산업경영시스템학회지 (Journal of Korean Society of Industrial and Systems Engineering)

  • 제36권2호
  • /
  • Pages.81-90
  • /
  • 2013
  • /
  • 2005-0461(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-7975(eISSN)
한국산업경영시스템학회 (Society of Korea Industrial and System Engineering)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

생산환경 변화에 따른 최적 Material Flow Control 선택방법

Selection Method for Optimal Shop Floor Control According to Manufacturing Environment

  • 박상근 (한국 지엠 주식회사 기술연구소) ;
  • 박성호 (에스에이치 글로벌 중앙연구소) ;
  • 하정훈 (홍익대학교 정보컴퓨터공학부 산업공학전공)
  • 투고 : 2013.05.28
  • 심사 : 2013.06.24
  • 발행 : 2013.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Material flow control (MFC) is a kind of operational policy to control of the movement of raw materials, components, and products through the manufacturing lines. It is very important because it varies throughput, line cycle time, and work-in-process (WIP) under the same manufacturing environments. MFC can be largely categorized into three types such as Push, Pull, and Hybrid. In this paper, we set various manufacturing environments to compare five existing MFC mechanisms: Push, Pull, and Hybrid (CONWIP, Gated MaxWIP, Critical WIP Loops, etc). Three manufacturing environments, manufacturing policies (make to stock and make to order), demand (low, medium, high), and line balancing (balanced, unbalanced, and highly unbalanced) are considered. The MFCs are compared in the point of the five functional efficiencies and the proposed compounded efficiency. The simulation results shows that the Push is superior in the functional efficiency and GMWIP is superior in the compounded efficiency.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. AnyLogic, http://www.xjtek.com/company, 2012.
  2. Grosfeld-Nir, A. and Magazine, M., Gated MaxWIP : a strategy for controlling multistage production systems. International Journal of Production Research, 2002, Vol. 40, No. 11, p 2557-2567. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540210128251
  3. Grosfeld-Nir, A., Magazine, M., and Vanberkel, A., Push and pull strategies for controlling multistage production systems. International Journal of Production Research, 2000, Vol. 38, No. 11, p 2361-2375. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540050031814
  4. Hopp, W.J. and Mark, L., Spearman, Factory Physics : Foundations of Manufacturing Management, New York, McGraw-Hill, 2007.
  5. Khojasteh-Ghamari, Y., Developing a framework for performance analysis of a production process controlled by Kanban and CONWIP. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2012, Vol. 23, p 61-71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-009-0338-y
  6. Lee, K.H., Formal integration of Process Planning and Shop Floor Control With Petri Nets. Proceedings of The Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society, 1996, Vol. 1, p 619-622.
  7. Sepehri, M.M. and Nahavandi, N., Critical WIP loops: a mechanism for material flow control in flow lines. International Journal of Production Research, 2007, Vol. 45, No. 12, p 2759-2773. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540600787077
  8. Sipper, D., Production Planning, Control and Integration, New York, McGraw-Hill, 1997.
  9. Spearman, M.L., Woodruff, D.L., and Hopp, W.J., CONWIP : a pull alternative to kanban. International Journal of Production Research, 1990, Vol. 28, No. 5, p 879-894. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207549008942761