DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Testing of Agricultural Tractor Engine using Animal-fats Biodiesel as Fuel

  • Kim, Youngjung (Energy & Environmental Division, Department of Agricultural Engineering, National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Lee, Siyoung (Energy & Environmental Division, Department of Agricultural Engineering, National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Kim, Jonggoo (Energy & Environmental Division, Department of Agricultural Engineering, National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Kang, Donghyeon (Energy & Environmental Division, Department of Agricultural Engineering, National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Choi, Honggi (Energy & Environmental Division, Department of Agricultural Engineering, National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration)
  • Received : 2013.07.19
  • Accepted : 2013.08.07
  • Published : 2013.09.01

Abstract

Purpose: Performances of a tractor diesel engine fueled by three different animal fats biodiesels were evaluated comparing with light oil tractor in terms of power, fuel consumption rate, exhaust gases, particulate matter amount and field work capacity. Methods: Animal fats based on pig biodiesel were manufactured manually and tested for its engine performance in the tractor diesel engine and fuel adoptability in the field works. Four different fuels, three different content of biodiesel (BD20, BD50, BD100) and light oil, were prepared and tested in the four strokes diesel engine. Power output, fuel consumption rate and exhaust gases of the four fuels in the diesel engine were compared and discussed. Results: Power output of light oil engine was the greatest showing 5.3% difference between light oil and BD100, but 0.37% better power than BD20 engine power. Less exhaust gases of $CO_2$, CO, $NO_X$ and THC were produced from animal fats biodiesel than light oil, which confirmed that biodiesel is environmental friendly fuel. For fuel adoptability in the tractor, biodiesel engine tractor showed its fuel competitiveness comparing with light oil for tractor works in the faddy field. Conclusions: With four different fuel types of animal-fats biodiesel, performances of a four cylinder diesel engine for tractor were evaluated in terms of power, exhaust gases, particulate matters (PM) and field work capacity. No significant differences observed in the engine performances including power output and exhaust gases emission rate. No significant power difference observed between the various fuels including light oil on the engine running, however, amounts of noxious exhaust gases including $CO_2$ and $NO_X$ decreased as biodiesel content increased in the fuels. Field performances of animal-fats biodiesel tractor were investigated by conducting plowing and rotary operation in the field. Tilling and rotary performance of light oil tractor and BD20 tractor in the field were compared, in which about 10% travelling speed difference on both operations were monitored that showed light oil tractor was superior to BD20 tractor by 10%. Animal-fats can be an alternative fuel source replacing light oil for agricultural machinery and an environmental friendly fuel to nature.

Keywords

References

  1. Choi, S. H., Y. T. Oh and C. H. Lee. 2006. The characteristics of biodiesel fuel as an alternative fuel of an agricultural engine. Journal of Biosystems Engineering 31:115-120. https://doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2006.31.2.115
  2. Choi, S. H., Y. T. Oh and G. H. Kim. 2007. Characteristics of durability and emission with biodiesel fuel (5%) in a common rail direct injection engine at seoul-10 mode. Journal of Biosystems Engineering 32:97-101 (In Korean, with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2007.32.2.097
  3. Goodfellow, J. 2010. Biofuel production from animal fats: A north American perspective. http://worldrenderers.org/11.pdf.
  4. Hofman, V. 2003. Biodiesel fuel: NDSU Extension Service. February. North Dakota State University, Fargo, USA.
  5. Kang, S. K. 2009. Exhaust gas reduction strategy of construction and agricultural machinery for green growth. Machinery Industry 2:120-132.
  6. Kim, Y. J., Y. K. Kang, K. C. Kang and Y. S. Ryou. 2008. Fuel qualities of different biodiesels in the gun type burner. Journal of Biosystems Engineering 33:124-129 (In Korean, with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2008.33.2.124
  7. Kim, Y. J., S. H. Park, C. K. Kim, D. H. Im, H. J. Kim and S. C. Jung. 2010. Investigation of adaptabilities of biodiesel for agricultural tractor. Journal of Biosystems Engineering 35:10-14. https://doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2010.35.1.010
  8. Kim, Y. J., S. H. Park, C. K. Kim, D. H. Im, Y. Jang and S. S. Kim. 2011. Endurance test of biodiesel fueled tractor engine. Journal of agricultural science and technology B1(1):1025-1031.
  9. Kim, Y. J., S. H. Park, Y. J. Kim and C. K. Kim. 2012. Fuel qualities and combustion characteristics of animal fats biodiesel for agricultural hot air heaters. Journal of Biosystems Engineering 37:296-301. https://doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2012.37.5.296
  10. ISO. 2007. Steady-state test cycles for different engine applications. in: part 4. ISO 8178-4. International Standard.
  11. Personal information. 2009. Unpublished Engine Test Report.
  12. Prankl, H, H. Schaufler, H. Lampel, J. Zierfub, A. Burgsteiner and P. Prinz-Hufnagel. 2006. Engine Tests. FJ-BLT Wieselburg. Austria.
  13. Wilson, A. 2003. Biodiesel: a cleaner, greener fuel for the 21st century. Environmental Building News 12:1-9.

Cited by

  1. Research Trends for Performance, Safety, and Comfort Evaluation of Agricultural Tractors: A Review vol.39, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2014.39.1.021