DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of Theory of Mind in Preschoolers Who Grow up in Two Conflicting and Unbalanced Cultures

  • Qu, Li (Division of Psychology, Nanyang Technological University) ;
  • Shen, Pinxiu (Division of Psychology, Nanyang Technological University)
  • Received : 2013.02.26
  • Accepted : 2013.04.30
  • Published : 2013.08.30

Abstract

Individuals rely on Theory of Mind (ToM) to represent themselves, others, and socio-cultural norms. Distinctive Western and Eastern developmental patterns of ToM have been reported in monocultural children. Relatively little is known about bicultural children, especially those children who grow up in two conflicting and unbalanced cultures. We hypothesized that the development of ToM in these bicultural preschoolers would follow the pattern of the dominant culture. To examine this hypothesis, we recruited English-speaking Chinese Singaporean preschoolers. In Study 1, we tested 3- to 5-year-olds (N = 120) with 5 ToM tasks, including diverse desires, diverse beliefs, knowledge access, and false belief, as well as a vocabulary task. In Study 2, we tested 5-year-olds (N = 30) with a picture-choice version of these ToM tasks. Both studies supported our hypothesis by revealing that the development of ToM in these bicultural children followed the pattern of the dominant culture. Additionally, we found that 5-year-old bicultural children are still developing false belief, and their verbal ability correlated with their ToM.

Keywords

References

  1. Astington, J. W., & Jenkins, J. M. (1999). A longitudinal study of the relation between language and theory-of-mind development. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1311-1320. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.35.5.1311
  2. Benet-Martinez, V., Lee, F., & Leu, J. (2006). Biculturalism and cognitive complexity: Expertise in cultural representations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022106288476
  3. Berry, J. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology, 46, 5-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.1997.tb01087.x
  4. Bialystok, E., & Senman, L. (2004). Executive processes in appearance-reality tasks: The role of inhibition of attention and symbolic representation. Child Development, 75, 562-579. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00693.x
  5. Callaghan, T. C., Rochat, P., Lillard, A., Claux, M. L., Odden, H., Itakura, S., & Singh, S. (2005). Synchrony in the onset of mental-state reasoning. Psychological Science, 16, 378-384. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01544.x
  6. Chen, S. H., Kennedy, M., & Zhou, Q. (2012). Parents' expression and discussion of emotion in the multilingual family: Does language matter? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 365-783. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612447307
  7. Cutting, A. L., & Dunn, J. (1999). Theory of mind, emotion understanding, language and family background: Individual differences and interrelations. Child Development, 70, 853-865. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00061
  8. Davis, H. L., & Pratt, C. (1995). The development of children's theory of mind: The working memory explanation. Cognitive Development, 47, 25-31. doi: 10.1080/00049539508258765
  9. Doan, S. N., & Wang, Q. (2010). Maternal discussions of mental states and behaviors: Relations to emotion situation knowledge in European American and immigrant Chinese children. Child Development, 81, 1490-1503. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01487.x
  10. Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (2006). Examiner's manual for the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (4th ed.). Bloomington, MN: Pearson Assessments.
  11. Farver, J., & Shin, Y. (1997). Soial pretend play in Korean- and Anglo-American preschoolers. Child Development, 68, 544-556. doi: 10.2307/1131677
  12. Garrett-Peters, P. T., & Fox, N. A. (2007). Cross-cultural diferences in children's emotional reactions to a disappointing situation. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, 161-169. doi: 10.1177/0165025407074627
  13. Goetz, P. J. (2003). The effects of bilingualism on theory of mind development. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728903001007
  14. Grosjean, F. (2001). Life with two languages: An introduction to bilingualism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  15. Hong, Y., Morris, M., Chiu, C., & Benet-Martinez, V. (2000). Multicultural minds: A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. American Psychologist, 55, 709-720. doi: 10.1037//0003-066X.55.7.709
  16. Kang, S. M. (2006). Measurement of acculturation, scale formats, and language competence: Their implications for adjustment. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 669-693. doi: 10.1177/0022022106292077
  17. Lewis, C., & Osborne, A. (1990). Three-yearolds' problems with false belief: Conceptual deficit or linguistic artifact? Child Development, 61(5), 1514-1519. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1990.tb02879.x
  18. Liu, D., Sabbagh, M. A., Gehring, W. J., & Wellman, H. M. (2009). Neural correlates of children's theory of mind development. Child Development, 80, 318-326. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01262.x
  19. Liu, D., Wellman, H. M., Tardif, T., & Sabbagh, M. A. (2008). Theory of mind development in Chinese children: A meta-analysis of falsebelief understanding across cultures. Developmental Psychology, 44, 523-531. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.44.2.523
  20. Lu, H., Su, Y., & Wang, Q. (2008). Talking about others facilitates theory of mind in Chinese preschoolers. Developmental Psychology, 44, 523-531. doi: 10.1037/a0013074
  21. Luna, D., Ringberg, T., & Peracchio, L. A. (2008). One individual, two identities: Frame switching among biculturals. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 279-293. doi: 10.1086/586914
  22. Milligan, K., Astington, J. W., & Dack, L. A. (2007). Language and theory of mind: Metaanalysis of the relation between langauge ability and false-belief understanding. Child Development, 78, 622-646. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01018.x
  23. Ng, S. H., Han, S., Mao, L., & Lai, J. C. L. (2010). Dynamic bicultural brains: fMRI study of their flexible neural representation of self and significant others in response to culture primes. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 83-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-839X.2010.01303.x
  24. Novin, S., Banerjee, R., & Riegge, C. (2012). Bicultural adolescents' anger regulation: In between two cultures? Cognition and Emotion, 26, 577-586. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2011.592084
  25. Oh, S., & Lewis, C. (2008). Korean preschoolers' advanced inhibitory control and its relation to other executive skills and mental state understanding. Child Development, 79, 80-99. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01112.x
  26. Oyserman, D., Coon, H., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3-72. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.128.1.3
  27. Perner, J., Leekam, S., & Wimmer, H. (1987). Three-year-olds' difficulty with false belief: The case for a conceptual deficit. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 5, 125-137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.1987.tb01048.x
  28. Peterson, C. C., Wellman, H. M., & Liu, D. (2005). Steps in theory-of-mind development for children with deafness or autism. Child Development, 76, 502-517. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00859.x
  29. Pillow, B. H. (1989). Early understanding of perception as a source of knowledge. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 47, 116-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(89)90066-0
  30. Pratt, C., & Bryant, P. E. (1990). Young children understand that looking leads to knowing (so long as they are looking into a single barrel). Child Development, 61, 973-982. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130869
  31. Qu, L. (2011). Two is better than one, but mine is better than ours: Preschoolers' executive function during co-play. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108, 549-566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2010.08.010
  32. Qu, L., Gao, S., Yip, C., Li, H., & Zelazo, P. D. (2012). Affective decision making in European Canadian, Chinese Canadian, Hong Kong Chinese, and mainland Chinese preschoolers. Child Studies in Diverse Contexts, 2, 123-132. doi: 10.5723/csdc.2012.2.2.123
  33. Repacholi, B. M., & Gopnik, A. (1997). Early reasoning about desires: Evidence from 14-and 18-month-olds. Developmental Psychology, 33, 12-21. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.33.1.12
  34. Sabbagh, M. A., Xu, F., Carlson, S. M., Moses, L. J., & Lee, K. (2006). The development of executive functioning and theory of mind: A comparison of Chinese and U.S. preschoolers. Psychological Science, 17, 74-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01667.x
  35. Shahaeian, A., Peterson, C. C., Slaughter, V., & Wellman, H. M. (2011). Culture and the sequence of steps in theory of mind development. Developmental Psychology, 4, 1239-1247. doi: 10.1037/a0023899
  36. Shakoor, S., Jaffee, S. R., Bowes, L., Ouellet-Morin, I., Andreou, P., Happe, F., & Arseneault, L. (2012). A prospective longitudinal study of children's theory of mind and adolescent involvement in bullying. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53, 254-261. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02488.x.
  37. Takemura, K., Yuki, M., & Ohtsubo, Y. (2010). Attending inside or outside: A Japanese-US comparison of spontaneous memory of group information. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 303-307. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-839X.2010.01327.x
  38. Verkuyten, M., & Pouliasi, K. (2002). Biculturalism among older children: Cultural frame switching, attributions, selfidentification, and attitudes. Journal of Cross- Cultural Psychology, 33(6), 596-609. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022102238271
  39. Vinden, P. (2001). Parenting attitudes and children's understanding of mind: A comparison of Korean American and Anglo-American families. Cognitive Development, 16, 793-809. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(01)00059-4
  40. Wang, Q., Hutt, R., Kulkofsky, S., McDermott, M., & Wei, R. (2006). Emotion situation knowledge and autobiographical memory in Chinese, immigrant Chinese, and European American 3-year-olds. Journal of Cognition and Development, 7, 95-118. doi:10.1207/s15327647jcd0701_5
  41. Wang, Q., Shao, Y., & Li, Y. J. (2010). "My way or mom's way?" The bilingual and bicultural self in Hong Kong Chinese children and adolescents. Child Development, 81, 555-567. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01415.x
  42. Wang, X.-L., & Bernas, R. (2012). When a lie is not a lie: Understanding Chinese workingclass mothers' moral teaching and moral conduct. Social Development, 21, 68-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2011.00619.x
  43. Washbrook, E., Waldfogel, J., Bradbury, B., Corak, M., & Ghanghro, A. A. (2012). The development of young children of immigrants in Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Child Development, 83, 1591-1607. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01796.x
  44. Wellman, H. M., & Bartsch, K. (1989). 3-yearolds understand belief. Cognition, 33, 321-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(89)90033-4
  45. Wellman, H. M., Cross, D., & Watson, J. (2001). Meta-analysis of theory of mind development: The truth about false belief. Child Development, 72, 655-684. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00304
  46. Wellman, H. M., Fang, F., Liu, D., Zhu, L., & Liu, G. (2006). Scaling of theory-of-mind understandings in Chinese children. Psychological Science, 17, 1075-1081. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01830.x
  47. Wellman, H. M., Fang, F., & Peterson, C. C. (2011). Sequential progressions of a theoryof-mind scale: Longitudinal perspectives. Child Development, 82, 780-792. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01583.x
  48. Wellman, H. M., & Liu, D. (2004). Scaling of theory of mind tasks. Child Development, 75, 523-541. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00691.x
  49. Wellman, H. M., & Woolley, J. D. (1990). From simple desires to ordinary beliefs: The early development of everyday psychology. Cognition, 35, 245-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(90)90024-E
  50. Zelazo, P. D., Qu, L., & Muller, U. (2005). Hot and cool aspects of executive function: Relations in early development. In W. Schneider, R. Schumann-Hengsteler, & B. Sodian (Eds.), Young children's cognitive development: Interrelationships among executive functioning, working memory, verbal ability, and theory of mind (pp.71-93). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.