DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of the shades of background substructures on the overall color of zirconia-based all-ceramic crowns

  • Received : 2013.03.21
  • Accepted : 2013.07.08
  • Published : 2013.08.31

Abstract

PURPOSE. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of the color of a background substructure on the overall color of a zirconia-based all-ceramic crown. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Twenty one posterior zirconia crowns were made for twenty subjects. Seven premolar crowns and six molar crowns were cemented onto abutments with metal post and core in the first and second group. In the third group, eight molar crowns were cemented onto abutments with a prefabricated post and composite core build-up. The color measurements of all-ceramic crowns were made before try-in, before and after cementation. A repeated measure ANOVA was used for a statistical analysis of a color change of all-ceramic crowns at ${\alpha}$=.05. Twenty four zirconia specimens, with different core thicknesses (0.4-1 mm) were also prepared to obtain the contrast ratio of zirconia materials after veneering. RESULTS. $L^*$, $a^*$, and $b^*$ values of all-ceramic crowns cemented either on a metal cast post and core or on a prefabricated post did not show significant changes (P>.05). However, the slight color changes of zirconia crowns were detected and represented by ${\Delta}E{^*}_{ab}$ values, ranging from 1.2 to 3.1. The contrast ratios of zirconia specimens were 0.92-0.95 after veneering. CONCLUSION. No significant differences were observed between the $L^*$, $a^*$, and $b^*$ values of zirconia crowns cemented either on a metal cast post and core or a prefabricated post and composite core. However, the color of a background substructure could affect the overall color of posterior zirconia restorations with clinically recommended core thickness according to ${\Delta}E{^*}_{ab}$ values.

Keywords

References

  1. Coornaert J, Adriaens P, De Boever J. Long-term clinical study of porcelain-fused-to-gold restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1984;51:338-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(84)90217-8
  2. Walton TR. An up to 15-year longitudinal study of 515 metal- ceramic FPDs: Part 1. Outcome. Int J Prosthodont 2002; 15:439-45.
  3. Napankangas R, Raustia A. Twenty-year follow-up of metalceramic single crowns: a retrospective study. Int J Prosthodont 2008;21:307-11.
  4. Heffernan MJ, Aquilino SA, Diaz-Arnold AM, Haselton DR, Stanford CM, Vargas MA. Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. Part I: core materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 88:4-9.
  5. Heffernan MJ, Aquilino SA, Diaz-Arnold AM, Haselton DR, Stanford CM, Vargas MA. Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. Part II: core and veneer materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:10-5.
  6. Chen YM, Smales RJ, Yip KH, Sung WJ. Translucency and biaxial flexural strength of four ceramic core materials. Dent Mater 2008;24:1506-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.03.010
  7. Kingery WD. Introduction to ceramics. 2nded. New York; Wiley Interscience; 1975. p. 516-80,666.
  8. Klein GA. Industrial color physics. New York: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC; 2010, p. 185-6.
  9. Antonson SA, Anusavice KJ. Contrast ratio of veneering and core ceramics as a function of thickness. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:316-20.
  10. Chu FC, Sham AS, Luk HW, Andersson B, Chai J, Chow TW. Threshold contrast ratio and masking ability of porcelain veneers with high-density alumina cores. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:24-8.
  11. Yu B, Ahn JS, Lee YK. Measurement of translucency of tooth enamel and dentin. Acta Odontol Scand 2009;67:57-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016350802577818
  12. Sakaguchi RL, Powers JM. Craig's restorative dental materials. 12th ed. Mosby Elsevier; 2006, p. 33.
  13. Johnston WM, Kao EC. Assessment of appearance match by visual observation and clinical colorimetry. J Dent Res 1989; 68:819-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345890680051301
  14. Douglas RD, Steinhauer TJ, Wee AG. Intraoral determination of the tolerance of dentists for perceptibility and acceptability of shade mismatch. J Prosthet Dent 2007;97:200-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012
  15. Seghi RR, Hewlett ER, Kim J. Visual and instrumental colorimetric assessments of small color differences on translucent dental porcelain. J Dent Res 1989;68:1760-4. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345890680120801
  16. Douglas RD, Brewer JD. Acceptability of shade differences in metal ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:254-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70233-1
  17. Ishikawa-Nagai S, Yoshida A, Sakai M, Kristiansen J, Da Silva JD. Clinical evaluation of perceptibility of color differences between natural teeth and all-ceramic crowns. J Dent 2009; 37:e57-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2009.04.004
  18. Guazzato M, Albakry M, Ringer SP, Swain MV. Strength, fracture toughness and microstructure of a selection of allceramic materials. Part II. Zirconia-based dental ceramics. Dent Mater 2004;20:449-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2003.05.002
  19. Carter CB, Norton MG. Ceramic materials: Science and engineering. New York; Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.; 2007, p. 583.
  20. Baldissara P, Llukacej A, Ciocca L, Valandro FL, Scotti R. Translucency of zirconia copings made with different CAD/ CAM systems. J Prosthet Dent 2010;104:6-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60086-8
  21. Karaagaclioglu L, Terzioglu H, Yilmaz B, Yurdukoru B. In vivo and in vitro assessment of an intraoral dental colorimeter. J Prosthodont 2010;19:279-85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00568.x
  22. Li Q, Wang YN. Comparison of shade matching by visual observation and an intraoral dental colorimeter. J Oral Rehabil 2007;34:848-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01678.x
  23. Denry I, Kelly JR. State of the art of zirconia for dental applications. Dent Mater 2008;24:299-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.05.007
  24. Callister WD. Materials science and engineering. 4th ed, New York; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1997, p. 697-703.
  25. Paul SJ, Pliska P, Pietrobon N, Schärer P. Light transmission of composite luting resins. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1996;16:164-73.
  26. Azer SS, Ayash GM, Johnston WM, Khalil MF, Rosenstiel SF. Effect of esthetic core shades on the final color of IPS Empress all-ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96:397-401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.09.020
  27. Vichi A, Ferrari M, Davidson CL. Influence of ceramic and cement thickness on the masking of various types of opaque posts. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:412-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(00)70035-7
  28. Li Q, Yu H, Wang YN. Spectrophotometric evaluation of the optical influence of core build-up composites on all-ceramic materials. Dent Mater 2009;25:158-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.05.008
  29. Shimada K, Nakazawa M, Kakehashi Y, Matsumura H. Influence of abutment materials on the resultant color of heat-pressed lithium disilicate ceramics. Dent Mater J 2006; 25:20-5. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.25.20
  30. Nakamura T, Saito O, Fuyikawa J, Ishigaki S. Influence of abutment substrate and ceramic thickness on the colour of heat-pressed ceramic crowns. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:805-9. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00919.x
  31. Terzioglu H, Yilmaz B, Yurdukoru B. The effect of different shades of specific luting agents and IPS empress ceramic thickness on overall color. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2009;29:499-505.
  32. de Azevedo Cubas GB, Camacho GB, Demarco FF, Pereira- Cenci T. The Effect of Luting Agents and Ceramic Thickness on the Color Variation of Different Ceramics against a Chromatic Background. Eur J Dent 2011;5:245-52.
  33. Chang J, Da Silva JD, Sakai M, Kristiansen J, Ishikawa-Nagai S. The optical effect of composite luting cement on all ceramic crowns. J Dent 2009;37:937-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2009.07.009

Cited by

  1. Effect of coloration with various metal oxides on zirconia vol.131, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1111/cote.12118
  2. Effect of cement type on the color attributes of a zirconia ceramic vol.8, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.6.449
  3. An In Vitro Investigation of Veneered Zirconia-Based Restorations Shade Reproducibility pp.1059941X, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12489
  4. Effect of Thickness of Zirconia Ceramic on Its Masking Ability: An In Vitro Study pp.1059941X, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12625
  5. Color in Zirconia-Based Restorations and Related Factors: A Literature Review vol.27, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12740
  6. Comparison of Shade of Ceramic with Three Different Zirconia Substructures using Spectrophotometer vol.16, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1650
  7. Impact of background on color, transmittance, and fluorescence of leucite based ceramics vol.36, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2016-322
  8. The color masking ability of a zirconia ceramic on the substrates with different values vol.11, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2017.002
  9. Effect of thickness of monolithic zirconia ceramic on final color vol.120, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.10.007
  10. Effect of resin cement color on the color of commercially available zirconia crown vol.45, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.14815/kjdm.2018.45.4.233
  11. Effects of veneering porcelain thickness and background shade on the shade match of zirconia-based restorations vol.13, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2019.011
  12. Choice of resin cement shades for a high-translucency zirconia product to mask dark, discolored or metal substrates vol.11, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2019.11.5.286
  13. Effect of Hydrothermal Aging and Beverages on Color Stability of Lithium Disilicate and Zirconia Based Ceramics vol.55, pp.11, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina55110749
  14. The One-Year In Vivo Comparison of Lithium Disilicate and Zirconium Dioxide Inlays vol.14, pp.11, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14113102
  15. Effect of surface finishing and polishing procedures on color properties and translucency of monolithic zirconia restorations at varying thickness vol.33, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12681