DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Understanding Intersectoral Collaboration in Health Promotion

건강증진을 위한 부문 간 협력의 이해

  • Kang, Eunjeong (Department of Health Administration and Management, College of Medical Science, Soonchunhyang University)
  • 강은정 (순천향대학교 의료과학대학 보건행정경영학과)
  • Received : 2013.08.10
  • Accepted : 2013.09.25
  • Published : 2013.10.01

Abstract

Objectives: This paper aims to give a review on the concept, the type, and the purpose of intersectoral collaboration, to provide a framework of intersectoral collaboration, and to review the effectiveness of intersectoral collaboration. Methods: Peer-reviewed journals were searched in Pubmed using the terms of 'intersectoral collaboration,' 'multi-sector policy,' 'intersectoral partnership,' and 'cross-sector collaboration.' In total, 240 papers were identified. After reviewing the abstracts of these papers, 59 papers were chosen to be reviewed in full-text. Contents were extracted from these papers that were pertinent to the research questions. Results: Intersectoral collaboration has been advocated since Alma Ata Declaration. However, it has been largely ignored in practice. Various factors including context, support, task, team, interactional process, individual, and overarching factors can affect the success and the failure of intersectoral collaboration. Conclusions: Some strategies to facilitate intersectoral collaboration activities and future research agenda were suggested.

Keywords

References

  1. Aarts, M. J., Jeurissen, M. P. J., van Oers, H. A. M., Schuit, A. J., & van de Goor, I. A. M. (2011). Multi-sector policy action to create activity-friendly environments for children: A multiple-case study. Health Policy, 101, 11-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.09.011
  2. Adeleye, O. A., & Ofili, A. N. (2010). Strengthening intersectoral collaboration for primary health care in developing countries: Can the health sector play broader roles? Journal of Environmental and Public Health, 2010, 1-6.
  3. Bolstad, C. A., & Endsley, M. R. (2005). Choosing team collaboration tools: Lessons from disaster recovery efforts. Ergonomics in Design, 13, 7-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/106480460501300404
  4. Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., & Higgs, A. C. (1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46(4), 823-850. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb01571.x
  5. CSDH. (2008). Closing the gap in a generation: Health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
  6. Cramton, C. D. (2002). Finding common ground in dispersed collaboration. Organizational Dynamics, 30(4), 356-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-2616(02)00063-3
  7. Detienne, F. (2006). Collaborative design: Managing task interdependencies and multiple perspectives. Interacting with Computers, 18(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2005.05.001
  8. Edwards, A., & Wilson, J. R. (2004). Implementing virtual teams: A guide to organizational and human factors. Aldershot, England: Gower.
  9. Fear, H., & Barnett, P. (2003). Holding fast: The experience of collaboration in a competitive environment. Health Promotion International, 18(1), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/18.1.5
  10. Frankish, C. J., Casebeer, A. L., Moulton, G. E., Eyles, J. D., Quantz, D., Labonte, R., . . . Evoy, B. E. (2007). Addressing the non-medical determinants of health. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 98(1), 41-47.
  11. Fletcher, B. W., Lehman, W. E. K., Wexler, H. K., Melnick, G., Taxman, F. S., & Young, D. W. (2009). Measuring collaboration and integration activities in criminal justice and substance abuse treatment agencies. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 103(Suppl 1), 54-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.01.001
  12. Frost & Sullivan. (2006). Meetings around the world: The impact of collaboration on business performance [online]. Available from: http://newscenter.verizon.com/kit/collaboration/MAW_WP.pdf
  13. Geneau, R., Legowski, B., & Stachenko, S. (2009). An intersectoral network for chronic disease prevention: The case of the Alberta Healthy Living Network. Chronic Disease in Canada, 29(4), 153-161.
  14. Hackman, J. R. (1990). Groups that work (And those that don't): Creating conditions for effective teamwork. Oxford, England: Jossey-Bass.
  15. Harvey, C. M., & Koubek, R. J. (2000). Cognitive, social, and environmental attributes of distributed engineering collaboration: A review and proposed model of collaboration. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 10(4), 369-393. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6564(200023)10:4<369::AID-HFM2>3.0.CO;2-Y
  16. Hayes, S. L., Mann, M. K., Morgan, F. M., Kelly, M., & Weightman, A. L. (2012). Collaboration between local health and local government agencies for health improvement. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 10. CD007825.
  17. Hendriks, A. M., Gubbels, J. S., De Vries, N., Seidell, J. C., Kremers, S. P. J., & Jansen, M. W. J. (2012). Interventions to promote an integrated approach to public health problems: An application to childhood obesity. Journal of Environmental and Public Health, 2012, 1-14.
  18. Hill, C. J., & Lynn, L. E. (2003). Producing human services: Why do agencies collaborate? Public Management Review, 5, 63-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461667022000028861
  19. Himmelman, A. T. (2001). On coalitions and the transformation of power relations: Collaborative betterment and collaborative empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29, 277-284. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010334831330
  20. Huxman, C. (Ed.). (1996). Creating collaborative advantage. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE
  21. Kang, E., Park, H. J., & Kim, J. E. (2011). Health impact assessment as a strategy for intersectoral collaboration. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, 44(5), 201-209. https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2011.44.5.201
  22. Karasek, R. A. (1998). Demand/control model: A social, emotional, and physiological approach to stress risk and active behaviour development. In J. M. Stellmann (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of Occupational Health and Safety (4th ed., pp.34.6-34.14). Geneva, Switzerland: ILO.
  23. Konrad, E. L. (1996). A multidimensional framework for conceptualizing human services integration. New Directions for Evaluation, 69, 5-19.
  24. Kim, C. (1999). Community partnership in health promotion service. Paper presented at the Seoul National University Research Institute for Nursing Science Conference. Seoul, Korea
  25. Kim, J. (2012). Principles for evaluating Healthy Cities. Korean Journal of Health Education and Promotion, 29(4), 67-81.
  26. Lawn, J. E., Rohde, J., Rifkin, S., Were, M., Paul, V. K., & Chopra, M. (2008). Alma-Ata: Rebirth and Revision 1. Alma-Ata 30 years on: Revolutionary, relevant, and time to revitalise. Lancet, 372, 917-927. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61402-6
  27. Mattessich, P. W., & Monsey, B. R. (1992). Collaboration: What makes it work? A review of research literature on factors influencing successful collaboration. St Paul, MN: Amherst H. Wilder Foundation
  28. Murphy, M., Perrot, F., & Rivera-Santos, M. (2012). New perspectives on learning and innovation in cross-sector collaborations. Journal of Business Research, 65, 1700-1709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.02.011
  29. Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (2000). Distance matters. Human-Computer Interaction, 15(3, Pt. 2), 139-178. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327051HCI1523_4
  30. Patel, H., Pettitt, M., & Wilson, J. R. (2012). Factors of collaborative working: A framework for a collaboration model. Applied Ergonomics, 43, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2011.04.009
  31. Peters, B. G. (1998). Managing horizontal government: The politics of coordination. Public Administration, 76(2), 295-311. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00102
  32. Provan, K. G., & Milward, H. B. (2001). Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public-sector organizational networks. Public Administration Review, 61, 414-423. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00045
  33. Randolph, F., Blasinsky, M., Morrissey, J. P., Rosenheck, R. A., Cocozza, J., Goldman, H. H., & ACCESS Natl Evaluation Team. (2002). Overview of the ACCESS program. Psychiatric Services, 53, 945-948. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.53.8.945
  34. Rosenthal, H. (1998). Collaboration for the nutrition field: Synthesis of selected literature. Journal of Nutrition Education, 30, 246-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3182(98)70335-8
  35. Stahl, T., Wismar, M., Ollila, E., Lahtinen, E., & Leppo, K. (Eds.). (2006). Health in all policies, prospects and potentials. Finland: The Ministry of Social Affairs and Health.
  36. Storm, I., Aarts, M. J., Harting, J., & Schuit, A. J. (2011). Opportunities to reduce health inequalities by 'Health in All Policies' in the Netherlands: An explorative study on the national level. Health Policy, 103, 130-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.09.009
  37. Unsworth, K., & West, M. A. (2000). Teams: The challenges of cooperative work. In N. Chmiel (Ed.), An introduction to work and organizational psychology: A European perspective (pp. 327-346). Oxford, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
  38. Walsh, J. P., & Maloney, N. G. (2007). Collaboration structure, communication media, and problems in scientific work teams. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(2), 712-732. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00346.x
  39. Wilson, J. R., Jackson, S., & Nichols, S. (2003). Cognitive work investigation and design in practice: The influence of social context and social work artefacts. In E. Hollnaegel (Ed.), Handbook of Cognitive Task Design (pp. 83-98). Hillsdale, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  40. World Health Organization. (1997). Intersectoral action for health: A cornerstone for health-for-all in the twenty-first century. Proceedings of International Conference on Intersectoral Action for Health. World Health Organization, Halifax, Canada.
  41. World Health Organization. (2007). The Buenos Aires Declaration: Towards a health strategy for equity, based on primary health care. Retrieved from: http://new.paho.org/hq/dmdocuments/2010/PHC_ Declaration_Buenos_Aires-2007.pdf
  42. World Health Organization. (2011). Bugs, Drugs and Smoke. Stories from Public Health. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.

Cited by

  1. Intersectoral collaboration for physical activity in Korean Healthy Cities vol.31, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dav020
  2. Value and direction of Health Promotion in Korea: A content analysis of Health Plan 2020 vol.38, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.14367/kjhep.2021.38.4.1