DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Reinforcement design for the anchorage of externally prestressed bridges with "tensile stress region"

  • Liu, C. (Department of Bridge Engineering, Tongji University) ;
  • Xu, D. (Department of Bridge Engineering, Tongji University) ;
  • Jung, B. (Research Training Group 1462, Bauhaus-Universitat Weimar) ;
  • Morgenthal, G. (Modelling and Simulation of Structures, Bauhaus-Universitat Weimar)
  • Received : 2011.09.01
  • Accepted : 2012.10.29
  • Published : 2013.05.01

Abstract

Two-dimensional tensile stresses are occurring at the back of the anchorage of the tendons of prestressed concrete bridges. A new method named "tensile stress region" for the design of the reinforcement is presented in this paper. The basic idea of this approach is the division of an anchor block into several slices, which are described by the tensile stress region. The orthogonal reinforcing wire mesh can be designed in each slice to resist the tensile stresses. Additionally the sum of the depth of every slice defined by the tensile stress region is used to control the required length of the longitudinal reinforcement bars. An example for the reinforcement design of an anchorage block of an external prestressed concrete bridge is analyzed by means of the new presented method and a finite element model is established to compare the results. Furthermore the influence of the transverse and vertical prestressing on the ordinary reinforcement design is taken into account. The results show that the amount of reinforcement bars at the anchorage block is influenced by the layout of the transverse and the vertical prestressing tendons. Using the "tensile stress region" method, the ordinary reinforcement bars can be designed more precisely compared to the design codes, and arranged according to the stress state in every slice.

Keywords

References

  1. AASHTO LRFD. (2004), Bridge design specification and commentary, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington D.C.
  2. ACI Committee 318. (2005), Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-05) and commentary (318R-05), American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Mich.
  3. Bae, H.U., Oliva, M.G. and Bank, L.C. (2011), "Reinforcement-free decks using modified strut-and-tie model", ACI Struct. J., 108(5), 562-571.
  4. Breen, J.E., Burdet, O., Roberts, C., Sanders, D. and Wollman, G. (1991), Anchorage zone reinforcement for post-tensioned concrete girders, University of TEXAS, Austin.
  5. CSA International. (2000), Canadian highway bridge design code, National Standard of Canada CAN/CSA-S6-00.
  6. Empelmann, M. and Wichers, M. (2009), "Strut-and-tie models and concentrated loading according to DIN 1045-1 and Eurocode 2-modelling and application", Beton-und Stahlbetonbau, 104(4), 226-235. https://doi.org/10.1002/best.200900668
  7. He, Z.Q. and Liu, Z. (2010), "Optimal three-dimensional strut-and-tie models for anchorage diaphragms in externally prestressed bridges", Eng. Struct., 32(8), 2057-2064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.03.006
  8. Li, F.Y. and Wang, J. (2010), "Spatial analysis on deviation block of external prestressed bridge with finite element software", ICIC 2010 - 3rd International Conference on Information and Computing, 4, 261-264.
  9. Lu, W.Y., Hwang, S.J. and Lin, I.J. (2010), "Deflection prediction for reinforced concrete deep beams", Comput. Concrete, 7(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2010.7.1.001
  10. Park, J.W., Yindeesuk, S., Tjhin, T. and Kuchma, D. (2010), "Automated finite-element-based validation of structures designed by the strut-and-tie method", J. Struct. Eng.-ASCE, 136(2), 203-210. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2010)136:2(203)
  11. Perera, R. and Vique, J. (2009), "Strut-and-tie modelling of reinforced concrete beams using genetic algorithms optimization", Constr. Build. Mater., 23(8), 2914-2925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.02.016
  12. Praveen, N. and Madhavan, T.M.P. (2008), "Analysis and design of simply supported deep beams using strut and tie method", Adv. Struct. Eng., 11(5), 491-499. https://doi.org/10.1260/136943308786412050
  13. Sergio, F.B. and Micah, C.M. (2007), "Factors affecting strength of elements designed using strut-and-tie models", ACI Struct. J., 104(3), 104-126.
  14. Victoria, M., Querin, O.M. and Marti, P. (2011), "Generation of strut-and-tie models by topology design using different material properties in tension and compression", Struct. Multidiscip. O., 44(2), 247-258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-011-0633-z
  15. Xu, D. (2008), External prestressing technology of bridge, China Communications Press, Beijing.
  16. Zhao, J.L., Shen, S.L., Wang, L.B. and Chen, J. (2011), "A design approach for the interior anchorage zone of post-tensioned concrete structure", KSCE J. Civil Eng., 15(3), 487-495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-011-0835-3

Cited by

  1. Design equation to evaluate bursting forces at the end zone of post-tensioned members vol.24, pp.5, 2019, https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2019.24.5.423