DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Constructability optimal design of reinforced concrete retaining walls using a multi-objective genetic algorithm

  • Kaveh, A. (Centre of Excellence for Fundamental Studies in Structural Engineering, School of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Kalateh-Ahani, M. (Centre of Excellence for Fundamental Studies in Structural Engineering, School of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Fahimi-Farzam, M. (Centre of Excellence for Fundamental Studies in Structural Engineering, School of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology)
  • Received : 2013.01.02
  • Accepted : 2013.07.17
  • Published : 2013.07.25

Abstract

The term "constructability" in regard to cast-in-place concrete construction refers mainly to the ease of reinforcing steel placement. Bar congestion complicates steel placement, hinders concrete placement and as a result leads to improper consolidation of concrete around bars affecting the integrity of the structure. In this paper, a multi-objective approach, based on the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) is developed for optimal design of reinforced concrete cantilever retaining walls, considering minimization of the economic cost and reinforcing bar congestion as the objective functions. The structural model to be optimized involves 35 design variables, which define the geometry, the type of concrete grades, and the reinforcement used. The seismic response of the retaining walls is investigated using the well-known Mononobe-Okabe analysis method to define the dynamic lateral earth pressure. The results obtained from numerical application of the proposed framework demonstrate its capabilities in solving the present multi-objective optimization problem.

Keywords

References

  1. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) (2002), Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, 17th Edition, Washangton, D.C.
  2. American Concrete Institute, committee 318 (ACI 318-08) (2008), Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary, Farmington Hills.
  3. Ceranic, B., Fryer, C. and Baines, R.W. (2001), "An application of simulated annealing to the optimum design of reinforced concrete retaining structures", Comput. Struct., 79(17), 1569-1581. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(01)00037-2
  4. Coello, C.A.C., Pulido, G.T. and Lechuga, M.S. (2004). "Handling multiple objectives with particle swarm optimization", IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., 8(3), 256-279. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2004.826067
  5. Das, B.M. (2010), Principles of Foundation Engineering, 7th Edition, Cengage Learning, USA.
  6. Das, B.M. and Ramana, G.V. (2010), Principles of Soil Dynamics, 2nd Edition, Cengage Learning, USA.
  7. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., Agarwal, S. and Meyarivan, T. (2002). "A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II", IEEE. Trans. Evolut. Comput., 6(2),182-197. https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.996017
  8. Deb, K. (2009), Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms, Wiley, New York, USA.
  9. Giri, D. (2011), "Pseudo-dynamic approach of seismic earth pressure behind cantilever retaining wall with inclined backfill surface", Geomech. Eng., 3(4), 255-266. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2011.3.4.255
  10. Kaveh, A. (2006), Optimal Structural Analysis, 2nd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, UK. 244
  11. Kaveh, A. and Shakouri-Mahmud-Abadi, A. (2010), "Harmony search based algorithms for the optimum cost design of reinforced concrete cantilever retaining walls", Int. J. Civil Eng., 9(1), 1-8.
  12. Kaveh, A., Laknejadi, K. and Alinejad, B. (2011), "Performance-based multi-objective optimization of large steel structures", Acta Mech., 223(2), 355-369.
  13. Kaveh, A. and Behnam, A.F. (2012), "Charged system search algorithm for the optimum cost design of reinforced concrete cantilever retaining walls", Arab. J. Sci. Eng., 37(7), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-011-0161-6
  14. Khajehzadeh, M., Taha, M.R. and Eslami, M. (2013), "Efficient gravitational search algorithm for optimum design of retaining walls", Struct. Eng. Mech., 45(1), 111-127. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2013.45.1.111
  15. Martinez-Martin, F.J., Gonzalez-Vidosa, F., Hospitaler, A., Yepes, V. (2012). "Multi-objective optimization design of bridge piers with hybrid heuristic algorithms", J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. A (Appl. Phys. & Eng.), 13(6), 420-432. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A1100304
  16. MATLAB (2012), The Language of Technical Computing, Math Works Inc.
  17. Mononobe, N. (1929), "Earthquake-proof construction of masonry dams," Proceedings of World Engineering Conference, 9, 274-280.
  18. Okabe, S. (1926), "General theory of earth pressure", J. Jpn. Soc. Civ. Engrs., 12(1).
  19. Saribas, A. and Erbatur, F. (1996). "Optimization and sensitivity of retaining structures" J. Geotech. Eng. Div., 122(8), 649-656. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1996)122:8(649)
  20. Talbi, E.G. (2009), Metaheuristics: From Design to Implementation, Wiley, New Jersey.
  21. Yepes, V., Alcala, J., Perea, C. and Gonzalez-Vidosa, F. (2008), "A parametric study of optimum earth-retaining walls by simulated annealing", Eng. Struct., 30(3), 821-830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.05.023
  22. Yepes, V., Gonzalez-Vidosa, F., Alcala, J. and Villalba, P. (2012), "$CO_{2}$-optimization design of reinforced concrete retaining walls based on a VNS-threshold acceptance strategy", J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 26(3), 378-386. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000140

Cited by

  1. Cost optimization of reinforced concrete cantilever retaining walls under seismic loading using a biogeography-based optimization algorithm with Levy flights vol.49, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215X.2016.1191837
  2. Optimal design of Reinforced Concrete Cantilever Retaining Walls considering the requirement of slope stability vol.21, pp.7, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-017-1627-1
  3. Efficient non-linear analysis and optimal design of biomechanical systems vol.2, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/bme.2015.2.4.207
  4. Constructability: Outline of Past, Present, and Future Research vol.143, pp.8, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001331
  5. Automating pseudo-static analysis of concrete cantilever retaining wall using evolutionary algorithms vol.115, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2017.10.032
  6. Teaching learning-based optimization for design of cantilever retaining walls vol.57, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2016.57.4.763
  7. Multi-objective topology and geometry optimization of statically determinate beams vol.70, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2019.70.3.367
  8. Rao-3 algorithm for the weight optimization of reinforced concrete cantilever retaining wall vol.20, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2020.20.6.527
  9. CO2 and Cost Optimization of Reinforced Concrete Cantilever Soldier Piles: A Parametric Study with Harmony Search Algorithm vol.12, pp.15, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12155906
  10. The Usage of the Harmony Search Algorithm for the Optimal Design Problem of Reinforced Concrete Retaining Walls vol.11, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3390/app11031343
  11. Optimum design of cantilever retaining walls under seismic loads using a hybrid TLBO algorithm vol.24, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2021.24.3.237
  12. A comparative study of multi-objective evolutionary metaheuristics for lattice girder design optimization vol.77, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2021.77.3.417
  13. Adaptive-Hybrid Harmony Search Algorithm for Multi-Constrained Optimum Eco-Design of Reinforced Concrete Retaining Walls vol.13, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041639
  14. An Artificial Intelligence-Based Prediction Model for Optimum Design Variables of Reinforced Concrete Retaining Walls vol.21, pp.12, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0002234