Structural Engineering and Mechanics

  • 제47권1호
  • /
  • Pages.45-58
  • /
  • 2013
  • /
  • 1225-4568(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-6217(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An efficient response surface method considering the nonlinear trend of the actual limit state

  • Zhao, Weitao (Key Laboratory of Liaoning Province for Composite Structural Analysis of Aerocraft and Simulation, School of Aerospace Engineering, Shenyang Aerospace University) ;
  • Qiu, Zhiping (Institute of Solid Mechanics, Beihang University) ;
  • Yang, Yi (Key Laboratory of Liaoning Province for Composite Structural Analysis of Aerocraft and Simulation, School of Aerospace Engineering, Shenyang Aerospace University)
  • 투고 : 2012.05.28
  • 심사 : 2013.07.03
  • 발행 : 2013.07.10
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

In structural reliability analysis, the response surface method is a powerful method to evaluate the probability of failure. However, the location of experimental points used to form a response surface function must be selected in a judicious way. It is necessary for the highly nonlinear limit state functions to consider the design point and the nonlinear trend of the limit state, because both of them influence the probability of failure. In this paper, in order to approximate the actual limit state more accurately, experimental points are selected close to the design point and the actual limit state, and consider the nonlinear trend of the limit state. Linear, quadratic and cubic polynomials without mixed terms are utilized to approximate the actual limit state. The direct Monte Carlo simulation on the approximated limit state is carried out to determine the probability of failure. Four examples are given to demonstrate the efficiency and the accuracy of the proposed method for both numerical and implicit limit states.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Allaix, D.L. and Carbone, V.I. (2011), "An improvement of the response surface method", Struct. Safety, 33(2), 165-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2011.02.001
  2. Basaga, H.B., Bayraktar, A. and Kaymaz, I. (2012), "An improved response surface method for reliability analysis of structures" , Struct. Eng. Mech., 42(2), 175-189. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2012.42.2.175
  3. Bucher, C.G. and Bourgund, U. (1990), "A fast and efficient response surface approach for structural reliability problems", Struct. Safety, 7(1), 57-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4730(90)90012-E
  4. Chowdhury, R., Rao, B.N. and Prasad, A.M. (2009), "High-dimensional model representation for structural reliability analysis", Commun. Numer. Meth. Eng., 25(4),301-337. https://doi.org/10.1002/cnm.1118
  5. Ditlevsen, O. and Madsen, H.O. (1996), Structural Reliability Methods, Wiley, Chischester, UK.
  6. Duprat, F. and Sellier, A. (2006), "Probabilistic approach to corrosion risk due to carbonation via an adaptive response surface method", Prob. Eng. Mech., 21(3), 207-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2005.11.001
  7. Elegbede, C. (2005), "Structural reliability assessment based on particles swarm optimization", Struct. Safety, 27(2), 171-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2004.10.003
  8. Gavin, H.P. and Yau, S.C. (2008), "High-order limit state functions in the response surface method for structural reliability analysis", Struc. Safety, 30(2), 162-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2006.10.003
  9. Gayton, N., Bourinet, J.M. and Lemaire, M. (2003), "CQ2RS: a new statistical approach to the response surface method for reliability analysis", Struct. Safety, 25(1), 99-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4730(02)00045-0
  10. Hasofer, A.M. and Lind, N.C. (1974), "Exact and invariant second-moment code format", J. Eng. Mech., ASCE,100(1),111-121.
  11. Kang, S.C., Koh, H.M. and Choo, J.F. (2010), "An efficient response surface method using moving least squares approximation for structural reliability analysis", Prob. Eng. Mech., 25(4), 365-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2010.04.002
  12. Kaymaz, I. and Chris, A.M. (2005), "A response surface method based on weighted regression for structural reliability analysis", Prob. Eng. Mech., 20(1), 11-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2004.05.005
  13. Khuri, A.I. and Cornell, J.A. (1997), Response Surfaces: Design and Analyses, Marcel and Dekker, New York.
  14. Kim, S. and Na, S. (1997), "Response surface method using vector projected sampling points", Struct. Safety, 19(1), 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4730(96)00037-9
  15. Kiureghian, D.A., Lin, H.Z. and Hwang, S.J. (1987), "Second order reliability approximations", J. Eng. Mech., ASCE, 113(8), 1208-1225. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1987)113:8(1208)
  16. Lemaire, M. (2009), Structural reliability, John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA.
  17. Li, D.Q., Jiang, S.H., Cheng, Y.G. and Zhou, C.B. (2013), "A comparative study of three collocation point methods for odd order stochastic response surface method", Struct. Eng. Mech., 45(5), 595-611. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2013.45.5.595
  18. Liu, P.L. and Kiureghian, D.A. (1991), "Optimization algorithms for structural reliability", Struct. Safety, 9(3), 161-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4730(91)90041-7
  19. Myers, R.H. and Montgomery, D.C. (1995), Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization using Designed Experiments, Wiley, Chischester, UK.
  20. Nguyen, X.S., Sellier, A., Duprat, F. and Pons, G. (2009), "Adaptive response surface method based on a double weighted regression technique", Prob. Eng. Mech., 24(2),135-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2008.04.001
  21. Rackwitz, R. and Fiessler, B. (1978), "Structural reliability under combined random loadsequences", Comput. Struct., 9(5),489-494. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(78)90046-9
  22. Rajashekhar, M.R. and Ellingwood, B.R. (1993), "A new look at the response surface approach for reliability analysis", Struct. Safety, 12(3), 205-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4730(93)90003-J
  23. Wang, L. and Grandhi, R.V. (1996), "Safety index calculation using intervening variables for structural reliability analysis", Comput. Struct., 59(6), 1139-1148. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(96)00291-X
  24. Wong, S.M., Hobbs, R.E. and Onof, C. (2005), "An adaptive response surface method for reliability analysis of structures with multiple loading sequences", Struct. Safety, 27(4), 287-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2005.02.001

피인용 문헌

  1. An efficient simulation method for reliability analysis of systems with expensive-to-evaluate performance functions vol.55, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2015.55.5.979
  2. A response surface method based on sub-region of interest for structural reliability analysis vol.57, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2016.57.4.587
  3. A Gaussian process-based response surface method for structural reliability analysis vol.56, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2015.56.4.549
  4. Reliability analysis of double-layer domes with stochastic geometric imperfections vol.2, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/acd.2017.2.2.133
  5. Decomposable polynomial response surface method and its adaptive order revision around most probable point vol.76, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2020.76.6.675