DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

특허 인용 관계가 기업 성과에 미치는 영향 : 소셜네트워크분석 관점

The Effect of Patent Citation Relationship on Business Performance : A Social Network Analysis Perspective

  • 박준형 (국민대학교 비즈니스IT전문대학원) ;
  • 곽기영 (국민대학교 경영대학 경영정보학부)
  • Park, Jun Hyung (Graduate School of Business IT, Kookmin University) ;
  • Kwahk, Kee-Young (School of Management Information Systems, College of Business Administration, Kookmin University)
  • 투고 : 2013.06.13
  • 심사 : 2012.07.09
  • 발행 : 2013.09.30

초록

최근 지식기반 사회의 진입과 더불어 지식재산에 대한 관심이 증가하고 있다. 특히 하이테크산업을 이끌고 있는 ICT기업들은 지식재산의 체계적 관리를 위하여 끊임없이 노력하고 있다. 기업의 지적 자본을 대표하는 특허정보가 지속적으로 축적됨에 따라 정량적인 분석이 가능해졌다. 특허정보를 통하여 특허수준부터 기업수준, 산업수준, 국가 수준에 이르기 까지 다양한 수준에서의 분석이 가능하다. 특허정보는 기술 현황을 파악하거나 성과에 미치는 영향을 분석하는데 활용되고 있다. 특허 인용 정보를 활용한 분석은 크게 두 가지로, 인용 횟수를 활용하는 인용지표 분석과 인용관계를 바탕으로 한 네트워크분석으로 나뉜다. 네트워크를 통한 분석은 지식 영향의 흐름을 나타내며, 이를 통하여 기술의 변화를 확인할 수 있을 뿐만 아니라 앞으로의 연구 방향을 예측할 수 있다. 네트워크를 활용한 분석 분야에서는 기업이 차지하는 네트워크상에서의 위치가 기업성과에 미치는 영향을 다각도에서 분석하는 연구가 진행되고 있다. 본 연구에서는 소셜네트워크분석 기법을 활용하여 특허 인용을 기반으로 한 기업 간의 네트워크를 도출하고 특허 인용 네트워크에서 차지하는 기업의 위치적 특성이 기업성과에 미치는 영향을 분석하였다. 이를 위해 미국 S&P500에 등록된 IT 및 통신서비스 기업 가운데 74개 기업을 표본으로 선정하였다. 소셜네트워크분석을 통하여 개별 기업들의 아웃디그리 중심성, 매개 중심성, 효율성(구조적 공백)을 측정하여 네트워크 상에서의 위치적 우위를 나타내는 독립변수로서 이용하였으며, 기업성과 변수로는 순이익을 사용하였다. 실증 분석 결과, 각각의 네트워크 지표는 기업성과인 순이익에 통계적으로 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 두 가지 중심성 지표는 기업성과에 정(+)의 영향을 미친 반면, 구조적 공백으로 인한 위치적 우위를 나타내는 효율성은 기업성과에 부정적(-)인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 세 가지 네트워크 지표를 동시에 고려할 경우에는 매개 중심성만이 기업성과에 대해 통계적 유의성을 보였다. 분석 결과를 토대로 연구의 발견점을 토의하고 시사점을 논의하였다.

With an advent of recent knowledge-based society, the interest in intellectual property has increased. Firms have tired to result in productive outcomes through continuous innovative activity. Especially, ICT firms which lead high-tech industry have tried to manage intellectual property more systematically. Firm's interest in the patent has increased in order to manage the innovative activity and Knowledge property. The patent involves not only simple information but also important values as information of technology, management and right. Moreover, as the patent has the detailed contents regarding technology development activity, it is regarded as valuable data. The patent which reflects technology spread and research outcomes and business performances are closely interrelated as the patent is considered as a significant the level of firm's innovation. As the patent information which represents companies' intellectual capital is accumulated continuously, it has become possible to do quantitative analysis. The advantages of patent in the related industry information and it's standardize information can be easily obtained. Through the patent, the flow of knowledge can be determined. The patent information can analyze in various levels from patent to nation. The patent information is used to analyze technical status and the effects on performance. The patent which has a high frequency of citation refers to having high technological values. Analyzing the patent information contains both citation index analysis using the number of citation and network analysis using citation relationship. Network analysis can provide the information on the flows of knowledge and technological changes, and it can show future research direction. Studies using the patent citation analysis vary academically and practically. For the citation index research, studies to analyze influential big patent has been conducted, and for the network analysis research, studies to find out the flows of technology in a certain industry has been conducted. Social network analysis is applied not only in the sociology, but also in a field of management consulting and company's knowledge management. Research of how the company's network position has an impact on business performances has been conducted from various aspects in a field of network analysis. Social network analysis can be based on the visual forms. Network indicators are available through the quantitative analysis. Social network analysis is used when analyzing outcomes in terms of the position of network. Social network analysis focuses largely on centrality and structural holes. Centrality indicates that actors having central positions among other actors have an advantage to exert stronger influence for exchange relationship. Degree centrality, betweenness centrality and closeness centrality are used for centrality analysis. Structural holes refer to an empty place in social structure and are defined as efficiency and constraints. This study stresses and analyzes firms' network in terms of the patent and how network characteristics have an influence on business performances. For the purpose of doing this, seventy-four ICT companies listed in S&P500 are chosen for the sample. UCINET6 is used to analyze the network structural characteristics such as outdegree centrality, betweenness centrality and efficiency. Then, regression analysis test is conducted to find out how these network characteristics are related to business performance. It is found that each network index has significant impacts on net income, i.e. business performance. However, it is found that efficiency is negatively associated with business performance. As the efficiency increases, net income decreases and it has a negative impact on business performances. Furthermore, it is shown that betweenness centrality solely has statistically significance for the multiple regression analysis with three network indexes. The patent citation network analysis shows the flows of knowledge between firms, and it can be expected to contribute to company's management strategies by analyzing company's network structural positions.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Albert, "Direct validation of citation counts as Indicator of Industrially Import patents," Journal Research Policy, Vol.20, No.3(1991), 251-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(91)90055-U
  2. Brass, D. J., "Being in the right place : A structural analysis of individual influences in an Organization," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.29, No.4(1984), 518-539. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392937
  3. Breschia, S. and C. Catalinia, "Tracing the links between science and technology : An exploratory analysis of scientists' and inventors' networks," Research Policy, Vol.39, No.1 (2010), 14-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.11.004
  4. Burt, Brokerage and Closure : An Introduction to Social Capital, Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2005.
  5. Choi, J. H., H. S. Kim, and N. G. Im, "Keyword Network Analysis for Technology Forecasting," Journal of Intelligence and Information Systems, Vol.17, No.4(2011), 227-240.
  6. Chon, B. S., "The Structure of Global Alliance Networks in the Telecommunication Industry," Korean Journal of Broadcasting, Vol.19, No.1 (2005), 47-75.
  7. Choo, K. N., "Inventor Citations versus Examiner Citations-An Analysis of Determinants of Patent Citations Using Korean Patent Data," The Journal of Intellectual Property, Vol.6, No.4(2011), 209-242. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpq221
  8. Christian S., A. Barkowski and R. Schramm, "Visualizing Patent Statistics by Means of Social Network Analysis Tools," World Patent Information, Vol.30(2008), 115-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2007.08.003
  9. Clarkson, G., Objective Identification of Patent Thickets : A Network Analytic Approach, Harvard Business School Doctoral Thesis, 2004.
  10. Ernst, H., "Patent Information for Strategic Technology Management," World Patent Information, Vol.25(2003), 233-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0172-2190(03)00077-2
  11. Freeman, "Centralit in Social Network : I. Conceptual Classfication," Social Network, Vol.1 (1979), 215-239.
  12. Granstrand, O., The Economics and Management of Intellectual property : Towards Intellectual Capitalism, MA : Edward Elgar, 1999.
  13. Griffith Hack, The Smartphone Patent Wars, 2011. Available at http://www.ambercite.com/downloads/The%20Smartphone%20Patent%20Wars%20whitepaper_March%202011.pdf(Accessed 13 June, 2013).
  14. Hall, The NBER patent citations data file : lessons, insights and methodological tools, MA : Cambridge, 2001.
  15. Han, J., D. Y. Shin, and N. K. Ki, "Niche Structures and Inter-firm Competitive Dynamics in the Korean Systems Integration Industry : Explaining Firm Performance From A Network Perspective," Korea Management Review, Vol.33, No.5(2004), 1441-1459.
  16. Ibarra, H., "Personal networks of women and minorities in management : A conceptual framework," Academy of Management Review, Vol.18, No.1(1993), 56-87.
  17. Jeon, K. E., The patent law in America about fundamental technologies, KIPO, 1999. Available at http://www.kipo.go.kr/home/portal/nHtml/Data/NewKnowH04.html(Accessed 13 June, 2013).
  18. Jung, M. A., Y. H. Choi, and E. N. Heo, "Relationship between Innovative Capacities and IPR Performances among Korean Bio-firms," The Korean Economic Review, Vol.55, No.4 (2007), 243-273.
  19. Karki, M. M. S., "Patent citation analysis : a policy analysis tool," World Patent Information, Vol.19, No.4(1997), 269-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0172-2190(97)00033-1
  20. Kim, H., D. H. Baek, M. J. Shin, and D. S. Han, "A Model for Evaluating Technology Importance of Patents under Incomplete Citation," Journal of Intelligence and Information Systems, Vol.14, No.2(2008), 121-198.
  21. Kim, H. J. and K.-Y. Kwahk, "Effects of Centrality on IT Usage Capability : A Perspective of Social Networks," The Journal of Information Systems, Vol.20, No.1(2011), 147-169. https://doi.org/10.5859/KAIS.2011.20.1.147
  22. Kim, C. S. and K.-Y. Kwahk, "The Effects of Alliance Network Characteristics on Firm Performance in the Golf Resorts Industry of Korea : A Social Network Perspective," Journal of Business Research, Vol.26, No.2(2011), 23-50.
  23. Koo, T. H. and Y. C. Lee, "The Structural Holes in the Strategic Networks and the Performance of Hotels : The Social Network Analysis for The Five Star Hotels in Korea," Journal of Tourism Science, Vol.30, No.4(2006), 67-86.
  24. Kwahk, K.-Y., Social Network Analysis : UCINET Application, Graduate School of Business IT Kookmin University Lecture Materials, 2013.
  25. Lee, B. K., "The Exploratory Study on the Determinants of Innovation at the firm level : Social Network Analysis on Inventor's Network in Pharmaceutical Industry," The Journal of Intellectual Property, Vol.4, No.1(2009), 81-107. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpn233
  26. Lee, C. S., S. J. Lee, and B. G. Choi, "An Intelligent Decision Support System for Selecting Promising Technologies for R&D based on Timeseries Patent Analysis," Journal of Intelligence and Information Systems, Vol.18, No.3 (2012), 79-96.
  27. Nam, Y. J. and E. S. Jeong, "A Study on the Development of New Patent Index Used the Citation Information," Journal of Korea Society for Information Management, Vol.10, No.4(2007), 221-241. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2006.23.1.221
  28. Namn, S. H. and S. S. Seol, "Coauthorship Analysis of Innovation Studies in Korea : A Social Network Perspective," Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, Vol.10, No.4(2007), 605-628.
  29. OECD, The measurement of scientific and technological Activities : using patent data as Science and Technology Indicators : patent Manual, 1994.
  30. Park, S. Y., H. W. Park, and M. H. Cho, "The Relationship between Technology Innovation and Firm Performance of Korean Companies based on Patent Analysis," Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, Vol.9, No.1 (2006), 1-25.
  31. Peter, N., R. Frietsch, T. Schubert, and K. Blind, Patents and the Financial Performance of Firms-An Analysis based on Stock Market Data, Fraunhofer ISI Discussion Paper Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis, 2011.
  32. Powell, W. W. and L. Smith-Doerr, Networks and economic life, Princeton University Press, 1994.
  33. Scott, Social network analysis : A Handbook, CA : SAGE Publications, 2000.
  34. Seo, J., O. J. Kwon, K. R. Noh, W. J. Kim, and E. S. Jeong, "A Study on the research outcome measurement and application using the patent citation information," 2006 Proceeding of the Korea Technology Innovation Society Conference.
  35. USTPOa., Chapter 2000 Duty of Disclosure, USTPO, 2004. Available at http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/mpep-2000.pdf(Accessed 13 June, 2013).
  36. USTPOb., 706 Rejection of Claims, USTPO, 2012. Available at http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/s706.html(Accessed 13 June, 2013).
  37. Wasserman, S. and K. Faust, Social Network Analysis : Methods and Applications, Cambridge University Press, 1994.
  38. Xu, H., "A Regional University-Industry Cooperation Research Based on Patent Data Analysis," Asian Social Science, Vol.6, No.11 (2010), 88-94.
  39. Yoo, S. H., Y. H. Lee, and D. K. Won, "A Study on the Measurement of Technological Impact using Citation Analysis of Patent Information," Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, Vol.10, No.4(2007), 687-705.
  40. Yoon, B. and Y. Park, "A Text-mining-based Patent Network : Analytical Tool for Hightechnology Trend," Journal of High Technology Management Research, Vol.15(2004), 37-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2003.09.003
  41. Yoon, M. H., "Technological Regime and the Shift of Industrial Leadership in the DRAM Industry : A Patent Citation Analysis," The Journal of Intellectual Property, Vol.6, No.3 (2011), 239-270.
  42. Z1aheer, A. and G. G. Bell, "Benefiting from Network Position : Firm Capabilities, Structural Holes, and Performance," Strategic Management Journal, Vol.26(2005), 809-825. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.482

피인용 문헌

  1. A Study on the Application of Korean Standards(KS) Networks to the Development of a Product Portfolio Strategy vol.41, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2013.41.4.637
  2. Enhancing Predictive Accuracy of Collaborative Filtering Algorithms using the Network Analysis of Trust Relationship among Users vol.22, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.13088/jiis.2016.22.3.113
  3. Discovery of Market Convergence Opportunity Combining Text Mining and Social Network Analysis: Evidence from Large-Scale Product Databases vol.22, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.13088/jiis.2016.22.4.087
  4. Study on the Prevention of Patent Disputes through Network Analysis - Focusing on NPEs in Smart Car Industry - vol.23, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7467/KSAE.2015.23.3.315
  5. Smarter Classification for Imbalanced Data Set and Its Application to Patent Evaluation vol.20, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.13088/jiis.2014.20.1.015
  6. Analyzing the Ecosystem of the Domestic Online Game Industry : Focusing on the Linkage between Developers and Publishers vol.42, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7232/JKIIE.2016.42.2.138
  7. A Technology Planning Approach Based on Network and Growth Curve Analyses : the Case of Augmented Reality Patents vol.42, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7232/JKIIE.2016.42.5.337
  8. 친구관계 네트워크가 학습성과에 미치는 영향 -S대학 비서학전공 전문대학생들을 중심으로- vol.15, pp.11, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5392/jkca.2015.15.11.616
  9. 산학협력 및 기술이전 촉진을 위한 텍스트마이닝과 사회 네트워크 분석 기반의 특허 분석 방법 vol.22, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.7838/jsebs.2017.22.3.001
  10. 사회연결망 분석을 통한 인증 포트폴리오 전략에 관한 연구 vol.45, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.7469/jksqm.2017.45.3.427
  11. 기술 성숙도 및 의존도의 네트워크 분석을 통한 유망 융합 기술 발굴 방법론 vol.24, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.13088/jiis.2018.24.1.101
  12. 특허로 살펴본 얼굴인식 기술개발 동향 vol.34, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.22648/etri.2019.j.340204
  13. A Study on the Analysis of the Technology of Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicle Parts : With Focus on the Patent Analysis of Co-Assignees vol.28, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.7467/ksae.2020.28.3.227
  14. 인공지능의 기술 혁신 및 확산 패턴 분석: USPTO 특허 데이터를 중심으로 vol.20, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5392/jkca.2020.20.04.086
  15. 네트워크 분석 논문의 고찰: 계량서지적 분석과 내용분석을 중심으로 vol.38, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2021.38.1.169