Spatial Information Research

Korea Spatial Information Society (대한공간정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Research on the Relative Importance and the Priority for the Functions of the U-City Service Aid Organization

U-City 서비스 지원기관 기능의 상대적 중요도와 우선순위 연구

  • Yi, Mi Sook (Urban Information Engineering, Anyang University) ;
  • Shin, Dong Bin (Urban Information Engineering, Anyang University) ;
  • Lee, Jae Yong (National Infrastructure & GIS Research Division, Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements)
  • Received : 2013.03.07
  • Accepted : 2013.04.25
  • Published : 2013.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The aim of this research is to analyze the priority to functions of the U-city Service Aid Organization(USAO), which is to support invigorating U-City industry. This research analyzes the relative importance and the priority about the functional area and components of UASO based on AHP. This research also performs a sensitivity analysis. The research result shows that relative importance of functional area is like following orders: 1) distribution of U-City service-related information, 2) quality certification of U-City-related products and services, 3) R&D of U-City technology, 4) standardization of U-City, 5) U-City human resource development. The relative importance order of functional components is 1) establishment of U-City information distribution organization, 2) construction and management of U-City information distribution network, 3) supporting U-City information distribution and price policy, 4) providing U-City information list for distribution, 5) preparation and application of quality certification standard of U-City products and services, 6) research on legal system of U-City items, targets, and procedures for quality certification, 7) research, analysis, and provision of U-City information distribution situation, 8) level examination of constructed infrastructures and services in U-City, 9) U-City core technology development and localization of technology, 10) standardization of collected U-City information, service classification, distribution system. This research result can be applied directly to design functions of USAO. The result also can be used for duty management, human resource planning, or resource allocation.

본 연구는 U-City 서비스 지원기관이 'U-City 서비스 및 산업 활성화를 지원하는 기관'으로서의 역할을 수행하기 위하여 어떠한 기능에 우선순위를 두어야 하는지 분석하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 이를 위하여 관 산 학 연 전문가를 대상으로 AHP 방법을 활용하여 U-City 서비스 지원기관의 기능 영역과 기능 요소의 상대적 중요도와 우선순위를 분석하고, 민감도 분석을 실시하였다. 연구 결과, 기능 영역별 상대적 중요도는 1) U-City 서비스 관련 정보의 유통, 2) U-City 관련 제품 및 서비스의 품질인증, 3) U-City 기술의 연구개발, 4) U-City의 표준화, 5) U-City 전문인력 양성 순으로 나타났다. 기능 요소별 상대적 중요도는 1) U-City 정보 유통 추진체계 마련, 2) U-City 정보 유통을 위한 유통망 설치 운영, 3) U-City 정보 유통 및 가격 정책 수립 지원, 4) U-City 정보 유통 목록 제공, 5) U-City 제품 및 서비스의 품질인증 기준 마련 및 적용, 6) U-City 인증항목, 인증대상, 인증절차 등 제도연구, 7) U-City 정보 유통현황의 조사 분석 및 제공, 8) U-City에 구축된 인프라와 서비스 수준 평가, 9) U-City 관련 핵심원천기술의 개발 및 국산화, 10) U-City 수집 정보 및 서비스의 분류체계, 전달체계 등의 표준화 순으로 나타났다. 이러한 연구결과는 U-City 서비스 지원기관의 기능 설계에 직접적으로 반영할 수 있고, 직무 조정과 인력 배치, 재원 배분 등에 활용될 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Byun, W. H; Yang, D. S; Ki, H. Y; Jung, M. C. 2011, The Study on U-Service Priority for Low-Income People Using AHP, The Journal of The Korea Institute of Intelligent Transport Systems, 10(1): 100-111.
  2. Jeong, H. C. 2010, Study on AHP and Non-Parametric Verification on the Importance of the Diagnosis Indicators of Personal Information Security Level, Journal of the Korean data analysis society, 12(3): 1499-1510.
  3. Jeong, W. S; Park, W. H; Cho, B. S. 2008, A Study on Evaluation Criteria of u-City Feasibility Using AHP, The Korea Spatial Planning Review, 56: 123-144. https://doi.org/10.15793/kspr.2008.56..007
  4. Jeong, Y. T; Lee, H. H; Kim, H. M. 2012, A Study on the prioritization of Policies Responding to Low Fertility, The Journal of Korea Association for Public Management, 26(3): 55-79.
  5. Kim, J. H; Yi, M. S. 2007, A Study on Current Issues for the Realization of u-City, The Journal of GIS Association of Korea, 15(1): 1-14.
  6. Lee, H. Y; Em, E. S. 1999, The Site Selection of Waste Incinerator Using Fuzzy Sets and AHP Theory, The Journal of GIS Association of Korea, 7(2): 223-236.
  7. Lee, S. H. 2011, A Study on the importance and prioritization of establishment standards of promotion and support agencies for national space information industry based on AHP, The Journal of Korean Association of Cadastre Information, 13(1): 11-20.
  8. Park, D. W; Lee, J. H; Kim, J. M. 2010, Development of a Performance Reference Model (PRM) for Ubiquitous City Operations, The Journal of Korean Institute of CALS/EC, 15(3): 25-44.
  9. Park, J. D. 2012, Analysis of Relative Important and Priority of Civil Servant's Education Training Policy: Using Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) Method, The Journal of Korea Contents Society, 12(4): 263-272. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2012.12.04.263
  10. Park, M. S; Jang, E. S; Park, S. J. 2012, An Analysis on the Relative Importance of Lifelong Educators' Job, CNU Journal of Educational Studies, 33(1): 165-186. https://doi.org/10.18612/cnujes.2012.33.1.165
  11. Park, S. J; Choi, Y. C. 2010, Prioritizing the Functions of Local Education Support Authority Using AHP Method, The Journal of Educational Administration, 28(4): 281-300.
  12. Saaty, T. L. 1990, How to make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process, European Journal of Operation Research, Vol.48.
  13. Saaty, T. L; Vargas, L. G. 1991, The Logic of Priorities, Pittsburgh, RWS Publications.

Cited by

  1. Developing evaluation criteria by weighted importance in selecting U-City service types vol.24, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-016-0035-9
  2. 법정 스마트도시서비스 지원기관의 발전방향 vol.17, pp.7, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5392/jkca.2017.17.07.397