DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

닭 정액 동결 시 동결 보호제가 정액 성상에 미치는 영향

Effects of Kinds of Cryoprotectants on the Characteristics of Frozen Fowl Semen

  • 최진석 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 가축유전자원시험장) ;
  • 신단비 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 가축유전자원시험장) ;
  • 고응규 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 가축유전자원시험장) ;
  • 도윤정 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 가축유전자원시험장) ;
  • 변미정 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 가축유전자원시험장) ;
  • 박수봉 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 가축유전자원시험장) ;
  • 성환후 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 가축유전자원시험장) ;
  • 김현 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 가축유전자원시험장) ;
  • 공일근 (경상대학교 축산학과) ;
  • 김성우 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 가축유전자원시험장)
  • Choi, Jin Seok (Animal Genetic Resources Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Shin, Dan-Bi (Animal Genetic Resources Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Ko, Yeoung-Gyu (Animal Genetic Resources Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Do, Yoon-Jung (Animal Genetic Resources Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Byun, Mijeong (Animal Genetic Resources Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Park, Soo-Bong (Animal Genetic Resources Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Seong, Hwan-Hoo (Animal Genetic Resources Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Kim, Hyun (Animal Genetic Resources Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Kong, Il-Keun (Department of Animal Science, Division of Applied Life Science, Institute of Agriculture and Life Science, Graduate School of Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Kim, Sung Woo (Animal Genetic Resources Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
  • 투고 : 2013.07.09
  • 심사 : 2013.07.30
  • 발행 : 2013.09.30

초록

본 연구는 닭 정액 동결 보존을 위하여 동결 보호제로 7%의 DMA, DMF 그리고 7.5%의 MA를 이용하여 동결 융해 후 정자의 생존율, 정상 첨체율 및 미토콘드리아의 활성도를 FACS를 이용하여 평가하고, 수정률과의 상관관계를 조사하고자 수행하였다. 닭 정액을 동결한 결과, DMF를 사용하였을 때 생존율은 $52.1{\pm}5.52%$로 DMA와 MA에 비해 유의적으로 높았으며(P<0.05), DMA $46.94{\pm}5.06%$, MA $36.56{\pm}4.66%$순으로 나타났다(P<0.05). 첨체막이 파열되고 죽은 정자는 이와 반대로 MA를 이용하여 동결한 정액이 $61.16{\pm}1.86%$로서 가장 높았고, DMA $47.48{\pm}1.9%$ DMF $36.56{\pm}1.42%$순으로 유의적 차이를 보였다(p<0.05). 정자 미토콘드리아 막이 손상되지 않은 생존 정자는 DMF를 이용하여 동결한 정액에서 $52.68{\pm}1.07%$로 가장 높게 나타났고, DMA $44.46{\pm}1.04%$, MA $38.36{\pm}1.88%$순으로 유의적 차이를 나타냈다(p<0.05). 7% DMF를 사용하여 동결하였을 때 수정률은 유의적인 차이가 없었지만, 생존율 및 미토콘드리아 활성도가 유의적으로 가장 높았으며, 정상 첨체율이 유의적으로 높았다. 이는 DMF를 이용한 닭 정자 동결법이 정자의 세포막과 첨체의 손상에 미치는 영향이 가장 낮은 동결 보호제인 것으로 사료된다.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sperm viability, normal acrosome and mitochondrial activity in the frozen-thawed fowl semen by different cryoprotectants. The experiment was carried out on 10 sexually adult roosters of Ogye. The semen was collected twice a week and pooled semen was diluted 1:1 EK extender containing no cryoprotectant at $5^{\circ}C$. After equilibration for 30 minutes, diluted chicken semen was diluted 1:1 extender containing either 7% dimethylacetamide (DMA), 7% dimethylformamide (DMF) or 7.5% methylacetamide (MA) at final concentration and was put in 0.5 mL plastic straws and frozen for 30 minutes by exposure to liquid nitrogen vapor 4 cm above the surface of liquid nitrogen, followed by plunging into liquid nitrogen. Frozen semen was thawed in water bath at $5^{\circ}C$ for 2 minutes. For cytometric analysis, the frozen-thawed semen was diluted with EK extender to a final concentration of 90 million spermatozoa per mL. Sperm membrane integrity was evaluated as SYBR-14 and propidium iodide (PI). Acrosome integrity was assessed with fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled PSA and PI. The percentage of mitochondrial function was estimated by using Rhodamine123 (R123) and PI. In conclusion, freezing rooster semen by using 7% DMF as cryoprotectant was significantly highest in rates of survival and mitochondrial function while its rate of damage of acrosome was significantly lowest. As a result, DMF is the cryoprotectant that has the lowest influences on sperm membranes and acrosome integrity. Therefore it could be used for freezing method of animal genetic conservation method for poultry diversity.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Allen TE, Bobr LW 1995 The fertility of fowl spermatozoa in glycerol diluent after intrauterine insemination. Poultry Sci 34:1167-1169.
  2. Blesbois E, Grasseau I, Seigneurin F 2005 Membrane fluidity and the ability of domestic bird spermatozoa to survive cryopreservation. Reproduction 129:371-378. https://doi.org/10.1530/rep.1.00454
  3. Bongalhardo DC, Somnapan-Kakuda N, Buhr MM 2002 Isolation and unique composition of purified head plasma membrane from rooster sperm. Poultry Sci 81:1877-1883. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/81.12.1877
  4. Burrows WH, Quinn JP 1935 A method of obtaining spermatozoa from the domestic fowl. Poultry Sci 14:251-254. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0140251
  5. Clark CE, Shaffner CS 1960 The fertilizing capacity of frozen chicken sperm and the influence of related in vitro processes. Poultry Sci 39:1213-1220. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0391213
  6. Chalah T, Seigneurin F, Blesbois E, Brillard JP 1999 In vitro comparison of fowl sperm viability in ejaculates frozen by three different techniques and relationship with subsequent fertility in vivo. Cryobiology 39:185-191. https://doi.org/10.1006/cryo.1999.2201
  7. Christensen P, Stenvang JP, Godfrey WL 2004 A flow cytometric method for rapid determination of sperm concentration and viability in mammalian and avian semen. J Androl 25:255-264. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1939-4640.2004.tb02786.x
  8. Donoghue AM, Thistlethwaite D, Donoghue DJ, Kirby JD 1996 A new method for rapid determination of sperm concentration in turkey semen. Poultry Sci 75:785-789. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0750785
  9. Esteves SC, Sharma RK, Thomas AJ, Agarwal TA 2007 Evaluation of acrosomal status and sperm viability in fresh and cryopreserved specimens by the use of fluorescent peanut agglutinin lectin in conjunction with hypo-osmotic swelling test. Int Braz J Urol 33:364-376. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-55382007000300009
  10. Garner DL, Johnson LA 1995 Viability assessment of mammalian sperm using SYBR-14 and propidium iodide. Biol Reprod 53:276-284. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod53.2.276
  11. Gill SPS, Buss EG, Mallis RJ 1996 Cryopreservation of rooster semen in thirteen and sixteen percent glycerol. Poultry Sci 75:254-256. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0750254
  12. Gillan L, Evans G, Maxwell WMC 2005 Flow cytometric evaluation of sperm parameters in relation to fertility potential. Theriogenology 63:445-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.09.024
  13. Graham JK, Kunze E, Hammerstedt RH 1990 Analysis of sperm cell viability, acrosomal integrity, and mitochondrial function using FACS. Biol Reprod 43:55-64. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod43.1.55
  14. Graham JK 2001 Assessment of semen quality : a flow cytometric approach. Anim Reprod Sci 68:239-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(01)00160-9
  15. Hanzawa S, Niinomi T, Miyata T, Tsutui M, Tajima A 2010 Cryopreservation of chicken semen using N-methylacetamide as cryoprotectant. Jp Poult Sci 47:J27-J32.
  16. Harris GC, Thurston RJ, Cundall J 1973 Changes in the ultrastructure of the fowl spermatozoon due to rapid freezethaw. J Reprod Fertil 34:389-394. https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0340389
  17. Kirby JD, Tressler CJ, Kirby YK 1998 Evaluation of the duration of sperm fertilizing ability in five lines of commercial broiler breeder and Delaware cross males. Poultry Sci 77:1688-1694. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/77.11.1688
  18. Lake PE, Ravie O 1984 An exploration of cryoprotective compounds for fowl spermatozoa. Br Poult Sci 25:145-150. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632758408454852
  19. Lake PE, Ravie O, McAdam J 1981 Preservation of fowl semen in liquid nitrogen: application to breeding programmes. Br Poult Sci 22:71-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071688108447865
  20. Long JA, Kulkarni G 2004 An effective method for improving the fertility of glycerol-exposed poultry semen. Poultry Sci 83:1594-1601. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/83.9.1594
  21. Nagy S, Hallap T, Johannisson A, Rodriguez-Martinez H 2004. Changes in plasma membrane and acrosome integrity of frozen-thawed bovine spermatozoa during a 4 h incubation as measured by multicolor FACS. Anim Reprod Sci 80:225-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2003.08.003
  22. Neville WJ, Macpherson JW, Reinhart B 1971 The contraceptive action of glycerol in chickens. Poultry Sci 50:1411-1415. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0501411
  23. Partyka A, Nizanskib W, Lukaszewicz E 2010 Evaluation of fresh and frozen-thawed fowl semen by FACS. Theriogenology 74:1019-1027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.04.032
  24. Polge C, Smith AU, Parkes AS 1949 Revival of spermatozoa after vitrification and dehydration at low temperatures. Nature 164:666.
  25. Phillips JJ, Bramwell RK, Graham JK 1996 Gryopreservation of rooster sperm using methyl cellulose. Poultry Sci 75: 915-923. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0750915
  26. Purdy PH, Song Y, Silversides FG, Blackburn HD 2009 Evaluation of glycerol removal techniques, cryoprotectants, and insemination methods for cryopreserving rooster sperm with implications for breed and/or line regeneration. Poultry Sci 88:2184-2191. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00402
  27. Salisbury GW, Van Demark NL, Lodge JR 1978 Physiology of Reproduction and Artificial Insemination of Cattle. W. H. Freeman and Co. 2nd (eds), San Francisco, USA
  28. Sasaki K, Tatsumi T, Niinomi T, Imai T, Naito M, Tajima A, Nishi Y 2010 A method for cryopreserving semen from Yakido roosters using N-methylacetamide as a cryoprotectant. Jp Poult Sci 47:297-310. https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.009111
  29. Schramm GP 1991 Eignung verschiedener gefrierschutzstoffe zur kryoprotektion von hahnensperma. (German) Monatsh Veterinaermedizin 46:438-440.
  30. Seigneurin F, Blesbois E 1995 Effects of the freezing rate on viability and fertility of frozen-thawed fowl spermatozoa. Theriogenology 43: 1351-1358. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(95)00119-S
  31. Sexton TJ 1973 Effect of various cryoprotectants on the viability and reproductive efficiency of chicken spermatozoa. Poultry Sci 52, 1353-1357. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0521353
  32. Tereshchenko AV 1988 Cock sperm integrity dependence on the conditions of cryopreservation. Cand Sci Thesis Ukranian Poultry Research Institute, Borky.
  33. Tselutin K, Seigneurin F, Blesbois E 1999 Comparison of cryoprotectants and methods of cryopreservation of fowl spermatozoa. Poultry Sci 78:586-590. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/78.4.586
  34. Watanabe M, Terada T 1976 A new diluent for deep freezing preservation of fowl spermatozoa. Proceed 8th Inter Congress Anim Reprod Artific Insem 4:1096-1099.
  35. Xia L, Lalli MF, Ansah GA, Buckland RB 1988 Ultrastructure of fresh and frozen-thawed spermatozoa of high and low fertility lines of chickens. Poultry Sci 67:819-825. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0670819
  36. 오신애, 최선호, 고민희, 강태영, 조상래, 고문석, 오영미, 조원모 2012 제주흑우 동결정액 제조 시 Amide 계열의 동결 보호제가 동결 융해 후 정자의 성상에 미치는 영향. 한국동물자원과학회지 56(2): 95-101. https://doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2012.54.2.95
  37. 최진석, 김성우, 신단비, 고응규, 도윤정, 김동훈, 공일근, 박수봉 2012 N-methylacetamide 동결 보호제가 오계 동결정액의 생존성, 수정 및 부화율에 미치는 영향. 한국가금학회지 39(4): 291-295. https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2012.39.4.295

피인용 문헌

  1. Effect of cryoprotectants and thawing temperatures on chicken sperm quality 2017, https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.13070
  2. Effect of N-Methylacetamide Concentration on the Fertility and Hatchability of Cryopreserved Ogye Rooster Semen vol.41, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2014.41.1.21
  3. The Study of Estimation of Chromatin Abnormality of Ogye Rooster Sperm and Activity by Diff-Quik Staining Method vol.42, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2015.42.2.109