kinikli Campus) ;
  • Senel, Sevket Murat (Civil Engineering Department, Pamukkale University, Kinikli Campus)
  • 투고 : 2012.11.06
  • 심사 : 2013.10.02
  • 발행 : 2013.10.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

In this study, seismic performance of one story hinged precast buildings, which represents the majority of existing lightweight industrial building stock of Turkey, was assessed. A lot of precast buildings, constructed in one of the important seismic zones of western Turkey, were investigated and building inventories were prepared. By this method, structural properties of inventory buildings and damaged precast buildings in recent earthquakes were compared. Damage estimations based on nonlinear analysis methods have shown that estimated damage levels of inventory buildings and observed damage levels in recent earthquakes are similar. Accuracy of damage estimation study and the simplicity of the one story precast building models implied that rapid seismic performance assessment method for these buildings can be developed. In this assessment method, capacity curves and vibration periods of precast buildings were calculated by using structural properties of precast buildings. The proposed assessment method was applied to inventory buildings by using two different seismic demand scenarios which reflect moderate and soft soil conditions. Comparison of detailed analysis and rapid assessment methods have indicated that reliable seismic performance estimations can be performed by using proposed method. It is also observed that distribution of damage estimations is compatible in both scenarios.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Adalier, K. and Aydingun, O. (2001), "Structural engineering aspects of the June 27, 1998 Adana-Ceyhan (Turkey) earthquake", Eng. Struct., 23(4), 343-355. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(00)00046-8
  2. Arslan, M.H., Korkmaz, H.H. and Gulay, F.G. (2006), "Damage and failure pattern of prefabricated structures after major earthquakes in Turkey and shortfalls of the turkish earthquake code", Eng. Fail. Anal., 13(4), 537-557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2005.02.006
  3. Atakoy, H. (2000), "The August 17th Earthquake and the prefabricated structures built by the members of the Prefabric Union", Concrete Prefabrication, 52-53.
  4. Cruz, A.M. and Steinberg, L.J. (2005), "Industry preparedness for earthquakes and earthquake-triggered hazmat accidents in the 1999 Kocaeli earthquake", Earthq. Spectra, 21(2), 285-304.
  5. Ersoy, U., Tankut, T. and Ozcebe, G. (1995), Earthquake Behavior of Precast Building Connections, The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey, Ankara. (in Turkish)
  6. Ersoy, U., Ozcebe, G. and Tankut, T. (2000), "Observed precast building damages in 1999 Marmara and Duzce earthquakes", 10th Prefabrication Symposium, Istanbul. (in Turkish)
  7. FEMA 450 (2003), NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations of New Buildings and Other Structures, Part 1: Provisions, NIBS, Washington, USA.
  8. Fischinger, M., Kramar, M. and Isakovic, T. (2008), "Cyclic response of slender RC columns typical of precast industrial buildings", B. Earthq. Eng., 6, 519-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-008-9064-7
  9. Karaesmen, E. (2001), Prefabrication in Turkey: Facts and Figures, Department of Civil Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.
  10. Kayhan, A.H. (2004), "A rapid evaluation method for determining seismic performance of precast industrial buildings", M.S. Thesis, Pamukkale University, Denizli.
  11. Kilincarslan, N. and Kilincarslan, E. (2008), Geological and Geotechnical Investigation of Denizli Organized Industrial Zone, Zemin Muhendislik Ltd. Comp., Denizli. (in Turkish)
  12. Palanci, M. (2010), "Seismic performance estimation of existing industrial precast structures based on building inventories", M.S. Thesis, Pamukkale University, Denizli.
  13. Park, R., Priestley, M.J.N. and Gill, W.D. (1982), "Ductility of square-confined concrete columns", J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 108(ST4), 929-950.
  14. Posada, M. and Wood, S.L. (2002), "Seismic performance of precast industrial buildings in Turkey", 7th National Conference on Earthquake Engineering (7NCEE), Boston, USA.
  15. Priestley, M.J.N., Calvi, G.M. and Kowalsky, M.J. (2007), Displacement Based Seismic Design of Structures, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy.
  16. Saatcioglu, M., Mitchell, D., Tinawi, R., Gardner, N.J., Gillies, A.G., Ghobarah, A., Anderson, D.L. and Lau, D. (2001), "The August 17, 1999 Kocaeli (Turkey) earthquake-damage to structures", Can. J. Civil Eng., 28(4), 715-737.
  17. Senel, S.M. and Palanci, M. (2013), "Structural aspects and seismic performance of 1-story precast buildings in Turkey", J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 27(4), 437-449. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000316
  18. Sezen, H. and Whittaker, A.S. (2006), "Seismic performance of industrial facilities affected by the 1999 Turkey earthquake", J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 20(1), 28-36. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2006)20:1(28)
  19. TEC-1998, Turkish Earthquake Code (1998), Specifications for structures to be built in disaster areas, Ministry of Public Works and Settlement, Ankara, Turkey.
  20. TEC-2007, Turkish Earthquake Code (2007), Specifications for structures to be built in seismic areas, Ministry of Public Works and Settlement, Ankara, Turkey.
  21. Tezcan, S.S. and Colakoglu, H.K. (2003), "Weak points of the TEC-98 precast building code provisions", Fifth National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Istanbul, Turkey. (in Turkish)
  22. Zorbozan, M., Barka, G. and Sarifakioglu, F. (1998), "Observed precast building damages in Ceyhan earthquake, reasons and solutions", Concrete and Prefabrication, 48, 20-24. (in Turkish)

피인용 문헌

  1. Assessment of one story existing precast industrial buildings in Turkey based on fragility curves vol.15, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9956-x
  2. Flexural Response Prediction of Reinforced Concrete Members Based on Statistical Observations vol.42, pp.9, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-016-2392-z
  3. Seismic risk estimation of the Kirikkale province through street survey based rapid assessment method (SSRA) vol.14, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2018.14.6.615
  4. Fuzzy rule based seismic risk assessment of one-story precast industrial buildings vol.18, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-019-0526-5
  5. Research on the Barrier Analysis and Strength Measurement of a Prefabricated Building Design vol.12, pp.7, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072994