Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry (대한치과보존학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Biocompatibility of root-end filling materials: recent update

  • Saxena, Payal (Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Government College of Dentistry) ;
  • Gupta, Saurabh Kumar (Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Government College of Dentistry) ;
  • Newaskar, Vilas (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Government College of Dentistry)
  • Received : 2013.05.03
  • Accepted : 2013.06.24
  • Published : 2013.08.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of a root-end filling is to establish a seal between the root canal space and the periradicular tissues. As root-end filling materials come into contact with periradicular tissues, knowledge of the tissue response is crucial. Almost every available dental restorative material has been suggested as the root-end material of choice at a certain point in the past. This literature review on root-end filling materials will evaluate and comparatively analyse the biocompatibility and tissue response to these products, with primary focus on newly introduced materials.

Keywords

References

  1. Gatewood RS. Endodontic materials. Dent Clin North Am 2007;51:695-712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2007.04.005
  2. Andreasen JO. Cementum repair after apicoectomy in humans. Acta Odontol Scand 1973;31:211-221. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357309002507
  3. Regan JD, Gutmann JL, Witherspoon DE. Comparison of Diaket and MTA when used as root-end filling materials to support regeneration of the periradicular tissues. Int Endod J 2002;35:840-847. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00582.x
  4. Dahl JE. Toxicity of endodontic filling materials. Endod Topics 2005;12:39-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-1546.2005.00196.x
  5. Glickman GN, Hartwell GR. Chapter 33. Endodontic surgery. In: Ingle JI, Bakland LK, Baumgartner JC, ed. Ingle's Endodontics. 6th ed. Hamilton: BC Decker Inc; 2008. p1261-1294.
  6. Chong BS, Pitt Ford TR. Root-end filling materials: rationale and tissue response. Endod Topics 2005;11: 114-130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-1546.2005.00164.x
  7. Gutmann JL, Harrison JW. Posterior endodontic surgery: anatomical considerations and clinical techniques. Int Endod J 1985;18:8-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1985.tb00415.x
  8. Friedman S. Retrograde approaches in endodontic therapy. Endod Dent Traumatol 1991;7:97-107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.1991.tb00192.x
  9. Pitt Ford TR, ed. Harty's Endodontics in Clinical Practice. 5th ed. Edinburgh: Wright; 2004. Chapter 9, Surgical endodontics; p143-181.
  10. Anusavice KJ, ed. Phillip's Science of Dental Materials. 11th ed. St Louis: Saunders; 2003. Chapter 8, Biocompatibility of dental materials; p171-202.
  11. Pitt Ford TR, Andreasen JO, Dorn SO, Kariyawasam SP. Effect of IRM root end fillings on healing after replantation. J Endod 1994;20:381-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80295-5
  12. Pitt Ford TR, Andreasen JO, Dorn SO, Kariyawasam SP. Effect of various zinc oxide materials as root-end fillings on healing after replantation. J Endod 1995;28:273-278. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1995.tb00315.x
  13. Chong BS, Ford TR, Kariyawasam SP. Tissue response to potential root-end filling materials in infected root canals. Int Endod J 1997;30:102-114. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.1997.00060.x
  14. Chong BS, Pitt Ford TR, Kariyawasam SP. Short-term tissue response to potential root-end filling materials in infected root canals. Int Endod J 1997;30:240-249. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1997.tb00704.x
  15. Kimura JT. A comparative analysis of zinc and non-zinc alloys used in retrograde endodontic surgery. Part 1: apical seal and tissue reaction. J Endod 1982;8:359-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(82)80194-5
  16. Kimura JT. A comparative analysis of zinc and nonzinc alloys used in retrograde endodontic surgery. Part 2: optical emission spectrographic analysis for zinc precipitation. J Endod 1982;8:407-409. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(82)80095-2
  17. Pitt Ford TR, Andreasen JO, Dorn SO, Kariyawasam SP. Effect of super-EBA as a root end filling on healing after replantation. J Endod 1995;21:13-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80550-9
  18. Torabinejad M, Pitt Ford TR, McKendry DJ, Abedi HR, Miller DA, Kariyawasam SP. Histologic assessment of mineral trioxide aggregate as a root-end filling in monkeys. J Endod 1997;23:225-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(97)80051-9
  19. Baek SH, Plenk H Jr, Kim S. Periapical tissue responses and cementum regeneration with amalgam, SuperEBA, and MTA as root-end filling materials. J Endod 2005;31: 444-449. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.don.0000148145.81366.a5
  20. Kaplan SD, Tanzilli JP, Raphael D, Moodnik RM. A comparison of the marginal leakage of retrograde techniques. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1982;54:583- 585 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(82)90198-0
  21. Pitt Ford TR, Andreasen JO, Dorn SO, Kariyawasam SP. Effect of various sealers with gutta-percha as rootend fillings on healing after replantation. Endod Dent Traumatol 1996;12:33-37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.1996.tb00092.x
  22. Walivaara DA, Abrahamsson P, Isaksson S, Salata LA, Sennerby L, Dahlin C. Periapical tissue response after use of intermediate restorative material, gutta-percha, reinforced zinc oxide cement, and mineral trioxide aggregate as retrograde root-end filling materials: a histologic study in dogs. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;70: 2041-2047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2012.01.033
  23. Phillips RW, Love DR. The effect of certain additive agents on the physical properties of zinc oxide-eugenol mixtures. J Dent Res 1961;40:294-303. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345610400021201
  24. Weine FS. Endodontic Therapy. 4th ed. St Louis: Mosby; 1982. p498-502.
  25. Torabinejad M, Walton RE. Principles and Practice of Endodontics. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2002. p275-278.
  26. Hendra LP. EBA cement. A practical system for all cementation. J Br Endod Soc 1970;4:28-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1970.tb00013.x
  27. Oynick J, Oynick T. A study of a new material for retrograde fillings. J Endod 1978;4:203-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(78)80183-6
  28. Jeng JH, Hahn LJ, Lu FJ, Wang YJ, Kuo MY. Eugenol triggers different pathobiological effects on human oral mucosal fibroblasts. J Dent Res 1994;73:1050-1055. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345940730050601
  29. Meryon SD, Jakeman KJ. The effects in vitro of zinc released from dental restorative materials. Int Endod J 1985;18:191-198. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1985.tb00440.x
  30. Haglund R, He J, Jarvis J, Safavi KE, Spangberg LS, Zhu Q. Effects of root-end filling materials on fibroblasts and macrophages in vitro. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;95:739-745. https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2003.231
  31. Al-Sabek F, Shostad S, Kirkwood KL. Preferential attachment of human gingival fibroblasts to the resin ionomer Geristore. J Endod 2005;31:205-208. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.don.0000137650.61607.25
  32. Al-Hiyasat AS, Al-Sa'Eed OR, Darmani H. Quality of cellular attachment to various root-end filling materials. J Appl Oral Sci 2012;20:82-88. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572012000100015
  33. Barkhordar RA, Pelzner RB, Stark MM. Use of glass ionomers as retrofilling materials. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1989;67:734-739. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(89)90017-0
  34. Pissiotis E, Sapounas G, Spangberg LS. Silver glass ionomer cement as a retrograde filling material: a study in vitro. J Endod 1991;17:225-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81926-6
  35. Pissiotis E, Spangberg L. Reaction of bony tissue to implanted silver glass ionomer and a reinforced zinc oxide-eugenol cement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;89:623-629. https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2000.105173
  36. Brook IM, Hatton PV. Glass-ionomers: bioactive implant materials. Biomaterials 1998;19:565-571. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00138-0
  37. Callis PD, Santini A. Tissue response to retrograde root filling in the ferret canine: a comparison of a glass ionomer cement and gutta-percha with sealer. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1987;64:475-479. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(87)90156-3
  38. Geurtsen W. Biocompatibility of resin-modified filling materials. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2000;11:333-355. https://doi.org/10.1177/10454411000110030401
  39. Andreasen JO, Rud J, Munksgaard EC. Retrograde root obturations using resin and a dentin bonding agent: a preliminary histologic study of tissue reactions in monkeys. Tandlaegebladet 1989;93:195-197.
  40. Trope M, Lost C, Schmitz HJ, Friedman S. Healing of apical periodontitis in dogs after apicoectomy and retrofilling with various filling materials. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996;81:221-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(96)80419-7
  41. Camp MA, Jeansonne BG, Lallier T. Adhesion of human fibroblasts to root-end filling materials. J Endod 2003; 29:602-607. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200309000-00014
  42. Gupta SK, Saxena P, Pant VA, Pant AB. Adhesion and biologic behavior of human periodontal fibroblast cells to resin ionomer Geristore: a comparative analysis. Dent Traumatol 2012; Nov 6 [Epub ahead of print]. DOI:10.1111/edt.12016.
  43. Williams SS, Gutmann JL. Periradicular healing in response to Diaket root-end filling material with and without tricalcium phosphate. Int Endod J 1996;29:84-92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1996.tb01166.x
  44. Kettering JD, Torabinejad M. Cytotoxicity of root canal sealers: a study using HeLa cells and fibroblasts. Int Endod J 1984;17:60-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1984.tb00382.x
  45. Spångberg L. Biological effects of root canal filling materials. 7. Reaction of bony tissue to implanted root canal filling material in guineapigs. Odontol Tidskr 1969;77:133-159.
  46. Olsson B, Wennberg A. Early tissue reaction to endodontic filling materials. Endod Dent Traumatol 1985;1:138-141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.1985.tb00578.x
  47. Nencka D, Walia H, Austin BP. Histological evaluation of the biocompatibility of Diaket. J Dent Res 1995;74 (Supplement 1):101.
  48. Kim S, Kratchman S. Modern endodontic surgery concepts and practice: a review. J Endod 2006;32:601-623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2005.12.010
  49. Parirokh M, Torabinejad M. Mineral trioxide aggregate: a comprehensive literature review-Part III: Clinical applications, drawbacks, and mechanism of action. J Endod 2010;36:400-413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.09.009
  50. Thomson TS, Berry JE, Somerman MJ, Kirkwood KL. Cementoblasts maintain expression of osteocalcin in the presence of mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod 2003;29:407-412. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200306000-00007
  51. Pistorius A, Willershausen B, Briseno Marroquin B. Effect of apical root-end filling materials on gingival fibroblasts. Int Endod J 2003;36:610-615. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00698.x
  52. Pelliccioni GA, Ciapetti G, Cenni E, Granchi D, Nanni M, Pagani S, Giunti A. Evaluation of osteoblast-like cell response to Proroot MTA (mineral trioxide aggregate) cement. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2004;15:167-173. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSM.0000011819.26935.47
  53. Huang TH, Yang CC, Ding SJ, Yan M, Chou MY, Kao CT. Biocompatibility of human osteosarcoma cells to root end filling materials. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2005;72:140-145.
  54. Al-Rabeah E, Perinpanayagam H, MacFarland D. Human alveolar bone cells interact with ProRoot and toothcolored MTA. J Endod 2006;32:872-875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.03.019
  55. Souza NJ, Justo GZ, Oliveira CR, Haun M, Bincoletto C. Cytotoxicity of materials used in perforation repair tested using the V79 fibroblast cell line and the granulocyte-macrophage progenitor cells. Int Endod J 2006;39:40-47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.01045.x
  56. Yoshimine Y, Ono M, Akamine A. In vitro comparison of the biocompatibility of mineral trioxide aggregate, 4META/MMA-TBB resin, and intermediate restorative material as root-end filling materials. J Endod 2007;33: 1066-1069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.05.006
  57. Vajrabhaya LO, Korsuwannawong S, Jantarat J, Korre S. Biocompatibility of furcal perforation repair material using cell culture technique: Ketac Molar versus Pro- Root MTA. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006;102:e48-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.05.015
  58. Gorduysus M, Avcu N, Gorduysus O, Pekel A, Baran Y, Avcu F, Ural AU. Cytotoxic effects of four different endodontic materials in human periodontal ligament fibroblasts. J Endod 2007;33:1450-1454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.08.017
  59. Asrari M, Lobner D. In vitro neurotoxic evaluation of root-end filling materials. J Endod 2003;29:743-746. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200311000-00014
  60. Gomes-Filho JE, de Faria MD, Bernabe PF, Nery MJ, Otoboni-Filho JA, Dezan-Júnior E, de Moraes Costa MM, Cannon M. Mineral trioxide aggregate but not light-cure mineral trioxide aggregate stimulated mineralization. J Endod 2008;34:62-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.09.018
  61. Gomes-Filho JE, de Moraes Costa MM, Cintra LT, Duarte PC, Takamiya AS, Lodi CS, Bernabe PF. Evaluation of rat alveolar bone response to Angelus MTA or experimental light-cured mineral trioxide aggregate using fluorochromes. J Endod 2011;37:250-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.11.005
  62. Gomes-Filho JE, de Moraes Costa MT, Cintra LT, Lodi CS, Duarte PC, Okamoto R, Bernabe PF, Nery MJ, Cannon M. Evaluation of alveolar socket response to Angelus MTA and experimental light-cure MTA. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;110:e93-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.05.065
  63. Gomes-Filho JE, Rodrigues G, Watanabe S, Estrada Bernabe PF, Lodi CS, Gomes AC, Faria MD, Domingos Dos Santos A, Silos Moraes JC. Evaluation of the tissue reaction to fast endodontic cement (CER) and Angelus MTA. J Endod 2009;35:1377-1380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.06.010
  64. Brasseler USA Co.: Endosequence root repair material paste, Information. Available from: http://www. brasselerusa.com/display.cfm?pid=newproducts (updated 2010 Dec).
  65. Alanezi AZ, Jiang J, Safavi KE, Spangberg LS, Zhu Q. Cytotoxicity evaluation of endosequence root repair material. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;109:e122-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.11.028
  66. Ma J, Shen Y, Stojicic S, Haapasalo M. Biocompatibility of two novel root repair materials. J Endod 2011;37: 793-798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.02.029
  67. Damas BA, Wheater MA, Bringas JS, Hoen MM. Cytotoxicity comparison of mineral trioxide aggregates and EndoSequence bioceramic root repair materials. J Endod 2011;37:372-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.11.027
  68. Chung CR, Kim E, Shin SJ. Biocompatibility of bioaggregate cement on human pulp and periodontal ligament (PDL) derived cells. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2010;35:473-478. https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2010.35.6.473
  69. Lee JH, Shon WJ, Lee W, Baek SH. The effect of several root-end filling materials on MG63 osteoblast-like cells. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2010;35:222-228. https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2010.35.3.222
  70. Innovative BioCeramix, Inc Co.: Information. Available from: http://www.ibioceramix.com/Publications.html (updated 2012 Jan).
  71. De-Deus G, Canabarro A, Alves GG, Marins JR, Linhares AB, Granjeiro JM. Cytocompatibility of the ready-to-use bioceramic putty repair cement iRoot BP Plus with primary human osteoblasts. Int Endod J 2012;45:508-513. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.02003.x
  72. Kim M, Ko H, Yang W, Lee Y, Kim S, Mante FK. A new resin-bonded retrograde filling material. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;108:e111-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.07.020
  73. Yang WK, Ko HJ, Kim MR. Evaluation of the rat tissue reaction to experimental new resin cement and mineral trioxide aggregate cement. Restor Dent Endod 2012;37: 194-200. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2012.37.4.194
  74. Wei W, Qi YP, Nikonov SY, Niu LN, Messer RL, Mao J, Primus CM, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Effects of an experimental calcium aluminosilicate cement on the viability of murine odontoblast-like cells. J Endod 2012; 38:936-942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.03.020
  75. Aguilar FG, Roberti Garcia LF, Panzeri Pires-de-Souza FC. Biocompatibility of new calcium aluminate cement (EndoBinder). J Endod 2012;38:367-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.11.002
  76. Torabinejad M, Chivian N. Clinical applications of mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod 1999;25:197-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80142-3
  77. Orstavik D, Nordahl I, Tibballs JE. Dimensional change following setting of root canal sealer materials. Dent Mater 2001;17:512-519. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00011-2
  78. Porter ML, Berto A, Primus CM, Watanabe I. Physical and chemical properties of new-generation endodontic materials. J Endod 2010;36:524-528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.11.012
  79. Bird DC, Komabayashi T, Guo L, Opperman LA, Spears R. In Vitro evaluation of dentinal tubule penetration and biomineralization ability of a new root-end filling material. J Endod 2012;38:1093-1096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.04.017
  80. Washington JT, Schneiderman E, Spears R, Fernandez CR, He J, Opperman LA. Biocompatibility and osteogenic potential of new generation endodontic materials established by using primary osteoblasts. J Endod 2011;37:1166-1170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.05.011
  81. Laurent P, Camps J, De Meo M, Dejou J, About I. Induction of specific cell responses to a $Ca_3SiO_5$-based posterior restorative material. Dent Mater 2008;24: 1486-1494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.02.020
  82. Goldberg M, Pradelle-Plasse N, Tran X, Colon P, Laurent P, Aubut V, About I, Boukpessi T, Septier D. Emerging trends in (bio)material researches. In: Goldberg M, ed. Biocompatibility or cytotoxic effects of dental composites. Oxford: Coxmoor Publishing; 2009. p181-203.
  83. Han L, Okiji T. Uptake of calcium and silicon released from calcium silicate-based endodontic materials into root canal dentine. Int Endod J 2011;44:1081-1087. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01924.x
  84. Zhou HM, Shen Y, Wang ZJ, Li L, Zheng YF, Häkkinen L, Haapasalo M. In Vitro cytotoxicity evaluation of a novel root repair material. J Endod 2013;39:478-483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.11.026
  85. Krishnan PS, Joshi M, Bhargava P, Valiyaveettil S, He C. Effect of heterocyclic based organoclays on the properties of polyimide-clay nanocomposites. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 2005;5:1148-1157. https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2005.171
  86. Modareszadeh MR, Chogle SA, Mickel AK, Jin G, Kowsar H, Salamat N, Shaikh S, Qutbudin S. Cytotoxicity of set polymer nanocomposite resin root-end filling materials. Int Endod J 2011;44:154-161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01825.x
  87. Lee SJ, Chung J, Na HS, Park EJ, Jeon HJ, Kim HC. Characteristics of novel root-end filling material using epoxy resin and Portland cement. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:1009-1015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0782-5
  88. Ndong F, Sadhasivam S, Lin FH, Savitha S, Wen-Hsi W, Lin CP. The development of iron-free partially stabilized cement for use as dental root-end filling material. Int Endod J 2012;45:557-564. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02011.x
  89. Coon D, Gulati A, Cowan C, He J. The role of cyclooxygenase- 2 (COX-2) in inflammatory bone resorption. J Endod 2007;33:432-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.12.001
  90. Hammad HM, Hamadah MA, Al-Omari WM. Histological evaluation of rat tissue response to GMTA, Retroplast, and Geristore retrograde filling materials. Aust Endod J 2011;37:18-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4477.2009.00195.x
  91. Song M, Kim E. A prospective randomized controlled study of mineral trioxide aggregate and super ethoxybenzoic acid as root-end filling materials in endodontic microsurgery. J Endod 2012;38:875-879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.04.008
  92. Chong BS, Pitt Ford TR, Hudson MB. A prospective clinical study of mineral trioxide aggregate and IRM when used as root-end filling materials in endodontic surgery. Int Endod J 2003;36:520-526. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00682.x
  93. Lindeboom JA, Frenken JW, Kroon FH, van den Akker HP. A comparative prospective randomized clinical study of MTA and IRM as root-end filling materials in single-rooted teeth in endodontic surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005;100:495-500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.03.027
  94. Walivaara DA, Abrahamsson P, Fogelin M, Isaksson S. Super-EBA and IRM as root-end fillings in periapical surgery with ultrasonic preparation: a prospective randomized clinical study of 206 consecutive teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011;112:258-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.01.016
  95. Saunders WP. A prospective clinical study of periradicular surgery using mineral trioxide aggregate as a root-end filling. J Endod 2008;34:660-665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.03.002
  96. Christiansen R, Kirkevang LL, Horsted-Bindslev P, Wenzel A. Randomized clinical trial of root-end resection followed by root-end filling with mineral trioxide aggregate or smoothing of the orthograde gutta-percha root filling - 1-year follow-up. Int Endod J 2009;42:105-114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01474.x
  97. Evidence-based review of clinical studies on the root apex. J Endod 2009;35:1158-1159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.05.024
  98. Walivaara DA, Abrahamsson P, Samfors KA, Isaksson S. Periapical surgery using ultrasonic preparation and thermoplasticized gutta-percha with AH Plus sealer or IRM as retrograde root-end fillings in 160 consecutive teeth: a prospective randomized clinical study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;108:784-789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.06.010

Cited by

  1. Rational design and fabrication of a β-dicalcium silicate-based multifunctional cement with potential for root canal filling treatment vol.2, pp.24, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1039/C4TB00129J
  2. Tissue Reaction to Different Types of Calcium Hydroxide Paste in Rat vol.57, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.2209/tdcpublication.2015-0031
  3. Factors affecting the periapical healing process of endodontically treated teeth vol.25, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0464
  4. Cytotoxicity and physical properties of tricalcium silicate-based endodontic materials vol.39, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2014.39.2.89
  5. Comparative analysis of physicochemical properties of root perforation sealer materials vol.39, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2014.39.3.201
  6. Management of extensive external apical root resorption leading to root perforation pp.1757-790X, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2017-220234
  7. Endodontic medicine: interrelationships among apical periodontitis, systemic disorders, and tissue responses of dental materials vol.32, pp.suppl 1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0068
  8. Osteogenic Response of Osteoblastic Cells to Root-End Filling Materials vol.926, pp.1662-9752, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.926.95
  9. Systemic bone marker expression induced by grey and white mineral trioxide aggregate in normal and diabetic conditions vol.51, pp.8, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12900
  10. The Era of Endodontic Research…………Root-end Filling Materials vol.7, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5005/ijcpd-7-2-v
  11. Sealing Ability of Root-end Filling Materials vol.16, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1663
  12. Bioceramics in endodontics – a review vol.51, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.63659
  13. Tricalcium silicate cements: osteogenic and angiogenic responses of human bone marrow stem cells vol.127, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.12613
  14. Investigating unset endodontic sealers’ eugenol and hydrocortisone roles in modulating the initial steps of inflammation vol.24, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02957-2
  15. Assessment of bone healing after mineral trioxide aggregate and platelet-rich fibrin application in periapical lesions using cone-beam computed tomographic imaging vol.24, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-03003-x
  16. Comparison of the sealing ability of various bioceramic materials for endodontic surgery vol.46, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2021.46.e35
  17. Pleiotropic Effects of Eugenol: The Good, the Bad, and the Unknown vol.2021, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/3165159
  18. Scanning electron microscopy analysis of marginal adaptation of mineral trioxide aggregate, tricalcium silicate cement, and dental amalgam as a root end filling materials vol.84, pp.9, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.23762