Journal of the korean academy of Pediatric Dentistry (대한소아치과학회지)

Korean Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (대한소아치과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Acid Neutralizing Capacity of Giomer in an Acidic Solution

자이오머의 산성용액에 대한 산중화능

  • Ahn, Ha-Na (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Seon-Mi (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Choi, Nam-Ki (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University)
  • 안하나 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 김선미 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 최남기 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실)
  • Received : 2013.01.22
  • Accepted : 2013.06.20
  • Published : 2013.08.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the acid neutralizing capacity and to observe surface changes of giomer in comparison with composite resin, when it comes in contact with an acidic solution. A packable giomer(Beautifil II) and a flowable giomer(Beautifil Flow F02) were used as experimental groups, while a packable composite resin($Filtek^{TM}$ Z-250) was used as control group. pH values were measured after mixing the specimens of the disc and powder types with a pH 2.0 hydrochloric acid solution, respectively. Also, in the case of powder type giomers used in the earlier experiment, their pH values were measured again after mixing them with a fresh acid solution. Moreover, surface structure changes of disc type specimens were observed by using a scanning electron microscopy(SEM). In the disc type test, the pH values of packable giomer were significantly increased after 24 hours(p < 0.05). In contrast, in the powder type test, the pH values of packable and flowable giomers were dramatically increased within 30 minutes. The pH value of packable giomer, in particular, was higer than that of flowable giomer(p < 0.05). In the repeated neutralizing test, the degree of pH variation was lower than that of the previous neutralizing test(p < 0.05). Erosive changes on the surface of packable giomer were observed to be more than those on composite resin and flowable giomer as well. In conclusion, giomer has a acid neutralizing capacity, when it comes in contact with an acidic solution. Especially, packable giomer with high filler content has a greater acid neutralizing capacity than flowable giomer.

본 연구는 자이오머의 산성용액에서 시간에 따른 산중화능을 평가하고, 산에 노출된 자이오머의 표면변화를 관찰하기 위해서 시행되었다. 실험군으로는 수복용 자이오머인 Beautifil II와 유동성 자이오머인 Beautifil Flow F02, 대조군으로 수복용 복합레진인 $Filtek^{TM}$ Z250을 선택하였고, 원판과 가루 형태로 시편을 제작하여 pH 2.0의 염산 수용액과 혼합한 후 pH 값을 측정하였으며, 분말 형태의 자이오머는 새로운 염산 용액과 재혼합 후 pH 값을 측정하였다. 또한 주사전자현미경을 이용하여 원판형태 시편의 표면구조의 변화를 관찰하여 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 원판 형태의 실험에서는 수복용 자이오머만이 실험 24시간 이후 유의한 pH 값의 증가를 보였다. 반면, 분말 형태의 실험에서는 수복용, 유동성 자이오머 모두 초기부터 유의한 수준의 pH 증가가 보였으며, 수복용 자이오머가 더 높은 pH 증가를 보였다. 분말 형태의 자이오머는 새로운 염산용액에서 이전 실험에 비해 낮은 정도의 pH 증가를 보였다. 또한, 충전용 자이오머의 표면에서 레진과 유동성 자이오머에 비해 더 많은 부식성의 구조적 변화가 발생했다. 결론적으로, 자이오머는 산중화능을 가지며, 필러 함량이 높은 충전용 자이오머는 유동성 자이오머보다 더 큰 산중화능이 있음을 알 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. MacInnis WA, Ismail A, Brogan H : Placement and replacement of restorations in a military population. J Can Dent Assoc, 57:227-231, 1991.
  2. Berg JH : The continuum of restorative materials in pediatric dentistry-a review for the clinician. Pediatr Dent, 20:93-100, 1998.
  3. Ten Cate JM : Fluorides in caries prevention and control: empiricism or science. Caries Res, 38:254-257, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1159/000077763
  4. Itota T, Carrick TE, Yoshiyama M, McCabe JF : Fluoride release and recharge in giomer, compomer and resin composite. Dent Mater, 20:789-795, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2003.11.009
  5. Itota T, Al-Naimi OT, McCabe JF, et al. : Fluoride release and neutralizing effect by resin-based materials. Oper Dent, 30:522-527, 2005.
  6. Itota T, Nakatsuka T, Yoshiyama M, et al. : Neutralizing effect by resin-based materials containing silane-coated glass fillers. Dent Mater J, 29: 362-368, 2010. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2009-108
  7. Roberts TA, Miyai K, Ikemura K, et al. : Fluoride ion sustained release preformed glass ionomer filler and dental compositions containing the same. United States Patent No.5883153, 1999.
  8. Rounds SA : Alkalinity and acid neutralizing capacity, U.S. Geological Survey TWRI Book 9 Chapter A6. 1-45. 2012.
  9. Thuy TT, Nakagaki H, Robinson C, et al. : Effect of strontium in combination with fluoride on enamel remineralization in vitro. Arch Oral Biol, 53:1017-1022, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2008.06.005
  10. Bernardo M, Luis H, DeRouen TA, et al. : Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc, 138:775-783, 2007. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2007.0265
  11. McCabe JF : Resin-modified glass-ionomers. Biomaterials, 19:521-527,1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00132-X
  12. Yoon M, Kim JS, Yoo SH : Changes of compressive strength and microhardness of composite resin, giomer and compomer after thermocycling treatment. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 37:438-444, 2010.
  13. Ikemura K, Tay FR, Endo T, Pashley D : A Review of chemical-approach and ultramorphological studies on the development of fluoride-releasing dental adhesives comprising new pre-reacted glass ionomer (PRG) fillers. Dent Mater J, 27:315-339, 2008. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.27.315
  14. Fujimoto Y, Iwasa M, Nakatsuka T, et al. : Detection of ions released from S-PRG fillers and their modulation effect. Dent Mater J, 29:392-397, 2010. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2010-015
  15. Mohamed-Tahir MA, Yap AU : Effects of pH on the surface texture of glass ionomer based/containing restorative materials. Oper Dent, 29:586-591, 2004.
  16. Ullmann GM : Relations between protonation constants and titration curves in polyprotic acids: a critical view. J Phys Chem B, 107:1263-1271, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp026454v
  17. Berovic M, Legisa M : Citric acid production. Biotechnol Annu Rev, 13:303-343, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1387-2656(07)13011-8
  18. Waser J : Acid-base titration and distribution curves. J Chem Educ, 44:274, 1967. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed044p274
  19. Kim MG : Surface microhardness change by commercial drink on giomer and composite resin material. Unpublished master's thesis, Chonnam National University, 2012.
  20. Restorative about Giomer. Assessment service. Available from URL : http://www.shofu.com/en/restoratives/187 (Assessed on October 4, 2012)
  21. Stephan RM, Hemmens E : pH studies on oral micro-organisms. J Dent Res, 25:172, 1946.
  22. Kooi T, Tan Q, Soh M, et al. : Effects of Food-simulating Liquids on Surface Properties of Giomer Restoratives. Oper Dent, 37:665-671. 2012. https://doi.org/10.2341/11-419-L
  23. Mohamed-Tahir MA, Tan HY, Woo AA, Yap AU : Effects of pH on the microhardness of resin-based restorative materials. Oper Dent, 30:661-666, 2005.
  24. Kimyai S, Lotfipour F, Milani M, et al. : Effect of two prophylaxis methods on adherence of Streptococcus mutans to microfilled composite resin and giomer surfaces. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 16:e561-567, 2011.