Computers and Concrete

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of soil-structure interaction on construction stage analysis of highway bridges

  • Ates, Sevket (Department of Civil Engineering, Karadeniz Technical University) ;
  • Atmaca, Barbaros (Department of Civil Engineering, Karadeniz Technical University) ;
  • Yildirim, Erdal (Department of Civil Engineering, Karadeniz Technical University) ;
  • Demiroz, Nurcan Asci (Department of Civil Engineering, Avrasya University)
  • Received : 2012.07.20
  • Accepted : 2013.02.19
  • Published : 2013.08.01
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to determine the effect of soil-structure interaction and time dependent material properties on behavior of concrete box-girder highway bridges. Two different finite element analyses, one stage and construction stage, have been carried out on Komurhan Bridge between Elazi$\breve{g}$ and Malatya province of Turkey, over Fırat River. The one stage analysis assume that structure was built in a second and material properties of structure not change under different loads and site conditions during time. However, construction stage analysis considers that construction time and time dependent material properties. The main and side spans of bridge are 135 m and 76 m, respectively. The bridge had been constructed in 3 years between 1983 and 1986 by balanced cantilever construction method. The parameters of soil-structure interaction (SSI), time dependent material properties and construction method are taken into consideration in the construction stage analysis while SSI is single parameter taking into consideration in the one stage analysis. The 3D finite element model of bridge is created the commercial program of SAP2000. Time dependent material properties are elasticity modulus, creep and shrinkage for concrete and relaxation for steel. Soft, medium, and firm soils are selected for evaluating SSI in both analyses. The results of two different finite element analyses are compared with each other. It is seen that both construction stage and SSI have a remarkable effect on the structural behavior of the bridge.

Keywords

References

  1. Abbas, S. and Scordelis, A.C. (1993), "Nonlinear geometric, material and time-dependent analysis of segmentally erected three-dimensional cable stayed bridges", UCB/SESM-93/09, University of California, Berkeley.
  2. Adanur, S., Gunaydin, M., Altunisik, A.C. and Sevim, B. (2012), "Construction stage analysis of Humber Suspension Bridge", Appl. Math. Model., 36(11), 5492-5505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2012.01.011
  3. Altunisik, A.C., Bayraktar, A., Sevim, B., Adanur, S. and Domanic, A. (2010), "Construction stage analysis of Komurhan Highway Bridge using time dependent material properties", Struct. Eng. Mech., 36(2), 207-223. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2010.36.2.207
  4. Ates, S. (2010), "Numerical modelling of continuous concrete box girder bridges considering construction stages", Appl. Math. Model., 35(8), 3809-3820.
  5. Atmaca, B. and Ates, S. (2012), "Construction stage analysis of three-dimensional cable-stayed bridges", Steel Compos. Struct., 12(5), 413-426. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2012.12.5.413
  6. Bayraktar, A., Altunisik, A.C., Sevim, B., Turker, T., Domanic, A. and Tas, Y. (2009), "Vibration characteristics of komurhan highway bridge constructed with balanced cantilever method", J. Perform. Constr. Fac., 23(2) 90-99. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2009)23:2(90)
  7. Bishara, A.G. and Papakonstantinou, N.G. (1990), "Analysis of cast-in-place concrete segmental cantilever bridges", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 116(5), 1247-1268. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1990)116:5(1247)
  8. CEB-FIP Model Code (1990), Thomas Telford, London.
  9. Chiu, H.I., Chern, J.C. and Chang, K.C. (1996), "Long-term deflection control in cantilever prestressed concrete bridges I: Control method", J. Eng. Mech., ASCE, 12(6), 489-494.
  10. Cho, T. and Kim, T.S. (2008), "Probabilistic risk assessment for the construction phases of a bridge construction based on finite element analysis", Finite Elem. Anal. Des., 44(6-7), 383-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2007.12.004
  11. Cruz, P.J.S., Mari, A.R. and Roca, P. (1998), "Nonlinear time-dependent analysis of segmentally constructed structures", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 124(3), 278-288. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:3(278)
  12. Daloglu, A.T. and Vallabhan, C.V.G. (2000), "Values of k for slab on winkler foundation", J. Geotech. Geoenviron., 126(5), 463-471. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2000)126:5(463)
  13. Gunaydin, M., Adanur, S., Altunisik, A.C. and Sevim, S. (2012), "Construction stage analysis of fatih sultan mehmet suspension bridge", Struct. Eng. Mech., 42(4), 489-505. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2012.42.4.489
  14. Ketchum, M.A. (1986), "Redistribution of stresses in segmentally erected prestressed concrete bridges", Department of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, UCB/SESM-86/07.
  15. Kwak, H.G. and Son, J.K. (2002), "Determination of design moments in bridges constructed by balanced cantilever method", Eng. Struct., 24(5), 639-648. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00128-6
  16. Kwak, H.G. and Son, J.K. (2004), "Span ratios in bridges constructed using a balanced cantilever method", Eng. Struct., 18(10), 767-779.
  17. Limkatanyu, S., Kuntiyawichai, K., Spacone, E. and Kwon, M. (2012), "Natural stiffness matrix for beams on Winkler foundation exact force-based derivation", Struct. Eng. Mech., 42(1) , 39-53. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2012.42.1.039
  18. Mari, A.R. (2000), "Numerical simulation of the segmental construction of three dimensional concrete frames", Eng. Struct., 22, 585-596. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(99)00009-7
  19. Pindado, S., Meseguer, J. and Franchini, S. (2005), "The influence of the section shape of box-girder decks on the steady aerodynamic yawing moment of double cantilever bridges under construction", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 93(7), 547-555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2005.05.005
  20. Rosseland, S. and Thorsen, T.A. (2000), "The stolma Bridge: world record of free cantilevering", Proceeding of the 2nd International Symposium on Structural Lightweight Aggregate Concrete, Kristiansand, Norway, June.
  21. SAP2000 (2008), Integrated Finite Element Analysis and Design of Structures, Comput. Struct., Inc, Berkeley, California, USA.
  22. Somja, H. and Goyet, V.V. (2008). "A new strategy for analysis of erection stages including an efficient method for creep analysis", Eng. Struct., 30(10), 2871-2883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.03.015
  23. Wang, P.H., Tang, T.Y. and Zheng, H.N. (2004), "Analysis of cable-satyed bridges during construction by cantilever methods", Comput. Struct., 82(4-5), 329-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2003.11.003
  24. Wolf, J.P. (1985), Dynamic Soil-Structure Interaction, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA.

Cited by

  1. Construction stages analyses using time dependent material properties of concrete arch dams vol.14, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2014.14.5.599
  2. Determination of structural behavior of Bosporus suspension bridge considering construction stages and different soil conditions vol.17, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2014.17.4.405
  3. Contribution of local site-effect on the seismic response of suspension bridges to spatially varying ground motions vol.10, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.10.5.1233
  4. Öngerilmeli ve Betonarme Kirişlerin Dinamik Karakteristiklerinin Karşılaştırılması vol.7, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.29130/dubited.421496
  5. A simplified frequency formula for post-tensioned balanced cantilever bridges vol.20, pp.7, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-019-00160-y