DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Flexural strength and microstructure of two lithium disilicate glass ceramics for CAD/CAM restoration in the dental clinic

  • Kang, Suk-Ho (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Seoul National University School of Dentistry and Dental Research Institute) ;
  • Chang, Juhea (Clinic for Persons with Disabilities, Seoul National University Dental Hospital) ;
  • Son, Ho-Hyun (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Seoul National University School of Dentistry and Dental Research Institute)
  • Received : 2013.05.23
  • Accepted : 2013.06.26
  • Published : 2013.08.30

Abstract

Objectives: There has been a growing interest in glass ceramic systems with good esthetics, high fracture resistance and bonding durability, and simplified fabrication techniques using CAD/CAM. The aim of this study is to compare flexural strength before and after heat treatment of two lithium disilicate CAD/CAM blocks, IPS e.max CAD (Ivoclar Vivadent) and Rosetta SM (Hass), and to observe their crystalline structures. Materials and Methods: Biaxial flexural strength was tested according to ISO 6872 with 20 disc form specimens sliced from each block before and after heat treatment. Also, the crystalline structures were observed using field-emission scanning microscopy (FE-SEM, Hitachi) and x-ray diffraction (XRD, Rigaku) analysis. The mean values of the biaxial flexural strength were analyzed by the Mann-Whitney U test at a significance level of p = 0.05. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in flexural strength between IPS e.max CAD and Rosetta SM either before heat treatment or after heat treatment. For both ceramics, the initial flexural strength greatly increased after heat treatment, with significant differences (p < 0.05). The FE-SEM images presented similar patterns of crystalline structure in the two ceramics. In the XRD analysis, they also had similar patterns, presenting high peak positions corresponding to the standard lithium metasilicate and lithium disilicate at each stage of heat treatment. Conclusions: IPS e.max CAD and Rosetta SM showed no significant differences in flexural strength. They had a similar crystalline pattern and molecular composition.

Keywords

References

  1. Hooshmand T, Parvizi S, Keshvad A. Effect of surface acid etching on the biaxial flexural strength of two hotpressed glass ceramics. J Prosthodont 2008;17:415-419. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00319.x
  2. Miyazaki T, Hotta Y. CAD/CAM systems available for the fabrication of crown and bridge restorations. Aust Dent J 2011;56(Supplement 1):97-106.
  3. Lin WS, Ercoli C, Feng C, Morton D. The effect of core material, veneering porcelain, and fabrication technique on the biaxial flexural strength and weibull analysis of selected dental ceramics. J Prosthodont 2012;21:353-362. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00845.x
  4. Gonzaga CC, Okada CY, Cesar PF, Miranda WG Jr, Yoshimura HN. Effect of processing induced particle alignment on the fracture toughness and fracture behavior of multiphase dental ceramics. Dent Mater 2009;25:1293-1301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.03.013
  5. Charlton DG, Roberts HW, Tiba A. Measurement of select physical and mechanical properties of 3 machinable ceramic materials. Quintessence Int 2008;39:573-579.
  6. Siarampi E, Kontonasaki E, Papadopoulou L, Kantiranis N, Zorba T, Paraskevopoulos KM, Koidis P. Flexural strength and the probability of failure of cold isostatic pressed zirconia core ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 2012; 108:84-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60112-7
  7. Jin J, Takahashi H, Iwasaki N. Effect of test method on flexural strength of recent dental ceramics. Dent Mater J 2004;23:490-496. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.23.490
  8. ISO-Standards ISO 6872 Dentistry-Ceramic materials. 3rd ed. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2008. p11-12.
  9. Albakry M, Guazzato M, Swain MV. Biaxial flexural strength, elastic moduli, and x-ray diffraction characterization of three pressable all-ceramic materials. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:374-380. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2003.42
  10. Seo DG, Roh BD. The comparison of relative reliability on biaxial and three point flexural strength testing methods of light curing composite resin. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2006;31:58-65. https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2006.31.1.058
  11. Buso L, Oliveira-Junior OB, Hiroshi Fujiy F, Leao Lombardo GH, Ramalho Sarmento H, Campos F, Assuncao Souza RO. Biaxial flexural strength of CAD/ CAM ceramics. Minerva Stomatol 2011;60:311-319.
  12. Harrer W, Danzer R, Supancic P. Influence of the surface quality of ceramic specimens on the results of B3Btests. 18th European Conference on Fracture. 2010. Dresden, Germany.
  13. Harrer W, Danzer R, Morrell R. Influence of surface defects on the biaxial strength of a silicon nitride ceramic-Increase of strength by crack healing. J European Ceram Soc 2012;32:27-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2011.07.019
  14. Reich S, Schierz O. Chair-side generated posterior lithium disilicate crowns after 4 years. Clin Oral Investig. Available from: http://link.springer.com (updated 2012 Nov 8).
  15. Fasbinder DJ. Materials for chairside CAD/CAM restorations. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2010;31:702-704,706,708-709.
  16. Fischer J, Stawarczyk B, Hammerle CH. Flexural strength of veneering ceramics for zirconia. J Dent 2008;36:316-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2008.01.017
  17. Schultheis S, Strub JR, Gerds TA, Guess PC. Monolithic and bi-layer CAD/CAM lithium-disilicate versus metalceramic fixed dental prostheses: Comparison of fracture loads and failure modes after fatigue. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17:1407-1413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0830-1
  18. Kuzielova E, Palou M, Kozankova J. Crystallization mechanism and bioactivity of lithium disilicate glasses in relation to CaO, $ P_2O_5$, $CaF_2$ addition. Ceram Silik 2007; 51:136-141.

Cited by

  1. Effect of Thermocycling on Flexural Strength and Weibull Statistics of Machinable Glass–Ceramic and Composite Resin vol.14, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-013-0335-x
  2. Fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia molar crowns with reduced thickness vol.73, pp.8, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2015.1007479
  3. Reliability Analysis of Lithium Disilicate Crowns: Effectof Veneering and Milling Production Workflow vol.25, pp.8, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12478
  4. EFFECT OF PRE-CRYSTALLIZATION ON LITHIUM DISILICATE GLASS-CERAMICS FABRICATED BY DIFFERENT PROCESSES vol.31, pp.0, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3363/prb.31.24
  5. Dental ceramics: a review of new materials and processing methods vol.31, pp.suppl 1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2017.vol31.0058
  6. Bonding of the silane containing multi-mode universal adhesive for lithium disilicate ceramics vol.42, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2017.42.2.95
  7. Evaluation of the marginal and internal gaps of three different dental prostheses: comparison of the silicone replica technique and three-dimensional superimposition analysis vol.9, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.3.159
  8. Fracture Resistance of Monolithic Glass-Ceramics Versus Bilayered Zirconia-Based Restorations pp.1059941X, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12684
  9. Effect of Two Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness, Topography, and Flexural Strength of a Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Ceramic pp.1059941X, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12586
  10. The Effect of Hydrofluoric Acid Etching Duration on the Surface Micromorphology, Roughness, and Wettability of Dental Ceramics vol.17, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17060822
  11. Does the Translucency of Novel Monolithic CAD/CAM Materials Affect Resin Cement Polymerization with Different Curing Modes? pp.1059941X, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12956
  12. Effects of surface treatments on repair bond strength of a new CAD/CAM ZLS glass ceramic and two different types of CAD/CAM ceramics vol.60, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.17-0109
  13. Flexural strength of a pressable lithium disilicate ceramic: influence of surface treatments vol.1, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1186/2196-4351-1-7
  14. Mechanical performance of implant-supported posterior crowns vol.114, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.10.015
  15. Enhanced bonding strength between lithium disilicate ceramics and resin cement by multiple surface treatments after thermal cycling vol.14, pp.7, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220466
  16. Enhanced bonding strength between lithium disilicate ceramics and resin cement by multiple surface treatments after thermal cycling vol.14, pp.7, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220466
  17. Effect of thermal and mechanical cycles on shear bond strength of zirconia core to porcelain veneer under different surface treatments vol.13, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2019.035
  18. Effect of different surface treatments and multimode adhesive application on the Weibull characteristics, wettability, surface topography and adhesion to CAD/CAM lithium disilicate ceramic vol.28, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2020-0122
  19. Effect of staining and repeated firing on the surface and optical properties of lithium disilicate vol.32, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12558
  20. Fracture Resistance of New Metal-Free Materials Used for CAD-CAM Fabrication of Partial Posterior Restorations vol.56, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina56030132
  21. Influence of Occlusal Thickness and Radicular Extension on the Fracture Resistance of Premolar Endocrowns from Different All-Ceramic Materials vol.10, pp.8, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3390/app10082696
  22. Splinting of the Anterior Maxillary Teeth Using Glass-Ceramic Materials: A Case Report vol.14, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210602014010711
  23. Influence of Computer-aided Design/Computer-aided Manufacturing Diamond Bur Wear on Marginal Misfit of Two Lithium Disilicate Ceramic Systems vol.45, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.2341/19-089-l
  24. Surface Characterization and Optical Properties of Reinforced Dental Glass-Ceramics Related to Artificial Aging vol.25, pp.15, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25153407
  25. Surface Characterization and Conductivity of Two Types of Lithium-Based Glass Ceramics after Accelerating Ageing vol.13, pp.24, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13245632
  26. Effect of different surface treatments on the biaxial flexure strength, Weibull characteristics, roughness, and surface topography of bonded CAD/CAM silica-based ceramics vol.37, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2020.11.009
  27. The Influence of Surface Roughening and Polishing on Microbial Biofilm Development on Different Ceramic Materials vol.30, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13260
  28. Comparison of Fracture Load of the Four Translucent Zirconia Crowns vol.26, pp.17, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26175308
  29. Improving early running-in wear characteristics for dental lithium disilicate glass-ceramics by ion-exchange vol.126, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.105037