DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound Promotes Healing with Increases Collagen Deposition and Collagen mRNA Expression in Skin Wound of Rat

저강도 맥동초음파에의한 피부 상처 치유 촉진과 아교질 축적 및 아교질 mRNA 발현 증가

  • Lee, Jae-Hyoung (Dept. of Physical Therapy, Electrotherapy Research Laboratory for Tissue Growth & Repair, Wonkwang Health Science University) ;
  • Jeka, Seung-Joo (Dept. of Clinical Laboratory Science, Wonkwang Health Science University) ;
  • Kwon, Pil-Seung (Dept. of Clinical Laboratory Science, Wonkwang Health Science University)
  • Received : 2013.07.31
  • Accepted : 2013.08.19
  • Published : 2013.08.31

Abstract

목적: 본 연구는 저강도 맥동 초음파적용이 흰쥐의 전층 상처 치유와 아교질 축적 및 아교질 mRNA발현에 미치는 영향을 규명할 목적으로 시행하였다. 방법: 12마리의 Sprague-Dawley계 흰쥐를 저강도 맥동 초음파군(n=6)과 대조군(n=6)에 무작위 배정하고 등에 $19.63mm^2$ 크기의 전층 적출 상처를 만든 다음 저강도 맥동 초음파군은 3 MHz, 순환주기 20%, SATA 강도 $0.4W/cm^2$로 1일 1회, 1회 5분씩 초음파를 적용하고, 대조군은 가짜 초음파를 적용하였다. 7일간 처치 후 초음파군과 대조군의 아교질 축적, 아교질 mRNA 발현, 상처치유율, 절반치유시간을 비교하였다. 결과: 초음파군의 아교질 축적(p<05)과 아교질 mRNA 발현(p<.01)이 대조군보다 유의하게 증가하였고, 상처치유율(p<.05)과 절반치유시간(p<.0)도 초음파군의 대조군보다 유의하게 빨랐다. 결론: 본 연구에서 전층 상처에 저강도 맥동 초음파를 적용한 결과 상처 치유가 촉진되었고 육아조직에 아교질 축적이 증가하였다. 이러한 결과는 맥동 초음파의 기계적 자극이 제 1형 아교질 mRNA 전사활동을 촉진시키는 것으로 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Baker KG, Robertson VJ, Duck FA. A Review of Therapeutic Ultrasound: Biophysical Effects. Phys Ther. 2001;81(7):1351-8.
  2. Byl NN, McKenzie A, Wong T, et al. Incisional wound healing: a controlled study of low and high dose ultrasound. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1993;18(5):619-28. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.1993.18.5.619
  3. Chiquet M, Renedo AS, Huber F, et al. How do fibroblasts translate mechanical signals into changes in extracellular matrix production? Matrix Biol. 2003;22(1):73-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0945-053X(03)00004-0
  4. Chiquet M, Gelman L, Lutz R, et al. From mechanotransduction to extracellular matrix gene expression in fibroblasts. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1793(5):911-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2009.01.012
  5. Cullum NA, Al-Kurdi D, Bell-Syer SE. Therapeutic ultrasound for venous leg ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(6):CD001180.
  6. de Ávila Santana L, Alves JM, Andrade TA, et al. Clinical and immunohistopathological aspects of venous ulcers treatment by Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound (LIPUS). Ultrasonics. 2013;53(4):870-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2012.12.009
  7. Demir H, Yaray S, Kirnap M, et al. Comparison of the effects of laser and ultrasound treatments on experimental wound healing in rats. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2004; 41(5):721-8. https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2003.08.0131
  8. Freitas TP, Gomes M, Fraga DB, et al. Effect of therapeutic pulsed ultrasound on lipoperoxidation and fibrogenesis in an animal model of wound healing. J Surg Res. 2010;61(1):168-71.
  9. Fu SC, Hung LK, Shum WT, et al. In vivo low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) following tendon injury promotes repair during granulation but suppresses decorin and biglycan expression during remodeling. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010;40(7):422-9. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2010.3254
  10. Guimarães GN, Pires-De-Campos MS, Leonardi GR, et al. Effect of ultrasound and dexpanthenol on collagen organization in tegumentary lesions. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2011;15(3):227-32. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552011000300009
  11. Landsman A, Taft D, Riemer K. The role of collagen bioscaffolds, foamed collagen, and living skin equivalents in wound healing. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2009;26(4):525-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpm.2009.08.012
  12. Loyola-Sánchez A, Richardson J, Beattie KA, et al. Effect of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on the cartilage repair in people with mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis: a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(1):35-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2011.07.196
  13. Menon SN, Flegg JA, McCue SW, et al. Modelling the interaction of keratinocytes and fibroblasts during normal and abnormal wound healing processes. Proc Biol Sci. 2012;279(1741):3329-38. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.0319
  14. Naito K, Watari T, Muta T, et al. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) increases the articular cartilage type II collagen in a rat osteoarthritis model. J Orthop Res. 2010;28(3):361-9.
  15. Oberyszyn TM. Inflammation and wound healing. Front Biosci. 2007;12(8):2993-9. https://doi.org/10.2741/2289
  16. Ramirez A, Schwane JA, McFarland C, et al. The effect of ultrasound on collagen synthesis and fibroblast proliferation in vitro. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997;29(3):326-32. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-199703000-00007
  17. Schofer MD, Block JE, Aigner J, et al. Improved healing response in delayed unions of the tibia with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound: results of a randomized sham-controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11:229. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-229
  18. Taşkan I, Ozyazgan I, Tercan M, et al. A comparative study of the effect of ultrasound and electrostimulation on wound healing in rats. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;100(4):966-72. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199709001-00020
  19. Uenaka K, Imai S, Ando K, et al. Relation of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound to the cell density of scaffold-free cartilage in a high-density static semi-open culture system. J Orthop Sci. 2010;15(6):816-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-010-1544-3
  20. Wang JH, Thampatty BP, Lin JS, et al. Mechanoregulation of gene expression in fibroblasts. Gene. 2007;391(1-2):1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2007.01.014
  21. Webster DF, Harvey W, Dyson M, et al. The role of ultrasound-induced cavitation in the 'in vitro' stimulation of collagen synthesis in human fibroblasts. Ultrasonics. 1980;18(1):33-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0041-624X(80)90050-5
  22. Wong RA, Schumann B, Townsend R, et al. A survey of therapeutic ultrasound use by physical therapists who are orthopaedic certified specialists. Phys Ther. 2007;87(8):986-94. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20050392
  23. Young SR, Dyson M. Effect of therapeutic ultrasound on the healing of full-thickness excised skin lesions. Ultrasonics. 1990;28(3):175-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/0041-624X(90)90082-Y