DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development and Priority Setting of Policy Measures on Styrofoam Buoy Marine Debris

스티로폼 부자 해양쓰레기 대응 정책 개발과 우선순위 평가

  • 장용창 (동아시아바다공동체오션) ;
  • 이종명 (동아시아바다공동체오션) ;
  • 홍선욱 (동아시아바다공동체오션) ;
  • 심원준 (한국해양과학기술원 유류.유해물질 연구단) ;
  • 강대석 (부경대학교 생태공학과)
  • Received : 2013.05.13
  • Accepted : 2013.08.12
  • Published : 2013.08.25

Abstract

Even though styrofoam buoys represent a large portion of beached marine debris in Korea, efficient government actions have been lacking to address them. Three participatory workshops were organized from 2010 to 2012 to develop policy measures to manage styrofoam buoy marine debris. The first workshop held in 2010 was organized in order for workshop participants to understand and share the styrofoam debris issue. Participating stakeholders suggested policy measures to address styrofoam debris through brainstorming in the second workshop in 2011. In the third workshop organized in 2012, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was used to set priorities for 16 selected policy measures. A total of 56 people participated in AHP, and answers of 40 participants that passed the consistency test were analyzed. 'Beach cleanup by public works program' ranked highest in priority, followed by 'Development of alternative buoy and aquaculture technologies'. Other research projects also ranked high in priority. Feasibility of policy measures was considered the most important criterion in the priority setting, followed by effectiveness, efficiency, and acceptability. This study demonstrated that participatory workshops in which diverse stakeholders take part in could provide a valuable tool in developing practical policy measures on styrofoam buoy marine debris.

스티로폼 부자는 한국의 해변 쓰레기 중 가장 높은 발생 빈도를 보이는 쓰레기 중의 하나이지만 정부 정책은 소극적으로 이루어져왔다. 이 문제를 해결하기 위한 정책을 개발할 목적으로 2010년부터 2012년까지 연차별로 워크숍을 개최하였다. 문제의 탐색과 공유, 브레인스토밍 과정을 통해 정책 대안을 도출하고, 계층분석과정을 통해 정책 대안들의 우선순위를 평가하였다. 우선순위 평가에는 총 56명이 참가하였고 일관성 기준을 통과한 40명의 의견을 분석하였다. 16개 정책 대안들 중 지자체 공공근로 등을 활용한 해안정화 활동이 가장 높은 점수를 받았으며, 대체 부자 및 양식법 개발 등 조사 연구 사업이 다른 사업들보다 높은 점수를 받았다. 정책 대안을 평가하는 기준에 대해서는 실행가능성, 효과성, 효율성, 수용가능성의 순서로 중요하게 평가되었다. 합리적인 정책 설계 절차에 따라 다양한 이해관계자들이 참여함으로써 스티로폼 해양쓰레기 문제에 대해 보다 현실성 있는 정책 대안들이 발굴될 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Andrady, A.L., 2011, Microplastics in the marine environment, Marine Pollution Bulletin 62, 1596-1605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.05.030
  2. Cheshire, A., Adler, E., Barbière, J., Cohen, Y., Evans, S., Jarayabhand, S., Jeftic, L., Jung, R., Kinsey, S., and Kinsui, E., 2009, UNEP/IOC guidelines on survey and monitoring of marine litter, United Nations Environment Programme, Regional Seas Programme, p. 120.
  3. Coe, J.M. and Rogers, D.B. (ed.), 1997, Marine debris: sources, impacts and solutions, Springer, p. 432.
  4. Davidson, T.M., 2012, Boring crustaceans damage polystyrene floats under docks polluting marine waters with microplastic, Marine Pollution Bulletin 64, 1821-1828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2012.06.005
  5. Delgado, L.E., Marín, V.H., Bachmann, P.L., and Torres- Gomez, M., 2009, Conceptual models for ecosystem management through the participation of local social actors: The Rio Cruces wetland conflict, Ecology and Society 14, 50. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-02874-140150
  6. Derraik, J.G.B., 2002, The pollution of the marine environment by plastic debris: a review, Marine Pollution Bulletin 44(9), 842-852. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-326X(02)00220-5
  7. Diehl, M. and Stroebe, W., 1987, Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Vat 53(3), 497-509. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.497
  8. Dunn, W.N., 2003, Public policy analysis: An introduction, Third Edition, Prentice Hall, translated into Korean by Namgung, G., Lee, H.S., Kim. S.H., and Kim, J.W. at Beabmoon Publishing Company (법문사), p. 650.
  9. Engler, R.E., 2012, The complex interaction between marine debris and toxic chemicals in the ocean, Environmental Science & Technology 46(22), 12302-12315. https://doi.org/10.1021/es3027105
  10. ERFGMA (Enforcement Rule of Fishing Ground Management Act, 어장관리법 시행규칙), 2011, Order No. 232 by Ministry of Farming, Forestry, and Fishery (농림수산식품부령 제232 호), Partially revised on 30th December, 2011 (2011년12월 30일 일부 개정).
  11. FOS (Foundations of Success), 2009, Using Conceptual Models to Document a Situation Analysis: An FOS How-To Guide, Foundations of Success, Bethesda, Maryland, USA, p. 18.
  12. Fossi, M.C., Panti, C., Guerranti, C., Coppola, D., Giannetti, M., Marsili, L., and Minutoli, R., 2012, Are baleen whales exposed to the threat of microplastics? A case study of the Mediterranean fin whale (Balaenoptera physalus), Marine Pollution Bulletin 64, 2374-2379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2012.08.013
  13. Hare, M., Letcher, R.A., and Jakeman, A.J., 2003, Participatory modelling in natural resource management: A comparison of four case studies, Integrated Assessment 4, 62-72. https://doi.org/10.1076/iaij.4.2.62.16706
  14. Hidalgo-Ruz, V. and Thiel, M., 2013, Distribution and abundance of small plastic debris on beaches in the SE Pacific (Chile): A study supported by a citizen science project. Marine Environmental Research 87-88, 12-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2013.02.015
  15. Hinojosa, I.A. and Thiel, M., 2009, Floating marine debris in fjords, gulfs and channels of southern Chile, Marine Pollution Bulletin 58, 341-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2008.10.020
  16. Ingram, H. and Mann, D.E., 1989, Interest groups and environmental policy, in James P. L. (ed.), Environmental Politics and Policy: Theory and Evidence, Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, p. 400.
  17. Jeong, J.G., Choi, J.W., Lee, S.W., and Jeong, J.G., 2003, Principles of Policy Studies (정책학 원론), Daemyoung Publishing Company (대명출판사), p. 996.
  18. Kim, C.S., 2000, A study on the factors influencing environmental policy implementation - focusing on the water quality improvement policies of the Han and the Naktong River basin, Ph.D thesis at Department of Public Administration, Seoul National University, p. 347.
  19. Kim, O.I., Chae, K.J., and Park, G.G., 2009, An exploratory survey on strategic priority of multi-cultural policy of the local government (다문화정책의 전략적 우선순위에 관한 탐색적 연구: 기초자치단체 다문화 정책을 중심으로), Korean Society and Public Administration (한국 사회와 행정 연구) 20(2), 115-135.
  20. Kim, G.T., Choi, Y.R., Jang, J.Y., and Kim, W.S., 2012, The yellow sea ecoregion conservation project: the present situation and its implications, Journal of the Korean Society for Marine Environmental Engineering 15(4), 337-348. https://doi.org/10.7846/JKOSMEE.2012.15.4.337
  21. Konidari, P. and Mavrakis, D., 2007, A multi-criteria evaluation method for climate change mitigation policy instruments, Energy Policy 35, 6235-6257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.07.007
  22. Kruskal, W.H. and Wallis, A., 1952, Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis, Journal of the American Statistical Association 47(260), 583-621. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1952.10483441
  23. Kusui, T. and Noda, M., 2003. International survey on the distribution of stranded and buried litter on beaches along the Sea of Japan, Marine Pollution Bulletin 47(1), 175-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-326X(02)00478-2
  24. Lee, J.E., Kim, Y.P., Jeong, Y.S., and Kim, T.J., 2007, An analysis of recognition of comparative seriousness of social risk from different electric energy resources (발전원별 사회적 위험도에 대한 상대적 심각성 분석: AHP기법을 활용하여), Korean Public Administration Review (한국행정학보) 41(1), 113-132.
  25. Lee, J., Jang, Y.C., Hong, S., and Lee, M.J., 2012, Report on Styrofoam Marine Debris Policy Workshop 2012 (2012 스티로폼 해양쓰레기 정책 워크숍 보고서), Our sea of East Asia Network (동아시아 바다공동체 오션), Korea Foam-Styrene Recycling Association (한국발포스티렌재활용협회), Yeongnam Sea Grant Center (영남씨그랜트센터), p. 176.
  26. Mau-Crimmins, T., de Steiguer, J.E., and Dennis, D., 2005, AHP as a means for improving public participation: A pre-post experiment with university students, Forest Policy and Economics 7, 501-514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2003.08.001
  27. MLTM (Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, 국토해양부), 2009a, The result report of the Korean National Marine Debris Monitoring in the first year (2008) (국가 해양쓰레기 모니터링 1차년도(2008년) 결과 보고서), p. 234.
  28. MLTM (Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, 국토해양부), 2009b, The result report of the Korean National Marine Debris Monitoring in 2009 (2009년 국가 해양쓰레기 모니터링 결과 보고서), p. 93.
  29. MLTM (Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, 국토해양부), 2010, The result report of the Korean National Marine Debris Monitoring in 2010 (2010년 국가 해양쓰레기 모니터링 결과 보고서), p. 112.
  30. MLTM (Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, 국토해양부), 2011, (The summary report of the Korean National Marine Debris Monitoring in 2011 (2011년 국가 해양쓰레기 모니터링 결과 보고서(요약문)), p. viii.
  31. MLTM (Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, 국토해양부), Ministry of Environment (환경부), Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (농림수산식품부), Korea Coast Guard (해양경찰청), 2008, The 1st Basic Plan on Marine Litter Management (제1차 해양쓰레기 관리 기본 계획), p. 75.
  32. Munger, M.C., 2000, Analyzing Policy: Choices, Conflicts, and Practices, New York: W. W. Norton, p. 448.
  33. Namgung, G., 2012, Policy Studies(정책학), Second Edition (제2판), Beob Moon Publishing Company (법문사), p. 855.
  34. Ng, K.L. and Obbard, J.P., 2006, Prevalence of microplastics in Singapore's coastal marine environment, Marine Pollution Bulletin 52, 761-767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2005.11.017
  35. Osborn, A.F., 1957, Applied imagination (rev. ed.), New York: Scribner, p. 379.
  36. Pak, S.l. and Oh, T.H., 2010, The Application of Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), Korean Journal of Veterinary Clinical Medicine 27, 71-78.
  37. Pascoe, S., Mary Dichmont, C., Brooks, K., Pears, R., and Jebreen, E., 2013, Management objectives of Queensland fisheries: Putting the horse before the cart, Marine Policy 37, 115-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2012.02.016
  38. Pirot, J.-Y., Meynell, P.J. and Elder, D., 2000, Ecosystem Management: Lessons from Around the World. A Guide for Development and Conservation Practitioners. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK, p. 132.
  39. Pound, W.T., 2000, A Practical Guide to Futures Study, NCSL Task Force on Legislatures of the Future, p. 34.
  40. Rho, W.J., 2003, Theories of Policy Analysis (기획과 결정을 위한 정책분석론), Second Edition (제2전정판), Bagyoung Publishing Company (박영사), p. 463.
  41. Rochman, C.M., Browne, M.A., Halpern, B.S., Hentschel, B.T., Hoh, E., Karapanagioti, H.K., Rios-Mendoza, L.M., Takada, H., Teh, S., and Thompson, R.C., 2013, Policy: Classify plastic waste as hazardous, Nature 494, 169-171. https://doi.org/10.1038/494169a
  42. Roosens, L., Cornelis, C., D'Hollander, W., Bervoets, L., Reynders, H., Van Campenhout, K., Van Den Heuvel, R., Neels, H., and Covaci, A., 2010, Exposure of the Flemish population to brominated flame retardants: Model and risk assessment, Environment International 36, 368-376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2010.02.005
  43. Saaty, T.L., 2008, Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decision in a Complex World, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA., p. 343.
  44. Saaty, T.L., and Kearns, K.P., 1985, Analytic Planning: The Organization of Systems, New York: Pergamon Press, Inc., p. 212.
  45. Shim, W.J., Song, Y.G., Heo, N.W., Jang, M., Han, G.M., Hong, S.H., Lee, J., Hong, S., Jang, Y.C., and Lee, M.J., 2012, (Composition and spatial distribution of microplastic on beaches of eastern seashore of Geoje Island (거제도 동부 모래해변에서 미세플라스틱의 조성 및 공간분포 특성), Proceedings of the 2012 Autumn Meeting, the Korean Society of Oceanography (2012년도 한국해양학회 추계학술발표대회요약집), 267-267.
  46. Silveira, K., Shaffer, R., and Behr, C., 1993, A Summary of Citizen Participation Methods for the Waterfront Development Project in Oconto, Wisconsin, p. 45.
  47. UNCED (United Nations Conference on Environment and Development), 1992, Agenda 21, United Nations.
  48. UNEP, 2011, UNEP Yearbook 2011: Egerging issues in our global environment, United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi, p. 79.
  49. Videira, N., Antunes, P., Santos, R., and Gamito. S., 2003, Participatory modelling in environmental decision-making: The ria Formosa natural park case study, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 5, 421-447. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333203001371

Cited by

  1. Economic Feasibility Analysis of Marine Debris Pollution Abatement Technology Program vol.17, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7846/JKOSMEE.2014.17.4.274
  2. Abundance and Distribution Characteristics of Microplastics in Surface Seawaters of the Incheon/Kyeonggi Coastal Region vol.69, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-015-0173-4