Earthquakes and Structures

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Simultaneous optimal damper placement using oil, hysteretic and inertial mass dampers

  • Murakami, Yu (Department of Architecture and Architectural Engineering, Kyoto University) ;
  • Noshi, Katsuya (Department of Architecture and Architectural Engineering, Kyoto University) ;
  • Fujita, Kohei (Department of Architecture and Architectural Engineering, Kyoto University) ;
  • Tsuji, Masaaki (Department of Architecture and Architectural Engineering, Kyoto University) ;
  • Takewaki, Izuru (Department of Architecture and Architectural Engineering, Kyoto University)
  • Received : 2013.02.22
  • Accepted : 2013.06.25
  • Published : 2013.09.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Oil, hysteretic and inertial mass dampers are representatives of passive dampers used for smart enhancement of seismic performance of building structures. Since oil dampers have a nonlinear relief mechanism and hysteretic dampers possess nonlinear restoring-force characteristics, several difficulties arise in the evaluation of buildings including such dampers. The purpose of this paper is to propose a practical method for simultaneous optimal use of such dampers. The optimum design problem is formulated so as to minimize the maximum interstory drift under design earthquakes in terms of a set of damper quantities subject to an equality constraint on the total cost of dampers. The proposed method to solve the optimum design problem is a successive procedure which consists of two steps. The first step is a sensitivity analysis by using nonlinear time-history response analyses, and the second step is a modification of the set of damper quantities based upon the sensitivity analysis. Numerical examples are conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness and validity of the proposed design method.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

References

  1. Adachi, F., Yoshitomi, S., Tsuji, M. and Takewaki, I. (2013), "Nonlinear optimal oil damper design in seismically controlled multi-story building frame", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 44(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.08.010
  2. Attard, T.L. (2007), "Controlling all interstory displacements in highly nonlinear steel buildings using optimal viscous damping", J. Struct. Eng. - ASCE, 133(9), 1331-1340. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:9(1331)
  3. Aydin, E., Boduroglub, M.H. and Guney, D. (2007), "Optimal damper distribution for seismic rehabilitation of planar building structures", Eng. Struct., 29, 176-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.04.016
  4. Cimellaro, G.P. (2007), "Simultaneous stiffness-damping optimization of structures with respect to acceleration, displacement and base shear", Eng. Struct., 29, 2853-2870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.01.001
  5. Cimellaro, G.P. (2012), "Correlation in spectral accelerations for earthquakes in Europe" Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., Article first published online: 7 SEP 2012 DOI: 10.1002/eqe.2248.
  6. Cimellaro, G.P., Lavan, O. and Reinhorn, A.M. (2009), "Design of passive systems for controlled inelastic structures", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 38(6), 783-804. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.867
  7. Cimellaro, G.P., Reinhorn, A.M. and De_Stefano, A. (2011), "Introspection on improper seismic retrofit of Basilica Santa Maria di Collemaggio after 2009 Italian earthquake", Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 10(1), 153-161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-011-0054-4
  8. Cimellaro, G.P., Soong, T.T. and Reinhorn, A.M. (2009a), "Integrated design of controlled linear structural systems", J. Struct. Eng. - ASCE, 135(7), 853-862. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000032
  9. Cimellaro, G.P., Soong, T.T. and Reinhorn, A.M. (2009b), "Integrated design of inelastic controlled structural systems", Struct.Control Health Monitor., 16, 689-702. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.314
  10. Christopoulos, C. and Filiatrault, A. (2006), Principle of passive supplemental damping and seismic isolation, IUSS Press, University of Pavia, Italy.
  11. de Silva CW (ed.) (2007), Vibration damping, control, and design, CRC Press.
  12. Garcia, D.L. (2001), "A simple method for the design of optimal damper configurations in MDOF structures", Earthq. Spectra, 17, 387-398. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586180
  13. Guyan, R.J. (1965), "Reduction of stiffness and mass matrices", AIAA J., 3, 380. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.2874
  14. Hanson, R.D. and Soong, T.T. (2001), Seismic design with supplemental energy dissipation devices, EERI, Oakland, CA.
  15. Hwang, J.S., Lin, W.C. and Wu, N.J. (2013), "Comparison of distribution methods for viscous damping coefficients to buildings", Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 9(1), 28-41.
  16. Lavan, O. and Dargush, G.F. (2009), "Multi-objective evolutionary seismic design with passive energy dissipation systems", J. Earthq. Eng., 13(6), 758-790. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460802598545
  17. Lavan, O. and Levy, R. (2005), "Optimal design of supplemental viscous dampers for irregular shear-frames in the presence of yielding", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 34(8), 889-907. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.458
  18. Lavan, O. and Levy, R. (2006), "Optimal design of supplemental viscous dampers for linear framed structures", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 35, 337-356. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.524
  19. Lavan, O. and Levy, R. (2010), "Performance based optimal seismic retrofitting of yielding plane frames using added viscous damping", Earthq. Struct., 1(3), 307-326. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2010.1.3.307
  20. Liu, W., Tong, M. and Lee, G. (2005), "Optimization methodology for damper configuration based on building performance indices", J. Struct. Eng.- ASCE, 131(11), 1746-1756. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:11(1746)
  21. Noshi, K., Yoshitomi, S., Tsuji, M. and Takewaki, I. (2013), "Optimal nonlinear oil damper design in seismically controlled multi-story buildings for relief forces and damping coefficients", J. Struct. Eng., Architectural Institute of Japan, Vol. 59B. (in Japanese)
  22. Silvestri, S. and Trombetti, T. (2007), "Physical and numerical approaches for the optimal insertion of seismic viscous dampers in shear-type structures", J. Earthq. Eng., 11, 787-828. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460601034155
  23. Singh, M.P. and Moreschi, L.M. (2001), Optimal seismic response control with dampers, Earthq. Eng. Struct Dyn., 30, 553-572. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.23
  24. Soong, T.T. and Dargush, G.F. (1997), Passive energy dissipation systems in structural engineering, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
  25. Takewaki, I. (1997), "Optimal damper placement for minimum transfer functions", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 26, 1113-1124. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199711)26:11<1113::AID-EQE696>3.0.CO;2-X
  26. Takewaki, I. (2009), Building control with passive dampers: optimal performance-based design for earthquakes, John Wiley & Sons Ltd. (Asia)
  27. Takewaki, I. (2000), "Optimal damper placement for planar building frames using transfer functions", Struct. Multidiscip. Opt., 20(4), 280-287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001580050158
  28. Takewaki, I., Murakami, S., Fujita, K., Yoshitomi, S. and Tsuji, M. (2011), "The 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku earthquake and response of high-rise buildings under long-period ground motions", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 31(11), 1511-1528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.06.001
  29. Takewaki, I., Murakami, S., Yoshitomi, S. and Tsuji, M. (2012), "Fundamental mechanism of earthquake response reduction in building structures with inertial dampers", Struct. Control Health Monitor., 19(6), 590-608. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.457
  30. Takewaki, I. and Yoshitomi, S. (1998), "Effects of support stiffnesses on optimal damper placement for a planar building frame", J. Struct. Des. Tall Build., 7(4), 323-336. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1794(199812)7:4<323::AID-TAL115>3.0.CO;2-L
  31. Trombetti, T. and Silvestri, S. (2004), "Added viscous dampers in shear-type structures: the effectiveness of mass proportional damping", J.Earthq. Eng., 8(2), 275-313.
  32. Tsuji, M. and Nakamura, T. (1996), "Optimum viscous dampers for stiffness design of shear buildings", J. Struct. Des. Tall Build., 5, 217-234. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1794(199609)5:3<217::AID-TAL70>3.0.CO;2-R
  33. Tsuji, M., Tanaka, H., Yoshitomi, S. and Takewaki, I. (2011), "Model reduction method for buildings with viscous dampers under earthquake loading", J. Struct. Construct. Eng., Architectural Institute of Japan, 76(665), 1281-1290. (in Japanese) https://doi.org/10.3130/aijs.76.1281
  34. Uetani, K., Tsuji, M. and Takewaki, I. (2003), "Application of optimum design method to practical building frames with viscous dampers and hysteretic dampers", Eng. Struct., 25, 579-592. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00168-2
  35. Whittle, J.K.,Williams, M.S., Karavasilis, T.L. and Blakeborough, A. (2012), "A comparison of viscous damper placement methods for improving seismic building design", J. Earthq. Eng., 16(4), 540-560. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2011.653864
  36. Zhang, R.H. and Soong, TT. (1992), "Seismic design of viscoelastic dampers for structural applications", J. Struct. Eng.- ASCE, 118, 1375-1392. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1992)118:5(1375)

Cited by

  1. Optimal distribution of friction dampers for seismic retrofit of a reinforced concrete moment frame vol.20, pp.10, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433216683197
  2. Optimal placement and design of nonlinear dampers for building structures in the frequency domain vol.7, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2014.7.6.1025
  3. Passive Control System for Mitigation of Longitudinal Buffeting Responses of a Six-Tower Cable-Stayed Bridge vol.2016, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6497851
  4. Passive control system for seismic protection of a multi-tower cable-stayed bridge vol.6, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2014.6.5.495
  5. A New Energy-Based Structural Design Optimization Concept under Seismic Actions vol.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2017.00044
  6. Multiobjective Optimal Control of Longitudinal Seismic Response of a Multitower Cable-Stayed Bridge vol.2016, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6217587
  7. Seismic performance evaluation of moment frames with slit-friction hybrid dampers vol.9, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.9.6.1291
  8. Seismic loss assessment of a structure retrofitted with slit-friction hybrid dampers vol.130, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.10.052
  9. Gradient based optimal seismic retrofitting of 3D irregular buildings using multiple tuned mass dampers vol.139, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2014.03.002
  10. Seismic performance of steel plate slit-friction hybrid dampers vol.136, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.05.005
  11. Effect of feedback on PID controlled active structures under earthquake excitations vol.6, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2014.6.2.217
  12. Performance-based optimisation of RC frames with friction wall dampers using a low-cost optimisation method vol.16, pp.10, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0380-2
  13. Optimal placement of metallic dampers for seismic upgrading of multistory buildings based on a cost-effectiveness criterion using genetic algorithm pp.15417794, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1595
  14. Optimal distribution of steel plate slit dampers for seismic retrofit of structures vol.25, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2017.25.4.473
  15. Optimum distribution of steel slit-friction hybrid dampers based on life cycle cost vol.27, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2018.27.5.633
  16. Optimal Viscous Damper Placement for Elastic-Plastic MDOF Structures Under Critical Double Impulse vol.5, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2019.00020
  17. The Effect of slit-friction hybrid damper on the Performance of Dual System vol.13, pp.None, 2019, https://doi.org/10.2174/1874149501913010271
  18. Hysteretic-Viscous Hybrid Damper System for Long-Period Pulse-Type Earthquake Ground Motions of Large Amplitude vol.6, pp.None, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2020.00062
  19. Simultaneous Optimization of Elastic-Plastic Building Structures and Viscous Dampers Under Critical Double Impulse vol.6, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2020.623832
  20. Multi-criteria performance-based optimization of friction energy dissipation devices in RC frames vol.18, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2020.18.2.185
  21. Evaluation of a developed bypass viscous damper performance vol.14, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-020-0627-2
  22. Trade-off Pareto optimum design of an innovative curved damper truss moment frame considering structural and non-structural objectives vol.28, pp.None, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.09.060
  23. GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION OF HYSTERETIC DAMPERS FOR ELASTIC-PLASTIC MDOF STRUCTURES VIA HYBRID APPROACH OF REAL-CODED GENETIC ALGORITHM AND LOCAL SEARCH vol.86, pp.787, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3130/aijs.86.1335
  24. Comprehensive Review of Optimal and Smart Design of Nonlinear Building Structures With and Without Passive Dampers Subjected to Earthquake Loading vol.7, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2021.631114
  25. Seismic Performance of the Inerter and Negative Stiffness-Based Dampers for Vibration Control of Structures vol.7, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2021.773622
  26. Global Simultaneous Optimization of Oil, Hysteretic and Inertial Dampers Using Real-Valued Genetic Algorithm and Local Search vol.7, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2021.795577
  27. Analytical approach for the design and optimal allocation of shape memory alloy dampers in three-dimensional nonlinear structures vol.249, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2021.106518
  28. Combination of different types of damped braces for two-level seismic control of rc framed buildings vol.44, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103268