Korean journal of food and cookery science (한국식품조리과학회지)

Korean Society of Food and Cookery Science (한국식품조리과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Quality Changes of Ground Pork Containing Safflower Seed during Frozen Storage

홍화씨를 첨가한 분쇄돈육의 동결저장 중 품질변화

  • Park, Kyung-Sook (Division of Hotel Culinary Arts, Daegu Technical College) ;
  • Choi, Young-Joon (Division of Hotel Culinary Arts, Daegu Technical College) ;
  • Park, Hyun-Suk (Division of Hotel Culinary Arts, Daegu Technical College) ;
  • Cha, Kyung-Sook (Banyeo Branch Office of Agricultural Products Inspection, Busan Institute of Health & Environment) ;
  • Lee, Kyung-Sook (Division of Hotel Culinary Arts, Daegu Technical College) ;
  • Jung, In-Chul (Division of Hotel Culinary Arts, Daegu Technical College)
  • 박경숙 (대구공업대학교 호텔외식조리계열) ;
  • 최영준 (대구공업대학교 호텔외식조리계열) ;
  • 박현숙 (대구공업대학교 호텔외식조리계열) ;
  • 차경숙 (부산보건환경연구원 농산물검사소) ;
  • 이경숙 (대구공업대학교 호텔외식조리계열) ;
  • 정인철 (대구공업대학교 호텔외식조리계열)
  • Received : 2013.06.17
  • Accepted : 2013.08.07
  • Published : 2013.08.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was carried out to investigate the effect of safflower seed on the physicochemical properties of ground pork during frozen storage. Three types of ground pork were evaluated: 20% pork back fat added (T0, control), 10% pork back fat and 10% added safflower seed (T1), and 20% added safflower seed (T2). Water holding capacity decreased with longer storage period, and that of T2 was the highest (p<0.05). Cooking loss increased with longer storage period, and that of T1 and T2 was higher than that of T0 (p<0.05). The reduction in diameter of T0 increased, but that of T1 and T2 was not significantly different with longer storage period. Hardness and chewiness increased, but springiness decreased with longer storage period (p<0.05). Hardness, springiness and chewiness of T2 was the highest (p<0.05). The pH decreased with longer storage period (p<0.05), and those of T0, T1 and T2 were pH 5.41, 5.43 and 5.32, respectively, after 50 days of storage. The TBARS (2-thiobarbituric acid reactive substances) values of T0 and T1 increased, but that of T2 was not significantly different with longer storage period. The TBARS values of T0, T1 and T2 were 4.76, 2.77 and 0.54 mg malonaldehyde/kg, respectively, after 50 days of storage. The $L^*$, $a^*$ and $b^*$ value of T0 was the highest among the samples (p<0.05), the $a^*$ value of the samples decreased with longer storage period (p<0.05). In conclusion, this study demonstrates that the addition safflower seed tended to improve physiological properties and antioxidative effects.

본 연구는 홍화씨가 동결저장 중 분쇄돈육의 이화학적 품질에 미치는 영향을 규명하고자 하였다. 분쇄돈육은 돈육등심 68%, 냉수 10%, 소금 2%에 돼지지방 20%를 첨가한 분쇄돈육(T0), 돼지지방 10%와 홍화씨 10%를 첨가한 분쇄돈육(T1) 그리고 홍화씨 20% 첨가한 분쇄돈육으로 구분하여 제조하였다. 보수력은 동결저장 중 유의적으로 감소하였으며, 홍화씨를 20% 첨가한 T2가 가장 높았다(p<0.05). 가열감량은 동결저장 기간이 경과하면서 유의적으로 증가하였으며, T1 및 T2의 가열감량이 T0보다 낮았다(p<0.05). 직경감소율의 경우 T0는 저장기간에 따라 증가하였지만 T1 및 T2는 동결저장 중 유의적인 변화가 없었다. 경도와 저작성은 동결저장 중 유의적으로 증가하였으며, 탄성은 감소하는 경향이었다(p<0.05). 경도, 탄성 및 저작성은 T2가 가장 높게 나타났다(p<0.05). 동결저장 중 pH는 유의적으로 낮아져 50일째에는 T0, T1 및 T2가 각각 5.41, 5.43 및 5.32를 나타내었다(p<0.05). TBARS값의 경우 T0 및 T1은 동결저장 중 유의적으로 증가하였으나 T2는 저장 중 유의적인 변화가 없었다. 그리고 동결저장 50일째의 TBARS값은 T0, T1 및 T2가 각각 4.76, 2.77 및 0.54 mg malonaldehyde/kg을 나타내었다. 명도($L^*$), 적색도($a^*$) 및 황색도($b^*$)는 T0가 가장 높았으며, 적색도는 동결저장 중 유의적으로 감소하는 경향이었다(p<0.05). 이상의 결과들을 종합적으로 고찰해보면 홍화씨의 첨가는 물리적 성질을 개선하면서 지반산화를 억제하여 기능성 육제품의 소재로서의 활용가능성이 있는 것으로 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Akesowan A. 2010. Quality characteristics of light pork burgers fortified with soy protein isolated. Food Sci Biotechnol 19(5):1143-1149 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-010-0163-2
  2. Ayo J, Carballo J, Solas MT, Jimenez-Colmenero F. 2008. Physicochemical and sensory properties of healthier frankfurters as affected by walnut and fat content. Food Chem 107(4):1547-1552 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.09.019
  3. Buege AJ, Aust SD. 1978. Microsomal Lipid Peroxidation, In methods in Enzymology, Gleischer S. and Parker L. (ed.), Academic Press Inc., New York, pp. 302-310
  4. Choi JW, Kim SH, Mun SH, Lee SJ, Shim JY, Kim YR. 2011. Optimizing the replacement of pork fat with fractionated barley flour paste in reduced-fat sausage. Food Sci Biotechnol 20(3):687-694 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-011-0097-3
  5. Devatkal SK, Narsaiah K, Borah A. 2010. Anti-oxidant effect of extracts of kinnow rind, pomegranate rind and seed powders in cooked goat meat patties. Meat Sci 85(1):155-159 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.12.019
  6. Dixon HG, Scully ML, Wakefield MA. White VM, Crawford DA. 2007. The effects of television advertisements for junk food versus nutritious food on children's food attitudes and preferences. Soc Sci Med 65(7):1311-1323 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.05.011
  7. El-Magoli SB, Laroia S, Hansen PTM. 1996. Flavour and texture characteristics of low fat ground beef patties formulated with whey protein concentrate. Meat Sci 42(2): 179-193 https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(95)00032-1
  8. Eswarapragada NM, Reddy PM, Prabhakar K. 2010. Quality of low fat pork sausage containing milk-co-precipitate. J Food Sci Technol 47():571-573 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-010-0086-1
  9. Gok V, Akkaya L, Obuz E, Bulut S. 2011. Effect of ground poppy seed as a fat replacer on meat burgers. Meat Sci 89(4):400-404 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2011.04.032
  10. Grossi A, Søltoft-Jensen J, Knudsen JC, Christensen M, Orlien V. 2011. Synergistic cooperation of high pressure and carrot dietary fibre on texture and colour of pork sausage. Meat Sci 89(2):195-201 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2011.04.017
  11. Hiramatsu M, Takahashi T, Komatsu M, Kido T, Kasahara Y. 2009. Antioxidant and neuroprotective activities of Mogambi-benibana (safflower, Carthamus tinctorius Linne). Neurochem Res 34(4):795-805 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11064-008-9884-5
  12. Hoffman K, Hamm R, Bluchel E. 1982. Neues uber die bestimmung der wasserbindung des fleisches mit hilfe der filterpapierpress methode. Fleischwirtschaft 62(1):87-93
  13. Huff-Lonergan E, Lonergan SM. 2005. Mechanism of water-holding capacity of meat: the role of postmortem biochemical and structural changes. Meat Sci 71(3): 194-203 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.04.022
  14. Jin Q, Shan L, Yue J, Wang X. 2008. Spectrophotometric determination of total serotonin derivatives in the safflower seeds with Ehrlich's reagent and the underlying color reaction mechanism. Food Chem 108(2):779-783 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.11.022
  15. Jung IC. 1999. Effect of freezing temperature on the quality of beef loin aged after thawing. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 28(4):871-875
  16. Keeton JT. 1983. Effect of fat and NaCl/phosphate levels on the chemical and sensory properties of pork patties. J Food Sci 48(3):878-881 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1983.tb14921.x
  17. Kim EO, Lee KT, Choi SW. 2008. Chemical comparison of germinated- and ungerminated-safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) seeds. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 37(9):1162-1167 https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2008.37.9.1162
  18. Kim HJ, Jun BS, Kim SK, Cha JY, Cho YS. 2000. Polyphenolic compounds content and antioxidative activities by extracts from seed, sprout and flower of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 29(6):1127-1132
  19. Kim JH, Kim JK, Kang WW, Ha YS, Choi SW, Moon KD. 2003. Chemical compositions and DPPH radical scavenger activity in different sections of safflower. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 32(5):733-738 https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2003.32.5.733
  20. Koyama N, Kuribayashi K, Seki T, Kobayashi K, Furuhata Y, Suzuki K, Arisaka H, Nakano T, Amino Y, Ishii K. 2006. Serotonin derivatives, major safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) seed antioxidants, inhibit low-density lipoprotein (LDL) oxidation and atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E-deficient. J Agric Food Chem 54(14):4970-4976 https://doi.org/10.1021/jf060254p
  21. Laugerette F, Gaillard D, Passilly-Degrace P, Niot I, Besnard P. 2007. Do we taste fat? Biochimie 89(2):265-269 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biochi.2006.10.011
  22. Lindahl G, Enfalt AC, von Seth G, Joseli A, Hedebro-Velander I, Andersen HJ, Braunschweig M, Andersson A, Lundstrom K. 2004. A second mutant allele (V1991) at the PRKAG3 (RN) lotus-II. Effect on colour characteristics of pork loin. Meat Sci 66(3):621-62 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(03)00180-3
  23. Mela DJ. 1990. The basis of dietary fat preference. Trend Food Sci Technol 1(1):55-78 https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-2244(90)90046-2
  24. Nogala-Kalucka M, Rudzinska M, Zadernowski R, Siger A, Krzyzostaniak I. 2010. Phytochemical content and antioxidant properties of seeds of unconventional oil plants. J Am Oil Chem Sco 87(12):1481-1487 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-010-1640-8
  25. Nunez de Gonzalez MT, Boleman RM, Miller RK, Keeton JT, Rhee KS. 2008. Antioxidant properties of dried plam ingredients in raw and precooked pork sausage. J Food Sci 73(5):H63-71 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2008.00744.x
  26. Panford JA, Williams PC, deMan JM. 1988, Analysis of oilseeds for protein, oil, fiber and moisture by near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy. J Am Oil Chem Sco 65(10):1627-1634 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02912567
  27. Park KS, Choi YJ, Moon YH, Park HS, Kim MJ, Jung IC. 2012. Physicochemical characteristics of ground pork with safflower seed powder as an animal fat replacer. Korean J Life Sci 22(7):928-935 https://doi.org/10.5352/JLS.2012.22.7.928
  28. Park KS, Park HS, Choi YJ, Moon YH, Lee KS, Kim MJ, Jung IC. 2011. Quality changes of pork patty containing lotus (Nelumbo nucifera) leaf and root powder during refrigerated storage. Korean J Life Sci 21(12):1732 -1739 https://doi.org/10.5352/JLS.2011.21.12.1732
  29. Raharjo MC, Brewer MS. 2007. Effect of natural antioxidants on oxidative stability of cooked, refrigerated beef and pork. J Food Sci 72(4):S282-S288 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2007.00335.x
  30. Sanchez-Escalante A, Torrescano G, Djenane D, Beltrán JA, Roncalés P. 2003. Stabilization of colour and odour of beef patties by using lycopene-rich tomato and peppers as a source of antioxidants. J Sci Food Agric 83(3): 187-194 https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.1298
  31. Sanchez-Zapata E, Muñoz CM, Fuentes E, Fernández-Lopez J, Sendra E, Sayas E, Navarro C. 2010. Effect of tiger nut fiber on quality characteristics of pork burger. Meat Sci 85(1):70-76 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.12.006
  32. Siddiqi EH, Ashraf M, Al-Qurainy F, Akram NA. 2011. Salt-induced modulation in inorganic nutrients, antioxidant enzymes, proline content and seed oil composition in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). J Sci Food Agric 91(15):2785-2793 https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.4522
  33. Song HI, Moon GI, Moon YH, Jung IC. 2000. Quality and storage stability of hamburger during low temperature storage. Korean J Food Sci Ani Resour 20(1):72-78
  34. Suleimanov TA. 2004. Phenolic compounds from Carthamus tinctorius. Chem Natural Comp 40(1):13-15 https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CONC.0000025456.09089.84
  35. Troy DJ, Desmond EM, Buckley DJ. 1999. Eating quality of low-fat beef burgers containing fat-replacing functional blends. J Sci Food Agric 79(4):507-516 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(19990315)79:4<507::AID-JSFA209>3.0.CO;2-6
  36. Verma SP, Sahoo J. 2000. Improvement in the quality of ground chevon during refrigerated storage by tocopherol acetate preblending. Meat Sci 56(4):403-413 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(00)00072-3
  37. Winger RJ, Fennema O. 1976. Tenderness and water holding properties of beef muscle as influenced by freezing and subsequent storage at -$3^{\circ} $ or -$15^{\circ} $. J Food Sci 41(6): 1433-1438 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1976.tb01189.x
  38. Yang A, Keeton JT, Beilken SL, Trout GR. 2001. Evaluation of some binder and fat substitutes in low-fat frankfurters. J Food Sci 66(7):1039-1046 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2001.tb08232.x
  39. Youn DH, Park KS, Lee KS, Jung IC, Park HS, Moon YH, Yang JB. 2007. Quality and sensory score of ground pork meats on the addition of pork fat, olive oil and soybean oil. Korean J Life Sci 17(7):964-969 https://doi.org/10.5352/JLS.2007.17.7.964
  40. Young LL, Garcia JM, Lillard HS, Lyon CE, Papa CM. 1991. Fat content effects on yield, quality, and microbiological characteristics of chicken patties. J Food Sci 56(6): 1527-1528 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1991.tb08632.x