DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Analysis of the Possibility for Using Converged Spatial Information(CSI) in National Territorial Planning - The Case Study of LH's Future Business about Land and Housing

융복합 공간정보의 국토계획 분야 활용가능성 분석 - LH 국토·주택관련 미래사업 예시를 중심으로

  • Choi, Jun Young (Spatial information office, Korea Land and Housing Corporation)
  • Received : 2013.06.05
  • Accepted : 2013.08.30
  • Published : 2013.08.31

Abstract

Due to explosively increasing utilization in spatial information and a rapid development in geospatial technology related to national territorial and housing, there are increasing demands for converging spatial information on not only urban planning and real estate data but also newly generated data from smart phone, GPS to achieve comparative advantage of national territory. In this paper, we prospect the utilization of Converged Spatial Information(CSI) to future national territorial planning for the purpose of enhancing territorial competitiveness. For this purpose, considering the Korea Land and Housing corporation(LH) takes charge most of government's land and housing development projects, CSI usage of this company's 6 future business domains until 2029 were used as a case study. Also, 7 CSIs derived from literature review were surveyed to find the degree of CSI utilization in the national territorial future. In the analysis result, it was found that 3D data and mobile data among others have higher degree of utilization, and urban and regional development is the most highly utilizable domain for CSIs. After all, to revitalize the use of CSI in national territorial future, it is required to do a balanced construction of territorial use spatial information about marine use, coastal use, underground space besides land use.

공간정보의 폭발적 증가와 공간정보 활용 기술의 발전으로 국토의 비교우위를 유지하기 위한 공간정보와 도시계획 및 부동산 정보 융복합 수요가 증가하고 있다. 본 논문에서는 국토 경쟁력 강화를 위해 필요한 융복합 공간정보의 장래 국토공간 계획 및 이용 활용도를 전망해 보았다. 이를 위해 국토, 주택분야 공기업인 한국토지주택공사(LH)의 장래 2029년까지 6대 분야별 미래사업을 도출하였다. 또한 문헌조사를 통해 도출한 7종의 융복합 공간정보의 미래사업 분야별 활용도를 설문조사하여 국토주택개발 분야의 미래 활용을 분석해 보았다. 분석결과 3D, 모바일 데이터, 정형 빅데이터, 지오센서, 참여형 공간정보 순으로 활용도가 높은 것으로 나타났고, 사업분야에서는 도시 및 지역개발이 활용도가 높은 것으로 나타났다. 미래 융복합 공간정보 활성화를 위해서는 토지이용 이외에 해양이용, 연안이용, 지하공간 등 균형있는 국토이용 공간정보의 구축이 필요한 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Batty, M. 2012, Editorial: Smart Cities, big data, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 39:191-193. https://doi.org/10.1068/b3902ed
  2. BBSR. 2003, Szenarien zur Raumentwicklung, Raum - und Siedlungsstrukturen Deutschlands 2015/2040.(http://www.bbsr.bund.de)
  3. Camagni, R. 2002, On the Concept of Territorial Competitiveness: Sound or Misleading?, Urban Studies, 39(13):2395-2411. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098022000027022
  4. Cho, C. M; Chung, M. S. 2010, U-City Service Space Realization Strategies in Digital Convergence Era, Journal of Korea Spatial Information Society, 18(2):77-88.
  5. Cho, W. S. 2011, Book review: Geospatial Information Convergence is prerequisite for acting geospatial information policy, Monthly National Territory, 358:156-157.
  6. Choi, B. M; Kim, H. J; Seo, D. J. 2010, Urban Information and GIS, Daewangsa:Seoul.
  7. Choi, B. N; Lee, Y. J; Kong, H. K. 2010, A Study on Value Chain and Dynamic Effects of Geospatial Information Convergence, KRIHS.
  8. Choi, J. W. 2009, Urban Regeneration Information and Building Information Modeling, Seminar on the Smart Urban Renaissance based on the NSDI, KNHC.
  9. Choi, J. Y; Kim, T. G. 2012, A Study on the Construction of Housing Geospatial Information for the Integrated use of Housing Supply Model, Journal of Korea Spatial Information Society, 20(6):1-11. https://doi.org/10.12672/ksis.2012.20.6.001
  10. Cheshire, J; Batty, M. 2012, Editorial: Visualization tools for understanding big data, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 39: 413-415. https://doi.org/10.1068/b3903ed
  11. DATAR. 2011, Territoires 2040.(http://www.datar.gouv.fr)
  12. DIACT. 2006, Territoires 2030.
  13. Drummond, W. J; Steve, P. F. 2008, The Future of GIS in Planning: Converging Technologies and Diverging Interests, Journal of the American Planning Association, 74(2):161-174. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360801982146
  14. ESPON. 2007, Scenarios on the territorial future of Europe, ESPON(http://www.eson.eu).
  15. Haklay, M. 2010, How good is volunteered geographic information? A comparative study of OpenStreetMap and Ordnance Survey datasets, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 37:682-703. https://doi.org/10.1068/b35097
  16. Heikkila, E. J. 1998, GIS is Dead; Long Live GIS!, Journal of the American Planning Association, 64(3):350-360. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369808975991
  17. Hur, J. Y; Kim, D. J; Kim, M. S; Kang, M. G; Park, J. H. 2012, Future Agenda and Policy Direction for National Territorial Development, KRIHS.
  18. Huxhold, W. E. 1991, An introduction to urban geographic information systems, Oxford university press.
  19. Kim, D. J; Lee, S. J; Lee, Y. W; Moon, J. H; Lee, S. J; Nam, G. C; Park, J. H; Lee, G. M. 2012, Pioneering the future national territory and new balanced development strategy, KRIHS.
  20. Korea Planners' Association. 2010, GIS of spatial information utilization for urban planning and management, Bo-seong-gak.
  21. Land, S; Haase, D; Seppelt, R; Schwarz, N. 2012, Simulating demography and housing demand in an urban region scenarios of growth and shrinkage, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 39: 229-246. https://doi.org/10.1068/b36046t
  22. Land and Housing Research Institute(LHI). 2010, Megatrend and 2030 LH Grand vision, LHI.
  23. Land and Housing Research Institite. 2011, A study on the pilot system development for LH spatial information utilization, LHI.
  24. Lee, H. J. 2009, Development strategy for Urban Renaissance Informatization(URI), Seminar on the Smart Urban Renaissance based on the NSDI, LH.
  25. Lee, J. I; Kang, Y. O. 2005, A study on the establishment and usage of urban land use information system in Seoul, Seoul Development Institute.
  26. Lee, Y. W; Kim, S. H; Son, H. G; Kim, D. H; Park, J. H; Im, J. Y. 2012, Future Prospect Strategies for National Territorial Development(I), KRIHS.
  27. LH. 2012, LH Sustainability Report 2012, LH.
  28. MLTM. 2011, Development of overseas expansion consulting program for best practice case of national spatial information, MLTM.
  29. MLTM. 2012, Spatial Big Data Master Plan for envision the participatory government, MLTM.
  30. Reads, J; Calabresse, F; Ratti, C. 2009, Eigenplaces: analysing cities using the space-time structure of the mobile phone networks, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 36:824-836. https://doi.org/10.1068/b34133t
  31. Advanced search service in Dictionary of IT term(http://terms.naver.com).

Cited by

  1. 지방자치단체 공간정보정책 개선방안 연구 - 서울특별시 공간정보정책 및 시스템 분석 사례 - vol.45, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.22640/lxsiri.2015.45.1.17