DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Space Practice Based on the Discussion about Social Space

사회적 공간 담론에 기초한 공간실천 연구

  • 송영민 (홍익대학교 디자인.공예학과)
  • Received : 2013.06.28
  • Accepted : 2013.08.09
  • Published : 2013.08.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to research the viewpoint of space practice method through the discussion about social space. The study researched how social practice strategy is unfolded through the understanding about daily life, space manufacture and interaction. As a social practice, space design should adopt the interaction approach method on the basis of social relationship latent in the base of space. As a result of study, the viewpoint of space practice can be summarized into 3 viewpoints as below. First, it is the viewpoint of recognition through the experience meeting daily life. Rural space is the one of experience where daily life and social relationship interact each other. As a delicate sensible experience, it is the recognition of special space detected in the space where daily life occurs. Second, it is the viewpoint of form creation as a media product of society and space. Space is a whole creature of the relationship that has been formed socially as a historical process. Depending on the goal of community, new form is created by sharing the characteristic of space and having sense of kinship. Third, it is the viewpoint of tuning as a practice for subject participation. Rural space is the daily space to practice structured society subjectively through interaction. In the place of subjective life, there should a space practice with the tuning and cooperation method between subject and society. The main vein of space practice, which is analyzed with the discussion about social space, shows that out lives are maintained by space practice and directly connected to social relationship and structure. After all, the space, which is searched for through space design, has a clear subjectivity, ensures abundant subject life and is led to realization of community value.

Keywords

References

  1. 국토연구원, 현대 공간이론의 사상가들, 도서출판한울, 2006
  2. 미즈우치 도시오(水內俊雄), 공간의 정치지리, 심정보 역, 푸른길, 2010
  3. 조명래, 현대사회의 도시론, 도서출판 한울, 2002
  4. 최윤경, 사회와 건축공간, 시공문화사, 2003
  5. David Harvey, 포스트모더니티의 조건, 구동회.박영민 역, 도서출판 한울, 1995
  6. Guy Debord, 이경숙 역, 스펙타클의 사회, 1996
  7. Herni Lefebvre, 공간의 생산, 양영란 역, 에코리브르, 2011
  8. Henri Lefebvre, 현대세계의 일상성, 박정자 역, 기파랑, 2005
  9. Markus Schroer, 공간.장소.경계, 정인모.배정희 역, 에코리브르, 2010
  10. 김민지, 도시공간과 실천적 일상전술의 예술적 실행, 현대미술학논문집 제16권 2호, 2012
  11. 박영민, 르페브르의 실천전략과 사회공간, 공간과 사회 통권 제9호, 1997
  12. 박치완, 스펙타클의 지배와 인간의 (자기)소외-G. 드보르의 스펙타클의 사회를 중심으로, 철학연구 제33권, 2007
  13. 장세룡, 앙리 르페브르와 공간의 생산-역사이론적 '전유'의 모색, 부산경남사학회, 역사와 경계 58권, 2006
  14. 장세룡, 앙리 르페브르의 일상생활 비판-문화이론적 접근, 전남사확회 46권, 2005
  15. 박노영, 기 드보르의 스펙터클 이론 연구 : 스펙터클의 도시 공간에 대한 비판과 실천을 중심으로, 홍익대 석사논문, 2002